Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Illinois/Assessment

Importance
I see we have finally implemented importance into our assessments. As of right now, I don't know who all is watching this, but I am thinking that all FA should be High-Top importance to this project, along with all GAs being of High importance. We can discuss as we go along what else is High and Top as we go along. I am also thinking of having a bot go through and assigning Low importance to all the project articles that need assessment once I get through the 6k assessments. Sound alright?--Kranar drogin 23:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Seems like thats putting the cart before the horse as a matter of policy...I'm sure someone could write an excellent article which is actually of such specialized interest that it would't qualify as Top- or High- importance. I'm not saying that the current FA, A, and GA articles aren't important, I am saying that neither importance, nor quality follows the other, and I'm not sure if codifying such a relationship is a "best practice". PreciousRoi (talk) 17:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Also, should Category-class articles have an NA-importance rating by default? I might tend to think so.PreciousRoi (talk) 17:19, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Where to add requests
The "Requesting an Assesment" section says "feel free to list below", but the next section says not to add entries by hand. Where do I add the entries, then? I have several entries that I have made significant changes to, so where do I put them for assessment? Thanks.Ballabosh 04:50, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You list them under the "Requesting an Assessment" subsection. The section "Assessment Logs" is the section which is automatically generated.PreciousRoi (talk) 17:22, 28 January 2008 (UTC)