Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Infoboxes/Films Infobox

Bot
I am currently writing a bot to help with this project. When finished, the bot will automatically add infoboxes to all film pages and populate them with the film's data. If all goes well, this bot will add infoboxes to every film page that's lacking one and drive this project to completion. More information about this bot can be found on my user page. -- Flankk 06:04, 16 August 2007 (UTC)


 * So, if the bot will be doing this, is there any point me continuing to add infoboxes to film articles? Should I instead concentrate on another area of WP:FILM where a bot can't be used? Mr pand 10:42, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


 * If you need help with bot creation and stuff, I have some experience (User:TheJoshBot) TheJosh 00:26, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Change to Film project banner
Hi All, There has been a cange made to the project banner for Film. Instead of including the Needs film infobox it now adds the page to a category directly.

The current category we use is Category:Articles that need a film infobox, but the banner now adds films to Category:Film articles needing infoboxes. I have added a second table to show the other films to the project page, but it might be better to change the Needs film infobox to use the new category instead. I would try to do this, but have no experience in editing templates. Let me know your thoughts. RWardy 06:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's really necessary to do anything with the old template; I've been moving over all of the uses of it by hand (did a couple hundred just now; 389 to go for tomorrow...). Once that's all been rolled over, we can just delete the old template outright. Girolamo Savonarola 07:22, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Needs film infobox
Template:Needs film infobox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Girolamo Savonarola 19:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Project Status
Is the Infobox Project still going on? Wanted? I am not sure how active this project is, as I don't see a lot going on. If its still desired, I am willing to dive in. I'd appreciate some feedback on this. I am a relative newbie so don't bite my head off for asking (or asking in wrong place or manner). Thanks Jacksinterweb (talk) 23:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * This project is always ongoing, as we continually have new film articles that are lacking infoboxes. There are so many different things that are needed to be done within WP:FILMS, so efforts are not always focused just on infoboxes. You can list your name if interested in helping and then choose which articles you add infoboxes for. If you take a look at the Template:WikiProject Films tasks, you'll see a list of articles that could really use an infobox, and I will usually update that at least once a week. I'm also considering holding a drive to get as many infoboxes/images added as possible later this month, so keep an eye out for that at WP:FILMS. If you have any further questions, let me know, and thanks for your interest! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Suggestion
PLEASE stop referring to Worldwide Box Office as "gross revenue" in the film infobox. it's horrendously wrong.

1) films don't account for box office as revenue, they account for their share of the theatrical rentals.

2) it ignores completely other release windows, TV / HV / PPV, etc.

take a look at any participation statement, you'll see what i mean.

Since it is virtually impossible to get this information publicly and accurately, change the label to "World Wide Box Office" which is all it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.31.159.101 (talk) 03:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Ended
I'm guessing this project page has ended, since nothing has happened since 2007--Mjs1991 (talk) 00:23, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Inclusion of film series chronology info
I would like to see chronology sequence data added to the infobox; this will aid in placing series films in proper order (such is becoming necessary with some film arcs, such as the James Bond and Final Fantasy franchises, now becoming interminable in number. The infobox would look approximately like the one now used for TV episodes.--66.41.95.121 (talk) 23:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Executive producers
Please consider adding executive producers, in addition to the current "producers" parameter, to the film infobox template. Thank you. soibangla (talk) 12:50, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Cast vs "Starring" performers
Not a very active discussion page, but the right starting point for my question. The infobox for most movie articles duplicates many ordinary "Cast" members under "Starring" in the infobox. See, for example, this one, which explicitly bills Gregory Peck as the sole "star". But his name is joined under "Starring" by another seven names, all of which have been spelled out in the Cast section. Formerly a star was defined as an actor whose name was placed above the film's title in advertising matter. WP should limit the term to those actors whose drawing power is equal to or greater than the title of a film. Bjenks (talk) 08:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)