Wikipedia talk:WikiProject International relations/Archive 7

Requested move at Talk:Ministry of Foreign Affairs
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Ministry of Foreign Affairs that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 12:20, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:China-US Cold War has been nominated for discussion
Category:China-US Cold War has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for First World
First World has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 04:07, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for European Council
European Council has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Requested moves of six country–NATO relations articles at centralized discussion
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Croatia–NATO relations that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. While they are all listed on the project page under requested moves, and it might be more relevant for WikiProject NATO, I thought it was worth a mention as it covers multiple articles. BucketOfSquirrels (talk) 19:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Project-independent quality assessments
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a class parameter to WikiProject banner shell, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to WikiProject banner shell, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass WPBannerMeta a new custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Please see the new draft, Draft:International relations of Wales
Please see this new draft which I have made. There has been some discussion about the scope of the article and the experience of this WikiProject could be utilised.

On a second note, I would like to suggest more clearly defined article naming precedence for non-sovereign countries like Wales, Scotland, Greenland etc. They all have difference of course, but perhaps a precedence of International relations of... would suit? Could we add this to the WikiProject project page?

Thanks for your time. Titus Gold (talk) 13:45, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Looks like there is a bit of a naming precedent for non-sovereign countries: the articles for Jersey, Guernsey, and Isle of Mann all use External relations of... exceptionally; but Faroe Islands, Hong Kong, Macau, Greenland, Niue, Rojava, etc, etc uses Foreign relations of.... I prefer the name Foreign relations of Wales, matching the mostly followed precedent for non-sovereign countries, unless there is a reason not to. //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 13:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comment. Would you mind adding to the discussion at Draft talk:International relations of Wales? Thanks again Titus Gold (talk) 00:49, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * At risk of forking discussion elsewhere, I would point out that terms like "country" are easily equivocated on, or at east the term does not completely capture the rich range of difference in arrangements between each. Denmark administers Faroe and Greenland in a different manner from the UK, and significantly allows them to conduct foreign relations to make international treaties on areas that lie within the powers of their governments. They thus have treaties and FTAs and some diplomatic representation. Hong Kong and Macau are separate customs territories that again require treaties and play a role in the WTO etc. Niue acts as an independent state in foreign policy despite having a shared head of State with New Zealand and being New Zealand citizens etc. Titus Gold wants to write about the Foreign relations of Wales, but the UK is a unitary state that has devolved government with reserved powers. It is quasi federal but not federal. Wales cannot make international treaties, nor create diplomatic missions. What it does have is an international strategy, which is primarily about trade, tourism and raising the profile of Wales on the world stage. This is not foreign policy.
 * It would be an error to attempt to create a one size fits all title policy here. Moreover this is now the third place this question has been raised as it has already been discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wales, and now also on the article talk page. My suggestion is that this WikiProject should decline to assert a new precedent to attempt to resolve a content dispute on a different page. You are, of course, all welcome to discuss the issue on the draft article talk page. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:17, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

For quality reviews in Transnational authoritarianism
Sorry for leaving the messages for discuss issues on Transnational authoritarianism about orginal reaserch problem,as the local memmber suggest it should geting WIKIPROJECT involved

The party in the case is well known in zhwiki communities for long of violatimg rules and acting like Wolf warrior,that keep on ideological battles and conflicts for no end with anyone against it. Those matters could be comfirmed by other memmbers in zhwiki communities if they could well defend the complicated annoying and unwanted contacts, attacks, intimidation from this user.

I would be ok for local professional memmbers to assist the topics,but as I have reported locally,the pattern of the user could make anyone involing the processes suffer,I suggest the parties of communties should holding enough strong mental powers for the matters. Longway22 (talk) 10:06, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Preparatory Committee for an Arms Trade Treaty
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Preparatory Committee for an Arms Trade Treaty that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. EggRoll97 (talk) 05:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Feedback and Review requried: UK-Pakistan Judicial Protocol on Children Matters (2003)
Hi there - an article that I created UK-Pakistan Judicial Protocol on Children Matters (2003) is in need of a feedback and review. If anyone is interested in this topic area I would greatly appreciate some more eyes on this. 147.188.245.156 (talk) 15:18, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

When is international migration defining
when is international migration defining? I have some theories here. My starting po8nts are I think that unless it is a clear move from x to y, it is better to call someone say a British emigrant and an immigrant to Greece, if they lived a year or more in Switzerland and Romania in the interim, than to try to put them in a British emigrant to Greece Category when the middle is fuzzy. I am not sure exactly how to determine when the middle becomes defining and when they are an expat and when an immigrant. If they lived in Switzerland 20 years and wrote 3 or their 7 published books during that time clearly, but most cases are less clear.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:52, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:International sanctions during the Venezuelan crisis
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:International sanctions during the Venezuelan crisis that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 15:14, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for NATO
NATO has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Rfc on Country Comparison charts/tables
Should we remove or keep country comparison charts/tables on bilateral relations articles?

An example being Russia–United States relations, which is the first section of the article after the lead. I am rather neutral on this issue, but I can see arguments for keeping and removing. While there is information that compares and contrasts information between both nations, it seems like it belongs more in like a world fact book and much of the information on there doesn't really seem to fit the overall topic of bilateral relations. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:55, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Pinging LibStar and Lollipoplollipoplollipop who commented from a previous short discussion last year. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:59, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't support country comparisons because I don't see how they are meaningful in terms of bilateral relations. One country being bigger in area than the other doesn't add value, or other aspects such as currency used or who the leader is. I support Wikicleanerman's statement seems like it belongs more in like a world fact book and much of the information on there doesn't really seem to fit the overall topic of bilateral relations.. LibStar (talk) 14:05, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I support removing them. //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 14:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC)


 * In general, these should be removed. They're a collection of randomly accrued stats. There are cases where country comparisons are useful, and these are when some comparison is commented upon by a few reliable sources that note its impact on some aspect of bilateral relations. However, these cases should produce information that is limited and specific, as well as in context. (Looking at the specific example of Russia–United States relations, they also clearly promote WP:OR. The "Economic alliance" and "Military alliance" rows are nonsense.) CMD (talk) 14:45, 12 June 2023 (UTC)


 * It should be an article-by-article decision. Summoned by bot. In some cases, the information is fascinating. While I wouldn't put the table as high in the article as it is, the table in Russia–United States relations is very interesting because the relative military might of these two powers is a major focus of international relations in the last year. If you had the same table with the same rows in, say, an article on U.S.-Haiti relations, well, that would be weird. At a minimum, it is very hard to support an RfC saying we should delete {thing} from {set of articles} without seeing more than one example in support of the assertion that these are bad and without knowing how many things are we talking about here. Chris vLS (talk) 22:07, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Here's three from France related articles, France–Germany relations, France–Spain relations, France–Russia relations. You have pretty much the same thing as the Russia-U.S. article. Are you saying that it should be kept on more important bilateral relations articles? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:45, 12 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Remove. I see little relevance to include comparisons. Without additional context and explanation, it's violating WP:NOTSTATS. SWinxy (talk) 23:52, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Kill it. Kill it with fire.
 * Rationale: WP:OR, WP:SYNTH, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:REDUNDANTFORK (usually from country infoboxes, prone to going out of date), usually random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dumps (WP:NOTSTATS).
 * Precedents / background discussions include:
 * 29 October 2018: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject International relations/Archive 6 – Common source for all / most of these cruft sections: User:128.117.10.25.
 * An anonymous user, has gone on a spree adding large "Country comparison" tables to articles about bilateral relations. In my opinion, those are redundant, visually distracting and certainly not helpful to readers. I don't think such layout is endorsed by the wikiproject, but bringing the matter here for a broader input. No such user (talk) 20:31, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree that this should cease. The IP user doesn't engage in discussion and merely reverts anybody trying to remove their cruft. Sandstein 22:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * 6 October 2020: Many country comparison sections have already been removed by User:Drmies. Example:
 * 6 October 2020: removed from Azerbaijan–Pakistan relations: rm trivia
 * 6 October 2020: User talk:Zeex.rice#"Country comparison" in international relations articles: Xeed.rice, I appreciate your work, but I need you to stop adding those comparisons. These statistics and comparisons are not inherently relevant to the subject matter, and those details like capitals and flags and whatnot are really irrelevant. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 16:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 8 October 2020: Talk:Singapore–United States relations: Telsho agreed with Drmies to remove "country comparison" sections.
 * (...) Removing them here would suggest that it's justified to remove them on other articles as well for similar reasons, which obviously would end up in a lot of useful information being removed. Telsho (talk) 01:29, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I see you removed them as well, I guess there's that. Telsho (talk) 01:30, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Yep, Telsho, there's that. At least some of those were added by a longterm disruptive editor, they never came with any explanation or argument, and why would we do that in the first place? I mean, the coats of arms and flags, who cares and what is the relevance of it? I've seen comparisons between a country and the EU, where lists of "important cities" are given--for what? I appreciate the idea that we should be consistent--but in this case, the better consistency is to remove that information. BTW I worked on a whole bunch of these articles a decade ago, and that stuff wasn't there at the time. Drmies (talk) 01:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 20 October 2020: removed from Russia–United Kingdom relations: not relevant to the article as agreed (removed by Telsho)
 * 4 May 2022: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject International relations/Archive 6
 * (...) Should we start removing these altogether in your view? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:18, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
 * absolutely LibStar (talk) 04:10, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I figure we can, but I think we need a wider consensus. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 10 June 2023: The 7 to 1 Deletion of Comparison of the Turkic states at Articles for deletion/List of Turkic dynasties and countries.
 * 19 June 2013: The 12 to 1 Deletion of Comparison of the Baltic states, Comparison of the Benelux countries, Comparison of the Nordic countries at Articles for deletion/Comparison of the Baltic states. Exchange there:
 * In many instances these tables are an affront to "summary style", and the duplication of basic country statistics to such articles virtually guarantee they'll be out of date. Draken Bowser (talk) 19:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Agreed. If they mention dates at all, the basic country statistics will be outdated eventually. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 21:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Disagree. Most of WP content is going to be outdated. This is a reason for updating pages (and yes, providing dates and references), not deletion. My very best wishes (talk) 19:31, 15 June 2023 (UTC) (Note: This user is the only 1 opposing deletion against 12 in favour of deletion at the "Comparison of the Baltic states" AfD)
 * Infoboxes are regularly updated, demographics articles are regularly updated, but those comparison articles/sections? Why bother? Unless we're making some sort of Template:Excerpt construction, so that the contents of comparison tables will always synchronised and up to date, I really don't think it's worth the trouble. And even if we do, we are admitting we are duplicating contents anyway. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 20:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * 15 June 2023: User talk:Nederlandse Leeuw/Archive 3.
 * Examples to Delete/Remove:
 * Arab–Pakistan relations another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Sino-Arab relations another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Arab League–European Union relations another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Arab League–Iran relations another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Arab League–Russia relations the whole article is another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Lists of the Arab League more random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dumps, although at least with a non-arbitrary scope.
 * Australia–Canada relations another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Canada–United Kingdom relations another random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * China–Russia relations another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * China–United States relations another random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Germany–Japan relations another random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Iran–Israel relations another random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Poland–Ukraine relations another random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Russia–United States relations another random partly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Russia–Ukraine relations another random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Spain–United Kingdom relations another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Switzerland–European Union relations another random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Turkey–United States relations another random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Austria–Germany relations another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Soviet Union–United States relations another random partly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Anglosphere and Anglosphere table: two more random partly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dumps.
 * Let's get rid of it, once and for all. Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 04:08, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * PS: Germanic-speaking world, Romance-speaking world, Iberophone and Finno-Ugric countries are four other random mostly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dumps. These four are so egregious that I am going to nominate them for deletion right now, because language family has been repeatedly found to be WP:NONDEFINING for countries, and Comparison of the Turkic states serves as a compelling precedent.
 * Ibero-America need not be deleted immediately, but Ibero-America is yet another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump.
 * Hispanic America shouldn't be deleted, but it has no fewer than 4 arguably random partly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dumps, not all of which may have added value.
 * Latin America obviously shouldn't be deleted, but we may well question the added value of the tables in Latin America, Latin America, Latin America, Latin America, Latin America, Latin America. Some of these seem excessively detailed and large for a general article, and may simply be moved to a thematic subpage (like, Latin America to Latin American economy). Latin America seems some kind of weird top-10 "competition" between who has the most heritage sites by comparison (through WP:SYNTH). Why should readers care? They are probably wondering which ones there are in Latin America as a whole. This section should probably be replaced by just links to List of World Heritage Sites in South America, List of World Heritage Sites in the Caribbean, List of World Heritage Sites in Central America, and List of World Heritage Sites in Mexico. Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 09:18, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * FYI Articles for deletion/Germanic-speaking world. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 10:19, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Update Germanic-speaking world, Romance-speaking world, Romance-speaking Africa, Iberophone and Finno-Ugric countries have now indeed been Deleted. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 07:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep with improved guidelines – assuming there are 195 countries, that means a potential ~18,000 articles (195*194)/2) which is presently beyond our capacity to rigorously maintain and keep cruft/OR free. That said, the structured naming would also make it easier to monitor such articles (okay along with tracking categories), as well as for readers interested in this very notable/reasonable topic to expect in a Wikipedia and this amount of articles don't exist either. What we should NOT standardize, is the presumed type of content covered. Sometimes military is covered in secondary sources, sometimes trade/diplomatic relations etc... and just because US/Russia are two super powers, doesn't make two smaller countries non-notable. Instead of debating whether to delete/rescue articles, let's focus on improving the content, whether it's more rigorous sourcing, guidelines on what makes bad cruft (the military comparisons seems to be a common offender) etc..
 * I misunderstood the RfC. Am neutral/leaning remove about comparison charts. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 13:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)


 * It should be an article-by-article decision. In some cases (see at the bottom of page Anglosphere), such comparisons seem to be just fine. In other cases (like Russia–Ukraine relations), the comparison is interesting and useful, but I would rather keep them as separate standalone list pages, with linking from other pages like "relations" and Russo-Ukrainian war. In other cases they better be removed. And so on. My very best wishes (talk) 22:26, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Remove as a general rule. The reader is just one click away from finding this info in country articles or two clicks away from lists of countries by any conceivable attribute. The data are often not updated regularly thus misleading the reader. Alaexis¿question? 08:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
 * It is possible that in individual cases this information can be useful, but as a general rule, no--and I say this because I would like for us to have it as a general rule. Too many articles suffer from this typically overlinked and overfetishized material which often accretes--material with emblems and flags and overlinking, with randomly picked data, and often in the most disruptive and conspicuous of places, such as in this article. I'll add that in many of the articles, it was the work of an LTA operating a variety of IPs from Turkey. Drmies (talk) 16:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Remove as a general rule; this is not inconsistent with article-by-article decisions so long as the justification for inclusion is pressing and valid, which is what article-by-article aims to do in the first place. Making a general rule would head off most of this WP:OR WP:NOTSTATS clutter. Iseult   Δx parlez moi 15:45, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment I think we can close this RfC as it has run for several weeks and consensus seems clear. LibStar (talk) 10:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I think I'll nominate Arab League–Russia relations for Deletion once this RfC is completed, because it consists entirely of another random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump. In all other cases, we just need to remove the random entirely/mostly/partly WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" data dump sections in existing articles, which can otherwise be Kept. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 10:43, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree. I'd welcome anyone to remove it despite the automatic removal date by the bot account. It's been almost a month since I started this and the consensus is clear. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Will someone please assess my draft article?
Draft:Vigilant Isles 22 is the link to clink on. StrongALPHA (talk) 15:12, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Another discussion at Talk:Second Cold War
The matter of the tag in the Second Cold War article is discussed. More inputs are welcome there. Link: Talk:Second Cold War George Ho (talk) 19:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Credibility bot
As this is a highly active WikiProject, I would like to introduce you to Credibility bot. This is a bot that makes it easier to track source usage across articles through automated reports and alerts. We piloted this approach at Vaccine safety and we want to offer it to any subject area or domain. We need your support to demonstrate demand for this toolkit. If you have a desire for this functionality, or would like to leave other feedback, please endorse the tool or comment at WP:CREDBOT. Thanks! Harej (talk) 17:55, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Allegations of genocide of Ukrainians in the Russian invasion of Ukraine/Archive 1
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Allegations of genocide of Ukrainians in the Russian invasion of Ukraine/Archive 1 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:50, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Allegations of United States support for the Khmer Rouge
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Allegations of United States support for the Khmer Rouge that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 09:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:National identity
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:National identity that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:19, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Cold war (term)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Cold war (term) that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 13:45, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Embassy of Country
I've been creating missing disambiguation pages, where several articles share a common prefix with different qualifiers but there's no dab. I've found several embassy prefixes such as Embassy of Afghanistan which has Embassy of Afghanistan, Berlin; Embassy of Afghanistan, Cairo; etc. However, rather than create a dab, it should probably be a redirect to List of diplomatic missions of Afghanistan. That would match existing redirects such as Embassy of Albania which redirects to List of diplomatic missions of Albania, Embassy of Bolivia which redirects to List of diplomatic missions of Bolivia, etc.


 * Embassy of Afghanistan → List of diplomatic missions of Afghanistan
 * Embassy of Algeria → List of diplomatic missions of Algeria
 * Embassy of Argentina → List of diplomatic missions of Argentina
 * Embassy of Armenia → List of diplomatic missions of Armenia
 * Embassy of Australia → List of diplomatic missions of Australia
 * Embassy of Austria → List of diplomatic missions of Austria
 * Embassy of Azerbaijan → List of diplomatic missions of Azerbaijan
 * Embassy of Belarus → List of diplomatic missions of Belarus
 * Embassy of Belgium → List of diplomatic missions of Belgium
 * Embassy of Brazil → List of diplomatic missions of Brazil
 * Embassy of China → List of diplomatic missions of China
 * Embassy of Colombia → List of diplomatic missions of Colombia
 * Embassy of Croatia → List of diplomatic missions of Croatia
 * Embassy of Cuba → List of diplomatic missions of Cuba
 * Embassy of the Czech Republic → List of diplomatic missions of the Czech Republic
 * Embassy of Egypt → List of diplomatic missions of Egypt
 * Embassy of Estonia → List of diplomatic missions of Estonia
 * Embassy of Finland → List of diplomatic missions of Finland
 * Embassy of France → List of diplomatic missions of France
 * Embassy of Germany → List of diplomatic missions of Germany
 * Embassy of Greece → List of diplomatic missions of Greece
 * Embassy of Hungary → List of diplomatic missions of Hungary
 * Embassy of Indonesia → List of diplomatic missions of Indonesia
 * Embassy of Iraq → List of diplomatic missions of Iraq
 * Embassy of Ireland → List of diplomatic missions of Ireland
 * Embassy of Israel → List of diplomatic missions of Israel
 * Embassy of Japan → List of diplomatic missions of Japan
 * Embassy of Kazakhstan → List of diplomatic missions of Kazakhstan
 * Embassy of Mexico → List of diplomatic missions of Mexico
 * Embassy of Moldova → List of diplomatic missions of Moldova
 * Embassy of the Netherlands → List of diplomatic missions of the Netherlands
 * Embassy of North Korea → List of diplomatic missions of North Korea
 * Embassy of Palestine and/or Embassy of the State of Palestine → List of diplomatic missions of the State of Palestine
 * Embassy of Peru → List of diplomatic missions of Peru
 * Embassy of the Philippines → List of diplomatic missions of the Philippines
 * Embassy of Poland → List of diplomatic missions of Poland
 * Embassy of Romania → List of diplomatic missions of Romania
 * Embassy of Saudi Arabia → List of diplomatic missions of Saudi Arabia
 * Embassy of Serbia → List of diplomatic missions of Serbia
 * Embassy of South Korea → List of diplomatic missions of South Korea
 * Embassy of Spain → List of diplomatic missions of Spain
 * Embassy of Sri Lanka → List of diplomatic missions of Sri Lanka
 * Embassy of Sweden → List of diplomatic missions of Sweden
 * Embassy of Switzerland → List of diplomatic missions of Switzerland
 * Embassy of Syria → List of diplomatic missions of Syria
 * Embassy of Turkey → List of diplomatic missions of Turkey

Would these redirects be helpful? If not, should we create something else at these titles?

We do have one dab, Embassy of Nigeria, but it is incomplete and should probably be replaced by a redirect to List of diplomatic missions of Nigeria. Certes (talk) 21:26, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I think the redirects you suggest would be helpful. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 17:50, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅; thanks for the advice. Certes (talk) 14:14, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Created a draft outline page for the Iran hostage crisis
The page is currently over at Draft:Outline of Iran hostage crisis, for anyone else interested in contributing to this. Parham wiki (talk) 11:24, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Blockade of the Republic of Artsakh (2022–present)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Blockade of the Republic of Artsakh (2022–present) that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 16:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Afc submission about the United Nations
 Draft:Liechtenstein and the United Nations  A.FLOCK (talk) 22:57, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Nations General Assembly Resolution ES-10/21
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Nations General Assembly Resolution ES-10/21. Your contributions would be appreciated. Historyday01 (talk) 17:27, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

United States involvement in regime change in Latin America has an RFC
United States involvement in regime change in Latin America has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. WMrapids (talk) 18:37, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Deportation of undocumented Afghans from Pakistan
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Deportation of undocumented Afghans from Pakistan that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —Alalch E. 23:59, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Global warming controversy
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Global warming controversy&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:59, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Re: United States cultural diplomacy in Iran
United States cultural diplomacy in Iran requires cleanup of sources (majority of which is not in English) and potentially a rewrite. W9793 (talk) 23:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Request for input on post-Yugoslav-breakup election article naming
We had a discussion relisted at Talk:May 1992 Yugoslavian parliamentary election that could benefit from the input of people who have knowledge of this topic area, please check it out. --Joy (talk) 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Move discussion at Guayana Esequiba
An editor has requested that Guayana Esequiba be moved to Guyana–Venezuela territorial dispute, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You &#32;are invited to participate in the move discussion. --WMrapids (talk) 20:40, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Move discussion for 2023 Guayana Esequiba crisis
An editor has requested that 2023 Guayana Esequiba crisis be moved to 2023 Guyana–Venezuela crisis, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You &#32;are invited to participate in the move discussion.--WMrapids (talk) 03:19, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

New Pact on Migration and Asylum of the European Union
I just created New Pact on Migration and Asylum of the European Union. Any help with expansion would be appreciated. Thriley (talk) 21:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Killing of Alon Shamriz, Yotam Haim, and Samer Talalka
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Killing of Alon Shamriz, Yotam Haim, and Samer Talalka that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — m w  (talk) (contribs) 20:49, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Bombardment of Yeonpyeong
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Bombardment of Yeonpyeong that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Houthi involvement in the Israel–Hamas war
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Houthi involvement in the Israel–Hamas war that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:United States border security concerns
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:United States border security concerns that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Potential enlargement of the European Union
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Potential enlargement of the European Union that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Unverified quotes in the "Debates and Discussions" section of "United Nations General Assembly Resolution 273"
Suggested change in the relevant page Zlmark (talk) 17:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Request for comments at Spanish West Africa
I'm requesting for comments about the ongoing discussion at Talk:Spanish West Africa. I haven't posted at Wikiproject Colonialism because it looks quite inactive. Thanks, Jotamar (talk) 16:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Jewish exodus from the Muslim world
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Jewish exodus from the Muslim world that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Guyana–Venezuela territorial dispute
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Guyana–Venezuela territorial dispute that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Italian soft power
An editor has requested that Italian soft power be moved to Soft power of Italy, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You &#32;are invited to participate in the move discussion. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 14:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:United Nations Conciliation Commission
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:United Nations Conciliation Commission that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Killarnee (talk) 23:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Liancourt Rocks
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Liancourt Rocks that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Remsense 诉  13:17, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:2024 Israeli bombing of the Iranian embassy in Damascus
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 Israeli bombing of the Iranian embassy in Damascus that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Attack on the Azerbaijani Embassy in Tehran
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Attack on the Azerbaijani Embassy in Tehran that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:2024 Iranian Strikes in Israel
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 Iranian Strikes in Israel that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:2024 Iranian strikes in Israel
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 Iranian strikes in Israel that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Talk: List of diplomatic missions in Haiti.
Why are the embassies of Japan and The Bahamas listed as former embassies when they're only temporarily closed due the ongoing crisis in the country? Also, China should be shaded light blue. Port-au-princien (talk) 14:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Postmodernism (international relations)
I believe this should be renamed Poststructuralism (international relations) per the one source supporting the article. Any input, however, would be welcome. (This is not my field, I just noticed the article while working on postmodernism.)

Cheers, Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 15:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:2024 raid on the Mexican embassy in Ecuador
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 raid on the Mexican embassy in Ecuador that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:2023 Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2023 Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:21, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

The Colourful Discrimination
Hi,No matter what the real colours of Miss Dress mini skirt and her eyebrows I would rather loved her they way she's lovely looking with her smell of her perfume with different mixture of different flowers immediately and she became flower to me since than and never discriminate such a Girl and she'll respect you for your kindness. I'll Vote on general elections to avoid to loss .Amooketsi Global Institutional Black and White Blackout to Knockout. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.113.158.82 (talk) 11:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Postmodernism (international relations)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Postmodernism (international relations) that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 02:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)