Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Karnataka/Archive 3

1956 State Reorganization Act
RFC is going on about the location of Hogenakkal Falls. Access to the detailed copy of 1956 state reorganization is needed that includes falls. Please post it here if you find one. Please visit discussions if you want to see the purpose.Naadapriya (talk) 07:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Hogenakkal Falls
There is currently a dispute on the talk page of the article in question relating to whether the falls are in part within the boundaries of the state of Karnataka, as well as in the state of Tamil Nadu. Any party who would be able to present clear evidence that Karnataka has made some sort of territorial claim on the area of the falls themselves is more than welcome to indicate as much, as the luck of such clear, reliable, verifiable, information is the nexus of the current discussion there. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 15:03, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

WP:INDIA Tagging with TinucherianBot
TinucherianBot can automatically tag articles with WP India Banner as to the talk page of articles without the project banner. It can also add the workgroup paramaters like "|karnataka=yes|karnataka-importance=" etc ,if needed. The currently supported workgroups are Kerala,  Maharashtra,  Andhra pradesh, Tamil Nadu,  Gujarat, Bengal, Goa, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka , Punjab,cities,  Cinema, Literature, Protected Areas of India, History, Politics states, Geography,Maps,Districts and Tamil.

If you need so, you need to provide me with the Categories to run the Bot. Due to some technical issues, the Bot will not run recursively to sub-categories. The requester should kindly verify that  there are NO non-related articles in the category. You may request for the bot run on my talk page... Thanks --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 06:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi project memebers, can you go thorough the following categories of this project ( collected from Category:Karnataka )and idendity the categories which I need to run the bot ? Please make sure there are no non-related project articles in that category .  Please mark Y/N with your signature. Thanks in advance --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 04:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Can somebody help with the remaining categories ? Once I get all the cats approved / rejected, I will add them to a page ... I will regularly run the Bot for the categories in future. Addition of new categories will require agreement by the workgroup members. --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 06:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I think Category:Ghatam players category, on the whole, cannot be included under WikiProject Karnataka. - KNM Talk 17:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * And.. Category:Kanjira players too. - KNM Talk 17:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Likewise, Category:Sangeetha Kalanidhi recipients, Category:Konkani, Category:Konkani Muslims, Category:Mridangam players. - KNM Talk 20:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The selected categories are added to WikiProject Karnataka/AutoTagging . You can see the regular runs of BOT here > User:TinucherianBot/Autotagg/Karnataka --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 06:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

The first run is ON.. There are some 2255 articles collected from the categories. I will keep the progress posted --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 08:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ : Out of 2255 articles that were checked, 1258 articles were newly tagged with the karnataka workgroup. Currently there are 891 Unassessed of total 2328 articles ( earlier 63/1070 ) . The bot will be done regularly in future ( say once/month ) . If you need to add any more Categories please have a discussion here and add them to WikiProject Karnataka/AutoTagging if there is an agreement. --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 10:31, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Need Separate Article for Bharatanatya
It is understood that this group is maintaining Bharatanatyam article which Bharatanatya article ##REDIRECTs to. The current article on 'Bharatanatyam' is written specific to a state and is not aligned with facts on South Indian Classical Dance, 'Bharatanatya'. It is embedded with many weasel references and statements contradict the evidence based facts. Looking at the current format in detail it is not feasible to modify the 'Bharatanatyam' article due to many embedded information specific to a state. Also current photos are repetitive and do not show 'Bhava', an important aspect of 'Bharatanataya'. Therefore a new article on 'Bharatanatya' is needed in the interest of Wikipedia readers. To make optimum use of editors valuable time I suggest a separate article 'Bharatanatya' based on authentic evidences. ThanksNaadapriya (talk) 17:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Need advice on use of New Photo for KanakaDaasa
Hope the articles on Purandara and Kanaka are better now after my edits. I have a better photo of Kanaka Daasa purchased in Avenue road shop. Can I scan and add to article. Is there any copyright issue? Photo does not say any such thing. I will get back to those articles soon. Currently a task I took to fix POV and speculative info in Hogenakkal falls article is demanding lot more time than what I had expected. I will follow up on Daasa articles soon. Naadapriya (talk) 17:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Watchlists
To help this workgroup patrol existing articles for vandalism/recent changes, Ganeshbot has created the WikiProject Karnataka/Articles page. This page will be updated on a regular basis. Please do remind me if I forget. :) It contains articles that were tagged with the India banner and fall under the scope of this workgroup. Please let me know in case of any questions. Thanks, Ganeshk  ( talk ) 11:35, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

WPKarnataka Navigation ->WPIndia Navigation
I am asking opinion of replacing WPKarnataka Navigation to WPIndia Navigation on WikiProject Karnataka Main page ( Like all other India workgroups of WP:INDIA. It will automatically list the Karanataka articles .. --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 15:18, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ : I am being WP:BOLD and replaced the template, as per convention of all other Indian workgroups --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 12:19, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Cleanup listings
User:WolterBot has created a WikiProject Karnataka/Cleanup listing page; it contains the articles that fall under the scope this workgroup and have cleanup tags on them. See this page for more information on this works. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Ganeshk  ( talk ) 04:04, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme
As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
 * The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
 * The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
 * A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot  ( Disable )  21:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

RFC in Carnatic Music
Input from all improve the article.

Naadapriya (talk) 16:37, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

AKKA article
I realized only today that there was no article that talks about the organization AKKA, Association of Kannada Kootas of America. I have created a stub. While this is specific to North America, I thought it still came under the Karnataka heading and hence I am posting here with request to improve the article. If it is not a relevant topic for this portal, please let me know a portal or people working on such articles (Kannada/Kannadigas outside Karnataka). Kanfoo (talk) 15:48, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Karnataka
Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:15, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Image needs replacement - Sadhashivnagar
Hello all...

An image used in the article, specifically Image:Image028.JPEG, has a little bit of a licensing issue. The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive. It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard. As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article. If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best.

You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:03, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Kingdom of Mysore FAR
nominated Kingdom of Mysore for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Regards, Fowler&amp;fowler  «Talk»  02:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Stub templates for Karnataka per district
I have created Stub templates for Karnataka per district after discussion at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals


 * : Bagalkot-geo-stub
 * : BangaloreRural-geo-stub
 * : BangaloreUrban-geo-stub
 * : Belgaum-geo-stub
 * : Bellary-geo-stub
 * : Bidar-geo-stub
 * : BijapurKarnataka-geo-stub
 * : Chamarajanagar-geo-stub
 * : Chikkaballapur-geo-stub
 * : Chikkamagaluru-geo-stub
 * : Chitradurga-geo-stub
 * : DakshinaKannada-geo-stub
 * : Davanagere-geo-stub
 * : Dharwad-geo-stub
 * : Gadag-geo-stub
 * : Gulbarga-geo-stub
 * : HassanIN-geo-stub
 * : Haveri-geo-stub
 * : Kodagu-geo-stub
 * : Kolar-geo-stub
 * : Koppal-geo-stub
 * : Mandya-geo-stub
 * : Mysore-geo-stub
 * : Raichur-geo-stub
 * : Ramanagara-geo-stub
 * : Shimoga-geo-stub
 * : Tumkur-geo-stub
 * : Udupi-geo-stub
 * : UttaraKannada-geo-stub

Please feel free to use them instead of Karnataka-geo-stub --  Tinu  Cherian  - 10:05, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The discussion at WP:WSS was for templates, only allowing categories when there are 60 stubs (as is standard stub-sorting practice). Quite a few of these categories are undersized, and it is likely they will be upmerged at some point. Grutness...wha?  23:58, 7 November 2009 (UTC)