Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Deletion

closed ones
I think it might be a good idea to keep the last six days of deletion discussions up unless they are still being discussed. The closed ones could be moved to the archives. --Pinkkeith (talk) 15:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm with you, my concern is the articles we never know about that get deleted. Banje boi  20:37, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * That's an age old problem with wikipedia sadly. Someone has to keep an eye on all AfDs. Ged UK (talk) 06:33, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I wonder if we should try to rev up Satyrbot (to add project tag onto articles) and something similar to search for articles with out tag that has a prod, Afd, Cfd, etc tag on it? Banje b oi   21:56, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Sounds like a good idea to me! Ged UK (talk) 06:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Empty day place holders
Do we really need place holders for days in which there are no new AfD's to be added? They sort of annoy me, but if there's a reason to have them, I'll deal with it. Aleta  Sing 20:16, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I have no objection. I just keep them there in case I missed an article, template or category up for discussion. There are links in the header that will take you directly to the discussions. --Pinkkeith (talk) 20:18, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

beware the a7 and prods, my son
Is there a better way of keeping an eye out for speedy deletion tagging on LGBT-related articles? I've been seeing a fairly large push to A7/PROD LGBT-related articles lately, without notifying the original author, and without applying WP:BEFORE. -- j &#9883; e decker  talk  16:55, 31 July 2010 (UTC)