Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law/Categorization

How precise?
How precise do we make this stuff? For example, if we add a case or concept fitting into "specific performance" or do we just want Contract_remedy? It seems like it would be legit to make it somewhat specific. Especially for really broad common law topics as they might get unweildy. mmm beer T / C / ? 00:33, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Good question. A table containing every topic in law in the world would be ridiculously huge. Since the section is called categorization it would be best to stick with categories for starts. However, we've already gone beyond that. Perhaps we should remove the excess detail or else just avoid adding more article names and focus on the categories. I'm open to suggestions. --PullUpYourSocks 04:15, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 * The Priestley 11 was the result of a legal education review in Australia. It may be something worth considering. VeryRusty (talk) 12:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Category:Computer law legislation
Please join the discussion at Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_April_8 Ottawahitech (talk) 02:27, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Don't know if anyone participates here, but just in case, the above discussion is still active and needs more input. Ottawahitech (talk)

Merging or Clarifying the Case Law and Lawsuit Categories
Not sure how many people watch this page, but you are invited to join this conversation. Thanks. RevelationDirect (talk) 19:17, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Categorization of case law
See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_U.S._Supreme_Court_cases and Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_April_15. Apokrif (talk) 14:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)