Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lebanon/Assessment

From scratch
I'm posting here to get everyone's opinion on what grading scheme for assessment we should follow. I think it's best to use the conventional grade scheme for article quality and the importance scale used by the Wikipedia Release Version team and WikiProject Canada respectively (both shown below). What do you think?

Proposed importance scale
We will of course have to make some modifications to this scale (e.g. replacing Canada with Lebanon). Lestat deLioncourt  talk 14:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Wow, this is great. I think it would be a great resource and help focus our efforts.  --Xtcrider 18:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


 * nice work lioncourt, it will surely help us expand and improve lebanese related articles. Fedayee 19:28, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks even though I can't take credit for this work :). But it is essential for us to start assessing articles in order to determine which ones need more care and have a more well-defined scope of operation. I will be working on the main assessment page this week. I hope you can all join with the assessment efforts. And please call me Lestat. Lestat deLioncourt  talk 19:38, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


 * These are great! I think they'll be really useful for helping us focus our attention on where it's needed most. — George Saliba[ talk ] 23:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Super!... Great Start, LeStat... I am still unfamiliar with things like classes, etc... When I have time, I will catch up. One thing I want to mention is that many articles about Lebanon specifically need Lebanese Editors who are a native speakers of Lebanese and have "accurate" familarity with Lebanon.  I am not sure how to incorporate this yet... Lcnj 08:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Just a quick remark, I think that's a very good work Lestat, these categories and grading scheme are suitable. for the moment, i'm little bit 'overbooked' and far away from home, i'll 'study' in detail what you've proposed in a week. Captainm 11:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Added assessment to template
I've added the assessment (rating and importance) to the WikiProject Lebanon Template. Please take a look. — George Saliba[ talk ] 10:12, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I've filled in Lebanon's values (GA and top) on the Lebanon talk page as an example of what it looks like. — George Saliba[ talk ] 10:16, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I've added the categories automatically generated by the template to the page. While these categories don't exist (as nobody has written any text on the pages yet), they are still functional and correctly list articles with that tag. The largest of the categories right now are obviously unassessed Lebanon articles and unknown-importance Lebanon articles. If someone wants to write some text on these category pages explaining what they are and how people can help I think that would be useful. — George Saliba[ talk ] 11:04, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Hats off to you George! Spectacular work~ I'll see what help I can give you with these categories. Adding just a sentence or two to each would be sufficient I think, so it shouldn't be too much trouble. &mdash;  Lestat deLioncour t  14:06, 19 December 2006 (UTC)