Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Led Zeppelin/Archive 2

American style dates
Is there a reason why many articles about LZ songs and albums use American style dates (e.g. January 10, 2009)? I would expect them to use European style dates (e.g. 10 January 2009) per WP:MOSNUM, section 2.4.1.2. In fact I've fixed some of these myself. -- Army1987 – Deeds, not words. 00:29, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I gather because most of the editors here (with the exception of myself and Edelmand) appear to be from the United States. Most of the first article edits were done by US editors. Feel free to change if and when consensus is reached. MegX (talk) 03:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Milestone Announcements
I thought this WikiProject might be interested. Ping me with any specific queries or leave them on the page linked to above. Thanks! - Jarry1250 (t, c) 21:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group
Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. &mdash; Delievered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:44, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the  parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:20, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

How Many More Times
I inadvertently walked into what apparently has been an issue for a while with the article "How Many More Times" and quite possibly with other Led Zeppelin song articles regarding crediting components of songs that are remakes. This one regards "The Hunter". Perhaps many of you are tired of this one. Nevertheless I am new to the article and have articulated my view without much response. Some response would be appreciated. It is at Talk:How_Many_More_Times.

Also a more general discussion regarding the same issue for all song articles (if you are interested) is at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Music - Steve3849 talk 06:36, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Keep an eye out for a new soapbox account trying to JBG fancruft a few LZ articles
There is a new account who is trying to alter any "LZ influenced heavy metal" content into saying "they might have... but it was really Jeff Beck". Typical 'so-and-so-said something different' soapbox crufting. The Real Libs-speak politely 14:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Project Work
Hello, I just joined the project out of personal interest and geek knowledge of the Zep universe. I'm a Wikipedia vandalism watcher so I will pay special attention to the articles associated with this project. After looking at the To Do list I think I can also donate my time to the Unassessed Articles and throw in my opinions on Quality and Importance. Feel free to follow up on my Assessments as I go forward. Doomsdayer520 (talk) 13:57, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

While I'm here I have a question. I have noticed that articles for Zep-related books have been included in the project, such as that piece-of-garbage Hammer of the Gods. Some other fairly recent Zep biographies and books of interest do not have their own WP articles. Is it a goal of this project to add articles on these books, or have you chosen to focus on adding and expanding articles about the music and the musicians? (Also, there is a WikiProject Books and many WP guidelines for book-related articles that will have an impact on this question.) Cheers. Doomsdayer520 (talk) 14:06, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppets influencing consensus
I am sorry to report that one of the main contributors to this project has been found to have been operating several sockpuppet accounts and using them to influence consensus. For those not yet aware of the situation, full details of the case are at Sockpuppet investigations/Wiki libs/Archive. The list of account names and IP addresses involved is rather extensive. Two recent discussions at the band page were influenced by two or more editors making comments that were actually all Wiki libs, Talk:Led_Zeppelin being a significant one regarding the lead paragraph. As reported by Luminifer at the SPI archive linked above, Libs used a total of six socks in one thread and used the strength of those numbers to declare consensus (see above linked report). So, I am posting this here to alert anyone who may have been influenced in this way when making decisions about article content in the recent past, based on either edit summaries or talk page commentary or both. Sswonk (talk) 20:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

portal
There has been a portal upgrade Portal:Led Zeppelin any concerns pls let me know!!! ......Buzzzsherman (talk) 04:08, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Update again! ✅...Moxy (talk) 21:57, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 03:31, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Request for comment on Biographies of living people
Hello Wikiproject! Currently there is a discussion which will decide whether wikipedia will delete 49,000 articles about a living person without references, here:

Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Since biographies of living people covers so many topics, many wikiproject topics will be effected.

The two opposing positions which have the most support is:
 * 1) supports the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, User:Jehochman
 * 2) opposes the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, except in limited circumstances, User:Collect

Comments are welcome. Keep in mind that by default, editor's comments are hidden. Simply press edit next to the section to add your comment.

Please keep in mind that at this point, it seems that editors support deleting unreferenced BLP articles if they are not sourced, so your project may want to source these articles as soon as possible. See the next, message, which may help.

Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people
If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see: Cleanup listings A list of examples is here
 * List of cleanup articles for your project

If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles that your project covers, to a special "incubation page", contact me, User talk:Ikip
 * Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages"

If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip
 * Watchlisting all unreferenced articles

Ikip 05:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Pageview stats
After a recent request, I added WikiProject Led Zeppelin to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at WikiProject Led Zeppelin/Popular pages.

The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 22:18, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Led Zeppelin articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Led Zeppelin articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (&diams;) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:15, 19 September 2010 (UTC)