Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics Competitions

Everyone!
Please pay attention here. Do you think that Sam Vandervelde is notable enough to have an article? He IS currently running the Mandelbrot competition, so... Also, do you think that Richard Ruscyzk and Sandor Lehoczky are notable enough? Please petition this or something: David Eppstein wants to delete all three of these articles, essentially.

--Heero Kirashami (talk) 06:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Please don't misrepresent my position. In general, I prefer to keep articles than to delete them. I think that in the state I tagged Vandervelde's article, it would be better not to keep it, but what I would prefer is that these articles be beefed up with real published third party sources documenting real significant achievements of these people, to the point where it's obvious that they're sufficiently notable to be kept. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:18, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Done. Should I remove the prod now? Temperal xy 03:28, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


 * It never was a prod. But, you added: a link to a "Think Swiss Event Calendar" that seems to have nothing to do with Vandervelde; an "about us" page from the Mandelbrot competition (not third-party), an author bio from Vandervelde's books (again not really third-party), a book that happens to mention his name in the acknowledgements (not non-trivial), a Stanford Math Circle calendar that mentions his name briefly as one of a long list of speakers (not third party and not non-trivial), and another Stanford Math Circle page that mentions his name briefly as one of a longer list of team members (again, not third party and not non-trivial). The non-trivial ones among these are fine for verifying basic facts about him (per the Wikipedia policy on biographies of living persons), but where are the non-trivial published third-party sources that might convince someone that anyone outside of the Mandelbrot competition / Stanford math circle crowd thinks of him as noteworthy? Newspaper stories, say? —David Eppstein 04:35, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


 * For the "Think Swiss Event Calendar"... uh, actually, I don't know what I was thinking; there's a vague allusion to him in the third paragraph, which I probably had thought would qualify as proof of his existence or something similar. The other non-third-party sources I will remove, though I personally feel some of them are good enough to back up the rather non-important facts they claim to source. I'll go search for what you suggested now, and will post the source back here once/if I find one. Temperal xy 16:18, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, there's a sentence stating him as coordinator of the Mandelbrot competition in the second part of the Swiss source, so I don't see why that wouldn't qualify as referencing that fact in an article. Temperal xy 16:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Doesn't it say on Verifiability that as long as a questionable source is relevant to their notability, not contentious, not unduly self-serving, does not involve claims about third-parties, and such and such, that it is okay? I mean, it's like taking some information from someone's website. Furthermore, if someone like Petronella Wyatt, who began her own article and tried to sue Wikipedia over vandalism someone did to her article, then I think that Sam Vandervelde is noteworthy enough(the self-advocating Wikipedia-suing journalist or the notable, competition-co-founding mathematician? c'mon, you've got to feel some mroe sympathy). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Heero Kirashami (talk • contribs) 02:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * "Sympathy" is hardly a basis for notability for an article. Your first point, however (I assume you're referring to WP:SELFPUB), probably has some merit. Temperal xy 03:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Seeing as there's been no challenge for over a week, I'm going to close this discussion and remove the tag. Temperal talk and matrix? 03:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme
As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
 * The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
 * The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
 * A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot  ( Disable )  20:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Mathematics Competitions
Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:34, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group
Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. &mdash; Delievered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the  parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:23, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 03:35, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Mathematics Competitions articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Mathematics Competitions articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (&diams;) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:19, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

List of winners of the Mathcounts competition
There is a new weekly section on the main page called "Today's featured list" and I have nominated List of winners of the Mathcounts competition to have a spot here. There has been some opposition to the nomination and it looks like the list could become a removal candidate very soon unless the quality of the list is improved. If you are interested in maintaining the list's featured status and seeing a summary of it up on the main page, your help in improving the article would be greatly appreciated. Neelix (talk) 03:38, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!


Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)