Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Cardiology task force

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

AliveCor
AliveCor is a medical device and artificial intelligence company that sells ECG hardware and software for consumer mobile devices. Would someone mind assessing the proposed updates to the article at: Talk:Alivecor? Thanks JerryGraf (talk) 21:43, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


 * ✅ PeaBrainC (talk) 05:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Antiarrhythmic effect of Quifenadine in children
Hi everyone! I'm working on expanding the article on the antihistamine Quifenadine, which appears to have an antiarrhythmic effect. Most articles on the drug are in Russian, and since I do not have a medical background I am having a hard time making sense of the results in the Google/DeepL translated article on the drug's antiarrhythmic effect in children. Could someone help me to summarise this study's conclusions in the article? Thanks, Doanri (talk) 17:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi Doanri. This study was published 2 years later by the same authors as the article you are interested in, enrolled twice as many patients, and was published in English.  It doesn't appear to address exactly the same question but is probably a better replacement.  However, bear in mind that we would normally try to avoid citing primary research papers and instead aim to use secondary sources such as review articles.  If a reliable secondary source can't be found to support the text you want to add, you should think carefully about whether the information should be added at all.  Thanks, PeaBrainC (talk) 20:20, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! Doanri (talk) 08:51, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Cardiology articles needing expert attention has been nominated for discussion
Category:Cardiology articles needing expert attention has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 06:45, 16 May 2021 (UTC)