Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Academy/Asking for help

Audit
Not certain about the bit directing people to the coordinators' page - mainly because we watch the talk page in any case, so it is a bit redundant?

otherwise, reviewed Cinderella157 (talk) 23:42, 21 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Directing again to coords page is a redundant. Also I would like add a couple things you might like to consider.
 * As mentioned, the template User is not used to ping, but to generate the standard user representation to list users, for example on Project members page etc. To ping we generally user Ping or u, that sends a notification to user, without creating that (talk . contribs) thing.
 * Also, if an user is looking for some general help, it would be good if we mention about help me, that can be used on the same user's talk page that automatically lists the page at Category:Wikipedians looking for help, and is category is often checked by editors, help comes faster.
 * Looking forward for you opinion regarding this. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 03:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * @Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, In that case, I see no real value in mentioning User? The object is to make a notification. This can be done by Ping or as I did, with a simple copy&paste. This is what should be said? Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 04:27, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, User is not worth mentioning here. Yeah, simple copy paste is also a good option. But make sure that syntax usage is clearly explained, from a beginner's point of view. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 07:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * @Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, thanks for the comments. If you are happy with this, you might close the review. You will note, that the process I described is a guide and commonsense should prevail. You have already part reviewed what I have done in response to my questions. Saying this, please copyedit anything that is trivial and close. "Good form" would ask me to concur with anything a little more substantial before closing. Hope this makes sense. Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 10:37, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * It's looks quite good. Review complete, requesting check. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:27, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, @Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, per the process, I am the reviewer. You have checked my work. There was nothing of significance in your comments. I have addressed these and there is no dispute. Under these an similar, it is appropriate for you to close. See also, the overview. Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 12:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh! Got confused a bit. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Closed per previous Cinderella157 (talk) 23:06, 25 October 2017 (UTC)