Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Sam Manekshaw/archive 1

Reopen
Hi, g'day. I request you to reopen this review as I have enough time to work on this. As it an archived A-class review, I am not sure how to work up with the things to put this in place. So please reopen and list this under A-class review. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 15:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Reminder. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:47, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Harry, I have enough time for this now. Also I've addressed the outstanding comments from the previous review. I wanted to open the review, but I was confused between whether we should go for separate review page, or do on the same page? Please do the needful. --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay. I would suggest just re-nominating it, because that involves less paperwork, but if you want to re-open this review that's fine. HJ Mitchell  &#124; Penny for your thoughts?  10:36, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Harry, thanks for reply. I don't think I can do the regular nomination procedure i.e. using "A-class" parameter in the Project template, because that links to this page. Also if I go for a new nomination WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Sam Manekshaw 2, the MILHIST bot may get confused. Please suggest the best way. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 10:45, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey, I've moved this out of the way. If you click the "currently undergoing" link on the talk page then follow the instructions as usual, everything should work normally. HJ Mitchell  &#124; Penny for your thoughts?  10:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)