Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Awards/Quarterly reviewing awards 2019

January to March 2019 reviewing tallies
MilHistBot (talk) 02:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * , before I go ahead and approve these, does your tally seem right? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:21, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Tks for checking PM, I did recuse coord duties and review one FAC each in Jan and Mar so I think there should be 2 in the FA column... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:48, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I've approved all but my own one. If someone could do that, we're done here. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Approved.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  19:56, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

April to June 2019 reviewing tallies
MilHistBot (talk) 01:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing you, . Should you be listed? Also,, while I'm a prodigious reviewer, I reckon this might be inflated by a number of ACRs where I've just prompted reviewers or pinged Nikkimaria to request an image review. Is there any way we can filter them out? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:02, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Tks for thinking of me, PM -- I believe I neglected to review any ACRs last month so no, wouldn't expect to be listed. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:24, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks Ian. Maybe I should add a couple of other coords who steward the processes. Should we have a protocol for making such comments on ACRs? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:14, 2 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Ian puts "recuse" or "recusing" into an edit summary to recuse during a FAC review. Otherwise the Bot won't count him because he is a coordinator. (This only needs to be done once per review.) To implement a protocol for making such comments on ACRs, we'd need to agree on something you could add to an edit summary and the Bot would know not to count that particular edit.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  11:59, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Perhaps if a non-reviewing coord used "clerking" in the edit summary, this might help differentiate? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:17, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Approved all except mine. if someone can approve mine, we are good to go. Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 11:20, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * can someone approve mine please? Then we can archive this one. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:47, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Done. Zawed (talk) 08:55, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

July to September 2019 reviewing tallies
MilHistBot (talk) 00:31, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * G'day, have you been underdone here? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:53, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * This has been checked and resolved. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:41, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I count 97 in my contributions also my peer reviews weren't in it. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 23:11, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * It only counts closed reviews, CPA-5, so that may be the difference. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

October to December 2019 reviewing tallies
MilHistBot (talk) 05:23, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * G'day, has the bot missed any of yours? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:24, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * G'day, these are all approved now, is this picked up in the general run of the bot or does it need to be specifically released for this run? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The awards job runs daily. It struck an edit conflict processing the awards this morning. I could restart it, but it will run again and complete tomorrow.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:28, 11 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:01, 11 January 2020 (UTC)