Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/News/June 2019/Op-ed


 * Great article thanks. I find the idea that 'Versailles' caused WWII because it was too harsh on Germany unconvincing. More important is that two major powers who could have brought stability to Europe were either indifferent (USA) or actively revisionist (Russia).  Added to this is that France and Britain became divided over how to enforce the treaty, with France wishing to stick to the letter and the British being more accommodating to change.  What's more the allies failed to crush the beaten German army and invade Germany.  This allowed the Germans to claim they were not beaten in the field, despite the fact that they were.  I think the best way to argue that Versailles 'harshness' is irrelevant is to point to the end of WWII.  Then Germany was vastly shrunk, occupied and divided for 50 years.   They were much more 'harshly' treated but it was the post-war environment which kept them right.  Keith Johnston (talk) 15:55, 9 July 2019 (UTC)