Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorcycling/BMW Motorcycles

Japanese?
Why does this page talk about bringing owners of Japanese motorcycles together? Is that a leftover typo from the template used to create this group? Ebikeguy (talk) 14:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, sorry about that. I used the Japanese one as a template and must have missed something. Thanks. DAFMM (talk) 10:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

So what's our first target?
So we have a few people now, what's the first order of business? Should we target some of the existing articles and improve them, or should we write something new? My suggestion is that we start with History of BMW motorcycles. --Biker Biker (talk) 06:38, 26 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, that is a good starting point. Any people with a specific interest in one type of bike would also be encouraged to create a new article on that in order to begin our comprehensive coverage of every model (in the next few days I'm going to do one on the R2 series as a basis). I am also going to promote the group over Wikipedia in the forthcoming days in order to make everyone who is interested in this area aware so we can get as much help as possible. Thanks. DAFMM (talk) 10:43, 26 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I see you have done the BMW R2 article. I made a few style changes, remove the unreliable references, then put a couple of better ones back in. You made a good start. Nice job. --Biker Biker (talk) 10:13, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks. My next big one is an article on the R25. However, I am undecided as to whether to add to the R27 article by adding the R24 and R25 histories or do them individually. Although they were all fifties 250 singles, they followed one another and did have significant changes between each other. They then had small changes made (eg. the R25/1, R25/2 etc..) during their respective productions runs. What do you think? DAFMM (talk) 16:55, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * One issue which was raised during the proposal was that of the R1200GS article and whether it should be merged with the R1200R and R1200RT articles. I am not an expert on these models, but would someone be up for combining these pages into one R1200 article which covers all variants? Thanks. DAFMM (talk) 16:59, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I think R1200R needs to be expanded, but the R1200GS and R1200RT have enough content to stand alone - and should remain separate. b.t.w. Please get in the habit of using the correct links to articles, e.g. BMW R1200RT not R1200RT. --Biker Biker (talk) 20:43, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry, didn't realise. And I agree with them being kept separate. DAFMM (talk) 08:38, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

'History of BMW motorcycles'
I know it sounds pedantic but isn't it a bit silly having a major page like that without correct grammar (the non-capital 'm' of 'motorcycles')? Thoughts..... DAFMM (talk) 22:34, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Isn't BMW Motorrad the proper noun? BMW motorcycles is the common noun, and so it's not capitalized, per Naming conventions (capitalization). The page could be moved to History of BMW Motorrad, which is consistent with BMW Motorrad. On the other hand, keeping it where it is is more consistent with pages like Kawasaki motorcycles. So either would be fine, but if it ain't broke don't fix it. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:58, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Agree with Dennis on both points. Happy to see the page moved if the name "BMW Motorrad" has been used consistently through its history and isn't just a recent brand / marketing affectation. --Biker Biker (talk) 09:14, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * It's not 'BMW Motorrad' which is the problem (in German, any noun uses a capital first letter). It's just as a title, 'BMW motorcycles' needs two capitals. But then if all the other articles are using that trend it's probably not worth bothering about. DAFMM (talk) 20:55, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you saying BMW motorcycles is a proper noun? How so? Only the first word of an article title is capitalized unless it's a proper noun. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:29, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * It doesn't matter whether it's a proper noun or not, if it is in a title. For example, 'The Very Happy Fish'; here, the definitve article, the adjective nor the noun (which is not a proper noun) would normally need a capital, but in tis case (let's say it's the title of a book) does need a capital. DAFMM (talk) 22:13, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * That's not Wikipedia's naming convention. It makes all the difference if it's a proper noun. Read Naming conventions (capitalization). The first sentence is, in bold, "Do not capitalize the second or subsequent words in an article title, unless the title is a proper noun." Elsewhere the style is different, but that's how it's done on Wikipedia. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:21, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry DAFMM but motorcycles just in not a proper noun. ww2censor (talk) 08:24, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * It doesn't matter whether it's a proper noun or not! It's not style, it's grammar, but if that's Wikipedia's convention then I suppose it's best sticking to it. DAFMM (talk) 16:34, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Please see: http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/capital.asp and http://grammar.yourdictionary.com/capitalization/rules-for-capitalization-in-titles.html for some reference. DAFMM (talk) 16:45, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's what two style guides say. But there are other style guides, and none is supreme. Wikipedia has chosen to follow the The Chicago Manual of Style and Fowler's Modern English Usage (Third edition). It's mentioned the WP MOS article above. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:58, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Ok, thanks. I'll have to have a look at Fowler's. I was pretty sure it was more strict but with it being the 'Modern Englsh Usage' edition it wouldn't surprise me. DAFMM (talk) 17:05, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia doeesn't always follow everything in Fowler's. Or the Chicago Manual. Just go by the WP:MOS and Naming conventions (capitalization). If something there looks wrong, suggest a change at the talk page for the policy or the guideline. At the article or project level, you have to just do what the policies and guidelines say. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:08, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

BMW S1000RR
BMW S1000RR gets a lot of drive-by edits claiming it's the fastest production motorcycle. If you know where the soures for these claims are, and whether they mean with or without the speed limiter disabled, can you cite them? I think it's helpful to explain that source X modified the bike by doing Y and recorded Z speed. It's not the same as recording a new fastest top speed for a stock bike, as in List of fastest production motorcycles, but it's interesting as long as it's taken with a grain of salt. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 03:28, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Airhead (motorcycle) merge discussion
A discussion on whether to merge Airhead (motorcycle) into History of BMW motorcycles has been started at Talk:History of BMW motorcycles. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 14:19, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Articles for the group's attention

 * BMW K1
 * BMW K75

The BMW K75 article currently has only one source. Until a few days ago, it had a source that was published before the K75 was launched; this was the result of an over-enthusiastic editor who copied the K100 infobox to the article and changed the info but not the citations. This has since been changed, where applicable, to another source, but it remains the only source for the article.

The K1 article is better sourced, but it needs copy editing.

Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 13:42, 25 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Here is one 1986 K75 review from Cycle World that might be useful. ww2censor (talk) 13:57, 25 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I'll see what I can do with it. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 09:36, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Proposal to merge BMW K75 into BMW K100
I have proposed a merger of the BMW K75 article into the BMW K100 article. The discussion is at Talk:BMW K100. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 01:34, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Expanding?
Looks like there hasn't been any activity on here in quite some time. I notice there is no /7 page, and no page for the R100 as well (the R100S has a page with some inaccurate information... I'm going to morph that into a general R100 page unless anyone has objections). Macboots (talk) 08:56, 11 July 2016 (UTC)