Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NASCAR/Archive 6

Articles flagged for cleanup
Currently, 1269 articles are assigned to this project, of which 177, or 13.9%, are flagged for cleanup of some sort. (Data as of 2008-07-14.) Are you interested in finding out more? I am offering to generate cleanup to-do lists on a project or work group level. See User:B. Wolterding/Cleanup listings for details. More than 150 projects and work groups have already subscribed, and adding a subscription for yours is easy - just place a template on your project page.

If you want to respond to this canned message, please do so at my user talk page; I'm not watching this page. --B. Wolterding (talk) 18:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Nascar Racing box scans?
I got the boxes for Nascar Racing and the Track Pack, would you like some scans of them? Charrr2 (talk) 21:55, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You can add them - it's more of a question for the video game WikiProject. Make sure that you have a robust fair use rationale or else they'll get deleted. Video game covers are considered Cover Art as far as that guideline is concerned.  Royal broil  03:53, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Mark Martin article moved again
Someone moved his article to Mark Martin (racecar driver). I put out a requested move to determine consensus on why he should not the WP:COMMONNAME for the article. Please comment at Talk:Mark Martin (racecar driver).  Royal broil  15:35, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Kansas's Cup Race is now called Camping World RV 400 also
Well, Kansas Speedway has just announced their sponsor for this years cup race. Per http://www.kansasspeedway.com/549209.html. We seem to have a problem as Dover Speedway also has the same race name. The only thing that differences the names of the two races are the subsponser in which Dover Speedway's Race is called Camping World RV 400 presented by AAA and Kansas Speedway's Race is called Camping World RV 400 presented by Coleman. Also another problem is the 2 races are back to back on the cup schedule which makes it even more confusing. My idea is to create a disambig page at Camping World RV 400 and move Kansas 400 to Camping World RV 400 (Kansas) or Camping World RV 400 presented by Coleman and move Camping World RV 400 to Camping World RV 400 (Dover) or Camping World RV 400 presented by AAA. I know how you fell about using the subsponser name in the articles so its up to you guys on where to move em too.  Sawblade05  (talk to me undefined my wiki life) 10:13, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmm, good question. My thoughts are: 1) create disambiguation page at Camping World RV 400, 2) move articles to Camping World RV 400 (Dover) and Camping World RV 400 (Kansas) and create redirects to them from Camping World RV 400 presented by AAA and Camping World RV 400 presented by Coleman. I miss the days when a sponsor was actually associated with the race because they did it for so many years. Thanks for bringing it up!  Royal broil  12:09, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Go ahead and set it that way.  Sawblade05  (talk to me undefined my wiki life) 10:10, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Would you? My wiki-time will be almost nothing for several days.  Royal broil  12:38, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Ditto on me so we need a 3rd person that can help.  Sawblade05  (talk to me undefined my wiki life) 11:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Adding a Number History?
What do you think about adding a number history system for each number in NASCAR. Each car number gets a page and you write out the history of the humber. The issue date, driver info, team info. Things along those lines. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.2.98.199 (talk) 20:46, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose. In the early days of NASCAR, each race often saw a different driver using the number. History would be impossible to combine in a meaningful fashion.  Royal broil  20:16, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

wrong info about Joey Logano
The Joey Logano page says he is racing in five upcoming Sprint Cup races. According to ESPN, and many other sources, he will be racing in seven events. http://sports.espn.go.com/rpm/nascar/cup/news/story?id=3556642


 * Actually if you read it correctly it says he will drive 5 races for Hall of Fame Racing.

"On August 28, 2008, Hall of Fame Racing announced that Logano would drive five races in their #96 car during the 2008 Sprint Cup Series." Hope that helps.- KaseyKahne Fan 23:03, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Removal of year links
You may have noticed that Lightbot is converting links like this: 1989 to plaintext, e.g. this edit. Am I right in thinking that consensus is that these links should not be removed? (I have asked the bot's owner to stop the bot from removing them, but I'm anticipating that they may ask for justification for my request). DH85868993 (talk) 09:57, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with you and I posted an expanded explanation of my opinion at WikiProject American Open Wheel Racing.  Royal broil  23:52, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

I agree; I think the year links should stand. Some Wikipedia pages end up being "orphaned" because too few other articles link to it. However, something like "1995 in NASCAR" should be avoided; a particular series should be specified. The more links (provided that they are proper), the better! 97.125.21.179 (talk) 05:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for NASCAR
Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I took care of it. Feel free to update diffs before mid October, as long as you make sure that no vandalism has creeped in.  Royal broil  02:44, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

George Atkinson Jr nominated for deletion
I nominated the George Atkinson Jr article for deletion. He races a late model at a NASCAR-sanctioned track in California and at the Bullring in Las Vegas. He's a local-level racer, not a national-level racer with no touring series starts listed. He's around 15th in points at Irwindale at the track's highest division. The article has conflict of interest issues from its originator. You can give your opinion on the deletion discussion by following the AFD link on the top of the article.  Royal broil  15:52, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

2009 NASCAR Nationwide Series
Can some interested editors please review the newly created article 2009 NASCAR Nationwide Series? A series of new editors has created most of the content and something doesn't quite feel right to me regarding the Teams list. I don't follow the series very much, but several of the listed drivers don't appear to have raced in the series or any series in quite some time. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:30, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Red Bulls
Hi all. user:Cvinne has just moved Red Bull Racing (the F1 team article) to Red Bull Racing (Formula One) and (I think) Team Red Bull (the NASCAR team) to Red Bull Racing Team (NASCAR). Probably quite logical, but I don't think it's been discussed, so I thought I should bring it up here for a project-wide view. Also, would anyone like to volunteer to get a bot to sort out all the links. I know redirects will take care of it, but that gets very messy if things change again in future. I've started a discussion at WP:MOTOR - can we discuss it there? 4u1e (talk) 18:38, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Deletion discussion
There is an AFD deletion occurring to determine if Mark Martin's son Matt Martin is notable enough to have an article. Please give your opinion at Articles for deletion/Matt Martin. I have.  Royal broil  13:56, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

List of motorsport terminology
Per this discussion at Wikiproject Motorsport I recently created the page List of motorsport terminology. Designed primarily to combat jargon, feel free to drop by and add common motorsport terms (this is going to be a big list). Aptery gial  05:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

2009 Daytona 500 entry list
Why is it unacceptable to post an entry list for the Daytona 500? I did so a few months ago and it was deemed as "vandalism" (which is only opinion). Organisers of Wikipedia pages for other forms of racing actually ENCOURAGE this sort of extra help. 97.125.21.179 (talk) 06:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree it wasn't vandalism. Several months ago I would consider it to be ill-advised as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Now that it's getting closer, I can see adding the section as long as you can find a reliable source to back you up.  Royal broil  06:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

My main news source for NASCAR news is Jayski.com. "Jayski" seems to be quite reliable, not branding a rumor as fact unless an official press release or a team's website confirms something. He usually has news stories that are deeper than at SPEEDtv.com or ESPN.com, but I'm not sure that some of the self-appointed Wikipedia "Gestapos" would agree. However, since YOU are registered they may respond better if you posted an entry list or a link to Jayski's list.

I mis-spoke when I said I had posted an entry list several months ago. I actually posted a list of past Daytona 500 winners and Cup champions who would compete or who may compete (doing the same on the 2009 Indianapolis 500 page), and showing whether or not they were exempt from the Top 35 rule (it can be seen in the page's history, with 3 or 4 reversions). You're right; posting an entry list that far in advance (November) would be a bit silly. 97.125.21.179 (talk) 04:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * An entry list is a very time consuming thing to do! I don't want to spend my time on it - I see lots of articles that I'd rather start instead. There's lots of admin things that I could be doing like taking care of speedy deletions. Some of them are really bad vandalism or attack articles. How about you create the entry list and let me know if someone removes it. Please provide a link on the first entry to your reference - Jayski should be fine in my opinion.  Royal broil  04:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

I just posted my list in the 2009 Gatorade Duels page (the Daytona 500 page has quite a bit of content now). Now that qualifying is less than two weeks away, it seems like a good time to post an entry list (at least tentative). It also comes with a link to Jayski's site, listed as the source. Each car number is a link to the team's Wikipedia page ([Hendrick Motorsports|48]), and known sponsors are listed. 97.125.20.204 (talk) 06:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Milestone Announcements
I thought this WikiProject might be interested. Ping me with any specific queries or leave them on the page linked to above. Thanks! - Jarry1250 (t, c) 22:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

NASCAR Lore
I'm starting a NASCAR lore page....much in the same grain as the NFL lore. First and foremost it's populated with the widely regarded and accepted "great moments" (races). Future sections could include famous machines and figures, but I think it should shy away from the great drivers. Otherwise it'll be too long. If there are rules named after drivers, or policies named after an incident, those could qualify too.


 * The I think there should be some scrutiny before adding "great" races and "honorable mention." The NFL lore page had the same problem. People would be adding a game the next day because they thought it was good, but it nowhere near made sense to consider it "lore" yet. Just because they have a close finish, doesn't immediately mean the race was 'great.'


 * There are plenty of magazine/newspaper/internet articles listing the accepted great race, and as time goes by, more and more references/citations will and should be added. I've started it out with several, but more an be added. Doctorindy (talk) 15:51, 21 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Further dicussion: Talk:NASCAR lore

Disputed Page Move
I have a Disputed Page move for a Template I was trying to move last night. The pages I was trying to move were User:UBX/NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series → User:UBX/NASCAR Camping World Truck Series per the new Series Name Change. I assumed that since the Camping World Truck Series was the new name of the series I shouldn't of had a Problem. But I did as someone disputed it per a Essay of WP:Broke, now I am having to dispute it per WP:NAME. The Discussion is at User talk:UBX/NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series Please put your input in.  Sawblade05  (talk to me undefined my wiki life) 18:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group
Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. &mdash; Delievered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:06, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the  parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:27, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

A. J. Foyt
User:Erika39 has controversially moved the article to Anthony Joseph Foyt. I have decided to dispute the move per WP:COMMONNAME. Please comment with your opinion about the name for his article at Talk:Anthony Joseph Foyt.  Royal broil  12:04, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps invitation
This message is being sent to WikiProjects with GAs under their scope. Since August 2007, WikiProject Good Articles has been participating in GA sweeps. The process helps to ensure that articles that have passed a nomination before that date meet the GA criteria. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. Instead of reviewing by topic, editors can consider picking and choosing whichever articles they are interested in.

We are always looking for new members to assist with reviewing the remaining articles, and since this project has GAs under its scope, it would be beneficial if any of its members could review a few articles (perhaps your project's articles). Your project's members are likely to be more knowledgeable about your topic GAs then an outside reviewer. As a result, reviewing your project's articles would improve the quality of the review in ensuring that the article meets your project's concerns on sourcing, content, and guidelines. However, members can also review any other article in the worklist to ensure it meets the GA criteria.

If any members are interested, please visit the GA sweeps page for further details and instructions in initiating a review. If you'd like to join the process, please add your name to the running total page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles from the worklist or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. With ~1,300 articles left to review, we would appreciate any editors that could contribute in helping to uphold the quality of GAs. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

John Wes Townley
I pulled this out of the speedy queue (it was mistagged); do I speedy it anyway? Apparently, this guy is new and never finished in the top 10. (I figger I need to know how to handle Nascar articles, seein' as how the Richard Petty Museum is in my town.) - Dank (push to talk) 03:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Had I been around, I would have objected to the speedy and improved it. Don't let this be a precedent that bad results equals speedy delete. Looking at the article, it didn't have any content - just an infobox. So a basically empty article got deleted.  Royal broil  02:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note that I declined the speedy and other guys tagged and bagged it without checking with me. I'm just sayin'. - Dank (push to talk) 02:43, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep, I noticed!  Royal broil  03:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

family articles
Shouldn't there be articles on racing families like there are for political and other kinds of families? Like for the Pettys, Labontes or Allisons? (or Andrettis, Unsers, etc) ie. Petty racing family or Petty family 70.29.208.129 (talk) 08:14, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

stats
User talk:Mr.Z-man is working on something that will provide us with some stats. on page views along the lines of: He's working on this for June - so maybe by next month we'll be able to see what articles are getting the most traffic. He also mentioned that he'll be doing this for WP:MOTOR. Just an FYI update. — Ched : ?  21:38, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * stats.grok.se

Nationwide driver's images - HELP NEEDED
Many of my pictures rank high on google, and a major NASCAR sponsor used one of my images for a marketing flier. To thank me for the image, they gave me a NASCAR garage & pit pass. I had special permission and was able to be with the drivers during introductions. So I took tons of pictures and uploaded every driver that I could to my flickr account, starting here. Now I can't identify many of the drivers. I want to use pictures of any driver without a Wikipedia image. Can everyone please help me identify the drivers? The race results can be found here. I haven't even started with pictures of the cars yet, I took many pictures of each car while they were parked on the frontstretch with my super high quality Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XS. I used my pocket camera with the drivers. It was an AWESOME experience that I'll never forget for the rest of my life.  Royal broil  00:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * WOW ... This is great! ... Yeppers, I will certainly try to match up pic per driver. Definitely worth the effort!  I just looked through a few of the pics, and some GREAT shots here.  Might take a little time to sort through it all, but nascar.com drivers should be able to match things up.  GREAT JOB RB! ... we'll certainly lend a hand. — Ched :  ?  00:57, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Pageview stats
After a recent request, I added WikiProject NASCAR to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at WikiProject NASCAR/Popular pages.

The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 20:31, 9 July 2009 (UTC)


 * GREAT! ... Thank you Mr. Z, we'll try to put the info to good use! Greatly appreciated ;) — Ched :  ?  21:46, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Changes to popular pages lists
There are a few important changes to the popular pages system. A quick summary: -- Mr.Z-man 00:21, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The "importance" ranking (for projects that use it) will be included in the lists along with assessment.
 * The default list size has been lowered to 500 entries (from 1000)
 * I've set up a project on the Toolserver for the popular pages - ~alexz/pop/.
 * This includes a page to view the results for projects, including the in-progress results from the current month. Currently this can only show the results from a single project in one month. Features to see multiple projects or multiple months may be added later.
 * This includes a new interface for making requests to add a new project to the list.
 * There is also a form to request a change to the configuration for a project. Currently the configurable options are the size of the on-wiki list and the project subpage used for the list.
 * The on-wiki list should be generated and posted in a more timely and consistent manner than before.
 * The data is now retained indefinitely.
 * The script used to generate the pages has changed. The output should be the same. Please report any apparent inconsistencies (see below).
 * Bugs and feature requests should be reported using the Toolserver's bug tracker for "alexz's tools" -

NASCAR Lore...part 2
Over at NASCAR lore, there's an effort by an unregistered member to add it seems every race perhaps he thinks his favorite guy won, etc, and everything that happened "yesterday". I'm soliciting some input for consensus at Talk:NASCAR lore. Doctorindy (talk) 17:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Suggestion

 * From Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NASCAR/Members which now redirects to WT:NASCAR. Airplaneman   ✈  Review? 03:19, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

I propose the list of members gets alphabetized/more organized. Any or all members please post your comment (yea or nay) below. Thank you. -Mattokunhayashi (talk) 04:37, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Nationwide Car of Tomorrow?
Please join this discussion regarding the new Nationwide Car of Tomorrow. --NaBUru38 (talk) 19:58, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Revised Infobox
i made a few subtile changes but not much and here it is what do you think? and this one is for retired BigPadresDUDE (talk) 07:41, 30 August 2009 (UTC)


 * What did you change? A change to an infobox that affected thousands of articles needs to be discussed in detail. I'm glad to see that you have taken that step. I see many issues. The worst one is how how there there are wikilinks to dates which is highly controversial. Why is the article linked to April 18th - how does reading an article about that date help you understand this driver? Even worse is the wikilink to April 18th - if anything it should be April 18. "2x Daytona 500 Winner" is way too informal - we have several Good Articles which will need tighter wording (Mario Andretti, Alan Kulwicki, Tim Richmond, A. J. Foyt IV). What problems have prompted these changes?  Royal broil  11:53, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

got a new version for active and retired drives coming soon when its finished tell me what ya think BigPadresDUDE (talk) 16:12, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

well here it is not to many changes just some rearraging a teams chart and color you like it? i used jeff gordon as an example retired version soon BigPadresDUDE (talk) 17:21, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose Color is not to be used to convey information per Colours. I see no improvement. Why would we want to do literally thousands of edits for some style changes? There needs to be a critical, strong, and COMPELLING reason to do such a huge undertaking, and I don't see any reason. What we have works just fine. Second, the field names look just like that - field names. We need to hide the details from the reader. These field names look awful, clunky, and they would prohibit articles from being able to be advanced to Good or Featured articles.  Royal broil  19:28, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

i think what we have already looks stale i can comprimise with color but i thought i did a good job is there anything good about the infobox i did? i worked hard on it and the old one to me is stale just request and changes and i will see what i can do but please forget the bad stuff and tell me what i did right BigPadresDUDE (talk) 19:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I like how your current driver infobox has the car number and team. That's useful information. However, I wouldn't want to make that change for all current drivers because it would take too long. The best thing that you did was ASK! You didn't just make massive changes that affects so many articles without thinking about it and do it the Wikipedia way - discuss it!  Royal broil  20:02, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

removed underlines and color how is it now? BigPadresDUDE (talk) 19:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't like how the infobox got even taller. The infobox is still way too wide tall for many articles - the majority of NASCAR drivers are stubby like Eddie Bierschwale. Since you're inspired, how about we try a real world example like him. How would you make it look better for someone with short article with a modest career like him? Feel free to do something in a WP:USERSUBPAGE.  Royal broil  20:02, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

i made an example with my infobox for Eddie Bierschwale. Go ToUser:BigPadresDUDE/Workspace to see its the second template BigPadresDUDE (talk) 20:17, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Your proposal is much taller, which is even a bigger problem when the driver has an image which falls off most monitor resolutions. I do like the years active information, but I don't think that it's worth making the infobox get longer. What can you do to display this information but in the shortest infobox possible? I like how the current infobox displays wins, Top 10s, and poles all in one area. I like how the current infobox only displays Nationwide and Truck series' results only if the driver did some races.


 * Wow, I didn't know that Eddie's final race was one of the most interesting races in NASCAR history - Richard Petty's last race, Jeff Gordon's first race, and the day that underdog privateer Alan Kulwicki won the championship by 1 position in the race results over Bill Elliott's well-funded team.  Royal broil  21:10, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

according to his page it was im just going by that anyway what should i remove/add to my infobox to get it used? i worked really hard on it BigPadresDUDE (talk) 21:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think that anything is broken - you're trying to fix something with no problem. I know you've worked real hard on it. Unfortunately, that's not a reason to make a huge number changes. I've worked hard on some things in here just to see it not get used. So why did you decide to fix this infobox? If you determined that the infobox needs a style change, then please figure out how to combine the style change with a way to make the infobox shorter. A longer infobox or one with less features is almost guaranteed to be opposed. The width of the infobox is fixed by a discussion at WikiProject Motorsport, our parent WikiProject, to allow consistency with drivers like Juan Pablo Montoya who have raced in multiple genres of motorsport and have numerous infoboxes.  Royal broil  21:53, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

i changed the template a little bit See User:BigPadresDUDE/Workspace For the revised version they are the final 2 templates and dramaticly smaller then my first proposal check em out and tell me what ya think BigPadresDUDE (talk) 22:16, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Moved the revised versions here BigPadresDUDE (talk) 22:33, 30 August 2009 (UTC)


 * No offense intended here BigPardes, but I'm going to have to agree with Royalbroil on this one. It seems to be more of a solution in search of a problem.  I admire the efforts you've made, and hopefully it's been very educational for you in regards to coding templates, but I'm not seeing a need here for these changes. — Ched :  ?  23:28, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

DAMNIT i suck BigPadresDUDE (talk) 00:54, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Can we alest use a few a the things i use in my infobox (minor changes) like the years active or awards at the bottom of the infobox? BigPadresDUDE (talk) 00:59, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You do not suck!!! I know what you mean, though. I bet I spent 50 to 100 hours on updating Alan Kulwicki's article after it became a Good Article, trying to get it up to Featured Article status. When I got there, everyone disagreed with everything about it. It's still not Featured. I did learn a lot and my work is much better now. I'd only support a change to the infobox if it resulted in the infobox getting shorter. I don't see how rearranging the awards section to the end helps or hurts anything. It's just different.  Royal broil  01:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

i tryed bunching some stuff up together to get it shorter but still have the info there did i do good? and what did i do ABSOULOUTE WRONG? BigPadresDUDE (talk) 01:50, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I think that the wins, Top 10s, and pole section already had the right balance - 2 lines used with no abbreviations. You didn't do anything absolutely wrong, you just didn't provide anything better than what existed (in my opinion). Please don't take it personally.  Royal broil  02:06, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

yeah man cool im gonna keep working and maybe one of my infoboxed will be used someday and if ya ever wanna change the infobox you can always come to me and im joining the project man BigPadresDUDE (talk) 02:13, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

John_Cohen_(NASCAR_owner)
Hi all. Since there are likely some experts on the subject matter, would you please chime in at this AFD? ArcAngel (talk) 22:23, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * It would be nice if more people showed up to comment on this issue. I have added some more research results in order to try and establish notability.  ArcAngel (talk) 07:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

GAN backlog reduction - Sports and recreation
As you may know, we currently have 400 good article nominations, with a large number of them being in the sports and recreation section. As such, the waiting time for this is especially long, much longer than it should be. As a result of this, I am asking each sports-related WikiProject to review two or three of these nominations. If this is abided by, then the backlog should be cleared quite quickly. Some projects nominate a lot but don't review, or vice-versa, and following this should help to provide a balance and make the waiting time much smaller so that our articles can actually get reviewed! Wizardman 23:39, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

2009 Sylvania 300
While the 2009 Sylvania 300 hasn't occurred yet (at least so far as I can tell), that hasn't stopped someone from starting an article that makes it sound as if it has already occurred. Anyone want to take this one on and make it look like an actual WP article, or should it just be deleted until the event is past? Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 04:21, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * And likewise for 2009 Dickies 500, created by the same editor. DH85868993 (talk) 04:27, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I've changed both articles to reflect both are in the future. ArcAngel (talk) 05:31, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Duplicate articles
I notice that we have both 2009 Crown Royal 400 and 2009 Crown Royal Presents the Russell Friedman 400 which appear to be duplicate articles about the same race. If that's the case, then obviously they should be merged. What's the preferred name for the merged article? DH85868993 (talk) 02:40, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

2008 Lifelock 400
I notice that we have 2008 Lifelock 400 (second 'l' lowercase) but we also have 2008 LifeLock 400 (second 'L' uppercase) which is a redirect to 2008 Camping World RV 400 presented by Coleman. Am I right in thinking that 2008 Lifelock 400 should actually be called "2008 LifeLock 400" and that neither one should redirect to 2008 Camping World RV 400 presented by Coleman? If so, then I'll ask an administrator to make the necessary changes. Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 03:09, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

List of Daytona 500 pole position winners
I have been working with User:Ched Davis to improve the article to become a Featured List candidate. There is no featured content under WikiProject NASCAR right now, just one failed FA candidate. We spent a lot of time improving the text in the article, but I've been feeling that the article is getting more and more off-topic for a list article. I recently had a peer review, and the reviewer suggested that most of the text might be best forked into a new article about the qualifying procedure for the Daytona 500. Ched suggested that the majority of the content could be used for a NASCAR qualifying article with a subsection on the special qualifying procedure used because of the special Twin qualifying races for the Daytona 500. So the questions are - Is the article on-topic? Is there too much detail about the qualifying procedure? Please comment at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Motorsport.  Royal broil  20:16, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia ad for WikiProject NASCAR
It would appear that there is no Wikipedia ad for this WikiProject. Is there anyone that would be interested in creating one? -- NerdyScienceDude :)  (click here to talk to me) 08:13, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll put it on my userpage if you create one. I'm probably one of the most visible people in the WikiProject.  Royal broil  12:48, 19 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I've been using a variation on this one, if anybody wants it. (FYI, it's the '50s Hudson Hornet.)  TREKphiler   any time you're ready, Uhura  14:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That Hudson Hornet image is missing its source. I have brought it up at Commons and it might have to be deleted. Sorry about that. I do see that the person who uploaded that image has done this before and has always changed to claiming that they took the picture themself. Would you put a border around the infobox? Right now the white on white doesn't show up. The best infobox is User_WP_NASCAR which adds you to WikiProject NASCAR!  Royal broil  23:17, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That Hudson Hornet image is missing its source. I have brought it up at Commons and it might have to be deleted. Sorry about that. I do see that the person who uploaded that image has done this before and has always changed to claiming that they took the picture themself. Would you put a border around the infobox? Right now the white on white doesn't show up. The best infobox is User_WP_NASCAR which adds you to WikiProject NASCAR!  Royal broil  23:17, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Photo finish
While I'm here, can somebody have a look at this? I'm getting an error message when I try to save (tho it appears to be saving correctly, somehow :/), & my contribution history says "adding email". (I have no idea where that's coming from...)  TREKphiler   any time you're ready, Uhura  14:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Are you sure that you should have restored it? It makes the article WAY too long and I can't work with it. Why isn't the motorsports people put into their own article with having a main link to that article? You must have added an email address when you restored the content. The "tag" gives some quick information to anyone watching the edit history. Often something like email address is added by vandals (obviously you aren't a vandal!). So this is an example of a false positive.  Royal broil  23:28, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 03:40, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed category mergers
FYI, I have proposed the following category mergers: Please add any thoughts you may have at the CfD page. Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 03:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Category:Heluva Good! Sour Cream Dips at The Glen to Category:Watkins Glen 220
 * Category:Subway Fresh Fit 500 to Category:Subway Fresh Fit 600
 * Category:Pepsi 500 to Category:Pepsi Max 400
 * Category:Chevy Rock & Roll 400 to Category:One Last Race to Make the Chase
 * Category:Crown Royal 400 to Category:Crown Royal Presents the Your Name Here 400
 * FYI, the discussion has expanded to include the whole NASCAR race category naming scheme, not just the 10 specific categories listed above. DH85868993 (talk) 22:57, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Jimmie Johnson
Excuse me everyone,but would you please go Talk:Jimmie Johnson and rate how the article is doing.Thank You.-Nascar1996 (talk) 00:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I moved this comment to the bottom of the talk page, that's where new comments go. There is very much to do to improve it. There is only a handful of references - I would expect the article to have around 60 references if it were a Good Article. You need to review every sentence and support it with a reference. Be very careful to use reliable sources like magazines, ESPN, NASCAR, possibly limited use of his official website as a last resort. You can combine a single source used in multiple sentences by using named references. Check out Alan Kulwicki if you want to see an excellent example. AK's article is probably ready for Featured Article consideration again and I might nominate it soon. The best thing for you to do would be to review other Good Articles so that you can see how it's done. Check out Alan Kulwicki, Tim Richmond, Mario Andretti, A. J. Foyt IV for examples. I think that the list of Johnson's wins is way too long and it should be removed from the article. Wikipedia is not a statistics database - rather it is an encyclopedia of sentences. His article is a MAJOR project well beyond anything that I have attempted.  Royal broil  03:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Race articles organization discussion
There's a new discussion about whether or not the NASCAR race articles should be sorted by track instead of by the current name since the names are constantly changing. The discussion is happening at Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_February_22 and you are welcome to put in your $0.02.  Royal broil  00:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Request input on AfD
I think that this deletion candidate might need some knowledgable eyes: Articles_for_deletion/Jordan_Anderson.Jarhed (talk) 18:29, 6 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi guys, thanks for all your useful input on this. The results were to delete the article.--Jarhed (talk) 08:40, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Why arn't top fives posted?
I noticed you guys post top tens, poles and wins for each nascar driver. Top fives are just as important if not more important than top tens. If you go on the nascar website they usually post poles, wins, top fives, top tens. In that order. Should be a stat posted for each driver. If you guys are going to just do wins and poles that is fine, but if you post top tens then you pretty much have to post top fives as well. It would be like if you post poles but not wins. It doesn't make any sense. Gforcebond (talk) 07:27, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * There are too many article to think about it now - I'm not going to spend any time on it. It would be overwhelming and there is almost no one here to do it beside myself. While I agree that it's important, it's not nearly as important as poles, wins, or Top 10s. It would no doubt take hundreds of hours to do all of the work. Besides, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a statistics database. If someone wants to look it up, then they can go to nascar.com or racing-reference.info.  Royal broil  13:51, 7 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Your attitude is horrible royalbroily, thank goodness the racing world has a very passionate person like yourself working on articles. You remind me of my buddy here: http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g250/vincestar/SouthParkWoWLoser.jpg

Thanks you, --Nascarfan1241 (talk) 00:17, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I never should have turned on my webcam that day (wink)! At least it was taken from my good side.  Royal broil  00:37, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, I completely understand it taking to long. I certainly don't have the time, but if anyone else has the time they can easily look up the stats for top fives on the nascar website here.

http://www.nascar.com/drivers/list/cup/dps/all_drivers_A.html

Gforcebond (talk) 19:21, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced living people articles bot
Okip  00:28, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * They are actually found at WikiProject NASCAR/Unreferenced BLPs.  Royal broil  04:42, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * thanks for fixing that earlier royalbroil :) Happy editing. Okip  00:28, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

List of NASCAR Sprint Cup Series last place finishers‎
List of NASCAR Sprint Cup Series last place finishers‎ has been nominated for deletion. Comment would be appreciated. --Falcadore (talk) 03:27, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Problems with 2009 season articles
Having quickly dashed through the collection of articles under 2009 in motorsport template, I have found the following articles do not mention who won the race/championship/title featured in the topic in the opening paragraph, or in the executive summary at the start of each of the articles.

The winner of these series or events is the most important detail of each as sporting events and they should all have this article included up top as a matter of logical writing for encylopedic content.

The list is:
 * 2009 NASCAR Mini Stock Series
 * 2009 NASCAR Nationwide Series

--Falcadore (talk) 03:21, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Sports Notability
There is discussion ongoing at Wikipedia_talk:BIO debating possible changes to the WP:ATHLETE notability guideline. As a result, some have suggested using WP:NSPORT as an eventual replacement for WP:ATHLETE. Editing has begun at WP:NSPORT, please participate to help refine the notability guideline for the sports covered by this wikiproject. —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 03:36, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Quick bio

 * From Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NASCAR/Standards which now redirects to WT:NASCAR. Airplaneman   ✈  Review? 03:11, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Way too many folks here are going rogue and are improperly editing articles. To help avoid this there is a new Quick Bio template available. --Hutcher (talk) 19:32, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons
The WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons (UBLPs) aims to reduce the number of unreferenced biographical articles to under 30,000 by June 1, primarily by enabling WikiProjects to easily identify UBLP articles in their project's scope. There were over 52,000 unreferenced BLPs in January 2010 and this has been reduced to 32,665 as of May 16. A bot is now running daily to compile a list of all articles that are in both Category:All unreferenced BLPs and have been tagged by a WikiProject. Note that the bot does NOT place unreferenced tags or assign articles to projects - this has been done by others previously - it just compiles a list.

Your Project's list can be found at WikiProject NASCAR/Unreferenced BLPs. As of May 17 you only have approximately 39 articles to be referenced, a 2.5% reduction from last week. The list of all other WikiProject UBLPs can be found at WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons/WikiProjects.

Your assistance in reviewing and referencing these articles is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please don't hestitate to ask either at WT:URBLP or at my talk page. Thanks, The-Pope (talk) 17:28, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It's went from 59 in mid March to 39 now. I've been working on it.  Royal broil  00:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Category:NASCAR races at ...
As User:Mike Selinker commented here, each "Category:NASCAR races at ..." is a subcategory of Category:NASCAR Sprint Cup Series races and only includes articles on Cup races. What should we do with the articles on other NASCAR races? If we put them in the respective "Category:NASCAR races at ...", then I think that the latter should be moved to a new Category:NASCAR races by track, which would be a subcategory of Category:NASCAR tracks and Category:NASCAR races. --NaBUru38 (talk) 23:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Should add Nationwide & Truck races into the Category:NASCAR races at ... Then do as suggested, move the tree to under Category:NASCAR tracks and Category:NASCAR races.  Royal broil  12:04, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Creation of New Lists
Wouldn't it make NASCAR lists better if we split List of NASCAR champions to List of Sprint Cup Series Champions, List of Nationwide Series Champions, and List of Camping World Truck Series Champions? I would like as many to comment on this as possible. -- Nascar 1996  (sign) 00:13, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I support for 3 reasons. 1) The lists are fairly long. 2) Then we could wikilink into the exact right article for the topic instead of a general article for all 3 articles. 3) then we could have analysis of the champions in each series.  Royal broil  04:50, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I am trying to improve NASCAR related article like someone did to the Formula One article. If I'm going to do it I will try to get it up to Featured List status. -- Nascar 1996  (sign) 04:53, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Category deletion discussion
There is a deletion discussion about how someone created a category system for grouping races by the manufacturer type (Chevy, Toyota, etc.) of the car driven by the winner. You can give your opinion here.  Royal broil  12:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC)