Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics/Key articles

Great effort. Articles already in Version 0.5: Good work! NCursework 11:36, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Quantum mechanics
 * Physics

Ordering
This could expand into a large list. We may have to sort it by alphabetical order or by topic? Zarniwoot 11:49, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


 * How do you mean topic? Insid physics? I think alphabetical order is enough. Because in reviewing nominations we have just physics topic and not any subtopic. NCursework 11:52, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I just tried too keep the possibilities open. It would be more difficult to divide into subtopics (eg. electromagnetism, particle physics, mechanics etc), so I think alphapetical order is better too. Zarniwoot 12:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I actually would like to order by subject. This will be a long list, and it will come naturally to physicists to order things by category.  Once the list is a little longer, I will think about what those should be&mdash;probably the same way that physics stubs are sorted&mdash;and organize the list. -- SCZenz 20:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Something WikiProject Tropical cyclones, among other WikiProjects, found manageable was to add an assessment parameter to a WikiProject banner, similar to . For example, you can see how Talk:Hurricane Floyd contains, which feeds it into Category:Tropical cyclone articles by quality, which is then processed by Mathbot to produce an assessment table, an assessment summary, and an assessment log. Mathbot then automatically sorts the list by quality grade, then by alphabetical order. Tito xd (?!? - help us) 07:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think there will be much interest in this in WikiProject physics. First because experts in physics tend to be more interested in adding new content than in organizing old content or improving elementary articles; second because there are far more physics articles than tropical cyclone articles, so the effort would be large.  However, once we have a list of key physics articles (the current one is woefully incomplete) perhaps we can look at organizing this. -- SCZenz 08:04, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Nevertheless, I have modified so that it has this capability.  I will probably (slowly!) start applying it. -- SCZenz 09:18, 2 June 2006 (UTC)