Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics/Archive 47

Good article reassessment for Monarchies in the Americas
Monarchies in the Americas has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:44, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Alessandro Orsini (sociologist)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Alessandro Orsini (sociologist) that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Left and right wing extremes
Left, and right wings are often extremes in certain fields, and often some fields are attributed to left or right wing policy, which is ridiculous. Why left wing politics is typically presented as anarchism and right wing policy is presented as fascism? In Europe, you can notice that some right wing media want to present left wing policy as supporting illegal migration to European Union while right wing policy is presented by left wing media as discrimination for other nations. Why we simply can't have strong external borders without illegal migration like 50 years ago, and open "borders" in Europe (Schengen)? Eurohunter (talk) 13:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:2022–2023 Belarusian and Russian partisan movement
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2022–2023 Belarusian and Russian partisan movement that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:China's peace plan
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:China's peace plan that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:New Democrats
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:New Democrats that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:34, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Michael Protzman
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/12/22/magazine/michael-protzman-death.html suggests that Michael Protzman would be a viable subject for an article. His name is mentioned in multiple articles already. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:56, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Capitalist Party
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Capitalist Party that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 01:04, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Constitution of New Jersey
Constitution of New Jersey has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Titling discussion at Talk:Mass killings under communist regimes
Link: Talk:Mass killings under communist regimes. George Ho (talk) 06:47, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:John Coburn (judge)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:John Coburn (judge) that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Vilma Santos-Recto
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Vilma Santos-Recto that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Requesting input, concerning the Australian governor-general
Seeing input for this discussion. -- GoodDay (talk) 04:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Request for Comment at Talk:2020 United States Senate election in Maine
A request for comment on creating a localized exception to the five percent rule has been opened at Talk:2020 United States Senate election in Maine. As this is an article under the scope of this WikiProject, all editors are invited to comment. Toa Nidhiki05 20:51, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Verifiability dispute at Talk:Right-wing populism
A neutral review would be appreciated on a dispute on historical-comparative content at right-wing populism over verifiability: whether the editor has met WP:Burden (or if WP:V has been correctly applied I suppose?) after I for failing WP:Verifiability. (WP:3O told me to ask a WikiProject, but note that the facts and sources themselves are not being challenged at this point -- this is WP:V.) SamuelRiv (talk) 23:24, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Task Force proposal
I would like to propose a task force for preparing pages for deaths of political figures. I got the idea from Wikipedia talk:In the news. This could function like WikiProject British Royalty/Operation London Bridge task force. If anybody has any questions, ideas or name proposals please reply. A.FLOCK (talk) 13:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Getting the category name right
Hello. A few countries have (or had) a consultative body made up of traditional chiefs (which are not upper houses of a legislature). It would be good to have them all in a category, but I was struggling to decide what it should be called. Perhaps something like Category:Traditional consultative bodies?

The ones I can think of are: Cheers, Number   5  7  02:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Council of Chiefs (Nauru)
 * Council of Iroij (Marshall Islands)
 * Council of Traditional Leaders (Namibia)
 * Great Council of Chiefs (Fiji)
 * House of Ariki (Cook Islands)
 * Malvatu Mauri (Vanuatu)
 * National House of Traditional Leaders (South Africa)
 * Ntlo ya Dikgosi (Botswana)
 * Traditional Councils in the Yap State
 * Zimbabwe Council of Chiefs (I am not sure this one is really consultative though)

Clarification on categories named similarly to Category:Russian nationalists - "nationalists from Russia" or "adherents of Russian nationalism"?
I've seen some categories named similarly to this that seem a bit ambiguous, such as Category:Ukrainian fascists and would like some clarification. Namely, does this category, and by extension similarly named categories, refer to "fascists from Ukraine" or "adherents of Ukrainian nationalist fascism"? While there is significant overlap between those groups, they should not be treated as one in the same. Pavel Gubarev is a good example, being a Russian nationalist fascist from Ukraine. Should he be placed in Category:Russian fascists or Category:Ukrainian fascists? I'd say that the "adherents of Ukrainian nationalist fascism" or "adherents of Russian nationalism" interpretation would make more sense, but it would be useful to have explicit clarification on this subject. Arctic Circle System (talk) 02:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Political international
I've tagged numerous problems at the Political international article, and some feedback at Talk would be good. The main problem is that it seems to be original research from beginning to end. I'm not even sure there's a notable topic behind it, as initial searches were not fruitful. Lots more details at the discussion I started. Normally, I'd ping a few of the top editors or recent ones but no one stood out, it just kind of grew slowly from a lot of editors over time. Ironically, purely from the tags I added just now, I'm already the #2 editor at the article. So, I'm bringing it here instead, in case anyone is interested. If not, I'll probably take it to WP:Afd after a week or so, but if there's a real topic there, I hope someone can rescue the article. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 02:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Norwegian nationalism Request
I'm Requesting that the article on Norwegian nationalism be added to WikiProject Politics, Thank you Zyxrq (talk) 06:12, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:2024 Jerusalem mayoral election
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 Jerusalem mayoral election that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Belarusian and Russian partisan movement (2022–present)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Belarusian and Russian partisan movement (2022–present) that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. voorts (talk/contributions) 04:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Removing political position from infobox
Does anyone know why a user would make more than a dozen edits removing the political position from the pages of US political parties and put "Longstanding consensus not to include political positions for the democratic or republican parties" in their edit summary?

For reference, see [|this edit here]. skarz (talk) 16:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)


 * It's true that both the Republican and Democratic main articles don't include political positions per consensus – so they're right about that, at least. I'm not aware of any consensus that it applies to affiliated parties, however. I'd assume they're good faith in that they think it applies to affiliates, but I'm unsure if it actually does. — Czello (music) 16:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I should have been more specific - they didn't remove it from the body of the article but the infobox template on the side. skarz (talk) 16:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * AFAIK, the consensus to exclude from the infoboxes, covers only the federal political parties. GoodDay (talk) 16:53, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Not going to read the massive wall of text but it would appear at a surface level that you are right. skarz (talk) 17:02, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello, sorry everyone, I was the editor that started removing it. I now understand that it may not be included in the specific consensus I was talking about. I was worried it left open an area of potential bias. For example most state level democratic parties that have positions listed, put democratic state parties as center to center-left, however most state level republican parties that have positions listed put it as right-wing and far-right, and I'm worried it could be used to frame the republican party as a fascist or a neo-fascist style party. Thats all. My intentions were good! Sorry for the intrusion everyone.
 * That's highly problematic putting any Democratic state party as centre or centre-left. By global standards they are far from. By global standards they are clearly neo-liberal/capitalist, which would put them on the right (centrist at best). Note: being progressive on individual issues is not a particularly left-right stance. TarnishedPath<b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b> 08:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Why is an Australian applying global standard to American politics? skarz (talk) 15:36, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Because people other than Americans read Wikipedia and would want a reference point to what they know? <b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b><b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b> 05:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I can't seem to find anything suggesting that the English Wikipedia writes articles specifically about American politics from a global perspective. Can you show me something I can read on that topic? WP:NPOV, WP:PG, and WP:MONDIAL are no help. skarz (talk) 05:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Michael the Brave
Michael the Brave has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. &#126;~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

British MPs infoboxes
Why have latest election results been added to infoboxes of current British MPs, right underneath when they took their seat? GoodDay (talk) 05:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

The parameter is also in the infoboxes of current members of the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Parliament & Northern Ireland Assembly. GoodDay (talk) 06:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Swedish Senior Citizen Interest Party
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Swedish Senior Citizen Interest Party that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:18, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

FAR for unification of Germany
User:Buidhe has nominated Unification of Germany for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Adding Advocacy campaigns section to Global Strategy Group article
Hello, I'm an employee at the political consulting firm Global Strategy Group. I recently posted an edit request to the GSG Talk page asking editors to consider adding an Advocacy campaigns section to the article. As currently constructed, the article has plenty of information about GSG's electoral and corporate work, but not much about the polling, research, and communications work it has done on social and political issues like gun safety, abortion access, and criminal justice reform. If that topic sounds interesting to you, please take a look at my request on the GSG Talk page. (Link here.) I've done my best to write a section draft that aligns with Wikipedia's content guidelines, but I'm willing to take direction from independent editors, if they believe the draft can be improved upon.

Thank you, ES at Global Strategy Group (talk) 20:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Zog I of Albania
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Zog I of Albania that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 01:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Progressive Party (United States, 1912–1920)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Progressive Party (United States, 1912–1920) that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Remsense 诉  01:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:2024 Haitian jailbreak
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 Haitian jailbreak that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:2024 Philippine political crisis
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 Philippine political crisis that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. CMD (talk) 10:17, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Liberal Unification Party
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Liberal Unification Party that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Libertarian conservatism
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Libertarian conservatism that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.  ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   17:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Deletion nomination for Category:American politicians who are the sole member of their party in statewide office
I am commenting to appeal for Keep votes on this deletion entry for Category:American politicians who are the sole member of their party in statewide office. I believe it is an extremely obvious measure of the unique identity of politicians who are incentivized to be "mavericks," as well as electoral geography and power balance. Much of the reasoning for deletion relies on the nominator's as-yet unsourced insistence that categories must permanently apply to pages, rather than be subject to current events or changes in employment, like elections. Others have simply declared this plainly unique status to be non-defining. The Delete voters have been largely unresponsive, and even when they do respond, have been argumentatively selective and engage in sophistry. Thank you very much for your consideration. 1Matt20 (talk) 18:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:The Great Wealth Transfer (United States)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:The Great Wealth Transfer (United States) that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Simon_Ekpa
More views welcome. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:09, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Global Strategy Group Advocacy campaigns section
Hello, I work at the political consulting firm Global Strategy Group. I'm visiting this WikiProject because it's listed at the top of the GSG Talk page. I'm hoping an editor here is available to review an edit request I placed in early March. I've been struggling mightily to find someone to take a look at it, so I would deeply appreciate anyone who takes the time.

In my request, which you can view here, I'm proposing a new Advocacy campaigns section for the article. This section covers GSG's work on social and political issues like gun safety, abortion access, and criminal justice reform. This aspect of the firm's business has been covered pretty extensively in the press, but it's not mentioned in the article at all. I'm making an effort to fix that, but given that I have a conflict of interest, I need oversight and possibly some constructive criticism from the independent editing community.

If anyone has questions or feedback, please reply to my request on the GSG Talk page. Thanks! ES at Global Strategy Group (talk) 12:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Rfc Request
I have request RfC on inclusion of -elect official into List of president/vice president/prime minister. Anyone interested can give their comments. Ckfasdf (talk) 02:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Samajbadi Morcha, Nepal
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Samajbadi Morcha, Nepal that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 20:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Need help with creating a consensus
About 2 months ago, I made an RFC at Talk:Somalia. After a slow RFC after which the opinion remained split, nothing happened. Owing to a recent edit war regarding the image, I am posting this here for further input so this issue can be put to bed. Fantastic Mr. Fox (talk) 20:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Weaponization of antisemitism
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Weaponization of antisemitism that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:2023 Georgian protests
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2023 Georgian protests that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:American politicians who are the most recent member of their party to hold statewide office has been nominated for discussion
Category:American politicians who are the most recent member of their party to hold statewide office has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 1Matt20 (talk) 16:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Martyr (politics) nominated for deeletion
Martyr (politics) has been nominated for deletion. The discussion is at Articles for deletion/Martyr (politics). There has been very little discussion, and it has been relisted several times. Scolaire (talk) 13:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Compliance requirements
Compliance requirements has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster  (trout me!)  10:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

FAR for 1880 Republican National Convention
I have nominated 1880 Republican National Convention for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 18:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:DOMOV
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:DOMOV that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 04:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Mideeye
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Mideeye that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 14:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Merge discussion at Talk:Political_party_committee
Hi all, I started a merge discussion for Political party committees and Hill committees that may be of interest to members of this Wikiproject. Thank you! Eventhisacronym (talk) 14:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Election denial movement in the United States
is not of low importance, as currently categorized

it is the Big Lie that is of vital importance and must be categorized accordingly soibangla (talk) 05:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:2023 Bud Light boycott
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2023 Bud Light boycott that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

British politics question
Hello, I had a question considering the UK general election has just been called today.

Currently there is an article called Labour Party leadership of Keir Starmer which details Starmer's time as the Leader of the party so far. However, all prime ministers have a 'Premiership of __' article. If Starmer does become the next prime minister (which looks likely), what should happen to the 'leadership' article? Should it be merged into the 'Premiership' article or kept separate as an article on his time in opposition? It is already quite long as it is. Thanks Michaeldble (talk) 21:39, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Infobox key positions parameter
I've noticed that a new convention has formed regarding the ideology parameter, which is to only put one or two all-encompassing ideologies (see Labour Party (UK)). It used to be the case that the ideology parameter had five or so more specific entries that gave the reader a good impression of the party at a glance (see Bharatiya Janata Party).

In light of this, I think there should be a 'key positions' parameter which has, say maximum five entries which editors agree on, including regarding their order, and they would be based on citations from recent academia. The policy on this could distinguish between social, economic, national, and international positions to ensure a wide coverage. A national one could be say Unionism for a UK party, and an international one could be Euroscepticism for a European party. Alexanderkowal (talk) 13:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Tupocracy
Article is as much publicity for a BLP as anything else. And promoting Nigeria. This article Making Positive Impact in Leadership through Tupocracy: A Case Study of the Leadership Style of the Lord Jesus Chris by the creator of the idea was published in what appears to be predatory journal: I'm not sure what to do with it but it's a mess. Doug Weller talk 08:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Honestly it could go straight to AfD. It appears to be a non-notable ideology promoted in a non-notable dissertation and then published into a non-notable book. Disproportionate weight for one individual's personal theory which hasn't received substaintal recognition outside of his own writings. — <i style="color:#8000FF">Czello</i> (<i style="color:#8000FF">music</i>) 09:05, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Czello If there is a book. Ok. Doug Weller  talk 10:17, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, is there a book? In the Gateway Echo in 2020, a book called "Tupocracy: Leadership by example for the Church and Civil society" is described, with special mention of a 4th edition in 2018. But I can't find it actually for sale anywhere, or find the publisher, or an ISBN. Can anybody help? I'd like to AfD Tupocracy, but knowing about the book would be helpful. Does it exist? Is it self-published? Does it have an ISBN? Bishonen &#124; tålk 15:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC).
 * I'm talking about the book that's mentioned in the article, here. I wasn't aware of the one you mentioned – so there are at least two. Both are written by the man who coined the term, though, so I'm not sure it improves notability. — <i style="color:#8000FF">Czello</i> (<i style="color:#8000FF">music</i>) 17:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Bish’s book Bighand International. Doug Weller  talk 17:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I could only find one mention.. So something very minor in Nigeria and not reliably published. Doug Weller  talk 17:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks. It's a pity BigHands International doesn't have any web presence. I'm also going to ping, who has analyzed similar articles in recent AfDs, here, here and here. Bishonen &#124; tålk 18:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC).
 * Thanks for the ping. I'll find time to take a look at it. Piscili (talk) 14:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Request input on comparative government topic: Creating 'branches of government' to de-clutter 'separation of powers'
Hi!

'Branches of government' is currently a redirect to separation of powers. I think readers and editors would be better served by the development of 'branches of government' (or a similarly named article) as a separate topic.

A descriptive, empirical taxonomy of institutional divisions of different countries' governments is a worthwhile endeavor in comparative government. But it is such a large topic on its own that it seriously unbalances and unduly lengthens the article on separation of powers. I would like to re-focus the latter article on the principle propounded by political philosophers, its reception by constitutions, and its technical implementation in constitutional law.

Of course, the principle of separating powers is the reason for the existence of different arms of government; but I think the two subjects need to be notionally distinguished. All the more so since their conflation is, to my mind, at the root of the poor quality (start class) of the 'separation of powers' article.

There is certainly a lot of interest in the institutional structure and in branches of government as a topic—just see the recent AfC request for a separate 'executive branch of the United States federal government' article. I think 'branches of government' is definitely deserving and capable of being its own article.

What do you think? I'd be glad of your input on my proposal (at the separation of powers talk page). §§ LegFun §§ talk §§ 21:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Officeholder tables
Hello, I'd be interested in hearing your opinions concerning officeholder tables. There is some difference of opinion concerning placement of elections in tables. As I see it, tables should follow a logical structure. Going from most common/important information to least common/important information, to allow readers to consistency across all officeholder tables. Across all officeholder tables you can expect the central information of NAME and some type of DATES. This is in principale the only information needed, everything else is used to expand and explain these two pieces of information. All political tables will include political party, and only some of them will include elections. Hence it makes sense to have the layout follow this logic. Otherwise, you end up with pages like List of presidents of the Dominican Republic, List of heads of state of Ghana and List of heads of state of Sierra Leone, where every table changes layout from the pervious. With inconsistency across all officeholder tables. has a different opinion, but I will let him make his own points. I look forward to hearing your opinions. Skjoldbro (talk) 09:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Peterborough (UK Parliament constituency)
Peterborough (UK Parliament constituency) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 00:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Alice Guo
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Alice Guo that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. HueMan1 (talk) 10:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Input requested Category:Assassinated politicians by political orientation
Hello. There is a discussion about a merging proposal of Category:Assassinated politicians by political orientation and its subcategories. It is at Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 28. Your input is most welcome. Regards,

Requested move at Talk:Tungipara Sheikh family
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Tungipara Sheikh family that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Edits! Talk! 00:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Timeline of the Donald Trump presidency
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Timeline of the Donald Trump presidency that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Edits! Talk! 04:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Prosecution of Donald Trump in New York
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Prosecution of Donald Trump in New York that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:2024 Taiwanese legislative reform protests
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 Taiwanese legislative reform protests that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 12:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:NewLabour Party (New Zealand)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:NewLabour Party (New Zealand) that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Edits! Talk! 17:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Infobox legislative election suggested edit
Hi editors. I have started a discussion at Template talk:Infobox legislative election, suggesting an edit that would allow any page using Template:Infobox legislative election for a future election to say "seats at dissolution" or list the number of seats won at the last election when the "ongoing" parameter in the template is set to "yes". -- T<small style="font-size:60%;">ed E<small style="font-size:60%;">dwards  18:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Superpower
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Superpower that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Edits! Talk! 20:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Filip Turek (racing driver)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Filip Turek (racing driver) that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Edits! Talk! 02:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:George Floyd Square
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:George Floyd Square that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Edits! Talk! 02:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:2024 Oregon House of Representatives election
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 Oregon House of Representatives election that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Edits! Talk! 14:57, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:BRICS
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:BRICS that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:35, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:2024 Bolivian coup d'état attempt
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 Bolivian coup d'état attempt that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Request for review: Transparency International e.V. – insufficient sources / questionable allegations
On the English Transparency International e.V. wiki talk page I have flagged unverified claims and questionable allegations against a living person. I am now writing here, as unfortunately no review of this section has happened during the last months, and I am hoping that someone from this Wiki Project has the interest and the resources to take a look at it. Kind regards Transparency 24 (talk) 10:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

== Talk:United States has an RfC on the topic: foreign relations with developing countries ==

Talk:United States has an RfC. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. The previous one was closed due to it being too combative and not inducive to discussion. Thank you. Alexanderkowal (talk) 09:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Help with Comstock Act Page
The Comstock Act is in the news (with regards to mifepristone and abortion) (and listed as a top page right now) but the page needs a lot of help! It is very contentious and it would be VERY helpful to have some editors participate! Shaftesbury&#39;sPipe (talk) 17:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

National Rally has an RfC
National Rally has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Vacant0 (talk) 13:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Requesting assistance editing Ohio State University protest article.
I recently created an article detailing the college protests at Ohio State University. After this article was made extended-protected, I lost my ability to edit the article because I do not have EP permissions. Substantial details are missing from this article, so until I regain my permissions, I have been adding suggestions to the talk page of this article. But no one has been implementing my suggestions on the talk page, despite the fact they are supported by multiple sources and add significant missing details from the article.

If members of this community could please visit the talk page of this article and implement my requested changes, this would be deeply appreciated. Thank you! Onlineone22 (talk) 19:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)