Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Protected areas/Archive 7

GA nomination of Arlington's Great Meadows
The article Arlington's Great Meadows nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Arlington's Great Meadows for things which need to be addressed.

I'm posting this notice here because this article is covered under WikiProject Protected areas, but the nominator has not been active on Wikipedia for two months. epicgenius (talk) 22:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Dierssen Wildlife Management Area listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Dierssen Wildlife Management Area to be moved to Dierrsen Wildlife Management Area. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:50, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

World Heritage Site listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for World Heritage Site to be moved to World Heritage site. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:45, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Queen's Commonwealth Canopy
I am developing the article Queen's Commonwealth Canopy and I imagine it should be linked to this project. Could someone put the project tag on the talk page, please? Cheers,  Tony Holkham   (Talk)  15:38, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Čistiny listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Čistiny to be moved to Siance. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 03:48, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Bents Basin State Recreation Area listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Bents Basin State Recreation Area to be moved to Bents Basin State Conservation Area. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 17:16, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Bents Basin State Conservation Area listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Bents Basin State Conservation Area to be moved to Bents Basin State Conservation Area. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 14:30, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template Transclude lead excerpt.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you. &mdash; The Transhumanist  11:00, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Punta Izopo Wildlife Refuge listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Punta Izopo Wildlife Refuge to be moved to Punta Izopo National Park. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 07:45, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

IP editor removing project templates?
Hello Special:Contributions/107.77.209.135 is removing your project template from select articles. In at least one case, this template was placed by a bot based on membership in a "Protected areas of..." category. Were you aware of these changes? -- DanielPenfield (talk) 10:18, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I just noticed this as well. I hoped to see an explanation here. This was today's ip Special:Contributions/107.77.206.230. Rmhermen (talk) 03:51, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * And Special:Contributions/107.77.207.41 on June 18 and 19 moving articles from this project to WP:Historic sites. I am leaning to rapid reverting these. I hope the IP communicates with us. Rmhermen (talk) 04:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Probably Special:Contributions/107.77.208.216 as well. Although items are more debatable. Rmhermen (talk) 04:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi everyone, User talk:107.77.207.41 placed the following message on my talk page in response to a message I placed on their talk page.Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 09:50, 21 June 2018 (UTC)"Hi Cowdy, Sorry I didn't see you reverted that edit on Category:Historical reserves of the Northern Territory or I would have let it be. The reason I changed it is because WikiProject Protected areas and Category:Protected areas are for environmentally protected areas while Wikipedia:WikiProject Historic sites amd Category:Historic preservation cover historically protected areas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.206.230 (talk) 04:18, 21 June 2018 (UTC)"

Alishan National Scenic Area listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Alishan National Scenic Area to be moved to Alishan (disambiguation). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 07:16, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Pleistocene Park size
I wanted to inform you that the Pleistocene Park size is 16 km², not 160 km². In the official site, they clearly say that it's a 16 km² territory. They also say that it's a 20 km² (I think approximately) in the Indiegogo campaign. So it's 16 km², not 160. But this user keeps changing the size to 160, stating that 16 km² is only the size of the fence, but the park is actually 160 km², but she's wrong, because the area inside the fence IS the park. There is no area outside the 16 km² fence that is part of the park. I can't correct it so please tell her to stop. I tried to contact her telling her to show me some evidence that the park is actually 160 km², but she doesn't reply and just keeps changing the size.--Supremo (talk) 01:11, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Bryher, Isles of Scilly listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Bryher, Isles of Scilly to be moved to Bryher. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 07:31, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Kadisha Valley listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Kadisha Valley to be moved to Holy Valley. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 12:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Bay City State Park listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Bay City State Park to be moved to Bay City State Park. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:45, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
 * Done. Rmhermen (talk) 07:53, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Bay City State Park listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Bay City State Park to be moved to Bay City State Park. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 08:00, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

World Heritage site listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for World Heritage site to be moved to World Heritage Site. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:17, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Coquet Island, England listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Coquet Island, England to be moved to Coquet Island. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 14:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Skomer listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Skomer to be moved to Skomer Island. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:46, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

World Heritage Site listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for World Heritage Site to be moved to World Heritage site. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:02, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Noss listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Noss to be moved to Isle of Noss. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:02, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Database searches for Protected Areas
I am compiling a list of ways to search if an area is designated (based on IUCN designation). The databases are not always easy to navigate, so I am putting these links here to make it easier. Maybe there is a better place to put this, or maybe this list already exists? For data basin, to find a new state I used Google with search terms: protected areas in [state] iucn data basin --David Tornheim (talk) 02:11, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Tanzania in Protected Planet
 * United States in Protected Planet
 * Utah in Data Basin
 * Idaho in Data Basin
 * Arizona in Data Basin
 * Washington in Data Basin
 * Virginia in Data Basin
 * Maryland in Data Basin
 * Eastern U.S. in Data Basin
 * Australia in Data Basin
 * Great list for resources, thanks! Funandtrvl (talk) 23:05, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

IUCN designations removed from 11 articles
An IP deleted the IUCN designations on 11 protected areas: Special:Contributions/107.77.209.97. I rolled back all those edits yesterday, as I do not believe a reliable source is required for the IUCN designated category. agrees. . Another IP showed up and removed them again insisting they could not be restored without a source: Special:Contributions/75.121.59.128. Can someone with more experience with the IUCN designations please revert the new IP to restore the IUCN designations? I do not want to be accused of edit-warring. --David Tornheim (talk) 09:37, 28 December 2018 (UTC) It looks like there is yet another IP editor who is deleted IUCN designations: Special:Contributions/107.77.209.181. But some edits by this user are properly referenced. I reverted most of those (except the one about a historic house which I think would not qualify) with a note saying to look here. --David Tornheim (talk) 11:05, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Two more IP editors doing the same: Special:Contributions/107.77.206.83 and Special:Contributions/2600:387:B:9:0:0:0:AE. I have not reverted any, but I agree with you, unless someone can support to the contrary. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 14:22, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * And another [107.77.209.208]. If the IP find it in the Protected Planet, they add the ref; if not, they delete it.  I have been trying to add refs for those that I find in Data Basin that are not in Protected Planet, rather than mass reverting the IP's deletions as before.  Some areas like Minidoka National Historic Site are in neither database.  Some areas that are in Data Basin, such as Sawtooth National Forest come up as "unassigned".  I am not sure what that means.  It's also not clear to me why the two databases give different results.
 * Maybe I should call one of these parks and see what they know. --David Tornheim (talk) 23:50, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Based off a quick look IUCN's Guidelines for Applying Protected Areas Management Categories it seems that it is upon the individual/organization to apply the categories to a given protected area (also defined within). That category will not appear in a database until an agency reports it to IUCN, but it appears that lack of reporting or assignment of a category does not exclude a protected area from having a category.
 * And honestly, having worked for U.S. land management agencies, I doubt if anyone, or at least the vast majority of people, at most parks would have any idea what you're talking about if you bring up IUCN categories. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 00:14, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for looking that up. This still seems to be an unanswered question on what is best to do.  Maybe we could add a parameter that says, "unofficial designation", so the nitpickers are satisfied?  It seems we could use a bigger discussion on how to handle this.
 * Also, I did find that the "iucn" parameters are not universal among the info box templates, e.g. and .  I raised the issue at Template_talk:Infobox_Australian_place.
 * I am not sure how best to handle this example: Death Valley here which uses the .  I don't know if my edit here was an improvement or not--it's not clear whether this parameter should be used with areas that are completely subsumed by an iucn protected area or not. Any thoughts on these other issues?  --David Tornheim (talk) 04:03, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree that what we should do with protected areas without official designations is not clear. In the case of Death Valley, that article is about the valley itself and not the park per se. There is a separate Death Valley National Park article. Death Valley (the valley itself) is a feature within a protected area, so I think we should keep the IUCN categories and other protected area-type tags on the pages about the protected area itself. The same would apply for geologic, historic, recreation, etc. features of other protected areas (as on Saint Mary Lake, Zion Lodge, Lake Solitude Trail). If there are not separate pages for a specific feature and a protected area then the IUCN category should be on that page (e.g. Mount Ararat). Looking at how the Australian Place infobox is used, that certainly should have an IUCN parameter, but I don't know if it's necessary for the geological infoboxes to have them. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 16:25, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback. --David Tornheim (talk) 23:16, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Any thoughts on this discussion? --David Tornheim (talk) 23:12, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

UK SSSI lists needing updates - references changed
It looks as if the URLs for Natural England's information on SSSIs have all changed - see discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_UK_geography, to keep the discussion in one place. Pam D  12:25, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

WP 1.0 Bot Beta
Hello! Your WikiProject has been selected to participate in the WP 1.0 Bot rewrite beta. This means that, starting in the next few days or weeks, your assessment tables will be updated using code in the new bot, codenamed Lucky. You can read more about this change on the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team page. Thanks! audiodude (talk) 06:48, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Thaidene Nene National Park Reserve listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Thaidene Nene National Park Reserve to be moved to Thaidene Nëné National Park Reserve. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:16, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A new newsletter directory is out!
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
 * – Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

List of national lakeshores and seashores of the United States
I have nominated this to be a featured list at Featured list candidates/List of national lakeshores and seashores of the United States/archive1. Any comments would be appreciated. and, I know you've contributed to this and other NPS articles. Thanks! Reywas92Talk 20:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

List of national memorials of the United States
This article is up for review at Featured list candidates/List of national memorials of the United States/archive1. Comments would be appreciated. Thanks, Reywas92Talk 22:51, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Shasta–Trinity National Forest listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Shasta–Trinity National Forest to be moved to Shasta-Trinity National Forest. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 16:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Noss listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Noss to be moved to Isle of Noss. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 17:46, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Bad articles
Hi there, I have been checking out your project articles ... two very long articles stand out. First off, Pleistocene Park: at first I saw that the lead had some text referenced to Facebook, Blogs and YouTube as sources, thought I'd get rid of that, but on closer inspection the entire article is largely sourced from Facebook: it's a shame, as it's a very interesting article, but unfixable regarding sourcing.

Then Tapiche Reserve in Peru: I first noticed a South American species of tree I was working on was listed in that article and though it might have useful info, but the article is misleading and completely un-sourced. As far as I can tell this is a commercial ecolodge, the "native village" in the picture are the tourist accommodations, calling it a "private conservation property" is cute, but in that sense Disneyland is a "paediatric recreation property" and McDonalds is a "gastronomic facilitation franchise" or whatever. Any ecolodge owner can market his property as a "private conservation property". Nothing relevant is sourced, and the text is full of useless external links. As far as some digging on the interwebs shows, the entire thing was written by one Amy H from Minneapolis, who booked a vacation at the facility in 2011 and was well impressed, writing a glowing recommendation on TripAdvisor. This got her in contact with the owner of the property, one Murilo Reis. She also got a Wikipedia account specifically to write that enormous puff piece. I must assume that all the pictures and information here on Wikipedia regarding species inventories, etc... was privately sent to Amy by the owner, Reis, as the information appears unique to the Wikipedia article and in no way can anyone take all those animal pictures and determine all those species in a trip of a few days. It may, and probably is, mostly true, but in no way verifiable. A shame again, because building species distributions from local species inventories is what I do, and I always try to list parks where the species I am working on are protected/can be viewed, but I can only use hard data. This lodge must be something really special, especially tour guide Katoo -a big hit with all the tourists (and there is much to said for retaining the article in reduced form), because looking around on Wikipedia I see links advertising its existence have been added to the articles Iquitos, rainforest and Peruvian Amazon - the one to Iquitos was removed, but someone added the section Iquitos in 2014 to include a glowing recommendation (and complain about the locals' habits regarding trash)... thing is that this facility is 400km away from the city, there are a number of real national parks much closer (someone added Allpahuayo-Mishana National Reserve later), and all the information in that article can only be sourced back to Amy H's edits from 2011 onward. I suppose the only reason it is mentioned in the Iquitos article at all is that most foreign lodge guests must travel via the Iquitos airport to get to the location.

I leave the Pleistocene Park stuff to you all. But would appreciate some feedback regarding Tapiche Reserve. Shall I just delete everything un-sourced? Am I being too harsh? I will ping a Peruvian member of your group:

Regards, Leo Breman (talk) 22:44, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Akaishi Keiryū Anmon no Taki Prefectural Natural Park listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Akaishi Keiryū Anmon no Taki Prefectural Natural Park to be moved to Tsugaru Shirakami Prefectural Natural Park. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:17, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Nomination of Portal:Antarctica for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Antarctica is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Antarctica until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 01:21, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Bazaruto National Park listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Bazaruto National Park to be moved to Bazaruto Archipelago National Park. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Nyungwe Forest listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Nyungwe Forest to be moved to Nyungwe Forest National Park. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 12:31, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Images from http://npgallery.nps.gov are being uploaded to Commons
Hey everybody. I've been working on a batch upload from the U.S. National Park Service's official media repository. The upload is ongoing as I verify that more images are in the public domain, but we have almost 9,000 at the time of writing this. Check them out at Commons:Category:Images from NPGallery or at the appropriate category in Commons:Category:Protected areas of the United States. The images need to be defused into specific categories (you can help!), but all of them should be at least in the main category for the corresponding protected area. – BMacZero (🗩) 16:46, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Brooks Peninsula Provincial Park listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Brooks Peninsula Provincial Park to be moved to Mquqᵂin/Brooks Peninsula Provincial Park. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:46, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Manzanar listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Manzanar to be moved to Manzanar National Historic Site. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 03:45, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

No Grand Canyon wikiproject?
I'm posting this here as well as at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Arizona and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America because it's under the WikiProjects' areas. I was just about to start the GAN review for Grand Canyon (book) and was surprised to not see a Grand Canyon WikiProject, or a task force relevant to one of the three mentioned WPs, on its talk page. I think that as a book on the subject, it may not be deemed relevant to Protected areas/Arizona/Indigenous p. of N. America individually, but that because of the subject matter it was surprising that there's no associated WikiProject to assess its coverage. I would propose a Grand Canyon project/task force myself, but am working a lot in article improvement at the moment. If any of the wikiprojects addressed would consider e.g. collaborating on a task force, I would probably join in, though! Just thought I'd leave the message and the idea. Kingsif (talk) 14:00, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

The deletion of Category:IUCN Category Ia
Hi everyone,

I have just noticed that Category:IUCN Category Ia has been deleted - please refer the following for the notice of deletion Category:IUCN_Category_Ia. I checked Category:Protected areas by World Conservation Union category and found that the remainder of the categories are still there. Was any notice received by WikiProject Protected areas about the proposal to delete "Category:IUCN Category Ia"?

Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 01:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Manzanar featured article review
I have nominated Manzanar for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  22:12, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The external links on the Manzanar article are being discussed. There are currently 18 of them, which is excessive. Please come participate in the discussion at Talk:Manzanar. Thanks! ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 04:25, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Boca Chica Village, Texas listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Boca Chica Village, Texas to be moved to Boca Chica, Texas. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Baviaankloof Wilderness Areas listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Baviaankloof Wilderness Areas to be moved to Baviaanskloof Wilderness Areas. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 14:03, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Timucuan Preserve listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Timucuan Preserve to be moved to Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:46, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Sagamore Hill (house) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Sagamore Hill (house) to be moved to Sagamore Hill. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 19:46, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

WikiProject Grand Canyon proposal
Hi there, editors at your Wikiproject may be interesting in the related WikiProject Grand Canyon proposal, which you can see and support here! Kingsif (talk) 08:41, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Help a newer user?
Hi! I was wondering if anyone would be interested in taking some new users under their wing. I'm pinging them here. They're working on a draft of a park in England, Draft:St Matthew's Piece. They seem to be quite eager and the park offhand does look like it's probably notable, it just needs more work to help it better fit Wikipedia's style guidelines. Parks aren't really in my area of interest, so I wanted to reach out here and in another area or two that could also fit their topic. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:32, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

National Recreation Area listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for National Recreation Area to be moved to National recreation area. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 02:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.