Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Red Link Recovery/Archive 4

Diacritics again?
Is there any plan to create a list of red links with wrong diacritics? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 15:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I doubt you're still searching after so long but, for the benefit of later readers, see WikiProject Red Link Recovery/Diacritics. Certes (talk) 21:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Hogenakkal_drinking_water_project
Something must have gone wrong with the parse--there are entries all over the place that claim the bad source is in Hogenakkal_drinking_water_project, but it's clearly not. Looking at what links here tells you the correct article, though.

A few examples:

WikiProject_Red_Link_Recovery/Capitalisation/52, #25510, 25513

WikiProject_Red_Link_Recovery/Unlikely/images, #45-69

(and probably several more, but those are the two I've noticed.

(incidentally, there also seems to have been a problem with special characters. On the images page, every item with question marks are not actually linked from anywhere.)

Noliver (talk) 09:21, 7 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Yup - something 'orrible appears to have happened to my analysis database. Most of the reports attribute a number of red links incorrectly to this article.  The links (and suggestions) are all valid, just not the source article.  No idea about the question marks on the images - will have to look further into that one.  - TB (talk) 11:27, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Is anyone doing these any more?
Is anyone doing these any more? At least when I have looked at WikiProject Red Link Recovery/Capitalisation, it seems that for the last two or three weeks, I have been the only one to edit any of the pages I have looked at. J I P | Talk 20:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I do some from time to time, more or less at random. Having updated lists is a spur to having a go. welsh (talk) 21:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I still work on this, occasionally. EmanWilm (talk) 15:56, 26 November 2008 (UTC)