Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Religion/Interfaith work group

Request for Interfaith review of Evaluative diversity page
Dear Wikiproject: The Evaluative diversity page makes a case that the major arguments about evaluative diversity are themes common to various religions. It cites passages from various sources to make that case, but there may be more appropriate passages that were not cited (I am more of a scientist than a scholar of religions). What is the right way to request that people who are more familiar with various religions help to identify appropriate citations? Langchri (talk) 02:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Request for comment on the definition of christophobia
Hi wikiproject. I've challenged the neutrality of the Wikipedia article Anti Christian Sentiment [] The word christophobia does not belong there. The page discusses hatred and intolerance towards christians. Phobia is defined by Wikipedia as a fear of something []

The reference given is a dead link that goes to a biased source - Council of European Episcopal Conferences [http://www.religiousintelligence.co.uk/news/?NewsID=2930.

I found a neutral source, the Phobia Dictionary on http://www.blifaloo.com/ Stronger references are not available. I searched Oxford Dictionary, Merriam Webster, The Free Online dictionary, among others, none had a definition for christophobia. Likewise, a search of the publication archives of the American Psychiatric Association turned up nothing.

I respectfully request the word christophobia be removed from the Anti-Christian Sentiment Page.

Moorstag (talk) 17:21, 28 July 2012 (UTC) Moorstag


 * Christophobia currently redirects to anti-Christian sentiment, even though you don't want that article to mention that term at all. A likely solution would be to create a new article at Christophobia specifically to explain that term, and what it has been used to mean, and by whom - since you say it is something different not covered by "anti-Christian sentiment". Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 19:19, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Request for comment on Biographies of living people
Hello Wikiproject! Currently there is a discussion which will decide whether wikipedia will delete 49,000 articles about a living person without references, here:

Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Since biographies of living people covers so many topics, many wikiproject topics will be effected.

The two opposing positions which have the most support is:
 * 1) supports the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, User:Jehochman
 * 2) opposes the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, except in limited circumstances, User:Collect

Comments are welcome. Keep in mind that by default, editor's comments are hidden. Simply press edit next to the section to add your comment.

Please keep in mind that at this point, it seems that editors support deleting unreferenced BLP articles if they are not sourced, so your project may want to source these articles as soon as possible. See the next, message, which may help.

Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people
If you don't already have Cleanup listings,  Cleanup listings is a bot which collects all tagged unreferenced biographies of living people, plus other lists onto one page in your project.
 * List of cleanup articles for your project

It is very easy to add to your project:  Cleanup listings simply add a template to a page of your project!

A list of examples is here

If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles that your project covers, to a special "incubation page", contact me, User talk:Ikip
 * Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages"

If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip
 * Watchlisting all unreferenced articles

Ikip 08:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

RfC - prefixes in article title of Eastern Orthodox officials
An RfC is currently open (Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(clergy)) regarding the appropriateness of having position titles in the article title of religious Eastern Orthodox officials. Commentary would be welcomed, as the WP:NCWC talk page has a low level of activity.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:03, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Ammended: The proposal currently tables is to remove of all prefix religious titles, positions and/or honours from the article title.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:03, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Requested Move Of Genesis Creation Myth
here Thank you For you time Weaponbb7 (talk)

Relevant AFD discussion page - The Most Hated Family in America
There is an AFD for The Most Hated Family in America, which is a television documentary film that was written and presented by the BBC's Louis Theroux about the family at the core of the Westboro Baptist Church (info from lede of article). Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 18:18, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * AFD is located at: Articles for deletion/The Most Hated Family in America.

Jerusalem
There is currently a discussion taking place at Talk:Jerusalem over how the article should word certain issues. Some editors want the word "proclaimed" to be added to the first sentence of the article to describe it as the "proclaimed capital" of Israel as the international community does not recognise it as the capital of Israel, others disagree and think the status quo which has existed for about 3 years should remain (something that has been debated many times over the years but retained), and several compromises have also been suggested. The issue has now also spread to other matters, with some editors wanting it to say "proclaimed flag", "proclaimed mayor", "proclaimed coat of arms" etc, to also highlight the fact the international community does not recognise the status of Jerusalem. This matter could have implications for other articles if changes are made and a similar pattern followed. So input from other editors would be helpful. Thanks BritishWatcher (talk) 14:19, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

AfD
Please see: Articles for deletion/Counter-missionary. The article is supported by this project. Borock (talk) 21:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Criticism of Muhammad
There are persistent problems at Criticism of Muhammad, an article that is quite different in style from Criticism of Jesus and other "Criticism of" articles. More eyes needed. Hans Adler 10:12, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Undue?
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Rosie O'Donnell. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 00:54, 20 April 2011 (UTC) (Using )

Proposed MOS for religion
There is now a proposed general Manual of Style for Religion and other articles relating to ethoses or belief systems at WikiProject Religion/Manual of style. Any input would be welcome. I personally believe at least one of the reasons why many articles in this field have been as contentious as they have been is because of lack of such guidelines, and would very much welcome any input from others to help come up with some generally acceptable solutions to some of these problems. John Carter (talk) 21:53, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Dead link: Category:Interfaith topics
Category:Interfaith topics is mentioned in the Scope section of the project page. It's a non-existant category. It needs some filling, removal of referances, or relocation of mentions to a todo list? Sowlos (talk) 11:41, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Discussion at RSN about Robert Almeder
There is a discussion at the reliable sources noticeboard about whether an article on reincarnation by Robert Almeder, professor emeritus of philosophy at Georgia State University, is a reliable source for the article on Ian Stevenson (1918–2007). Several editors have objected to it because Almeder published it in Journal of Scientific Exploration, a journal that deals with anomalies (fringe issues). Uninvolved input would be very helpful. See Reliable_sources/Noticeboard. Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) 19:19, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

GAR of Ursuline Convent Riots
Ursuline Convent Riots, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. This article has been bannered as falling within the scope of this project, and its principal editor is not very active. --  Magic ♪piano 22:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Call for help on Lay preacher
Newly created short stub Lay preacher needs some content. I personally cannot help more since I know so little about religion and have no good sources. --Pitke (talk) 13:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Forgive me if this is in the wrong place, I do not know my way around Wikipedia and its protocols at all. I am alerting you to the fact that an article of interest to you (and you are marked as this article being relevant to you) is currently being debated for removal/merging. It is being argued (I believe wrongly) that the article is irrelevant and has no place in having its own page, so I do think someone from your group should keep an eye on the discussion on the talk page. They already merged the article today into another article without any discussion but I managed to get an admin to move it back again. Conversation has now started on the talk page and I think it is definitely something you will want to keep an eye on. Talk page here; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Semitic_people Taurusthecat (talk) 14:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

I wish to join
I would be interested in joining this work group - all being well, I might be able to help it get active again. Vorbee (talk) 15:45, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Article on Kripke Center
I see the article on the Kripke Center is up for deletion. This could be of interest to members of the WikiProject group. Vorbee (talk) 09:16, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Expert attention
This is a notice about Category:Interfaith articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. There might be as few as one page in the category, or zero if someone has removed the expert request tag from the page. &thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 17:22, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

What to do about Criticism of the Catholic Church
A user has suggested splitting Criticism of the Catholic Church; you are invited to discuss at Talk:Criticism_of_the_Catholic_Church.Epiphyllumlover (talk) 02:08, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Category:Interfaith articles needing expert attention has been nominated for discussion
Category:Interfaith articles needing expert attention has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 20:55, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Ilhan Omar has an RFC
Ilhan Omar has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:34, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Francis Bok
Francis Bok has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Biblical and Quranic narratives
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Biblical and Quranic narratives that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.  ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   17:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)