Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Religious texts

WP 1.0 bot announcement
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 03:50, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Request for comment on Biographies of living people
Hello Wikiproject! Currently there is a discussion which will decide whether wikipedia will delete 49,000 articles about a living person without references, here:

Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Since biographies of living people covers so many topics, nearly all wikiproject topics will be effected.

The two opposing positions which have the most support is:
 * 1) supports the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, User:Jehochman
 * 2) opposes the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, except in limited circumstances, User:Collect

Comments are welcome. Keep in mind that by default, editor's comments are hidden. Simply press edit next to the section to add your comment.

Please keep in mind that at this point, it seems that editors support deleting unreferenced BLP articles if they are not sourced, so your project may want to source these articles as soon as possible. See the next, message, which may help.

Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people
If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see: Cleanup listings A list of examples is here
 * List of cleanup articles for your project

If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation page", contact me, User talk:Ikip
 * Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages"

If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip
 * Watchlisting all unreferenced articles

Ikip 02:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Request for comment on Biographies of living people
Hello Wikiproject! Currently there is a discussion which will decide whether wikipedia will delete 49,000 articles about a living person without references, here:

Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Since biographies of living people covers so many topics, many wikiproject topics will be effected.

The two opposing positions which have the most support is:
 * 1) supports the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, User:Jehochman
 * 2) opposes the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, except in limited circumstances, User:Collect

Comments are welcome. Keep in mind that by default, editor's comments are hidden. Simply press edit next to the section to add your comment.

Please keep in mind that at this point, it seems that editors support deleting unreferenced BLP articles if they are not sourced, so your project may want to source these articles as soon as possible. See the next, message, which may help.

Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people
If you don't already have Cleanup listings,  Cleanup listings is a bot which collects all tagged unreferenced biographies of living people, plus other lists onto one page in your project.
 * List of cleanup articles for your project

It is very easy to add to your project: simply add a template to a page of your project! Instructions

A list of examples is here

If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles that your project covers, to a special "incubation page", contact me, User talk:Ikip
 * Moving unreferenced blp articles to special "incubation pages"

If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip
 * Watchlisting all unreferenced articles

Ikip 09:09, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Adding Links
Hello, I am new to Wikipedia and am trying to understand how Wikipedia works, without disrupting anything or stepping on any one’s toes. My revisions on several pages have been removed and I am confused by these edits because I was not trying to self promote with my additions. Rather, I was adding a link to the Jewish Publication Society (JPS), the oldest Jewish publishing company in the United States and the authoritative English translation of the Jewish Bible. JPS has created a product called the Tagged Tanakh, which contains an online version of its most recent Bible translation.

You removed my links to the Tagged Tanakh, but Mechon Mamre, Bible Gateway, and the University of Michigan all have links in similar formats on Wikiperida pages related to the Bible. Please explain to me why these organizations are allowed to post and I am not. Additionally, I find it a little bothersome that Christian versions of the Bible (ie Bible Gateway and University of Michigan) are adding links to Jewish Wikipedia pages such as Torah and the Book of Genesis. Please advise me on the next step that I should take. Thank you, and I Look forward to hearing from you soon. Rrstern25 (talk) 14:00, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Religious texts articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Religious texts articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (&diams;) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:32, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Ormulum's FAR
nominated Ormulum for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. GamerPro64 (talk) 21:51, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

POV pushing
I have noticed that on articles like Gospel of Matthew, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Luke, and Gospel of John, some editors are pushing a POV. They define a set universe of "mainstream scholarship" and used that to define what the "scholarly consensus" is. No evidence is ever given that this is what the "mainstream" is, it is just assumed and requests for evidence are ignored. Not only that, but this fake-mainstream is even often described as the "consensus". This universe just so happens to include and be personified by skeptics and atheists like Bart Ehrman or the ultra-controversial Jesus Seminar. Actually Ehrman and Jesus Seminar members are often the most heavily cited sources. Any scholars who deviate from this view are labeled "fringe" and their views dismissed. Most scholars actually deviate from what is defined by certain editors as "mainstream", but this nice little definition allows the majority to be dismissed as "fringe". Evidence that these people represent the "mainstream" is never given, editors just demand that one accepts it because "that's what everyone knows". With this, direct quoted evidence that they don't represent the mainstream is dismissed and never taken seriously. If they make claims that are well cited, these claims are deleted outright for no reason other than they don't fit in with this artificially defined universe of what is "mainstream". Wikipedia is ruled by what the majority of editors on a given article think about a topic, not what the "correct" or "mainstream" view is. These edits don't represent the "mainstream" view, but a heavily skewed POV. As such, these articles are badly biased on certain points, especially authorship.

I would like some non-involved editors to take a look at these pages and the talk pages to see what they think. RomanHistorian (talk) 20:43, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Leadwind is pushing neutrality, and you're pushing back with theologically conservative fringe views. Worse, you're editing against consensus to insert weasel words. This is not good. Dylan Flaherty (talk) 20:48, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Dylan is one of the editors defining "neutral" as the work of atheistic scholars.RomanHistorian (talk) 04:25, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Request for comment on Christian Lit category
Please visit Category talk:Christian narrative and offer your input. Thanks, Aristophanes 68   (talk)  17:45, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Request for input in discussion forum
Given the closely linked subjects of the various religion, mythology, and philosophy groups, it seems to me that we might benefit from having some sort of regular topical discussion forum to discuss the relevant content. I have put together the beginnings of an outline for such discussion at WikiProject Religion/2011 meeting, and would very much appreciate the input of any interested editors. I am thinking that it might run over two months, the first of which would be to bring forward and discuss the current state of the content, and the second for perhaps some more focused discussion on what, if any, specific efforts might be taken in the near future. Any and all input is more than welcome. John Carter (talk)

Automated message by Project Messenger Bot from John Carter at 15:44, 5 April 2011

request for exper opinion on Books of Jeu
the Books of Jeu article is unsourced, except for the link to an online text of the book itself; is the information in the article reliable?--Melaen (talk) 16:18, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Book of Gad the Seer
Can anyone look this through, please. Not very reliable, the mention about "found lost book" only on one site and then translations... on DeviantArt. If looks genuine, please add some more scholarly-oriented comment what is legit and what could be not.

Szpawq (talk) 03:17, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Should we have articles that only repeat religious texts?
I've raised this issue about a specific article at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam. Dougweller (talk) 17:51, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Soliciting support for draft WikiProject Bibliographies
Fellow Wikipedians, I have taken the initiative, in consultation with a few others, to draft a WikiProject for Bibliographies. I hope it will be of interest to members of this project. The genesis of this effort has been a recent spate of AfD nominations of lists of publications. For the most part, the articles were not deleted, but that doesn’t mean many of them didn’t need work. A WP article entitled List of subject publications or any list of works, is by any other name, a Bibliography. Bibliographies within WP are specifically identified as a form of List in WP:List, are subject to List notability guidelines and the List Manual of Style. Unfortunately, many of the existing Bibliographies (or lists of publications) are not up to these standards. And there’s a high probability that new lists of publications or new Bibliographies won’t completely meet these standards as well, unless we as a community bring greater visibility to this genre of lists.

So the explicit goals of this draft project are to establish project-level advice for creating good bibliographies, gradually bring the existing set of bibliographies (400+) up to standard and to encourage editors to create bibliographies on topics and authors where appropriate. The goal is not to create bibliographies of everything or on everything.

I think the draft Bibliography project is logically connected to this project and members here would have a lot to contribute. If you are interested in participating, please sign up on the draft project page. If we get sufficient interest, I will move the draft into the Wikipedia space and we can press on. Also, please don’t hesitate to make suggestions on the draft here. I am sure it can be improved, will need some work to comply with Project guidelines and that it will evolve as this thing gets going. Thanks in advance for your support.--Mike Cline (talk) 19:39, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed moves
There are discussions underway at the talk pages of Books of Chronicles, Books of Kings, and Books of Samuel as to whether or not to move those pages to article titles reflecting the singular nature of each of the works in the Masoretic text, rather than the current Septuagint-based titles. The input of any interested editor would be greatly appreciated. Evanh2008 (talk) (contribs) 05:27, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed MOS for Religion
There is now a proposed general Manual of Style for Religion and other articles relating to ethoses or belief systems at WikiProject Religion/Manual of style. Any input would be welcome. I personally believe at least one of the reasons why many articles in this field have been as contentious as they have been is because of lack of such guidelines, and would very much welcome any input from others to help come up with some generally acceptable solutions to some of these problems. John Carter (talk) 22:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Paul Bedson's "pseudo-gnostic" nonsense
, now banned, created several stubs in Category:Gnostic apocrypha and Category:New Testament apocrypha for texts with names that begin with "Pseudo-": Pseudo-Abdias, Pseudo-Ambrose,  Pseudo-Crato,  Pseudo-Dorotheus,  Pseudo-Epiphanios,  Pseudo-Gregory,  Pseudo-Jerome,  Pseudo-John,  Pseudo-Linus,  Pseudo-Luke,  Pseudo-Marcellus,  Pseudo-Mark,  Pseudo-Melitus,  Pseudo-Simon,  Pseudo-Sophronius. Despite his contention that these somehow constitute "Pseudo-Gnostic Apocrypha" (see also template deletion discussion), it appears that while these are real texts, his categorisation of them is totally wrong - many or all of them are not Gnostic, they are not in any meaningful sense NT apocrypha, etc. I've fixed up Pseudo-Augustine (it's still a very brief stub, but at least is factually accurate now I believe.) The question with the remainder, is whether to fix them up to be accurate stubs about largely obscure texts, or just delete them. Given their obscurity, they may be destined to remain stubs for a long time if not forever. SJK (talk) 06:27, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Just my opinion (no more), but I would say they're not WP:NOTABLE. Evenssteven (talk) 06:47, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * To take Pseudo-Augustine as an example - it's probably not notable enough for an independent article, but might belong as a section in Augustine of Hippo bibliography, or deserve a mention in the history section of Order of Saint Augustine. The same is likely true of the other "Pseudo-" articles - probably not notable enough for an independent article, could be notable enough for a mention in an existing one. However, absent someone volunteering to research the true facts regarding these articles (I don't have the time to do it for more than one or two), maybe it is best to just delete them. SJK (talk) 07:38, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm really no expert in this topic, so maybe I shouldn't be venturing an opinion. However, you're welcome to take it for what it is: a broader perspective. Agreed: not notable enough for separate articles. Perhaps a mention in other articles, as you suggest. But I would keep in mind that the writings are spurious, intended to deceive. In the Augustine bibliography, a one-liner in a section titled "Spurious Writings" (or some such) indicating clearly that he is NOT the author would be enough. In the Order's article, a mention in order to refute dubious claims (only if those claims are notable enough in themselves). But it has to be worth something to mention it at all.  Were the claims historically significant in some way that affected other events or people's lives? - That sort of thing.  Otherwise it's just the kind of attention-getting rubbish that litters all periods of history including our own, and it deserves only consignment to the round file. And here's another indicator: no one has infinite time or energy, and this stuff falls beyond your cutoff line. Let someone step up here and say they have enough interest to take it on, that they have enough confidence that their own time wouldn't be wasted on the effort.  If no one appears, the project is just impractical, and then it may be impractical for other good reasons too. Good enough for deletion in my book. But I'm perfectly content to have someone take action based on a contrary view; the field is then theirs. Let my lack of interest be no barrier to someone else's interest. But let WP not be cluttered by things no one is interested in. Evenssteven (talk) 16:12, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of many "Pseudo-" stub religious texts
Please see here. SJK (talk) 11:07, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Help needed with Sefer haYashar
Greetings! The Sefer haYashar disambiguation page has had over a dozen links pointing to it for several months. Any help in fixing those links would be appreciated. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:34, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The non-deliberate links in article space are now dealt with. This leaves talk and project links, and the "see also"s, still an extensive list which I don't feel empowered to shorten. Fiddlersmouth (talk) 14:33, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Incorporation of Whole chapters in Wikipedia
I have seen articles on Quran incorporating the whole verses of the chapters in the corresponding Wikipedia article. I think Wikibooks/Wikisources are there to publish verses. Can we just move the verses to the respective Wikisource/Wikibooks pages and concentrate more on writing what,why and how's of the verses in the article. - Vatsan34 (talk) 06:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Book of Isaiah era consensus
Hello, A discussion is taking place for era-style consensus for article Book of Isaiah so see the article's talk page. Era-style is inconsistent, and ignore the recent era changes done in the article because there was no consensus approved yet. -- JudeccaXIII (talk) 02:59, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Ezra–Nehemiah era consensus
Hello, A discussion is taking place for era-style consensus for article Ezra–Nehemiah so see the article's talk page. The era-style is inconsistent. -- JudeccaXIII (talk) 23:40, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Book of Elchasai
I would like to add article: Book of Elchasai to the project. Please give some feedback. --Cheers-- JudeccaXIII (talk) 17:53, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Anyone can add any article to any project at any time, provided that the article reasonably falls within the scope of the project. That seems to be the case here, and I can't see any real reason for it not to be included. The easiest way to do that is to add the relevant project banner, with some assessment, to the article talk page. John Carter (talk) 19:27, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!


Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Quran listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Quran to be moved to Koran. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 03:14, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Samayasāra listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Samayasāra to be moved to Samayasara. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:59, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Masih ad-Dajjal listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Masih ad-Dajjal to be moved to Imposter Messiah. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 06:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Satkhandagama listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Satkhandagama to be moved to Shatkhandagama. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 03:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Updated Navbox 'Religion WikiProjects'
Greetings, Today I discovered a navbox WikiProject Religion/Religion WikiProjects and added WP Religious texts into the General (group1) section. Regards, — JoeHebda • (talk) 02:44, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Epistle to the Romans listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Epistle to the Romans to be moved to Epistle of Paul to the Romans. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 16:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Mahapurana (Jainism) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Mahapurana (Jainism) to be moved to Mahapurana. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 06:15, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Proposed deletion of Holy Piby


The article Holy Piby has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No RS can be found on this subject. The article is self-cited to a repository where this supposed text is located. It looks like it could be a hoax

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Bible listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Bible to be moved to The Bible. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 12:14, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Buddhist apocrypha listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Buddhist apocrypha to be moved to Post-canonical Buddhist texts. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 19:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

The Promise Key listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for The Promise Key to be moved to The Promised Key. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:31, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Book of Mormon listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Book of Mormon to be moved to The Book of Mormon. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 10:44, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Guru Granth Sahib listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Guru Granth Sahib to be moved to Granth Sahib. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 11:59, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Sepher Ha-Razim listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Sepher Ha-Razim to be moved to Sefer ha-Razim. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Merseburg Incantations listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Merseburg Incantations to be moved to Merseburg Charms. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 11:14, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Ichthus May 2018 is available

 * Project News: An admin is admonished
 * Achievements: Ralph Abernathy promoted
 * Featured article: Missionaries in the rainforest
 * Did You Know: Ioan C. Filitti sentenced to death
 * * Read this Ichthus in full * Get Ichthus delivered to your Talkpage * – Lionel(talk) 11:58, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template Transclude lead excerpt.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you. &mdash; The Transhumanist  11:01, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Ichthus June 2018 is out now!

 * Project News: Is Genesis History? See the RFC.
 * Did You Know: Phineas Hodson’s wife dies
 * Featured article: Jewish boy causes fall of Roman Catholic Papal States?
 * * Read this Ichthus in full * Get Ichthus delivered to your Talkpage * – Lionel(talk) 04:04, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Tanakh listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Tanakh to be moved to Hebrew Bible. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Ichthus July 2018 is out now!

 * The Top 7 Report: The big news was the marriage of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle
 * Did You Know: Sun of Unclouded Righteousness
 * Our newest Featured list: List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events
 * * Read this Ichthus in full * Get Ichthus delivered to your Talkpage * – Lionel(talk) 08:06, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Comma Johanneum listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Comma Johanneum to be moved to Johannine Comma. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Genesis flood narrative listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Genesis flood narrative to be moved to Noah's flood. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:47, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

New WikiProject
I have suggested that a new WikiProject that may be of relevance to this one, be created. If you are interested in viewing the proposal or taking part in the discussion, please see WikiProject Council/Proposals/Jewish works

Puzzledvegetable (talk) 21:02, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

New task force proposal
I am thinking about setting up a task force within this WikiProject to deal with Jewish works, primarily the Talmud and Mishna, similar to the WikiProject I suggested before. Despite the importance of written works in Judaism, many of the articles devoted to Jewish works, including articles on specific tractates of the Mishna and Talmud, are in desperate need of attention. They are poorly written, lack sources, and don’t convey enough information. If you would be willing to join such a task force, please indicate below. Any feedback about this idea would be appreciated. — Puzzledvegetable (talk) 18:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)


 * תנא קמא (talk) 18:02, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Hud (sūrah) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Hud (sūrah) to be moved. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 17:46, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Hud (surah) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Hud (surah) to be moved. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Liturgy of St Cyril listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Liturgy of St Cyril to be moved to Liturgy of Saint Cyril. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 12:18, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A new newsletter directory is out!
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
 * – Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Augustinian hypothesis listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Augustinian hypothesis to be moved to Augustine hypothesis. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 02:45, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

I Ching listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for I Ching to be moved to Yijing. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 12:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

2, The Cow, al-Baqarah listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for 2, The Cow, al-Baqarah to be moved to Al-Baqara. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 06:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Q2:255 Ayatul Kursi listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Q2:255 Ayatul Kursi to be moved to Throne Verse. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Tafsir ibn Kathir listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Tafsir ibn Kathir to be moved to Tafsir Ibn Kathir. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 09:32, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Shabuhragan listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Shabuhragan to be moved to Erzongjing. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 19:32, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Islamic sexual jurisprudence listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Islamic sexual jurisprudence to be moved to Sexuality in Islam. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 08:47, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Samaritan Pentateuch listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Samaritan Pentateuch to be moved to Samaritan Torah. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 13:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Sirach listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Sirach to be moved to Book of Sirach. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 14:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Sirach listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Sirach to be moved to Book of Sirach. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:32, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

FAR for Aradia, or the Gospel of the Witches
User:Buidhe has nominated Aradia, or the Gospel of the Witches for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:03, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Pāli Canon listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Pāli Canon to be moved to Pali Canon. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:26, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Marking Wikiproject as defunct
Hello all,

Unsure if anyone's still paying attention to this talk page since the last genuine human-to-human conversation (as opposed to notification) seems to be from years ago, but I'm considering upgrading the tag from "inactive" to "defunct". It seems clear to me that this project is just a duplicate - religious texts "in general" should be part of WikiProject Religion, and religious texts specific to one specific religion should be part of that religion's wikiproject (e.g. WikiProject Judaism, etc.). Any objection to this? The long years of inactivity seems to have proved that this project can safely be marked as historical. SnowFire (talk) 18:27, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree to this WikiProject change from "inactive" to "defunct". Chongkian (talk) 04:28, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Al-Inshirah listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Al-Inshirah to be moved to Ash-Sharh. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 11:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Hebrew Bible listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Hebrew Bible to be moved to Tanakh. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:46, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Sefer Torah listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Sefer Torah to be moved to Torah scroll. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 16:33, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Avot of Rabbi Natan listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Avot of Rabbi Natan to be moved to Avot de-Rabbi Nathan. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.