Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Science Fiction

Requested move at Talk:Robots of Stanisław Lem
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Robots of Stanisław Lem that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

List of films featuring androids
Cleaning up the See Also list at Ex Machina, it became obvious that we need a List of films featuring androids. Anyone feeling in the mood to get it going? I would but my list would be too trivial: That's it. I'm afraid that IMO there are very few SF films worth the time it takes to watch them 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 11:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Metropolis (1927 film)
 * Blade Runner
 * I, Robot
 * Ex Machina
 * Terminator series
 * Star Wars series (though arguably the androids are background action, not lead characters).
 * There already is a List of fictional robots and androids with a section for film. It's not exactly a quality piece of Wikipedia content, to put it mildly, but it exists. TompaDompa (talk) 12:12, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
 * TYVM, that's helpful. List articles can never be more that a set of pointers to specific articles, so we mustn't be too hard. The problem for my purposes with that one is that it is too non-selective and too open-ended. I think that there is an opening for a list that is restricted to movies where the android is leading actor or at least best supporting. Somebody who knows more about it than I do might mine that article to create the new one? --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 12:24, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Can't say I see the point. Sounds like a better idea to write a proper prose article on androids in fiction, assuming we have the sources for it (compare e.g. Mars in fiction). For the record, Robots in fiction currently redirects to Robots in literature, while Robots in film redirects to Science fiction film. TompaDompa (talk) 12:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Life, the Universe, & Everything
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Life, the Universe, & Everything that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. –  11:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Clare Winger Harris
Clare Winger Harris has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster  (chat!)  12:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Superman (1978 film)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Superman (1978 film) that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Requested merger at Talk:List of fictional computers
There is a requested merger discussion at Talk:List of fictional computers that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Dash77 (talk) 22:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace
Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 16:58, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Dyson_sphere
After a protracted argument on the Dyson sphere talk page that seemed to be going nowhere, I decided to consolidate and restate the basic issues concerning this section in general, and one particular instance that has proven especially vexing, as I see them. I hope that members of this and other related WikiProjects might weigh in and give their opinions. P Aculeius (talk) 18:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

"Cosmic Stories Blog" by Elizabeth Stanway
I just came across something called "Cosmic Stories Blog" by Elizabeth Stanway, an astrophysicist at the University of Warwick (the blog is hosted on the university's website). I took a quick look at some of the blog entries, and they seem like they could be useful for quite a few Wikipedia articles—if they are usable, which is what I wanted to ask here.

My thinking is as follows: according to this page, Stanway has been published in Foundation, The Conversation, and a book on Doctor Who, among others. That should mean that, when it comes to science fiction, Stanway counts as established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications per WP:Self-published sources, making "Cosmic Stories Blog" a reliable enough (even if low-profile/marginal) source for science fiction content. I wanted to hear if others agree or disagree with that assessment.

Ping some editors I know to be knowledgeable about sci-fi sources: what do you think? TompaDompa (talk) 00:07, 25 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @TompaDompa That seems like a valid case. I'd recommend attributing her too. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 01:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Solaris (1972 film)
Solaris (1972 film) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster  (trout me!)  02:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Requested split at Talk:First contact (science fiction)
There is a requested split discussion at Talk:First contact (science fiction) that may be of that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Ships  &amp;  Space (Edits) 17:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Discussion at Everything Everywhere All at Once
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Everything_Everywhere_All_at_Once, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Spinixster  (trout me!)  02:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:The Hunger Games (film series)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:The Hunger Games (film series) that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.  98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂  •  [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]   14:18, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for John W. Campbell
John W. Campbell has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:33, 22 June 2024 (UTC)