Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Singapore/2010 archive

Removal of certain information from some school articles
Articles about some Singaporean schools have been experiencing a "purge" of some sort recently, with large chunks of information removed. Most of the information removed were about school culture, discipline system, history, CCAs and some trivia stuff. The following are some examples:


 * 1) Catholic High School
 * 2) Dunman High School
 * 3) Hwa Chong Institution
 * 4) Maris Stella High School
 * 5) Pasir Ris Secondary School
 * 6) Presbyterian High School

Does anyone agree that too much information is removed? I think that basic information, such as school uniform, school song and history, should not be removed. As for the trivia stuff such as CCAs, trimming them might be better than removing them completely. Most of the edits were done by Bali ultimate on the grounds that the removed information is not supported by reliable references. What do you think? _LDS (talk) 08:42, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

WPSCH/AG and WikiProject_Schools/Article_guidelines may be of interest. WP:NPOV and WP:TRIVIA are common problems to articles about schools in general, and Singapore schools are no different. Where such facts are interesting and relevant, they should be woven into a paragraph. The verbatim text of a school song is definitely not desirable here; excerpts may be relevant to illustrate a certain point. Generally lots of WP:PEACOCKing too. Discussion is definitely helpful, though I won't disagree with the few edits listed per se. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 15:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Template:Major cities of Greater China
See here if you have any opinion on the matter. Thanks! Readin (talk) 00:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


 * FYI, the aforementioned template is completely un-encyclopaedic and the consensus/vote is a majority "DELETE", so it's now slated for deletion. Hence, my suggestion that we move on and improve other article pages instead. --Dave 1185 19:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Singapore hotels
[Reposted from "User talk:Jacklee".] Hi. can you replace the skyscrapers infoboxes in articles on Singapore hotels with infobox hotel as with Conrad Centennial Singapore and Raffles Hotel etc. Thanks Dr. Blofeld       White cat 21:55, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I am reposting this message at the talk page of the SGpedians' notice board so that editors active on those articles can take appropriate action. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 04:06, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Overseas Union Bank Ltd Godown No 2
Anyone have a clue where this picturesque godown might be located? — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 18:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


 * It was on Robertson Quay, across Saiboo St from Gallery Hotel. The facade, cleaned up and repainted, is now incorporated into the Watermark condo:  Jpatokal (talk) 05:17, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Wow, I'm impressed that you know this. Thanks very much. Great to hear that the building is still around. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 07:02, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I took pretty much the same picture in 2005, shortly before it was demolished.  And the building is not around in any meaningful sense, only a small slice of the facade is left. Jpatokal (talk) 08:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

clarke quay
what might have influenced the memorial's designer/s? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.82.80.126 (talk) 13:30, 30 January 2010 (UTC)


 * What memorial? — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 15:24, 30 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm curious too, as to where the memorial is located at, if you don't mind telling us. --Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 15:35, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

"Singapore" vs "Singaporean"
I believe the usage in Singapore is to use the word "Singaporean" only as a noun (i.e. to refer to a citizen of Singapore). The adjectival form should be "Singapore", not "Singaporean" (eg Singapore passport, Singapore citizenship, Singapore government, Singapore dollar, Singapore food). See https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/sn.html and Adjectivals_and_demonyms_for_countries_and_nations. It would be nice if someone could go and clean up all the articles that do not conform to this, but there are a large number of them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.77.41.120 (talk) 20:51, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I am not sure that the distinction is as strict as you make it out to be. I think it is perfectly acceptable to talk about a "Singaporean passport" and "Singaporean food", for instance. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 04:07, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

This is not just a noun / adjective issue. It is also an identity issue. It seems clear to me that there IS this distinction in the usage of the two terms in Singapore - Singaporean refers narrowly to citizens, and perhaps things directly related to them (eg. Singaporean inventions, Singaporean artworks). i think it is mostly foreigners operating in a foreign context who speak of things like 'Singaporean shoppers' - to a foreigner this might refer to anyone shopping in Singapore, ie Singapore consumers (cf. Californian shoppers) - but in local usage, this would be an unusual term referring to the subset of Singapore consumers who happen to be Singapore citizens. The distinction is especially relevant with the influx of migrants, globalisation, etc. In the example above, maybe up to a third or more of all shoppers in Singapore are NOT Singapore citizens! Take Singaporean achievements vs Singapore('s) achievements - if one of the foreign scientists working in Biopolis invented something big, it could be described as a great achievement in / for / by Singapore... even a Singapore achievement. but local usage would prevent it being described *directly* as a *Singaporean* achievement. People would feel uneasy about accepting this usage of the term, when they see that the inventor is a German or Thai national, who happens to live and work here for the time being (but if the scientist were to settle permanently here and acquires Singapore citizenship - then it could be seen as a Singaporean achievement). We still (rightly and usefully) maintain this distinction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.7.56.38 (talk) 08:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


 * That is interesting, but I still wonder if such a strict distinction (Singaporean only relates to Singapore citizens – aha, you see what I mean?) exists in practice. Personally, I don't think the usage is clear-cut enough for it to be transformed into a rule and inserted into the manual of style for Singapore-related articles, for instance. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 09:18, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Wonton noodle
Forgive me if there's a better way to list move discussions related to this wikiproject, I couldn't find any. Anyway looking for more feedback at Talk:Wonton noodle Nil Einne (talk) 12:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Photo identification time again
Anyone know which temple in Singapore is shown in this image from the Wikimedia Commons? — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 11:10, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Sure looks like Masjid Abdul Gaffoor KatongKid (talk) 04:57, 13 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Yup, that's probably it. Thanks! — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 06:26, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Zhang Haijie
Greetings. I was hoping folks from this project could find additional references that demonstrate this anchor's notability (if they exist). I suspect there are many non-English refs out there. Regards, PDCook (talk) 12:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Renaming of "The Float at Marina Bay"
There is a discussion at "Talk:The Float at Marina Bay" as to whether "The Float at Marina Bay" should be renamed "The Float@Marina Bay" which appears to be the official name, judging from StreetMap@Singapore (hah) and the official website of the Singapore 2010 Youth Olympic Games. However, an editor has pointed out that this may offend WP:MOSTM. Do join the discussion. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 07:10, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Photographs of HDB flats
Anyone know where these photographs were taken?

— Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 09:29, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Drastic edits to "International rankings of Singapore"
There is a discussion taking place at "Talk:International rankings of Singapore" about whether recent edits that reduced the article from 26Kb to 5Kb are appropriate. Do join the discussion with your comments. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 14:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi didn't know about this group
Hi I just came to this page. Didn't know that there is a group call SGpedian. I recently went through some learning curve on this article 2009 Singapore Romanian diplomat incident If I had know you all, perhaps will take it through this group instead of doing it on my own. Ronald2010 (talk) 01:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You seem to be doing a great job on the article! Feel free to ask for advice here. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 10:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Welcome aboard~! Leave a message here if you need any help, cheers~! --Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 10:38, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Chinese character redirects being speedily deleted
See Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 April 15

70.29.208.247 (talk) 05:35, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Cantonese (Yue)
FYI, Cantonese (Yue) is up on WP:RFC for naming, once again, see Talk:Cantonese (Yue)

70.29.208.247 (talk) 08:56, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons
The WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons (UBLPs) aims to reduce the number of unreferenced biographical articles to under 30,000 by June 1, primarily by enabling WikiProjects to easily identify UBLP articles in their project's scope. There were over 52,000 unreferenced BLPs in January 2010 and this has been reduced to 32,665 as of May 16. A bot is now running daily to compile a list of all articles that are in both Category:All unreferenced BLPs and have been tagged by a WikiProject. Note that the bot does NOT place unreferenced tags or assign articles to projects - this has been done by others previously - it just compiles a list.

Your Project's list can be found at WikiProject Singapore/Unreferenced BLPs. As of May 17 you have approximately 48 articles to be referenced, a 5.9% reduction from last week. The list of all other WikiProject UBLPs can be found at WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons/WikiProjects.

Your assistance in reviewing and referencing these articles is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please don't hestitate to ask either at WT:URBLP or at my talk page. Thanks, The-Pope (talk) 17:23, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

One admin deleted the article 'Orchard Towers' which is vandalizm
Hi Singaporean Wikipedians. User and admin David Fuchs deleted the article 'Orchard Towers'. Please refer to my reply on his talk page: User talk:David Fuchs I see this as vandalizm as this article was proper sourced with references etc. Please help and make David aware (on his talk page) that he should reinstate this article. Thanks for your help. --Shorty23sin (talk) 04:29, 26 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Can anyone help to reinstate this article? User David Fuchs does not seem to reverse his deletion. Any idea how to go about it? Help is appreciated. Thanks --Shorty23sin (talk) 05:40, 3 May 2010 (UTC)


 * SOLVED! Article has been reinstated! --Shorty23sin (talk) 04:54, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Yue Chinese / Cantonese
FYI, Yue Chinese is up for renaming, this is the article on the Cantonese language. See Talk:Yue Chinese.

76.66.193.224 (talk) 03:43, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Photos required from Singapore
I am currently working on many various articles for which I require photos from around the world. I am currently requiring photos from Singapore for these articles, and I was hoping that this message would reach a photographer who can take the photos for me. The photos I currently require are listed at User:Russavia/Required_photos. If any photographers can assist with this, I would be most appreciative. Please leave any comments or questions for me on my talk page at User_talk:Russavia as I am unlikely to read replies. Thanks in advance for any assistance which can be provided. Cheers, --Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 23:36, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Which bridge is this?


This is an old postcard of Boat Quay, said to be c. 1900. Does anyone know which bridge is featured? It does not look like either Anderson Bridge (built 1910) or Cavenagh Bridge (built 1870). Assuming the spire in the distance is St. Andrew's Cathedral, could it be Coleman Bridge (formerly New Bridge, built 1886)? — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 11:06, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

I have been advised off-wiki that it may be Read Bridge. Any other thoughts? — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 17:42, 13 June 2010 (UTC)




 * Correction, according to an old "uncle" of mine, he says this is actually North Boat Quay, otherwise known as Clarke Quay, and the bridge is indeed Read Bridge before modification/upgrade. Best. --Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 08:14, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the confirmation. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 10:25, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Category:Disambiguation pages with Chinese character titles
FYI, has been nominated for deletion. 70.29.212.131 (talk) 04:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Oranje Hotel
On looking for information about the "Oranje Hotel" an infamus prison in the dutch town of S'Gravenhage during WW2, I was rederected to the "Stamford House, Singapore" a building sometimes called "Oranje Building". A hotel is a building, but not all building are hotel's. To keep the information correct, it would be normal that this redirect is going to a page where all the options are mentioned. --Gesina11 (talk) 16:34, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * It seems from the article that the building was later turned into a hotel called the Oranje Hotel. However, I think it is fine for you to go ahead and convert the redirect into a disambiguation page. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 07:27, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Singaporean places
The Singaporean places wikiproject seems dead while not much activities seems to be happening here also..

Anybody interested to go over and help out? I am not active on sg articles but if we can fix a layout/template for sg places articles, I can help out in some of the articles. Xaiver0510 (talk) 13:49, 26 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't really work on articles on places either, but what sort of layout or template are you thinking of? You may want to have a look at existing articles on places to see what has been done previously. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 14:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC)


 * More of a MOS template, like a general guide of what content / sections we like to have on the articles. A good example will be like Kallang, a half completed will look like Paya Lebar and Jalan Besar while Mount Vernon looks lacking. Tried looking at a similar wikiproject for places in New Zealand but not sure how to go to the pages under that project to have a reference. Actually it is fine to close the project also~! Xaiver0510 (talk) 00:52, 27 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure how many editors are currently interested in articles about places. Maybe you could wait a few days and see if there's any response. If not, you are still most welcome to improve such articles on your own! — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 06:46, 27 July 2010 (UTC)


 * lol! I do not mind editing here and there but undecided to have a good layout and what sort of content are we looking at. We see how things go~! Xaiver0510 (talk) 15:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Bonny Hicks
It's currently under Good Article Review. Any help is appreciated. Also, if anyone can drive to Choa Chu Kang Cemetery and snap a photo of the SilkAir Flight 185 Memorial, it'd be most appreciated. It's, er, a little far from me to do so right now. :-) Newenehpets (talk) 09:00, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Merge Suntec articles
Currently, Suntec City has three articles under its name: Suntec City, Suntec City Mall and Suntec Singapore International Convention and Exhibition Centre. They can be found listed under the Suntec disambiguation page. I'm sure some merging needs to be done, since they can't possibly be left separate. After all, they share a common topic. I've added the merge tags to all the three articles, just fyi. Any ideas or opinions? A NG C HENRUI Talk ♨  04:12, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. While I see there advantage of merging the three articles since they are closely related (particularly since "Suntec City" is little more than a stub), "Suntec City Mall" is quite a long article on its own. However, if you want to go ahead and merge the articles I won't object. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 16:24, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I realised the majority of the content on Suntec City Mall are bulleted lists. I think I will move the content to the Suntec City article, under a new section "Mall" (or "Shopping mall"). As for Suntec Singapore International Convention and Exhibition Centre, do you think I should park it under Suntec City - under a new section as well? I did some Googling, and all three had their own separate websites. Of course, perhaps the developers just wanted to differentiate them. It's still a "multi-use development" after all I suppose? A NG C HENRUI Talk ♨  07:25, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * As regards the article on the Convention and Exhibition Centre, I think either way is fine. If you want to merge it into the main Suntec City article, I have no objections. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 10:04, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I am fine with merging all 3 articles together, as mentioned, it is a "multi-use development" after all. If any "section" grows too big, we can take it out as a separate article for that "section" Xaiver0510 (talk) 05:35, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Done merging, but left with the realisation that the contents are problematic. I've tagged it with the relevant templates, as I don't have the time to clean it up at this point in time. Do help if you can. Regards, A NG C HENRUI Talk ♨  08:35, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

SYOGOC Youth Olympics photos
Hello SGpedians, I was wondering if someone can help regarding the ongoing 2010 Summer Youth Olympics. It may be a long shot, but worth asking. The Organising Committee publishes photos of various events at a Flickr photostream. These photographs are tagged with CC-BY-NC licenses. I would like to see whether it's possible for someone to contact them and ask if some can be released as CC-BY-SA so that they can be used in Wikipedia. The release should probably go through the OTRS system if successful. Considering it's the first ever Youth Olympics, and because the Organising Committee seems open to media coverage from around the world, there might be a chance this is possible. Thanks! — Arsonal (talk + contribs) — 04:42, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Xavier0510 is going to laugh (see the "Notability issue" section above) when I say this, but why does it have to be "someone" and not you personally who contacts the Singapore Youth Olympic Games Organising Committee (SYOGOC)? I'm not saying this because I'm annoyed or anything, but we are all volunteers here at Wikipedia so each of us has an equal ability and responsibility to do what is needed to keep the project humming along. Also, there do not seem to be many active Singaporean Wikipedians, at least judging from the responses to messages at this talk page. Anyway, if there is some reason why you feel you cannot contact the SYOGOC yourself, post a message here and I'll see what I can do to help. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 10:08, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note that Flickr user WhyOhGee releases some Youth Olympics images under free licences. (WhyOhGee is an official blog run by the SYOGOC.) — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 10:17, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree with Jacklee. It's interesting that there are so many SGpedians listed on my project page, yet few are truly active. Maybe we can consider maintaining a non-active member list :D Arsonal, maybe you can just pen a quick email to them, and see what their response is. Cheers, A NG C HENRUI Talk♨ 13:02, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, i am smiling to myself when I see this. Haha. I scan thru the list and most are inactive already, only a handful here and there and probably more interested in other articles. I have only change my sights to SG articles recently only also. I think Arsonal can also contact the blog owner (SYOGOC) via the blog to ask them release more photos on Flickr. Save the issue on the OTRS side. Xaiver0510 (talk) 13:24, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I didn't realize how inactive this project is. (It seems like you've got the same problems as us over at WikiProject Indonesia.) I thought someone who was on location would know more how to ask directly. I will see what I can do about sending it myself. — Arsonal (talk + contribs) — 19:17, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I think all of us, whether resident in Singapore or not, are pretty much in the same position as regards contacting the SYOGOC. Anyway, I had a look at the official Games website's terms of use, and it says: "Request for written consent to use Materials should be directed to the [mailto:singapore2010_webmaster@singapore2010.sg singapore2010_webmaster@singapore2010.sg]. Please give details of your intended use of the relevant Material(s) and include your contact details: your name, address, telephone number, fax number and email." But I agree with Xavier0510 that it may be easier to contact the Flickr user to see if he or she will change the licence on the images to CC-BY or CC-BY-SA. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 10:51, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Reliable source to be used?
Just wondering the reliability of using The Temasek Review as a reliable source for some articles. Of course, I know its stand against the MIW etc. Just like to gather some viewpoints. Xaiver0510 (talk) 09:52, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't think it can be regarded as a reliable source on its own. It's essentially a blog, isn't it? However, if posts are referenced by reliable sources, those sources can be referred to directly. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 10:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Even Google identifies it as a blog, as well as the website's own "about" page. Zhanzhao (talk) 15:24, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I did not realise that for the about page. Some cleaning up to be done when I have the time :) thx guys! Xaiver0510 (talk) 15:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

LKY
Hi, I was defending the "family tree" at LKY article last 2 days against a trio of editors who came out of nowhere who wants to remove the prominent work. I have contributed to the article, however am not the originator of the tree. But I find that it has merit both visually and notable. If removed, the article is mainly text and looks kinda dull as well. Does anyone in SGpedian here have an opinion on this? Is it useless to argue with these veterans? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marinabay8 (talk • contribs) 05:01, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I've commented at "Talk:Lee Kuan Yew". — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 07:35, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. and to the others who responded as well. I will go with the concensus of the local editors. I don't think those trio are Sgpedians, and it was frustrating (angry even) that they could come in and delete someone's work in seconds thinking they comprise a majority - and even after I asked them to wait a while for comments. Marinabay8 (talk) 12:35, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Should "The Float@Marina Bay" be renamed "The Float at Marina Bay"?
There is an ongoing discussion as to whether "The Float@Marina Bay" should be renamed "The Float at Marina Bay", reversing a change that took place in April. Please share your views on the article's talk page. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 19:46, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Russell Lee (writer)
The article Russell Lee (writer) is so bad it's funny. Googling suggests that the books exist, but little more. Would anyone here care to do something (anything) with this article and the one on his book series? -- Hoary (talk) 10:01, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Not particularly. Go ahead if you are inclined. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 10:14, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I've made a small start; now over to somebody else. -- Hoary (talk) 12:10, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I do agree that the last paragraph elicits smiles from us readers – literally. I'll make a few incremental contributions right now. Cheers, A NG C HENRUI Talk♨ 14:30, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Singapore articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Singapore articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (&diams;) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Notability issue
Decided to lump under one section for easy discussion.
 * Crystal Shong - Not sure is she is notable in the first place. Nominate for deletion?
 * Joyce And The Boys - Notable enough?
 * Eddie Chin
 * I've never heard of any of these people. Then again, maybe I'm from the wrong generation. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 16:25, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Can help to nominate for deletion? thanks! Xaiver0510 (talk) 05:31, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Why don't you go ahead and do it? — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 08:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Somehow, I expected that response from you, lol. Will go read up on nomination for deletion pages, quite a handful to go through :(. For those who are reading this, you are welcome to help me nominate :P Xaiver0510 (talk) 06:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Nina Halim
 * All sent to AfD. Cheers. --ZhongHan (Email) 06:18, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks ZhongHan, never get to do it myself, lolx -- Xaiver0510 (talk) 08:39, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Advice to improve article: Rui En
I have been following the page Rui En for more than a year and had done a major overhaul for the page which I have been maintaining. It is currently rated C-Class on the quality scale for WikiProject Singapore. I would like to improve the article on the quality scale and appreciates guidance and advice. -- Pehxinyi (talk) 19:02, 27 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Have made some comments on the talk page. Article needs quite a fair bit of touch up. Xaiver0510 (talk) 05:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Made some comments on the talk page as well. A NG C HENRUI Talk♨ 09:55, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Noted with thanks. Will explore on your suggestions. -- Pehxinyi (talk) 19:55, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Is it possible to bring this article to at least a GA or even an A? Please advise. Thanks. -- Pehxinyi (talk) 18:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

National Junior Robotics Competition - citations
I would like to request for help adding citations to the above article. In it's current form, it lacks secondary and tertiary sources, and probably fails notability guidelines. --ZhongHan (Email) 03:28, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Found 3 links, 2008 competition's theme -, an article on robotics with mention of the competition and for this,   (digitised copy of The Straits Times, 8 September 2001), you need to go down to the library to read in detail (Extract - Keen rivalry at robotics competition DAWN WONG M THE popularity of the annual National Junior Robotics Competition is soaring with the number of teams taking part this year double that of last year. The 518 teams from 175 primary and secondary schools competed using robots built from the Lego Mindstorms...  ) --Xaiver0510 (talk) 09:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. --ZhongHan (Email) 11:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Civic District, Singapore
FYI, Civic District, Singapore was prodded for deletion. 76.66.200.95 (talk) 06:38, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Really? I had a look at the "What links here" page but the article doesn't appear to be linked to any deletion discussion. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 09:10, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Changi Airport buildings
Regarding File:SIA Boeing 747-400, Star Alliance livery, SIN.jpg - this photo

What are the names of the buildings in the background of the photo? I wanted someone to take a photo of Airline House, the Singapore Airlines head office. Is Airline House not visible in the photo? WhisperToMe (talk) 06:59, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * This map shows that SATS Airfreight Terminal 5 is between Airline House and the runway
 * If the airfreight terminal is low enough that Airline House would be visible, then it should be possible to get a photo of it from the runway.
 * Google Maps view of Airline House, overhead
 * Mentions a neon lighting project from 2000 - there is neon lighting at the top of the building
 * File:Cathay_Pacific%2C_Boeing_747-400%2C_SIN.jpg shows a CIAS Cargo Centre in front of one of the buildings
 * Here's another Flickr view: http://www.flickr.com/photos/86974734@N00/5113525102/sizes/o/in/photostream/
 * WhisperToMe (talk) 23:38, 18 October 2010 (UTC)


 * @WhisperToMe: actually, those buildings in the photos with SIA logo affixed, they are all Airline House (most people mistook/misunderstood Airline House as a single building, which is not the case here since it is actually more of a complex) but if it is the front facade you want, I can't help much except to ask you to try approaching the PR department for help. In any case, I suspect it might not be much you can expect from them since I know them all too well already. Like I said, put up a request to them and see what happens. Best. -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 09:29, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah - It looked like a single building from the map. Well, since both of those buildings are "Airline House" then I can use them to represent the HQ.
 * However I will also send an e-mail to the PR Department, just to see if they are willing to relicense a photo of the front entrance. - Sent.
 * Thank you very much for your help :)
 * WhisperToMe (talk) 09:40, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Places In Pulau Tekong
Just noticed this category Places In Pulau Tekong while going through unassessed articles. Any opinions on these articles? Pulau Tekong 300 metres range, Rocky Hill Camp, Sanyongkong Field Camp, Ladang and technically not a place but just a road, Tekong Highway.

To delete? update? merge them? Your opinions. --Xaiver0510 (talk) 01:08, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Non-English characters in dab page, article page, redirect page names, up for RfC
See WT:Article titles, where an RfC has been opened on the use of non-English characters in page titles for disambiguation and redirect titles (and there appears to also be discussion about article titles) 76.66.203.138 (talk) 09:34, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

hildanknight quit? natalina left?
some of the former great contributors, like aldwinteo and sengkang, could be listed at MW —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.189.218.107 (talk) 07:16, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * What is "MW"? — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 19:48, 21 November 2010 (UTC)


 * WP:MW missing wikipedians —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.189.219.60 (talk) 11:39, 23 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Aldwin is just busy with work and his personal life but he is still reachable by email. No idea about the others. Best. -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 12:45, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kampong Java Tunnel


The article Kampong Java Tunnel has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for the content of this article, fails WP:V and WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:00, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Wikimedia Singapore mailing list
Greetings SGpedians! You are all invited to join the newly-created Wikimedia Singapore mailing list for community collaboration and the inception of a Wikimedia chapter in Singapore. Please do let me know if you require any assistance. Thanks! — Nearly Headless Nick   {C}  18:47, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Languages_of_Singapore
Languages_of_Singapore is a Good Article Nominee, but the nominator hasn't edited in nearly a month. The article is promising (I am reviewing it to see if it can attain good article status) and I have left some questions at Talk:Languages_of_Singapore/GA1 which is the review page. If anyone can help with providing sourcing or any other material to make it comprehensive, it'd be much appreciated. I can copyedit and review at the same time. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:22, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia 10
In case you guys didn't know, Singapore will have an event to celebrate Wikipedia's 10 years old. The Simple English Wikipedia's Singaporean community has been notified. Join in the event if you are interested. Cheers. Hydriz (talk) 05:07, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notice, Hydriz. I have sent an email to the Singapore mailing list and would like to invite volunteers to help organize this event.  Please join the mailing list in order to collaborate and co-ordinate your efforts with other volunteers.  Thanks again! —  Nearly Headless Nick   {C}  20:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Featured article candidacy for Bombing of Singapore (1944–1945) now open
The featured article candidacy for Bombing of Singapore (1944–1945) is now open. Comments from reviewers are needed to help determine whether the article meets the criteria for featured articles; all editors are invited to participate, and any input there would be appreciated! Thanks! Nick-D (talk) 06:27, 30 December 2010 (UTC)