Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Singapore/2024 archive

Requested move at Talk:Peranakans
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Peranakans that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Let's welcome a new administrator from WikiProject Singapore~!
I like to congrat @Robertsky on his recently concluded successful RfA with 100% approval (196 votes)! Let~ JASWE (talk) 08:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Horrible IPs doing lots of damage
This has been going on for quite a while. A number of IP editors are making terrible edits on the pages of various common Singaporean politicians and political pages. Those of us here who have reverted these edits would know what I mean.

Examples:
 * unexplained template changes
 * unsourced content addition
 * confusing, unexplained edits
 * refusal to engage in dialogue; see User talk:121.6.221.174
 * unexplained template changes
 * unexplained content removal
 * unexplained content addition
 * refusal to engage in dialogue despite multiple warnings; see User talk:121.7.146.201
 * unexplained template changes
 * puzzling content removals
 * refusal to engage in dialogue or use edit summaries
 * unexplained template changes
 * puzzling content removals
 * refusal to engage in dialogue or use edit summaries
 * refusal to engage in dialogue or use edit summaries

Because of the similar nature of their edits, which are done often on the exact same pages and consecutively, I suspect that these IPs belong to a single editor. Even if they aren't, their persistent unexplained and unhelpful edits, combined with a lack of interest in engaging in the rules of Wikipedia, make their edits troublesome, difficult to deal with, and non-constructive. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 08:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Update: I have opened an ANI on this. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 08:26, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 * My theory is that these IPs are indeed the work of a single person who previously edited as, and/or . Their incompetent edits are pretty much identical. MordukhovichAleakin (talk) 08:53, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * How so? Perhaps we can open a sockpuppet investigation. My ANI was automatically archived after three days, as no one commented on it. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 02:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * also appears to be making similar edits. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 02:25, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Pinging @Justanothersgwikieditor for comment. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 02:39, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @Dawkin Verbier Sorry for the late reply as I was on a wikibreak due to work and personal commitments. Give me a day or two to read up and give you my comments. Thanks! ~ JASWE (talk) 08:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Dawkin Verbier while the behaviour is similar but basically these IP accounts have gone stale and non-disruptive already. I would suggest to just let it go and carry on with our usual things. ~ JASWE (talk) 04:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Justanothersgwikieditor 121.7.143.232 is now being problematic, making wide, unsourced, and unexplained changes to pages and creating dozens of edits per day. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 14:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Meetup 14 January 2024
Meetup/Singapore 15

We will be at NLB, at where Hans cafe used to be, from 1.30pm onwards.

Apologies for the late notification here. – robertsky (talk) 00:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Need help
Hello there, I will like to create an article in regards on the WP's recent incident relating to Raeesah Khan's exit and the WP all the way up to Pritam Singh's perjury, and if time permits, the cumulation of Aljunied-Hougang Town Council controversy, plus the billion dollar money laundering case. We dunno what might have in stores or what to write, or even concern on what title to name was appropriate. Perhaps maybe anyone who is experienced enough could help me if required. Thank you so much! Sculture65 (talk) 09:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)