Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/2017 Archive Aug 1

idigitals.in



 * Spammers

Dead link spamming, blacklisted. MER-C 08:48, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

godchecker.com
Previously posted at the admin noticeboard, sent here : Hello folks. How do we go about getting www.godchecker.com blacklisted from the site and all links to the site removed? It's clearly as bad as it gets (cf. this vs. our own entry, just to start). These links are doing nothing but feeding the site dollar bills while eroding our myth coverage wherever they appear. &#58;bloodofox: (talk) 04:59, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Judging by the comments below, it looks like we all see eye to eye on the problem here. Who wants to do the honors? &#58;bloodofox: (talk) 08:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  09:50, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Full Support  my antivirus went crazy.--Moxy (talk) 00:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Support What a horrid site. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * This needs to be globally blacklisted due to significant cross-wiki usage. I believe this should be placed on the meta blacklist.


 * , cross-wiki problem. --Dirk Beetstra T C 09:23, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Interesting pattern
The account that adds the spam link is immediately follow by one that makes a minor edit to hide the spam addition from socks. Evidence per this SPI


 * Spam links

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

random spam
from

user page does not exist, no clue if more links from this account. Someone please tag the user page with {{subst:uw-spam1}}, can't create it without an account.

Where it appeared: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TopSolid&type=revision&diff=753386983&oldid=693397869 92.224.59.84 (talk) 20:19, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Book spam in Lean services
A bit outside this page's usual scope, but the article (and some related topics) has been the target of SPA book spam for years, mostly to promote the views and publications of Debashis Sarkar. While the author seems to be somewhat knowledgeable, the self-adulating presentation on his official website contradicts his grand allegations of being one of the world's foremost experts. Anyway, expert or not, promotional spamming of publications is prohibited for both kinds of authors. It would be great if some interested editors could put the article(s) on their watchlist (already cleaned up some of the most problematic content and spam, but the article history clearly shows the problem). GermanJoe (talk) 18:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

daniel-gore.com
Various IP addresses have been used over the past month to repeatedly add a link for this webpage to General Medical Council (GMC). The webpage appears to do little other than act as a vehicle to publish allegations against an employee of the GMC. The associated comments added alongside the link suggest there has been some legal action against the publication of this material. Drchriswilliams (talk) 22:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

guiaturisticacuernavaca.com
Spammers

Spamming on the Cuernavaca page. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 04:56, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Great Canadian Gaming
Ansett (talk) 08:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

x2.tv-muse.ltd
Seems to be a streaming website. Links are being added to articles on recent movies such as The Dark Tower and Annabelle: Creation by new editors – though it appears all additions have been reverted now. Worth keeping an eye on it, I guess! –FlyingAce✈hello 18:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked and blacklisted. MER-C 12:20, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

NationalDetectives

 * Link

.-KH-1 (talk) 05:46, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Users:


 * to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Calendar download link in ~20 articles


I'm not sure if this type of link is acceptable. The download link on the target page doesn't work for me so I'm also unsure if it's free or under paywall. Several of the links were added by this user. User and talk page also show now-blanked past promotion (1, 2). Thanks, — Paleo Neonate  – 11:39, 14 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Two more previous spammers likely associated with the site:


 * The site is being spammed and should get blacklisted (3 spamming SPA accounts, first one is blocked). The site's "non-profit" claim is irrelevant - spamming of any type of link to promote external websites or publications is prohibited. Both previous spammers have also been clearly notified about this problem on their respective talkpages. GermanJoe (talk) 06:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC)


 * to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks . I assumed that it is also confirmed that the link should be removed from articles, but I wonder if it's acceptable for some relevant articles.  The first one I fall on has this mess which I'm not sure what to do with for instance: Islamic_calendar making me realize that this was far from the only similar external link.  Should I simply boldly delete all of them?  Some like fourmilab or dmoztools are very familiar names; some also appear to be on university sites.  Thanks, — Paleo  Neonate  – 08:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

.. what you describe sounds like a linkfamr or internet directory to me .. WP:NOT failure. —Dirk Beetstra T C 08:43, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * All instances removed from main article space. — Paleo  Neonate  – 10:47, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

spiritsecret.com


I just caught the addition of two links to it, then noticed that about 10 articles link to it, usually presented as direct external link or as an inline external link, sometimes as a source. Thanks, — Paleo Neonate  – 07:18, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * There's a big, long list of spammers at WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/spiritsecret.com. Blacklisted. MER-C 07:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Wow, I didn't realize. Still impressive that there were only 10 links in main space.  Thank you very much, — Paleo  Neonate  – 07:26, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

indianwikimedia.com
The domain name for this advertising agency appears to be intended to look like a WMF affiliate, which it obviously isn't. Spam links have been added both as external links and - more often - as references. [www.indianwikimedia.com/television/news/why-is-detective-dev-anand-burman-a-criminal/2017/07/12 Here] is a pretty typical example of an "article", showing the very poor content - the site is basically a gossip outlet, probably designed to draw customers for the agency. Please blacklist. --bonadea contributions talk 12:07, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Added. Did you report the domain to legal-tm-viowikimedia.org? MER-C 12:13, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * No, I haven't done that. Thanks for the pointer, I'll email them now. --bonadea contributions talk 12:18, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Children's literature


I reverted this edit on Children's literature. But this editor appears to be involved in adding multiple links to, what appears to be commercial sites. I have reverted several other edits but believe that a more knowledgable editor should intervene. Rwood128 (talk) 13:32, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

I added links to the website, which offers interactive adaptations of fairy tales. They could be very useful for parents who want to spend more time with their kids, reading stories together. I assume, according to WP policy on spam, a differentiation should be made between spam articles and legitimate articles about commercial entities. Sorry if there was a misunderstanding. Best, Nazim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazim Ragimov (talk • contribs) 17:22, 19 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Note, my edits and some by User talk:KH-1 have been reverted. Rwood128 (talk) 17:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

For Nazim Ragimov see. Rwood128 (talk) 18:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Another interesting link


Unrelated to the above editor I think, but interestingly found in ~300+ articles as external link, but we don't seem to have an article about the site (or I didn't find it). — Paleo Neonate  – 18:19, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Update: some are references like at The Lambkin and the Little Fish. Unsure if considered a reliable source, it's not contentious material but seems to be a personal compilation.  — Paleo  Neonate  – 18:26, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

loanstreet.com.my

 * (most/all reverted at time of posting, except one)
 * (most/all reverted at time of posting, except one)

Recently spammed in multiple articles, warned on talk page by two other editors. Unsure if worth it for unlinkbot or if previously also spammed by other accounts/addresses. — Paleo Neonate  – 11:11, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * That's an odd editing pattern... probably worth blocking for due to ToU violations. I'll blacklist this tomorrow if someone doesn't beat me. MER-C 13:31, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Beat me to listing it here. This one is odd, as the editor didn't really seem to show a pattern of spam and has a fair number of edits.  No question this is spam though and the site is anything but a reliable source.  There's something odd here, but I don't know what.  I can't imagine this is a compromised account, as it's only been a couple of spam posts, not the barrage I would normally expect.  Ravensfire ( talk ) 14:17, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * It may not necessarily be evidence of a pattern, but his user page was once deleted as a self-promotion fake-article with external links. At the time I then noticed his blog's address in another article used as a reference, but it's unclear if it was voluntary (Conversation with Eperoton after my removal attempt which he helped to more gracefully fix, ).  Oddly the blog's address was as part of fields passed via the google books url, but it was one of the external links on the deleted user page.  When I first noticed Menj was at Allah as Moon-god which was at WP:FTN at the time, he was a long inactive user on the English Wikipedia but returned and improved the article.  I would have to check again if he's the one who added some sources which I wasn't sure were reliable, I remember asking about one source at WP:RSN at the time RSN/bismikaallahuma.org thread because it appeared to be a soapboxing site; it however was used to support the mainstream view (as opposed to the fringe ones) so that settled it.  — Paleo  Neonate  – 17:22, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * So after looking at the diff again, it wasn't google books, but a cached document from that blog, it seems. — Paleo  Neonate  – 17:36, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * From the deleted userpage: "Currently I am employed as a Digital Marketing Specialist at a company in Petaling Jaya, Selangor." So that explains that. Blacklisted -- there are two spam only accounts blocked for adding links to this site in the past. MER-C 04:32, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, — Paleo Neonate  – 08:44, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Various spam

 * Links

.-KH-1 (talk) 11:23, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Users/IP (partial)
 * Blocked and blacklisted. MER-C 12:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked and blacklisted. MER-C 12:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

godchecker.com
Previously posted at the admin noticeboard, sent here : Hello folks. How do we go about getting www.godchecker.com blacklisted from the site and all links to the site removed? It's clearly as bad as it gets (cf. this vs. our own entry, just to start). These links are doing nothing but feeding the site dollar bills while eroding our myth coverage wherever they appear. &#58;bloodofox: (talk) 04:59, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Judging by the comments below, it looks like we all see eye to eye on the problem here. Who wants to do the honors? &#58;bloodofox: (talk) 08:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  09:50, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Full Support  my antivirus went crazy.--Moxy (talk) 00:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Support What a horrid site. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * This needs to be globally blacklisted due to significant cross-wiki usage. I believe this should be placed on the meta blacklist.


 * , cross-wiki problem. --Dirk Beetstra T C 09:23, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Unarchiving this, as the request for global blacklist was denied by . – Train2104 (t • c) 00:16, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Dineshsalem106
- not very active but user's edits are 100% refspam. Dunno if someone can just swing the banhammer and save time. Pinkbeast (talk) 16:12, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

dailyxvideos.com
See this discussion. User added links to pages about soccer that was confusingly hosted on a porn site. This should be watched or blacklisted. I've already gone through and removed all cases of it. — nihlus kryik   ( talk ) 05:42, 30 August 2017 (UTC)