Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/2022 Archive Sep

creyoface.com
—  Newslinger  talk   10:43, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

intelligentiobic.com
—  Newslinger  talk   01:22, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

goodmorningimagesdownload.in
—  Newslinger  talk   08:16, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

kkbuildtech.in
Users and IPs spamming waterproofing articles. There could be more users/IPs. —Bruce1eetalk 17:11, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

thingsyoullneed.myshopify.com
—  Newslinger  talk   04:46, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

assethomez.com
—  Newslinger  talk   05:46, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

rootsanalysis.com
WP:REFSPAM for a company selling commercial reports e.g. this one for $4,899.

Thparkth (talk) 16:25, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

11plusehelp.co.uk
—  Newslinger  talk   02:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Manipulatorchisinau.md
Posted spam in Manipulator (device) article. 151.67.125.77 (talk) 11:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

paultan.org
Has been posting the same website in several different articles dating back as early as May this year, one of which today was on my watchlist, Koenigsegg CC850. Pretty sure they're WP:NOTHERE.X-750 List of articles that I have screwed over 08:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

goodozen.com
User posted a link to this website on their userpage (which may be deleted by now). Nythar T . C 06:51, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

globalgurus.org
Noted in discussion at. —  Newslinger  talk   11:20, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

dnarayan.com.np
—  Newslinger  talk   11:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

glamupmall.com
—Nythar T . C 09:55, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

ujalatvhindi.com
—Nythar T . C 00:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

aitextpromptgenerator.com
This domain appears to be solely pushed by a single WP:SPA with zero other edits that do not involve this domain, in addition to what is presumably their IP when not signed in. -- benlisquare T•C•E 16:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I am new to editing this is a topic I am familiar with and am trying to document. I'm sure we can look back to the beginning of your editing history and find you only edited 2 things too. This topic is directly related to subject matter. Please stop removing it, or you can add it yourself if you want to control all the editing. Icemanld50 (talk) 16:44, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The link pushing is certainly against policy, but the editor hadn't had a talk page warning yet, so I just gave them one. MrOllie (talk) 16:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * How does an editor add a subject matter link to a page if I might ask? The link is on subject matter directly related to content, helps the reader with information on the subject and is documented. Icemanld50 (talk) 16:59, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * You can find guidelines about this at WP:EL. But the short answer is: for a link like this one, you don't add it at all because Wikipedia is not a link directory. MrOllie (talk) 17:01, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I see and yet I am looking at an external link section at the bottom of the page with relevant links. Wouldn't that qualify as the same. Icemanld50 (talk) 17:06, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * No. Local plumbers are 'relevant' to our article on plumbing. You'll note that we don't link to adverts for particular plumbers. MrOllie (talk) 17:30, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * You are correct in that normally you don't link to local plumbers, but you do however link to relevant resources and in this example that is what this is. Icemanld50 (talk) 17:57, 28 September 2022 (UTC)