Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/Suspicious articles/19 September 2020

Suspicious new articles (19 September)
I'm shortening the no-archive time to five weeks to make this page potentially load faster. MER-C 14:39, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Is it possible to cut the table into smaller blocks. Its quite big already and slow to edit A small collection of 3 or 4 tables would be quicker to edit and fill.   scope_creep Talk  20:22, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * This will appear in the next batch. MER-C 14:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

can we put these tables as a separate page under WT:WPSPAM, e.g. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/Suspicious Article reports/2020-09-19, listing them on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/Suspicious Article reports as a bulleted list, and here transcluding them in an own section? It brings down the editing a bit on this page, and maybe results in a better record. I would also be interested into have subject tracks on the relevant external links (e.g. the official website; just a link to WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/ will do, makes it easier to find them back through a special:whatlinkshere if they re-occur). --Dirk Beetstra T C 09:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Yip, suits me. Although I must point out there is other editors going through these lists as well, that review but don't report, but it should be easy to find the page, I guess.    scope_creep Talk  11:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , it would still be here. And if the transcluded page has a subheader you get an 'edit section' link on the table while transcluded. Dirk Beetstra T  C 13:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi . Yes, that sounds fine to me. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 09:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

I made it transclude .. but we hit the transclusion limit fast with this. --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:44, 28 September 2020 (UTC)