Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Telecommunications/Bell System

Kill the cat
Is there a reason why Category:Bell System (Pre-1984) ought to exist? Practically all its articles are in also in the parent category, and just about any that aren't, should be. Jim.henderson 23:35, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Jesus Christ, this still exists? Yet a page on a pretty significant band gets killed because some admin never heard of it. Whoever created this "wikiproject" and the guy that deleted that said band article (of which i made no contribution, just the reasoning really irked me, especially I discovered it deleted while I was looking for information that once existed on that page, and why I, and alot of other people stopped bothering with this wikipedia anymore. x570 00:20, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Huh?
Bell System and pre-84 AT&T is one and the same. Why the distinction? "Bell System" today refers collectively to AT&T, Verizon, and Qwest.

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme
As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
 * The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
 * The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
 * A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot  ( Disable )  22:16, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Bell System
Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group
Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. &mdash; Delievered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 04:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the  parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 08:52, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Project logo?
More a thought, but wouldn't using the old Bell system logo instead of a telephone make a little more sense, conveys that were doing Bell system exclusivity and not telecom companies in general?--The Navigators (talk)-May British Rail Rest in Peace. 22:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Probably still a trademark, alas, even though little used anymore. Jim.henderson (talk) 20:31, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 02:59, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

SBC?
I'm starting a page for the defunct telecoms company SBC Communications. Is that within your requiem or should I just stick with the general Telecom header for the talk page?--The Navigators (talk)-May British Rail Rest in Peace. 03:19, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Bell System articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Bell System articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (&diams;) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 22:03, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Incoming links to AT&T
A lot of incoming links to AT&T (AT&T Inc.) actually intend to link to AT&T Corporation. I have begun to resolve these and who knows how long it will take, but there is a whole pile of ambiguity in which references intended for two different articles are thrown together. Ordinarily this is handled by a dab page (e.g. "AT&T") and separate article pages (e.g. "AT&T Inc." and "AT&T Corp.") but I think that is against consensus in this case. It is also probable that new bluelinks to just "AT&T" will be created regularly that intend the other article, continuing the pile-on of ambiguity.

After the AT&T Corp. links are all fixed I would like to go back through and direct the other links to the target AT&T Inc. rather than AT&T. This appears similar to other disambiguation cases where the user is targeted to a redirect rather than the article title and for similar reasons. The benefit is that newly created bluelinks can be easily watched for and pointed to the correct source, either AT&T or AT&T Corporation. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. 12.153.112.21 (talk) 17:29, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

On second thought there are over 2000 articles involved. It may be better to go through and dab the Corp. and the Inc. at the same time. If I don't hear back I will proceed. 12.153.112.21 (talk) 20:21, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Breakup of AT&T
Comment is requested at Talk:Breakup of AT&T. 138.16.102.158 (talk) 12:49, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Conversion to task force
This project has been converted into a task force of WikiProject Telecommunications because of inactivity, and inability to exist as a standalone project. One may now use the Telecommunications project template to tag articles for the task force. RGloucester (talk) 23:12, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

History of Verizon
Editors interested in the Bell System may like to review my latest request to update the Verizon Communications article's History section, focusing on updating the Bell Atlantic (1983–2000) subsection. As I work for Verizon and have a conflict of interest, I ask others to look at my requests and make edits on my behalf. I am happy to answer questions about this request on the article Talk page. Thank you, VZEric (talk) 20:15, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * This request has been answered. However, editors here interested in Verizon's early history may also be interested in this new request mainly to clean up the chronology of the 2000-2002 section. Thank you, VZEric (talk) 17:00, 7 December 2022 (UTC)