Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/American television task force/Archive 1

Question about this Project
I noticed that this project is undergoing a restructuring and by a strange coincidence I am also restructuring and resurrecting WikiProject United States. There are currently dozens of Wikiprojects related to the United States (most of which are Inactive or maintain minimal activity) and I was going to create an arts and Entertainment subproject or task force (I hadnt really worked out the details yet). I was wondering if you would consider restructuring as a subproject or Task force under that Wikiproject. This will allow maximum participation and visibility for both projects while minimizing overhead by sharing things like templates, membership and to do lists. There's no requirement too mind you its just a suggestion since I am going to create an entertainment related something (Aside from television theres also novels, authors, music, etc) anyway. There are also a lot of Wikiprojects that relate to this one that I believe could/should be covered by this project. See the Embassy page and the Arts and Entertainment section for the list I have so far but a lot of them are Inactive and I believe should consolidated somewhere. Please let me know what you think either way.--Kumioko (talk) 03:47, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

US Collaboration reactivated & Portal:United States starting next
Casliber recently posted a suggestion on the talk page for WikiProject United States about getting the US Wikipedians Collaboration page going again in an effort to build up articles for GA through FA class. See U.S. Wikipedians' notice board/USCOTM. After several days of work from him the page is up and ready for action. A few candidates have already been added for you to vote on or you can submit one using the directions provided. If you are looking for inspiration here is a link to the most commonly viewed articles currently under the scope of Wikiproject United States. There are tons of good articles in the various US related projects as well so feel free to submit any article relating to US topics (not just those under the scope of WPUS). This noticeboard is intended for ‘’’All’’’ editors working on US subjects, not just those under WPUS.

The next item I intend to start updating is Portal:United States if anyone is interested in helping. Again this is not specific to WPUS and any help would be greatly appreciated to maximize visibility of US topics. The foundation has already been established its just a matter of updating the content with some new images, biographies and articles. Please let leave a comment on the Portals talk page or let me know if you have any questions or ideas. --Kumioko (talk) 19:03, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Non Free Content Discussion
There is a discussion Here about the use of screens shots in character articles, we need more views, to see what the consensus is. RAIN*the*ONE  BAM 15:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Some questions about the scope of the project
I was hoping I could get some clarification from the scope of the project. It seems clear enough that channels, titles of series and episodes would be covered under this project but here are a couple things that are not so clear and I think need to be discussed. Does the project or should the project cover: Thanks --Kumioko (talk) 16:57, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Individual characters of the shows (ie Jack Bauer and James T. Kirk)
 * Does it cover vehicles and props (ie Starship Enterprise, KITT or Herbie)
 * Individual episodes of tv shows.

May 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
.--Kumioko (talk) 02:42, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

July 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 03:26, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Renaming to Aqua Teen Hunger Force to Aqua Unit Patrol Squad 1
Please comment here for the requested move for discussion of renaming to Aqua Teen Hunger Force to Aqua Unit Patrol Squad 1. Thank you for your time. Regards, JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  08:25, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Bot run to auto assess some of the Unassessed articles
There is a discussion here for a Bot to do an assessment run through the 2000+ Unassessed articles that currently fall under WikiProject United States and the projects supported by it. Please post any comments or concerns you might have there. --Kumioko (talk) 18:44, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 03:14, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Merger of this project into WikiProject Television as a task force
It has been suggested that WikiProject American television be merged into WikiProject Television as a task force since the project might be inactive or semi-active. After reviewing this project that it appears that there have not been any active discussion on the talk page in some time and the only content updates appear to be simple maintenance so being supported by a larger project might be beneficial. If you have questions or comments, please let us know. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  08:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I have to admit I am a little confused. On one hand you add several projects to WPUS and then you ask to merge this one into Television when its already associated to WPUS. I am fine with it don't get me wrong but I am a little confused. Perhaps sharing it would be appropriate? --Kumioko (talk) 03:57, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify were not removing or disbanding WikiProject American television. Just adding and converting into a joint task force since I've created the project myself one year ago. There are only 5 members (there were 6 since I've left). It is not very active. The only change is adding it to the WikiProject Television project banner template and you can see and looks here with others such as Avatar: The Last Airbender, Realtly television, Glee and Dexter. This would allow the project to be visible of mach large editors as well as take advantage by various bots. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  04:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Its no problem, I was just confused. So your saying it will be associated to both projects? --Kumioko (talk) 14:43, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, just like American cinema and United States military history task force. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  20:56, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination as a United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month candidate
One or more articles relating to this project have been nominated to be a future United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month. All editors interested in improving these articles or voting for next months collaboration are encouraged to participate here. --Kumioko (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 01:34, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality reassessment request
I'm sure this is probably the wrong place, but this is the first time I'm making a request like this, so I'm not sure exactly where I should put it. I recently noticed that The Mickey Mouse Club article was rated as "B-class" roughly five years ago and doesn't appear to me to meet "B-class" criteria in any way, shape or form, so I was hoping someone here could take a look at the page and reassess it properly. I left a message about this a couple of weeks ago and got no replies. My concerns I expressed on the article's talk page are as follows:

Before I begin, I should say that this issue is not regarding the article as it is written, but rather, the apparent lack of reliable sources for 90+% of the page. From skimming through the article, I don't have any objections to the content, but, to my knowledge, "B-class" status is not something that should be conferred casually – particularly since, when the article was assessed as "B-class" (on November 12, 2007), the article boasted a grand total of one reference, which was cited as a source for the names of the 1990s cast. As it is, in my opinion, the few sources cited honestly don't appear to even meet a respectable "C-class" criteria (it should be noted that an article's Quality assessment should not be confused with its Importance assessment). I'm not familiar with the assessing editor's work, but I'm a firm believer that assessments should be undertaken by qualified editors, lest assessment ratings become essentially meaningless. As I said – I don't have any problems with the content of the article (it appears to be well-written), and I believe sources could most likely be found to substantiate most (if not all) of what's here, but, until such time that they are referenced as inline citations within the text passage(s) of the article, I believe the page needs to be reassessed by a qualified assesser affiliated with the WikiProjects concerned (given the lack of sources I'd say the page falls squarely within the "start-class" category, but I'm leaving the "B" for now). I realize talk pages don't traditionally get a lot of traffic, so I'll leave this here for a week or two to give other editors an opportunity to reply. If this post fails to generate a discussion, then I'll take the next steps to alert the WikiProjects associated with the article in order to get the page properly assessed.

I should be clear that I'm not necessarily suggesting that any content within the article should be removed, but rather, that the article should be reassesed. Given the article's lack of citations to reliable sources, I believe a "B-class" assessment for the page defeats the whole purpose of having a rating system in the first place (I honestly can't see any way that it should rate higher than "Start-class"). --- Crakkerjakk (talk) 19:44, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Star Trek featured portal candidate
and I have nominated Portal:Star Trek as a featured portal candidate.
 * Portal:Star Trek

Commented would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Star Trek.

Thank you for your time,

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:23, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 09:51, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposal for United States A-Class review process
There is a proposal at WikiProject United States to start an A-Class review process for United States related articles. Please stop by and join the discussion. Kumioko (talk) 01:58, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Simpsons episode template awaiting feedback
Please comment at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_The_Simpsons.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:43, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Tribune Entertainment/Studios
Currently, there is a discussion over the Tribune Entertainment and its relationship with Tribune Studios at the talk page there. Spshu (talk) 21:42, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

C-SPAN at FAC—looking for reviewers
Hello to anyone watching this page! Back in the middle of August I submitted the C-SPAN article for review at WP:FAC. The discussion has been limited, and though this Talk page seems to be very quiet I wanted to post here in case anyone has this page watchlisted and is interested in reviewing the article for the purpose of promoting it to FA status. The discussion can be found here. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 17:29, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Dancing With the Stars RFD
Just making this group aware. Dancing with the Stars request for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:11, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride
 You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!


 * What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
 * When? June 2015
 * How can you help?
 * 1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
 * 2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
 * 3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing!

User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa

Discussion to remove the Automatically assessed logic from the WikiProject United States template
Greetings, there is a discussion regarding removal of the logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories from Template:WikiProject United States. Most of the categories (over 220 Wikipedia wide) were deleted in February 2013 because they were empty. These categories were previously populated by a bot that hasn't run since 2011 and the categories aren't used. Removal of this uneeded/unused logic will greatly reduce the size and complexity of the WikiProject United States template. Any comments or questions are encouraged here. Kumioko (talk) 18:17, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Lest there is any confusion for people who don't speak the same language, the words "logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories" refer to the feature that was supposed to allow this WikiProject's template to "inherit" class and importance ratings from other WikiProjects. Kumioko says that there are no longer any bots performing the function that formerly copied those ratings. --Orlady (talk) 22:55, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Series overview tables
Please come to Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television to discuss the implementation of these tables in television articles, from main articles to List of Episode pages.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  19:23, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of The Land of Gorch for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Land of Gorch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Land of Gorch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 10:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mango (Saturday Night Live) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mango (Saturday Night Live) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mango (Saturday Night Live) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Right cite (talk) 22:53, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Expert attention
This is a notice about Category:American television articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. Iceblock (talk) 21:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Sisters at Heart
I have initiated a featured article candidacy for "Sisters at Heart", an article about an American television episode. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide at the discussion would be greatly appreciated. Neelix (talk) 20:36, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for peer review
I've listed The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for peer review.

Comments would be appreciated, at Peer review/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise/archive1.

Thank you for your time,

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 23:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Television Hall of Fame inductees has been nominated for discussion
Category:Television Hall of Fame inductees, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King? - featured article candidate
I've nominated the article about the episode "Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King?" for Featured Article consideration. The article is about about an episode from the American television medical drama Private Practice that received critical acclaim and attention for its representation of rape.

Comments would be appreciated, at Featured article candidates/Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King?/archive1. Thank you for your time. Aoba47 (talk) 22:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Please See - Submissions
https://wikiconference.org/wiki/Submissions --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject United States - 50,000 Challenge
--- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:10, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Love, Inc. (TV series) - featured article candidate
I've nominated the article about the television series Love, Inc. for Featured Article consideration. This article is a short-lived UPN sitcom that revolves around five matchmakers working at a New York City dating agency. Comments would be appreciated, at Featured article candidates/Love, Inc. (TV series)/archive1. Thank you for your time. Aoba47 (talk) 22:12, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Russell family (Passions) - featured article candidate
I've nominated the article about the episode Russell family (Passions) for Featured Article consideration. This article is about a fictional character on the American soap opera Passions. Comments would be greatly appreciated, at Featured article candidates/Russell family (Passions)/archive1. Thank you for your time.

Please come and help...
Greetings! I have recently relisted a requested move discussion at Talk:American Idol (ABC TV series), regarding a page related to this WikiProject. Your opinion and rationale are needed so a decision can be made. Thank you and Happy Publishing!  Paine Ellsworth   put'r there  01:14, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

House (TV series) Featured Article Review
FAR coordinator User:Casliber has nominated House (TV series) for a featured article review here. This is a procedural review of its FA status due to the discovery of socking at its original FAC. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. The instructions for the review process are here. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  16:00, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Roseanne Barr GAR
I've started WP:Good article reassessment/Roseanne Barr/1 and welcome input from others. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

RfC at Roseanne Barr
There is an RfC at the Roseanne Barr talk page found here that members of this project might be interested in taking part in. -- ψλ  ● ✉ ✓ 01:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Dana Plato
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Dana Plato. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:03, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Portal:Friends for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Friends is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Friends (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 02:48, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

RfC on disambiguation of TV articles
An RfC has been opened at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television). Additional participation is welcomed. -- Netoholic @ 18:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Discussion of Turner Classic Movies (TCM) and the TCM Movie Database (TCMdb) on the reliable sources noticeboard
There is a discussion on the reliability of Turner Classic Movies (TCM) and the TCM Movie Database (TCMdb) on the reliable sources noticeboard. If you're interested, please participate at —  Newslinger   talk   07:52, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Portal:Buffy the Vampire Slayer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Buffy the Vampire Slayer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Buffy the Vampire Slayer (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 10:08, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Chad Harris-Crane - featured article candidate
I've nominated the article about the episode Chad Harris-Crane for Featured Article consideration. This article is about a fictional character on the American soap opera Passions. The character made daytime television and soap opera history for participating in the first instance in a soap opera of two men simulating sex, and has also been cited as expanding the representation of LGBT characters of color on daytime television.

Comments would be appreciated, at Featured article candidates/Chad Harris-Crane/archive1. Thank you for your time. Aoba47 (talk) 01:34, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Bering Sea Gold: Under The Ice
An article that sports this project's banner – Bering Sea Gold: Under The Ice – has been proposed for merging with Bering Sea Gold. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you.  Paine  u/ c  03:40, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Eve - featured article candidate
I've nominated the article about the television series Eve for Featured Article consideration. This article is a short-lived UPN sitcom yhat revolves around two sets of male and female friends attempting to navigate relationships with the opposite sex. Comments would be appreciated, at Featured article candidates/Eve (2003 TV series)/archive1. Thank you for your time. Aoba47 (talk) 19:41, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Destination Truth
Destination Truth used to air on Syfy. It ended in 2012. Travel Channel is now broadcasting the show. It is branded as Josh Gates' Destination Truth. Here is an article about it. Here is the official site. Shouldn't that be included on this page? Charlotte Allison (Morriswa) (talk) 00:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Stop the insanity!
I've run into this repeatedly, & I continue to think it's lunatic, so... Many (all?) of the network schedule pages (like this one) have ratings positions ranked. The trouble is, ties are treated as if they're not tied, & (on this page, at least), entire rank positions have disappeared. (There's no 13th I can find.) By what lunatic definition does a tie for 2d make the next rank 4th? (In a list of results, 1+1, 2+2, 3+1, & 2+3, there are three different results, not four, & that's what tied means: equal.) And don't tell me "That's how PGA does it", because PGA does not get to dictate how anything is done outside the PGA. (The fact their system is designed by innumerate nitwits is their problem.) I'm not going to go trying to fix this clusterfuck, because I know, if I do, somebody will just rv it & call "PGA rule" on me. So it's time this project actually took a look at how completly crazy this is. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  20:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Removal of Game of Thrones' episodic Infobox images
Hi all. There is a discussion taking place on the Game of Thrones talk page regarding the removal of the Infobox images on every episode's article. Some much needed consensus is needed on this change. Please join in! Thanks!--Templeowls17 (talk) 12:03, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Judge Judy GAR
Judy Sheindlin, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Nole (chat·edits) 21:35, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Please come participate in discussion on V Wars
Please come participate in the discussion on the V Wars talk page regarding whether a review from the site WhatCulture should be used in the article. Thanks! ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 18:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

GA Review
Jeopardy!, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 👨x🐱 (talk) 16:10, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Category:American television articles needing expert attention has been nominated for discussion
Category:American television articles needing expert attention has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 05:45, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Running time in the Infobox?
Hi. I have a question about the Infobox in television-related articles (in particular South Park), which I've asked [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television#Running_time_in_the_Infobox? here]. Can editors please offer their thoughts? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 18:30, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Clarification on formatting
When constructing a tv series article, do we list in the infobox only those episodes which have aired, or the (cited) total number of episodes slated for that season? - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:16, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Proposed split of page for Amity Blight from List of The Owl House characters page
Hello everyone! I would like your input on a discussion on the List of The Owl House characters talk page, about whether to split off the section for Amity Blight into its own page. Currently, the page draft is available at Draft:Amity Blight, and consensus in this discussion is important to determine whether this character should get its own article. Thanks and I hope to see your comments. Historyday01 (talk) 01:41, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Working on an article on the ongoing bankruptcy of Diamond Sports Group
With the possibility of major changes in sports media, I thought it would be a good idea to work an article about Diamond Sports Group's ongoing bankruptcy. Help is appreciated! Draft:Bankruptcy of Diamond Sports Group. Esolo5002 (talk) 03:23, 4 May 2023 (UTC)