Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Texas/Archive 3

Nathan Lee
Nathan Lee is the last person in TX to be executed by hanging. Does this confer notability? WhisperToMe (talk) 10:10, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

James Turman
See "Texas House Speakers Oral History Project - James A. "Jimmy" Turman." Briscoe Center for American History. WhisperToMe (talk) 01:34, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Public domain

 * All Texas Department of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services content is in the public domain: http://www.dars.state.tx.us/rules/securityprivacy.shtml
 * The Texas Medical Board website is also in the public domain: http://www.tmb.state.tx.us/agency/privpolicy.php
 * The "Texas Military Forces" website is also in the public domain: http://www.agd.state.tx.us/sitelinks/privacypolicy.asp

So if someone wants to use it... WhisperToMe (talk) 07:00, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Public Information Act
Here is a long document about the Public Information Act: http://www.oag.state.tx.us/AG_Publications/pdfs/publicinfo_hb2008.pdf WhisperToMe (talk) 07:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Handbook of Texas online template
Original of this posting is on Village pump (technical)

Please be advised that Template:Handbook of Texas may need to be revised shortly, due to a new TSHA website going online TSHA. I noticed today they were "testing" and links were re-directed to a new Texas State Historical Association page, but only pointed the user to an additional link to click. It did not automatically roll over to the correct page. As of this posting, it's temporarily back the way it's always been.
 * Maile66 (talk) 19:16, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

As of this posting, the new TSHA website is up and running. They suggest users re-bookmark. If you look at the address bar in how it changed, it's like this Re-direct page to this New link. I'm not sure if there is a quick template fix on this, as how it changed is the right-hand end of the address line. But it will affect all Wikipedia articles that have used this template. And possibly affect any new articles using the template.


 * Maile66 (talk) 22:55, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to help with WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 02:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

A consideration for cross project consolidation of talk page templates
I have started a conversation here about the possibility of combining some of the United States related WikiProject Banners into WikiProject United States. If you have any comments, questions or suggestions please take a moment and let me know. --Kumioko (talk) 04:59, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

How do these changes relate to WikiProject Texas? Not sure I understand :) A. Ward (talk) 01:11, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Unless you want to, they don't. Some of the US related projects are starting to team up (because many of us have become inactive or the users have moved on) and work together so I offered a general invite thinking that others would as well. My original thought was that rather than have 200 different banners on article talk pages it would be better to add some of the projects to that and have just one. Many have declined though and thats ok. --Kumioko (talk) 02:30, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Zion Lutheran Church in Fredericksburg, Texas
Zion Lutheran Church (Fredericksburg, Texas) was part of Fredericksburg, Texas, but the content as it then existed on that page, took up almost the entirety of what was then "Fredericksburg in Religion". Because of the historic significance of the church, I felt it needed its own page. The wording was unchanged when I moved it over, and is not text of mine. Possibly, the text was lifted verbatim from a church brochure. I would encourage any interested editors who can re-work the text and provide verifiable sourcing to do so. The subject is worthy of its own page, but it needs considerable work. Maile66 (talk) 20:59, 6 December 2010 (UTC)


 * HI there! I lived in Texas for many years and never heard of the Church. Can you explain why there is historical significance? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anneaholaward (talk • contribs) 01:08, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


 * It's the oldest Lutheran church in the Texas Hill Country, and one of the oldest in the state of Texas, built in 1852. Built out of hand-hewed wood and native limestone rock. It was designated a Recorded Texas Landmark in 1964.  Maile66 (talk) 01:25, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Category: Members of the Congress of the Republic of Texas
I had been working on categories on the members of the various United States territorial legislature. I would be willing to start a category for members of the Congress of the Republic of Texas if there is consensus. Thank you-RFD (talk) 13:21, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Dallas Area Rapid Transit categories
See renaming proposal at Categories for discussion/Log/2010 December 11. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:32, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Don't Mess with Texas
Hey Everyone!

I have been working to de-stub the Don't Mess with Texas page. Unfortunately, I am running out of ideas. Anybody have any input for me??? Otherwise I'll go back to workin' on Sam Houston.

Cheers and happy editing :) A. Ward (talk) 01:10, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Are you working from the "De-stub" list on the WikiProject Texas page? That list has been out of date for a long time. It's not picking up the stubs from any kind of template. Somebody just manually input the tasks.  Looks like nobody has done a regular clean-up of that list since 2008.  I had removed some out-of-date items during the summer, and I just removed Don't Mess With Texas from the de-stub list there.  Don't Mess With Texas appears to have never been a stub, as it was first assessed as a "Start class" article. Maile66 (talk) 01:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Ohhhh, got it. Thanks! Do you need me to help with updating the de-stub list somehow? Otherwise I am not sure where to work off of.A. Ward (talk) 23:09, 13 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Do you have your preferences set to show the assessment (Stub, etc.) at the top of the page? It's in your Preferences, under Gadgets.  I think under User interface Gadgets, there's a box to check to display assessments.  That's a big help for you.  Then you know right off when you pull up the page if it's a stub or not.
 * There's probably a lot on that list that really are stubs. If you click the "more" thing there, it takes you to another page.  There's at least a couple of hundred stubs.
 * Not everything labeled a stub should still be a stub. Editors add things, and nobody edits the article's Talk page and reassesses it.
 * Do you know about this page Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment? This tells you the qualifications for the various assessments.  You can look at the various stub articles and decide if they should be reassessed on the Talk page.
 * Maile66 (talk) 00:04, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Had no idea about that feature, but I will definitely use it. No, I did not know about the editorial assessment page either. Thanks!!!!A. Ward (talk) 19:31, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Llano, Texas
Llano, Texas needs a total re-write, and I don't readily find enough online to do it myself. The History section has been lifted verbatim from the Handbook of Texas online. Much of the rest of it also seems to be a verbatim lift from other places. i.e., the section on Badu House seems to have been lifted from the commercial home page of the Badu House. Little ole Llano needs a lot of help, if anyone out there has the resources to give it some assistance. Maile66 (talk) 19:49, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/List of plants of Collin County, Texas
FYI. postdlf (talk) 05:24, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Collaboration with the Wine Project on Texas wine articles?
Hello! For 2011 the Wine Project is doing a new Wine Improvement Drive where each month we focus on an area of articles that relate to a particular theme. In January, we are are ringing in the New Year with New World wine, with a focus on the wines of the Northern Hemisphere-Canadian wine, American wine and Mexican wine. I am going by related projects to see if there is any interest in collaboration between this project and the wine project on the subject of Texas wine Some suggestion on potential article creations include History of Texas wine and expanding of important Texas related stubs such as Bell Mountain AVA, Escondido Valley AVA, Fredericksburg in the Texas Hill Country AVA, Mesilla Valley AVA, Texas Davis Mountains AVA, Texas Hill Country AVA and Texoma AVA. Another idea would be creating articles on notable wineries such as Becker Vineyards, Flat Creek Estate and McPherson Cellars. On a smaller scale, there are Texas wine related articles that could use some help with clean up tags such as Llano Estacado Winery and Black Spanish (grape). And, of course, of HUGE help would be the upload of free use photos of Texas wineries, wines and wine regions to Commons that could be used to better illustrate Texas wine articles. If you're interested in helping, please drop a note at the Wine Project's talk page with the article you're interested in helping with. Thanks and have a great New Year! AgneCheese/Wine 02:38, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

If anyone feels up to a challenge
The Mason County War was set up 2-1/2 years ago by an unregistered editor with unknown sources. Possibly lifted verbatim from elsewhere. Possibly somebody just deciding to tell the story in their own words after having read something. It's not well done. The whole section of "Background" really is not relevant to the war itself. The content, while having some validity, is often questionable. Not much has been done with it since.

In a nutshell, the Mason County War (or Hoo Doo War) in Texas was about cattle rustling, vigilante mobs and questionable law enforcement. It is sometimes portrayed as a racial war against the German population, but that is misleading as non-Germans were also victims. The usual names that surface in this are not German.

I started out to try and add some sourcing about the burning of the courthouse, which happened a year after the war ended - but which the writer would have us believe was "an obvious case of arson" and tied to the war.

As I read the article, I realized it needs a complete re-write. Something I am not able to devote time to at present, but the project is worthy.

This is not something that should be repaired patchwork, a source here, a source there. It needs to be taken apart and re-worked. And because this is one of those history areas where different sources will present a different slant, the sourcing needs to be cross-checked. Maile66 (talk) 14:54, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Hmmm. Looks like a potentially very interesting article, but I do not know much about it. I will put it on my list to research. A. Ward (talk) 17:52, 5 January 2011 (UTC)


 * See here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject American Old West I believe this project is taking this on, if anyone wants to help out. Maile66 (talk) 19:30, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

The West Pole, Texas
Is this serious? There's a pdf copy of the quoted House resolution here but I can't trace it online eg at http://www.legis.state.tx.us/. Maybe resolutions are like UK Early Day Motions, where an MP can raise a topic of local, minor, or even eccentric, interest and get it on the record. PamD (talk) 08:35, 13 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Look here: HR 2933 May 31 2007 Click tab that says "Text".   I notice it says "presumed site" Maile66 (talk) 21:05, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

US Collaboration reactivated & Portal:United States starting next
Casliber recently posted a suggestion on the talk page for WikiProject United States about getting the US Wikipedians Collaboration page going again in an effort to build up articles for GA through FA class. See U.S. Wikipedians' notice board/USCOTM. After several days of work from him the page is up and ready for action. A few candidates have already been added for you to vote on or you can submit one using the directions provided. If you are looking for inspiration here is a link to the most commonly viewed articles currently under the scope of Wikiproject United States. There are tons of good articles in the various US related projects as well so feel free to submit any article relating to US topics (not just those under the scope of WPUS). This noticeboard is intended for ‘’’All’’’ editors working on US subjects, not just those under WPUS.

The next item I intend to start updating is Portal:United States if anyone is interested in helping. Again this is not specific to WPUS and any help would be greatly appreciated to maximize visibility of US topics. The foundation has already been established its just a matter of updating the content with some new images, biographies and articles. Please let leave a comment on the Portals talk page or let me know if you have any questions or ideas. --Kumioko (talk) 19:30, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Old stereo card of San Antonio
Does anyone know exactly where in San Antonio this would have been? Would it be Military Plaza? - Jmabel &#124; Talk 18:17, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes - you're looking south on Military Plaza. According to this, that's where Hofhienz had his store (seen in the background), and you can see the almost exact outlines of the buildings on the map here.  Really cool picture.  Kuru   (talk)  20:01, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. There are a lot more where it came from, see Commons:Category:Stereo cards of San Antonio, Texas. - Jmabel &#124; Talk 19:38, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Maybe not. According to the 1891 Bexar County Directory R. J. Hofheinz was a few blocks up the street (assuming street numbering is the same and it had not moved) at 471 N Flores.  I also note that the shadows suggest that the camera is aimed toward the southwest or to the southeast (which should show the church, if this was the Military Plaza, would it not?)
 * I have tried, but failed, to find any Sanborn Fire Maps surrounding the Military Plaza (or Main Plaza) indicating the combination of a trolley line running before a hardware store, beside a saloon (assuming Texas Barrel House is one) and with a Loan office two buildings down.
 * I tried looking behind my screen, because the image clearly states that the description is on the back-- but that side isn't working!-- cregil  (talk)  19:40, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Texas Flag at DKR - North Texas vs Texas 2006.jpg listed for deletion
A file related to this WikiProject, File:Texas Flag at DKR - North Texas vs Texas 2006.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the if you would like to participate in the discussion. Johntex\talk 16:20, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Turtles of Texas
I am putting together a page on turtles of Texas in my sandbox. I intend to take it to Featured List. Just getting going now, but I have taken state reptiles to FL and painted turtle to FA. So have a little experience with turtles (though not a biologist) and with F content (although just two). I am not a Texas native, so want to make sure I cover this all properly. Will be asking for some looks when I get it close, and then when it is up for review. Right now, is just a skeleton that I am building. See here:  TCO (talk) 07:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)


 * P.s. There is an existing long list on reptiles of Texas, but I am going in more depth, just on turtles. TCO (talk) 07:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Rangers-Astros rivalry article
Could someone please add to this. It needs a lot of work. Arnabdas (talk) 17:10, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Willie Nelson/GA2
Willie Nelson is going through a GAN, and is on hold for an initial seven days to allow issues, mainly prose, to be addressed. Help is requested and welcome. SilkTork  *Tea time 17:56, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Listing of best Texas movies
I found: WhisperToMe (talk) 17:12, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Kelly, Christopher. "No Country for Bad Movies." Texas Monthly. June 2011.
 * O'Connor, Kyrie. "Best Texas movies?." Houston Chronicle. May 17, 2011.

Beer distribution bill articles
WhisperToMe (talk) 23:55, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Crocker, Ronnie. "Texas craft brewers' bubble popped." Houston Chronicle. May 26, 2011.
 * Marmaduke, Lauren. "Proposed Beer Legislation Seeks To Loosen the Reins on Texas Brewers." Houston Press. Friday February 18 2011

Nederland, Texas page
Please review the Nederland, Texas page, I have added quite a bit of information, and I think it should be ready to move up to a C quality at least. Sandman 511 (talk) 13:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Portal:Houston nominated for delisting as a Featured Portal
Portal:Houston has been nominated for delisting as a Featured Portal at Featured portal review/Houston because it is no longer maintained. It is likely to be delisted speedily unless immediate action is taken. BencherliteTalk 10:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

African Americans in Texas
The Texas Historical Commission has a pamphlet and website about African Americans in the State of Texas http://www.africanamericansintexas.com/ Could be useful in developing sources on stuff WhisperToMe (talk) 05:44, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Colonial Governors of Texas
Hello people of WikiProject Texas!

I've worked a lot on wikipedia articles related with the history of the Americas, since that this is a topic that I´m interested. the case is I realized that, since a long time, all governors of Texas have articles on wikipedia since those state joined the United States, while only a few colonial governors of this state had them. I thought it would be nice to at least most of colonial governors of Texas also have articles on wikipedia, because they are a bit forgotten in this encyclopedia. I've already looked for information and I've edited articles the some of these governors and I ask that, if interested, you also collaborate on editing articles from other governors of this state. The names of the governors of New Mexico are on the lists List of Texas Governors and Presidents.

I hopefully are at least some editors interested. I would appreciate any cooperation.--Isinbill (talk) 00:55, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

New page peer review request
Please review the page for The Lillie and Hugh Roy Cullen Sculpture Garden.

 Chris Engelsma  (talk) 13:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Please review the page for Nederland, Texas Sandman 511 (talk) 03:41, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * This is not a new page. It was created nine years ago in 2002. It's already had an assessment.Maile66 (talk) 15:38, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

TXDOT guide on gas stations
I found: WhisperToMe (talk) 06:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * ftp://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/library/pubs/bus/env/fieldguide_gas_stations_.pdf

List of schools of the Dallas Independent School District
Hi! I find List of schools of the Dallas Independent School District very difficult to edit.

Is it okay if I turn this into a simple list?

I want to add the following:
 * Wilmer Hutchins ES, Kennedy-Curry MS, and WH HS opening
 * Seguin Learning Center (kids going to bigger Russell Elementary) and Maynard Jackson Middle School (kids go to Kennedy-Curry) closing
 * A. Maceo Smith going magnet, zoned kids go to WH HS.

From:
 * Hobbs, Tawnell D. "Dallas school district to open 3 Wilmer-Hutchins campuses, close 2 others." The Dallas Morning News. November 24, 2010. Retrieved on July 15, 2011.

Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 08:46, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I encourage you to go with your instincts for the simple list. It's too much as it is. The size of it makes it take a very long time to open the page.  Your simplifying it would be an improvement.
 * - Maile66 (talk) 15:17, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Selena discussion
Please join in the discussion on the talk page to help expand the article to its fullest potential. AJona1992 (talk) 19:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Reversion of article name change request
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Adrián González. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:55, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Asking for a FAR of the article Sharon Tate
I believe it no longer meets FA status and have nominated it for FAR. Per wiki rules, I am notifying all of the article's involved wiki projects. Crystal Clear x3 03:27, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Need Afd review of Texas case: Texas Disposal Systems Landfill v. Waste Management Holding
There is currently an open AfD discussion for the article Texas Disposal Systems Landfill v. Waste Management Holding that is lacking in user activity. Can some interested editors please go and weigh in at the AfD?  Austex •  Talk  01:36, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

RfC on Template:Campaignbox Texas Revolution inclusion criteria
Opinions are requested at Template_talk:Campaignbox_Texas_Revolution on whether the template should include naval skirmishes or not. Karanacs (talk) 17:46, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

TEA 2000 directory
I found some info in a TEA 2000 directory, including WhisperToMe (talk) 22:34, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * http://web.archive.org/web/20000607221010/http://askted.tea.state.tx.us/tsd-2000/menus/main.htm - Texas School Directory
 * http://web.archive.org/web/20000902203801/http://askted.tea.state.tx.us/tsd-2000/tsd/iopsd.pdf - Directory of school districts

Statistics table in "Crime in Texas" is empty
Left a note at the article, too. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Crime_in_Texas#The_statistics_table_is_empty Unimaginative Username (talk) 22:00, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Some maps
WhisperToMe (talk) 03:59, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * State travel map: ftp://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/trv/maps/totm-mxd.pdf
 * County highway maps: http://txdot.lib.utexas.edu/
 * Additional county highway maps: http://www.dot.state.tx.us/travel/county_grid_search.htm

Texas gold medal
Alex from the San Diego project made: If anybody wants to use it as a barnstar, feel free! WhisperToMe (talk) 04:24, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * File:TX gold medal.svg

Texas Historic Sites Atlas references
For anyone who has linked references to search results obtained at Texas Historic Sites Atlas, please note that they changed their URL somewhat. If you linked to a reference obtained by right-clicking and then "Open Link in a new window", the result of opening in a new window is where they changed the address. Rather than the Texas Historical Commission just redirecting links to the old address, it seems it will be up to the individual editor to go back and manually correct such links the editor may have inserted in any Wikipedia article. Bummer. Maile66 (talk) 22:39, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Oil boom and small towns
The Chronicle released an article: It comes with a sidebar at http://www.chron.com/mediaManager/?controllerName=image&action=get&id=1769155&width=628&height=471 WhisperToMe (talk) 04:15, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Hiller, Jennifer and Vicki Vaughn. "Oil boom taxing small towns." Houston Chronicle. Sarurday November 19, 2011.

Possible changes in immigration
WhisperToMe (talk) 01:12, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Kever, Jeannie. "A&M sociologist sees shift in immigration trends." Houston Chronicle. Sunday November 19, 2011.

History of the Mexican-Americans in Texas
If anybody wants to start History of the Mexican-Americans in Texas, I found sources: WhisperToMe (talk) 15:52, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * De León, Arnoldo. Mexican Americans in Texas: A Brief History. Harlan Davidson, Jan 31, 2009. Third Edition. ISBN 0882952684, 9780882952680.
 * De León, Arnoldo. "MEXICAN AMERICANS." Handbook of Texas.

2011 TEA low performing schools list
Some supporting documents: WhisperToMe (talk) 04:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/taa/perfreport120811a.pdf

Photo request
If anyone in this project lives in or near Fort Worth and can get to the Sid Richardson Museum, some of us could use a wikipedia-legal image of this painting which appears to be on display there. Can anyone help? Thanks. Montanabw (talk) 03:39, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * If the painting has a Wikipedia article, I could attach a photo request tag there.
 * You may also want to ask at WikiProject Dallas
 * The Commons also has a photo request list
 * WhisperToMe (talk) 03:47, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll try commons and Dallas, thanks!  Montanabw (talk) 16:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Texas museums
I have just done a re-working of List of museums in Texas, due to its size, and organized it into sub pages by area. Since the sub pages were merely a sorting out of what already existed on the main page, I have no way of verifying any individual listings. It's possible that some of these may have closed down, or that there are existing museums not listed. Most pages are filled with red links that have no corresponding Wikipedia page. Some areas have no photos at all available on Commons. East Texas is really needy in the way of images. I would like to invite any interested party to peruse the lists and make any valid edits necessary. Museums are such a great expression of any area's culture and history. Maile66 (talk) 14:44, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Texas Award
Greeting from The Awards Project!

Currently, WP:PUA lists as your Project's award, but such an award does not appear on your project's page anywhere. I'd just like to confirm that it is, in fact, the Official Award for your Project before I move it to WP:WPPA. Cheers! Achowat (talk) 20:31, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Image deletion discussion
Relevant deletion discussion at .--GrapedApe (talk) 17:59, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject University of Texas at Austin was marked as inactive
I just wanted to drop a note that WikiProject University of Texas at Austin was recently marked as inactive. I recommend pulling it in as a task force of the Austin project but it doesn't seem very active either. I would like to recommend pulling both projects in under the WikiProject Texas project. --Kumioko (talk) 14:36, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * WikiProject Texas A&M also seems to be marked as inactive. The template was broken and I just fixed it but the active of the project indeed seems low. --Kumioko (talk) 14:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Also WikiProject University of North Texas. --Kumioko (talk) 14:41, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Spanish newspapers
Hi! I notice: Mentions: Does anybody have some info on the latter two? Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 23:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Tewes, David. "Victorians among 21 seeking new positions." ("Position") The Victoria Advocate. Thursday January 5, 1995. 10A (article began on 1A). Retrieved on January 8, 2012. Google News 6 of 17.
 * La Voz de Houston (we have an article)
 * El Sol in Dallas (no known article)
 * El Periodico statewide (no known article)

Maile66 (talk) 23:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * El Sol in Dallas might be El Sol de Texas
 * El Periodico in McAllen?

WikiProject Texas page clean up
I am inviting interested parties to respond to this within a week, by January 17, 2012.

The main page WikiProject Texas has for a long time needed updating. This is sometimes the first page an interested participant sees, and we need to make it representative of the project's scope and participants. With that in mind, I find two areas are really needy:
 *  Open tasks - If we are going to list in this box, we need it updated. As is, it's years out of date.  Otherwise, I'd rather not even see that Open Task box on the page.  Why incorrectly list a page as needing work, when the work was already done?  Confusing.  Do we have any  editors who would like to go in and clean that list? (this item is done as of Jan 12, 2012)
 * Participants - My plan is to divide the list into two parts, similar to what other projects have. An Active list, and an Inactive list. No listed participant will be deleted. But any listed participant whose User Page contributions list shows they have not been active on WP for over 6 months, will be moved to the Inactive list.  They can always move themselves back to Active.  It's also possible to take a look at currently active editors to see if they've contributed anything to the project in the last year.  If not, those also could be moved to Inactive.  Feedback is welcome. I will begin work on the Participants list on January 12, 2012. (this item is done as of Jan 20, 2012)

If you are reading this Talk page, then perhaps you are interested in how the project goes forward. Let us hear your ideas. Perhaps you have other ideas of how the main page should look. WikiProject Texas wants to hear from y'all - in-residence Texans, transplanted Texans, wannabe Texans, .or anybody who just has a hankering to be part of this project. Y'all come and be part of this, now. Y'hear? Maile66 (talk) 19:45, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Help Improve Texas Projects and Portals
This is an open invitation to anyone interested in helping to update the information on the various Texas projects and portals. The information is generally out-of-date, sometimes by years. Every little bit helps. Every small improvement adds to the larger whole. Together, we can get the Texas pages to look current and helpful to visitors.

These two Category links will take you to the various pages:
 * Category:Texas portals
 * Category:WikiProject Texas

Anyone interested in improving the basic look and structure, could open a WP:RfC. Dialogue is good for the project.

These are areas I see could be improved, in addition to miscellaneous information on the portal and project pages:


 * Participant lists could be divided in to two separate lists: Active, and Inactive participants
 * Task lists that require monitoring, can be somewhat automated by replacing the individual topic items with category page links
 * Eliminate duplication of efforts. Inter-connect the like sections in different pages to a singular template.
 * As an example, I already updated the Open Tasks on WikiProject Texas, and the Things You Can Do on the Texas portal. These are exactly the same information, but point to two different templates.  In a perfect world, these two pages would point to the same template, but they don't - possibly due to page formatting. I updated the templates they point to, so at least the individual items will point to Wiki links that would, in essence, make the list items self-updating. But it would be better if both pointed to only one template.

-Maile66 (talk) 19:32, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Redesign of WikiProject Texas main page
Soliciting input by February 1, 2012.

Please have a look at WikiProject United States.

I propose adapting the Tabbed style of the WPUS page to the Texas project page. It's a much cleaner, neater look and easier to navigate. Input is welcome.

On a second item, I propose completely eliminating the Inactive Participants list. Anyone who wishes to re-add themselves to the Active list can do so at any time. In moving the inactive out of the active, I already eliminated editors who had been indefinitely blocked years ago, mostly sockpuppet accounts. There seems to be no reason to keep an inactive list at all. However, feedback on the issue is welcome.

Maile66 (talk) 20:18, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Other than the members who are indefinately blocked, Sockpuppets or the like I would keep the ones that are just inactive. They have been known to come back after some time if they see something interesting. It also retains a bit of history for the project.


 * As for the tabbed style I would recommend the following: Main page, Members, Portal and Recognized content. This will be a good base and will help associate the project to the portal and you can always add additional tabs later if needed. --Kumioko (talk) 00:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The Recognized Content over on WPUS is a beautiful piece of work. How did you come up with the data? I am not aware of a one-stop shopping list for something like all Featured Articles, or all DYK for any project. Incredible achievement of that list over on WPUS.Maile66 (talk) 02:18, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks but I can't take the credit. Its done by one of the bots. I'll get Texas added to the list in a few. --Kumioko (talk) 02:28, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

I've started the main page layout, what do think? JJ98 (talk) 03:36, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I love it! What a great-looking and efficient improvement. Maile66 (talk) 12:32, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hot dog! You did good with that revamped page, Jj98 Maile66 (talk) 23:25, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I am going to create a Texas Barnstar myself. JJ98 (talk) 03:46, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

On the redesign where you have the categories listed, please add Category:Museums in Texas. Thanks. Maile66 (talk) 23:52, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Archive_3#WikiProject_Texas_Award This was on the talk page recently, and I never knew what to do about it. But it probably should be added to the main page.  Thanks. Maile66 (talk) 23:56, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Suggestion for WikiProject United States to support WikiProject Texas
Someone recently suggested that this project may be inactive or semi-active and that it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States. After reviewing the project it appears that there has been some attempts at getting discussions going by Maille66 with little response from others so it appears as though the project may need a little help.

Just to clarify the project page with members stay basically as they are with the members able to dictate how things happen, scope of the project, etc. Its not going to be absorbed or dissolved in any way and the scope won't change unless the members want it too. The only change would be that the WikiProject banner would be replaced with the WPUS banner with WikiProject Texas embedded within it. You can take a look at Category talk:Visitor attractions in South Carolina to see an example. Please don't look at this as a badge of shame for the project. But the project itself has little activity and I would like to try and change that. Partly through automation of messages and alerts but also in member activity. All the individual projects will function as they do and the WPUS project will perform certain tasks and the states do things also. All the projects use a standard group of parameters (Needs infobox, image, attention, geo coordinates, references, etc), and the banner allows for things like project to do lists, articles with to do lists and articles with comments. I have developed some bot tasks that automate the adding and removing of some of the parameter values like needs infobox, image, attention, etc. and those are beginnning to roll out now. This also allows the projects use the same article classes and importance.

How it will be supported can depend on what the members of the project want but typically WPUS is a bigger project with a lot more members and the more members we have collectively the better for all, it has a newsletter, a monthly collaboration, multiple bots that run actively through the articles for various things (as can be seen on the members page) with more being setup as we go along. This means that it will be seen by a lot of people in a lot of ways. We spent a lot of time concentrating on building up the project but with the new year we are going to be starting to do some drives to build up articles, create new ones, etc. I hope this helps and please let me know if you have any questions or comments. --Kumioko (talk) 20:33, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I was just perusing the WPUS newsletter found under that tab. Just from what I see there, being part of this would take the Texas project out of that stand-alone situation.  With the Texas project page as silent as it has been, I see no advantage in being a stand-alone project. Maybe WPUS editors in other states might like to contribute to Texas if they read about it in that newsletter.  Being part of WPUS could provide some good support and attention for the Texas project.Maile66 (talk) 01:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm also working on compiling a listing of articles and other content that needs to be tagged for the project. --Kumioko (talk) 19:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, I understand you to be talking about tagging WPUS on the talk page. How do you tag content, and what exactly are you looking for? Maile66 (talk) 19:11, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify I can tag it as US/TX or as Texas whichever the discussion determines. How I am determining it is a bit more complicated. I have some tools that let me pull in the titles of content, in this case, Articles, Categories, Templates, Files, Portal pages, Project pages and books that start with or end with Texas,, TX, , TX) or (Texas) so thats were I started. Then I pulled in all the Texas related projects articles (other than the State Texas project) then I add some of the larger Texas categories (People, Governent, Dallas Cowboys and a couple of others), then I compared that list to the articles already in the State project and the result are some of the articles relating to Texas that haven't been tagged. Of course it doesn't catch them all and I was very frugal with which categories I used so I don't accidentally pull in a bunch of stuff not related to texas that are poorly categorized but its a start. I hope that helps. The result is about 22, 195 that aren't already tagged as WikiProject Texas which includes a number of Redirects. --Kumioko (talk) 19:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Here are the lists of content that appears to not be tagged for Texas yet. They are both quite large at about 650K each andn about 11, 000 items on each.
 * Texas articles needing banners (A-K)
 * Texas articles needing banners (L-Z)

Since things seem to be favoring it for the moment I went ahead and added the Texas project and the ones identified as such below to the Supported projects list of WPUS here. If needed they can always be removed if things change. --Kumioko (talk) 14:47, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help. Maile66 (talk) 16:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Technical question for Kumioko
If I understand what you said above, your bot also looks for Redirects.

Until quite recently, I didn't even know there was a category for Redirect-Class Texas Articles, nor did it occur to me that when I created a redirect I should brand it with the Texas project on the Talk page. I think I'm not alone in that lack of knowledge. An overwhelming number of my redirects have the word Texas in their naming. But there are a great many of them do not have Texas in their naming.

Question: Will your bot pick up that they are Texas redirects if the article they redirect to has the Texas Project assessment on its talk page? Maile66 (talk) 14:32, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You don't really need to tag every redirect IMO but the rules of thumb that I typically use are: Do I want to be notified if someone sumbits it for deletion or does the title contain something directly linking it to the project. In this case the Words Texas or, TX (although you could also infer Dallas, Houston and other things in Texas as well). The redirects don't need to be tagged if the folks in the project like yourself don't want it to be but from a technical aspect if the article, redirect, etc does not have the projects banner on its talk page then ArticleAlertbot cannot notify the project if its submitted for deletion, merger, etc. It also makes it a bit harder to identify newly created articles that need to be tagged. To answer your second question, no it doesn't derive anything from the target of the redirect and in fact it won't pull the article the redirect points to for tagging the project either. There is a way I can do it but I have found that the margin of error is uncomfortably high. I have found that in many cases a redirect with something like Texas in it points to an article that is only tangentially related to the topic. I hope this helps. --Kumioko (talk) 15:04, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

The only problem I see with this is that there is a lot of content supported by this project is not related to the United States - it involves Texas before it became a part of the United States. Karanacs (talk) 16:02, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thats a good point but I don't think its a huge issue. There are already quite a few articles associated to various states such as WA, ID, UT and AZ that predate the US as well as some Revolutionary and American civil war topics that one could argue are not "part of the US". Additionally, a few articles predating colonial america are tagged as well as being of importance such as Christopher Columbus. I wouldn't advocate going back to prehistoric times but since the article will still be associated to Tx I don't think its a huge issue. --Kumioko (talk) 16:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Austin added to WPUS
Since it looks like there are no problems with adding this one I'll go ahead and add it to the template as well under Texas. As before if the determination comes out that we need to remove it I can. --Kumioko (talk) 20:52, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Its added here. I still need to create some of the support categories though. --Kumioko (talk) 14:52, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

UT- Austin added to WPUS
Since it looks like there are no problems with adding this one I'll go ahead and add it to the template as well under Texas. As before if the determination comes out that we need to remove it I can. --Kumioko (talk) 20:52, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Its added here. I still need to create some of the support categories though. --Kumioko (talk) 14:52, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Dallas-Fort Worth supported by WPUS
Hi I am a member of this project, I am okay with it. Since you added to the supported projects, how about Austin, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston and the Texas WikiProjects to be supported into the banner, but not Texas State Highways. Should it be okay as well? JJ98 (talk) 03:32, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't have a problem with it but I don't know what the activity level of those projects are. We probably should leave a note on the projects talk pages before making an assumption. Even if the Texas project is added to the supported projects list, there is no requirement for the others to do so as well. --Kumioko (talk) 14:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I just added a talk page invite to join us to discuss here - on the projects for Austin, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, Univ of Houston, Texas A&M, Texas Tech and UT-Austin. Some of those project main pages are really nicely designed. However, when the DFW one pulls up on my browser, the heading looks a little a-lop and disconcerting. Maybe it's my Firefox browser. Maile66 (talk) 18:56, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for leaving those notices. I'll take a look at that project page too. --Kumioko (talk) 19:02, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I've taken the liberty of stripping a huge chunk of WTF from the DFW project's header to make it flow better on smaller width pages. Hasteur (talk) 17:02, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Hasteur for doing this. It looks a lot better.  I have a widescreen monitor, but when I previously pulled it up, it looked like it overlapped somewhat.  Still, maybe my Firefox browser affects it.  But thanks for the improvement. Maile66 (talk) 17:39, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * As a casual member of the D/FW area project, I'd appreciate it if you would not suborn the project by removing the the WP:Texas banner and replacing it with the WPUS project banner. If there are legitimate concerns about the page, bring them up on the project's talk page. The previous open invitation to Maile66 on the talk page to come participate in the Texas page didn't really have a call to action other than "Come participate". Based on what I recall this is not the first time you've attempted to pull in other project's articles to WPUS. Hasteur (talk) 19:55, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Hasteur. I would like to add some clarification.  The notice on the DFW page was a courtesy. Kumioko only got involved because of contact from me regarding the main Texas project. You can go over to Kumioko's talk page and see that. Kumioko's first response was to offer suggestions, but nudge me to take care of it in whatever way I might try.  And the end result of my efforts was dead silence (as usual) from anyone who saw the notices. The suggestion to include the DFW project, as you can see above, came from someone other than Kumioko.  In response to that request, Kumioko suggested putting a notice on the DFW talk page.  Not having been a part of the DFW project, I don't know its activity level.  But I do know for the last couple of years the Texas project itself has been wanting in activity.  Whatever participant structure had been there before, is now absent. Kumioko is not trying to do anything but respond to my requests to help the Texas project.  While I respect your viewpoint, please respect my efforts to try to revive the Texas project. Maile66 (talk) 21:55, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Well frankly, speaking for this project only and after monitoring this projects talk page for some time, questoins frequently went unanswered until recently when Maille started taking an interest in the project so leaving a message would be rather futile. IRT my participation here, If you bothered to read the discussion above, which it appears you did not, I am merely trying to assist in determining if there is interest and providing options of how to best to improve a project that seems to be rather dead. Yes, there are many editors working no Texas related articles, but the project itself is largely inactive. As I said above, and as I have said many times before in these discussions I am ok either way with supported the project or not and I will help how and when I can. As for the DFW project, if they want to be seperate thats completely and totally fine. Thats why I asked that a message be left on all the projects pages when the question about them came up and excuse me for being a bit blunt here but if you don't like how things are going then step up and help out with the project. Otherwise it shouldn't matter. --Kumioko (talk) 20:25, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I've been watching this project along with the Austin and DFW projects for two years now. None of these projects is particularly active, so I support consolidating some project functions like the assessment banners with WPUS. As someone who lived in Texas, I can see why you might get some members from these projects who would prefer to keep the Texas projects independent. It's a Texas thing. -Mabeenot (talk) 21:40, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Ahem, Mabeenot. You gave me a good laugh.  I am a native-born Texan.  You did not lie. But I prefer to think of it as a Sam Houston thing. Maile66 (talk) 22:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Since there is clearly some opposition at this point I don't think we should add this one. Maybe some day in the future but its perfectly fine if they stay solo too. --Kumioko (talk) 18:16, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Question I see that there are "Affiliated Projects" in WPUS. What's the qualification for being at that level?
 * Sorry could you clarify the question a little? Are you talking about what are the qualifications to be affiliated with Texas or the WPUS project?--Kumioko (talk)
 * I am referring to the WPUS project, specifically the Joint Projects. I think I speak for the DFW when I say we're willing to accept assistance from WPUS, but would prefer to keep our own banner.  I'm perfectly fine with adding the WPUS banner to the top level importance articles for the area (possibly in a wikiproject shell template). No reason to reject a joint project.  Your thoughts Kumioko? Hasteur (talk) 18:30, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm ok with that. Seems perfectly reasonable to me. --Kumioko (talk) 18:34, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

I've added the WPUS banner to
 * Talk:History of Dallas, Texas (1874–1929)
 * Talk:High Five Interchange
 * Talk:List of tallest buildings in Dallas
 * Talk:List of Dallas Area Rapid Transit light rail stations
 * Talk:Plano Senior High School
 * Talk:Dr Pepper Ballpark
 * Talk:Arlington, Texas
 * Talk:Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport
 * as the highest rated and most important to D/FW articles. I didn't add articles that are already well covered by projects (Like Dirk Nowitzki) or ones that Dallas isn't the primary owner (Like the Kansas City Chiefs).  Hopefully this will be useful. Hasteur (talk) 20:34, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me. --Kumioko (talk) 20:50, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Houston and University of Houston (will not be added to WPUS)
I feel that our project is quite active. We have several featured articles and many good articles. The University of Houston project is a child of the Houston project. I prefer that we keep Houston independent. Postoak (talk) 05:43, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * We should skip this one too since there is some opposition. --Kumioko (talk) 18:17, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I think it should be added to the WikiProject Texas banner along with other projects. JJ98 (talk) 03:45, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Disagree. Postoak (talk) 22:01, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * For the moment I think if there is opposition to one being added we should skip it and work on the ones were there is no disagreement. If appropriate I do think that The University of Houston could at least be added to the Houston banner. --Kumioko (talk) 22:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Honestly I wouldn't mind WikiProject Houston being supported by the USA project. The Houston project is active, but I think having support from the USA project would be helpful. WhisperToMe (talk) 21:04, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

San Antonio added to WPUS
Since a couple days have gone by without a complaint I have added Texas and the San Antonio task force to the WikiProject United States template here. It has not yet been fully implemented and I can remove it if needed. I have also not added it to the supported projects list and will wait a week or two before moving forward to give this discussion some time. --Kumioko (talk) 02:44, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Kumioko. Especially for the San Antonio add.  It's a special interest of mine, but it seems like every page therein has been slapped with tags of one type of another.  It seriously needs attention. Maile66 (talk) 12:30, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem we can work on that. I look through and a lot of them are only minor problems and we don't need piles of tags on a stub article. Being a stub in itself infers that the article has some issues. We need not, IMO, cover it in additional tags as well. --Kumioko (talk) 14:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I also notice that this task force does not have any of the normal class or importance assessment capabilities so I will get those categories created in the next day or 2. --Kumioko (talk) 14:55, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Two that really stand out for me, because of their national significance, are related: Brooke Army Medical Center and Fort Sam Houston, and, of course, the ugly tags that have been there for years. For all the tagging, there was never even any discussion on their Talk pages. Brooke actually had a duplicate article - identical info - under another name San Antonio Military Medical Center, which I merged and took care of. Maile66 (talk) 15:25, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

University of North Texas added to WPUS
I put a notice on the Univ of North Texas talk page, also. But I think this one is more inactive than the others. It was worth a try. Maile66 (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll go ahead and add this one to the template as well under Texas. As before if the determination comes out that we need to remove it I can. --Kumioko (talk) 18:14, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Its added here. I still need to create all the class, importance and support categories though so you'll see some red links for the moment. --Kumioko (talk) 18:45, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Texas A&M added to WPUS
I saw the notice on the Texas A&M Wikiproject. I don't think anyone would have any objection to assistance. Buffs (talk) 22:59, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll go ahead and add this one to the template as well under Texas. As before if the determination comes out that we need to remove it I can. --Kumioko (talk) 18:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Its added here. I still need to create all the class, importance and support categories though so you'll see some red links for the moment. --Kumioko (talk) 18:46, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Texas Tech University added to WPUS
Since it looks like there are no problems with adding this one I'll go ahead and add it to the template as well under Texas. As before if the determination comes out that we need to remove it I can. --Kumioko (talk) 20:52, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Its added here. I still need to create some of the support categories though. --Kumioko (talk) 14:52, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Texas Tech is also done. --Kumioko (talk) 18:04, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Next step
I just wanted to give an update as of today. Before I do the rest I wanted to give folks a chance to comment. As with my earlier comments above. This can all be easily undone if the mood changes. Once we migrate things over though its much harder to undo. Its still possible, but the degree of effort increases. --Kumioko (talk) 17:47, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) The code for WikiProject United States template was implemented and the Texas projects identified above were added.
 * 2) I also added these projects to the documentation of the template and to the Supported projects list of WPUS.
 * 3) I deprecated the WikiProject templates for the 3 education related WikiProjects that were marked as inactive projects currently. What this does is essentially trick the template into displaying the WPUS template with the TX and Educational banner insead of the applicable WikiProject banner for any articles they exist on as well as WikiProject Texas until we can migrate them over completely. An example can be seen here. This also adds the related articles to the Category:United States articles with deprecated tags category. The three affected templates so far are:
 * 4) Template:WikiProject Texas A&M
 * 5) Template:WikiProject University of North Texas
 * 6) Template:WikiProject University of Texas at Austin
 * These three have been done. --Kumioko (talk) 18:03, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Deadline for full implementation
When I first started this thread, I gave a deadline of February 1 for feedback. That date has come and gone. But let's wait a few more days in case some interested editors haven't had a chance to read all this. NEW DEADLINE IS FEBRUARY 10. On February 11, Kumioko can go ahead with the full WPUS affiliation, omitting Houston for the moment, and DFW only as suggested by Hasteur.

Speak up now if you want to be heard on this issue.

'''DEADLINE FOR FEEDBACK IS FEBRUARY 10. On February 11, Kumioko can go forward with the plan'''. Maile66 (talk) 02:12, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Tomorrow I will start the implementation. Several of the projects have already been done. The 3 remaining ones, Texas, Austin and University of Austin will probably take the weekend to complete. I will not change anything with the Houston or Dallas related ones per request. Please let me know if there are any comments or concerns. --Kumioko (talk) 15:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Since no one has commented I am going to go ahead and start the process. It should get started in the next half hour. --Kumioko (talk) 17:24, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Full speed ahead. Maile66 (talk) 17:28, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Its running now. I am going to run it in groups of a couple thousand at a time. I'll keep watch but please let me know if you see it do something screwy. --Kumioko (talk) 18:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I forgot to mention if it doesn't convert one on the first time through its no problem, anything the bot doesn't convert I'll look at and rerun the list repeating the process till there all fixed. --Kumioko (talk) 18:12, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * So much for not changing the Houston project. Postoak (talk) 21:24, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * As far as I know I didn't touch the houston or Dallas-Fort Worth projects. Of course there are a lot of articles with both the houston and TX banners on it and I did replace the Texas ones, I left the houston ones alone. If you notice the bot replacing houston banners please let me know so I can stop that. --Kumioko (talk) 22:55, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not part of the Houston project. But I did split List of museums in Houston, Texas and List of museums in Greater Houston metropolitan area, Texas from List of museums in Texas  in early Dec 2011, and neither had the Houston project banner to begin with.  They did get the WPUS banner, as they should have. I'm OK either way on including them as Houston, but I don't want them to lose the WPUS banner. Overall, the museums in Texas could use all the help they can get.  I'm not sure what Postoak is referring to, but Houston got the WPUS banner, but it also has separate banners for WikiProject Cities and WikiProject Houston. The Houston project banner is not part of the WPUS banner on that one.Maile66 (talk) 00:41, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I added the WPUS banner to the articles I felt were deserving of the banner for the Dallas area.. The High 5 Interchange was de-listed from the banner by one of the Roads editors (even though it does make sense for multiple projects to share the article). Hasteur (talk) 00:27, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, USRoads tends to do that and I tired of arguing with them that its ok for multiple projects to tag the same articles. --Kumioko (talk) 00:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * For what its worth as that bot was cruising through I noticed that there were quite a few Houston related articles that did not have the Houston banner including a number of the Portal:Houston subpages. --Kumioko (talk) 00:58, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Once the bots done converting the Texas banners into WPUS/TX I will add all the texas content from Texas articles needing banners (A-K) and Texas articles needing banners (L-Z) so that'll be another 22, 000. Of course theres quite a few redirects but there are an aweful lot that are just untagged articles and such. --Kumioko (talk) 04:09, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikiproject Cleanup Listing
Jj98, Thanks for adding the clean-up icon under Resources on the Texas project main page. I clicked on it and was impressed with the efficiency of that listing. Cool. It tells you exactly what needs to be done to which article. I cleaned up a slew of 'em while I was there. You really did good on this. Maile66 (talk) 23:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's History Month
Hi everyone. March is Women's History Month and I'm hoping a few folks here at WP:Texas will have interest in putting on events (on and off wiki) related to women's roles in Texas's history, society and culture. We've created an event page on English Wikipedia (please translate!) and I hope you'll find the inspiration to participate. These events can take place off wiki, like edit-a-thons, or on wiki, such as themes and translations. Please visit the page here: WikiWomen's History Month. Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to seeing events take place! SarahStierch (talk) 00:36, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

STAAR test
I found some stuff about the STAAR test. It could help with an article about it: WhisperToMe (talk) 04:58, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * English
 * http://www.crandall-isd.net/docs/3-staareocbrochure2012.pdf
 * http://www.crandall-isd.net/docs/3-staargeneralbrochure2012.pdf
 * Spanish
 * http://www.crandall-isd.net/docs/3-STAARgeneralbrochuresp2012.pdf
 * http://www.crandall-isd.net/docs/3-staarEOCbrochuresp2012.pdf

Women's History Month and Texas First Ladies and Gents
For Women's History Month, I created List of First Ladies and Gentlemen of Texas and an accompanying Navbox. It's an area that has slipped through the cracks in Wikipedia. Photos are needed, as are individual pages. While all the presidents of the Republic, and the Governors of the state, have had individual articles created, most of the First Ladies of Texas have not, becoming neglected footnotes in history as names married to important persons. The state's only First Gentleman - James E. Ferguson - has his own page, but only because he was first a Governor. Any help anyone would care to give would be welcome. Maile66 (talk) 20:16, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

New articles tab
On this project's main page, there is a new blue tab at the top for "New articles", to show newly created Texas articles every few days. Enjoy. Maile66 (talk) 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Wiki-Picnic Houston Sat June 23
Attention Texans: Join and sign up at Meetup/Houston on Saturday June 23 as part of the Great American Wiknic!--Pharos (talk) 14:30, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Meetup/Dallas-Fort Worth June 23
Check out this proposed wiki-meet, it's also part of the Great American Wiknic 2012.--Pharos (talk) 00:57, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Blanking of Future section of Politics of Texas
The Future section at Politics of Texas has been blanked 4 times since 2 June 2012. Interested editors are invited to comment on this issue at Future section discussion. SBaker43 (talk) 16:24, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The article has been protected for one month, so only autoconfirmed users can edit. Maile66 (talk)

Proposal for United States A-Class review process
There is a proposal at WikiProject United States to start an A-Class review process for United States related articles. Please stop by and join the discussion. Kumioko (talk) 02:15, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Westerns
Well, it's not particularly well worded for non-userpages, but yeah, this WikiProject is now setup and still in the early stages of building its project area before user-participation can really begin to function. Anyone interested, please feel free to join. Note, this project not only covers film and TV, but Western novels, comics, actors, directors and authors, etc who make the fictional-Wild West possible. Thanks, Ma&reg;&copy; usBriti sh {chat} 01:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Photograph Request
Hello WikiProject Texas. I would like to request that anyone who has the time and convenience to drive to one of the state's Recreational Roads, that, if you could please take a picture of the road, as an issue with images is holding up an FLC. Thanks, - Awardgive, the editor with the msitaken name. 06:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Comment period on the Wikimedia United States Federation
There is a proposal for an an umbrella organization for chapters and other groups in the US called the Wikimedia United States Federation. A draft of the bylaws is now up at meta. There will be an open comment period on the bylaws 17 September, 2012 to 1 October, 2012. The comments received given will be incorporated into the bylaws and they will be put up to a ratification vote from 8 October, 2012 to 15 October, 2012. -- Guerillero &#124;  My Talk  21:47, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Copyright on images of historical markers
This is just a general FYI for anyone who might include a photo of an historical plaque on any article. I just ran across Commons:Deletion requests, which would indicate there is a copyright issue in play. These are not my images, and I have no idea who took most of them. However, there are a couple of west Texas ones I vaguely remember seeing, and thinking they were obviously somebody just playing tourist and snapping the photo. However, it's something to think about if an editor has any kind of marker photos posted on Wikipedia somewhere. — Maile (talk) 23:38, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Article on Medina, Texas is referring to two different places within Texas and needs major revisions.
The article located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medina,_TX is referring to two distinct places. The introduction is referring to the unincorporated town in Bandera County, and which is part of the San Antonio Metropolitan Statistical Area. However, much of the data provided in the article (including all data from the U.S. Census) is referring to the Census Designated Place (CDP) in Zapata County, Texas (in the Rio Grande Valley), which was created prior to the 2000 U.S. Census and used in that census.

Medina CDP was created by separating Zapata CDP into two parts (Zapata County has no incorporated towns or cities and all the significant settlements are CDPs); the western part kept the name Zapata CDP, while the eastern part took the name Medina CDP. The U.S. Census has no specific data for the unincorporated town in Bandera County; the best data source for population (2000 pop. of 515) appears to be "The Handbook of Texas Online":

Vivian Elizabeth Smyrl, "MEDINA, TX," Handbook of Texas Online (http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/hlm52), accessed November 16, 2012. Published by the Texas State Historical Association.

Under Geography, the geographic co-ordinates are correct, but the area is incorrect, as it describes Medina CDP in Zapata County, TX. Therefore, the entire Demographics section (including population figures) needs to be revised with whatever information can be found from non-U.S. Census sources.

I've edited the Bandera County, TX article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandera_County,_Texas to move Medina from the "Census Designated Place" category to the "Unincorporated Areas" category, at it was clearly the intent of the author to describe the unincorporated town in Bandera County and not the Census Designated Place in Zapata County. I've also added Lake Medina Shores to the "Census Designated Place" category in the Bandera County article, since it is a newly created CDP within Bandera County that first appears in the 2010 Census. Since the U.S. Census only has a 2010 population (and no 2000 population) for Lake Medina Shores CDP, I updated the population figures for Bandera City and Lakehills CDP as well to 2010 (those figures, being U.S. Census data, are both readily available from American Factfinder website at http://factfinder2.census.gov/).

Those changes to the Bandera County, TX page were rather minor. I unfortunately lack the technical expertise to overhaul a whole article, but I wanted to alert the Texas WikiProject that the Medina, TX page needs major revision.

Sincerely,

Scott Pusich Center for Urban and Regional Planning Research University of Texas at San Antonio — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.115.2.154 (talk) 19:47, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I went ahead and split Medina, Bandera County, Texas out from the article, and moved the original page to Medina, Zapata County, Texas, since that was the original topic of the article. Thanks for pointing that out. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 00:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking care of this. — Maile (talk) 00:33, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Texas State Highway 130
I have added all the exits for Texas Hwy 130 from Austin southward to I-10. Please review that article. Great50 (talk) 05:22, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Texas Slave Ranch AFD
Articles for deletion/Texas Slave Ranch — Maile (talk) 15:32, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * My concerns about this article have been rectified, and I am withdrawing the AFD nomination. We need an uninvolved editor to please close it.  Thanks. — Maile  (talk) 23:11, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ - NAC, GregJackP   Boomer!   01:00, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. — Maile (talk) 01:01, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Fort Hood Shooting casualty figure RfC
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Fort Hood shooting. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:03, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

List of counties in Texas
Folks, we had an e-mail at OTRS following up on a reply posted at Talk:List of counties in Texas. If anyone has time, would you please take a look and see if a further response is needed? Thanks.--ukexpat (talk) 19:56, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

J. Lindsay Embrey
Hello. I created J. Lindsay Embrey's page and a few minutes later someone tried to delete it. Mr Embrey was critical in the development of Richardson, Texas and a big donor to SMU, where a scholarship and a building are named in his honor. Please support the page by explaining why we should keep it. Thanks.Zigzig20s (talk) 21:10, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * ZigZag, this is one whale of a stupid deletion nomination. Either the user with the Curation-trigger-happy finger didn't really read the sourcing, or...well, it was just DUMB! — Maile (talk) 21:38, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I hope more members feel the same way so that we can keep this page, and hopefully expand it and add a picture. By the way, I liked my layout better, and a few of my references taken from The Dallas Morning News have been deleted, probably because I didn't post a link for them--you have to pay to have access to them.Zigzig20s (talk) 22:03, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm guessing, but that user probably removed them because you put them in the lead, and an article's lead doesn't need sources. It's supposed to be a summation of what is already in the rest of the article. I don't think the references were removed for lack of a link, because links are not required by WP.  So, if I were you, I'd just find places to stick them right back in the article, anywhere but in the lead. I don't know if I can comment on the format, because how it is now is not how I break up a page. But if you want some ideas of how others would do it for a similar individual Check this category  — Maile  (talk) 22:30, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I opined on the AfD and -ed the nominator. Seriously... 20 minutes is nowhere near appropriate for AfD nomination. Hasteur (talk) 22:19, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * It would be interesting to know which shopping centers and apartment complexes he owned. Also, where can we find referenced info about the legislative resolution passed after his death? It would be interesting to add something about this (did it lead to anything?) and which congresspeople or senators proposed it and/or voted on it. On another note, his great-grandfather appears to have been a prominent earlier developer and judge of the area, and should have his own page if we can find enough references I think. I hope you can help, and thank you for your enthusiasm.Zigzig20s (talk) 15:53, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * If you follow the link I left on the nom for deletion page, and click around, you come to this Text of the Resolution. Usually, memorial resolutions are just acknowledging a notable Texas and expressing sorrow at their passing. However, you can also search for any notable Texan at www.texas.gov  And in general, below are places I go to find Texas information, in addition to a plain old Bing search or Google Books search.— Maile  (talk) 16:31, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you. How do we know who proposed it?Zigzig20s (talk) 16:36, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * You read it. — Maile (talk) 16:47, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Citing info from Handbook of Texas Online
To anyone interested, I received an email from Laurie Jasinski, Research Editor, at the Handbook of Texas Online. She advised me that it is allowable to use Handbook information and/or quote short passages under Fair Use. She also requested citations to use the follow format which cites Austin, Texas as an example -

David C. Humphrey, "AUSTIN, TX (TRAVIS COUNTY)," Handbook of Texas Online (http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/hda03), accessed April 03, 2013. Published by the Texas State Historical Association.

I have gone back and started editing my articles trying to adhere to that format. If someone has the time could you please check my article Rhea Mills, Texas and let me know if what I have complies with that. Thanks.Walter 20:59, 22 April 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WalterJF (talk • contribs)


 * Hello, WalterJF. Thank you for your valuable input, and welcome to WikiProject Texas. You might be interested in Template:Handbook of Texas. How you would fill out the template, for instance if you were using the Austin, Texas  one above, is that you would fill in id=hda03 and fill in name=Austin Texas.  Then it should work fine.   — Maile  (talk) 23:05, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Deletion Mica Mosbacher
issues with this article's tone aside, is Mica Mosbacher notable in Texas? In ictu oculi (talk) 03:09, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia User Group
For those of you who like to organize real life events, User:Pharos mentioned that there are meta:Wikimedia User Groups - Texas-based ones are welcome to form one! WhisperToMe (talk) 17:33, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Tornado outbreak article necessary?
Do we need an article or section about the tornado outbreak in North Texas, including the DFW area on May 15, 2013? Great50 (talk) 04:02, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't think so. Tornado activity is pretty common in North Texas. These would have to be fairly notable storms. Check with WikiProject Severe weather and their tornado guidelines for details. –Mabeenot (talk) 04:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norman Igo


The article Norman Igo has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability as a civil engineer; Wikipedia is not a memorial

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Angr (talk) 16:15, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Czech Texan - expand this for DYK?
Improved Czech Texan; if you have time to expand this, there are enough sources to turn this into a DYK. Djembayz (talk) 19:54, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Dallas-Ft Worth Wiki-Picnic for June
Sign up: Meetup/Dallas–Fort Worth!--Pharos (talk) 19:52, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Please see Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Dallas–Fort Worth for a continuing discussion about bringing the Great American Wiknic to Texas.--Pharos (talk) 13:51, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Jack Pope
Currently at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jack Pope (Texas jurist). Hugo Black is the Good Article I'm trying to follow, but won't be able to edit further until the 17th. Any assistance appreciated. The Texas State Cemetery information (currently reference #2, was submitted by Pope himself, and several of the sources are involved, but so far I've only formatted what the submitter had already. I'm cross-posting this to WikiProject Biography and WikiProject Law. Dru of Id (talk) 16:51, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Help with article
Need some assistance with article Thank God for Mississippi which mentions Texas. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 20:18, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Discussion to remove the Automatically assessed logic from the WikiProject United States template
Greetings, there is a discussion regarding removal of the logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories from Template:WikiProject United States. Most of the categories (over 220 Wikipedia wide) were deleted in February 2013 because they were empty. These categories were previously populated by a bot that hasn't run since 2011 and the categories aren't used. Removal of this uneeded/unused logic will greatly reduce the size and complexity of the WikiProject United States template. Any comments or questions are encouraged here. Kumioko (talk) 18:50, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Lest there is any confusion for people who don't speak the same language, the words "logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories" refer to the feature that was supposed to allow this WikiProject's template to "inherit" class and importance ratings from other WikiProjects. Kumioko says that there are no longer any bots performing the function that formerly copied those ratings. --Orlady (talk) 23:33, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Pleasure Island (Borger, Texas amusement park)
I'm suspicious of Pleasure Island (Borger, Texas amusement park). It turns up absolutely zero hits on Google Books or Google News, and all of the hits online appear to be rehashed from Wikipedia, or pages full of gibberish that have nothing to do with "Pleasure Island" or "Borger". In short, I've found literally zero proof that this place even existed, with only a couple memories from the IP on the talk page keeping me from writing this off as a hoax. Can anyone locate any proof that this place was ever real? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 12:09, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

The Houstonian
I've recently gone ahead and created an article about the newspaper, The Houstonian (newspaper).
 * The Houstonian (newspaper)

Help with suggestions for additional secondary sources would be appreciated at the article's talk page, at Talk:The Houstonian (newspaper).

Thank you for your time,

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

William P. Hobby, Jr -- WP:COI
I do I.T. work for William P. Hobby, Jr and he recently asked me how he might edit his own page in Wikipedia. He wants to do two things in particular:

1. Bold his book titles.

2. Add a section called, "Family Eponyms."

He didn't ask me to do it, but I was asked about how to do it. Knowing as little as I do about Wikipedia, this kind of editing would seem to fall on the bad side of WP:COI both for him to edit the page and for me to help him to do it.

Putting aside the book title boldenings (which smell a little too much like self-promotion), he is a fount of information about his family's history and he has a lot of ties within the universities around the state.

If this information was of general interest to the page, how might he get this information up there without running afoul of the policies?

Mwhalenhtc (talk) 21:33, 18 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I did a copy and paste of your message over at WikiProject United States. It might possibly get seen by more eyes over there. I don't know how many people are active on the Texas project.  Keep an eye on that link, and you might have some advice over there. — Maile  (talk) 21:43, 18 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Mwhalenhtc (talk) 23:14, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Popular pages tool update
As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).

Web tools, to replace the ones at ~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs.

If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot (talk) (for Mr.Z-man ) 05:30, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Citation on the difference between pig scramble and pig wresting
Help needed from an expert on the subject of rural southern US culture need to de-conflate two referents at the article pig scramble. Please help! Chrisrus (talk) 16:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikimedia User Group Texas proposed
Is anyone interested in joining the Wikimedia User Group "Wikimedia Texas"? See: meta:Talk:Wikimedia_United_States_Coalition WhisperToMe (talk) 04:47, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Please see meta:Texas Wikimedians WhisperToMe (talk) 12:25, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride
Are there any Texans interested in participating in Wiki Loves Pride 2014, a multi-national effort to improve coverage of LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects? Perhaps an edit-a-thon or a photography project? You'll see an activity has already been proposed for Houston, but what about Austin? Dallas? Please visit the project page for details or let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:30, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Great American Wiknic 2014 - Texas
I'd like to invite you to add a Texas event for the Great American Wiknic. This year we're aiming to coalesce nationally around July 6, but any date that is convenient to your local community works as well. It seems like Austin would perhaps be the most central location, while Houston is perhaps the single most populous one, but it's all up to you.--Pharos (talk) 15:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Mustang wine
Hello. I would greatly appreciate it if some of you wanted to expand Mustang wine with more referenced info. Also, are you able to take a picture of mustang wine in a wine glass and upload it to Wikimedia commons/the article? Feel free to talk to me on my talkpage. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 02:49, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Ivy Taylor
I've added and cited a significant portion of the article for the newly-elected San Antonio mayor, Ivy Taylor. I'd appreciate it if another set of eyes could look it over and add any clean-ups as needed. There's not much out there on her yet, so I did the best I could. (Creed90952 (talk) 17:40, 6 August 2014 (UTC))

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

To Create
All are welcome to assist with the creation of articles for these statues on the University of Texas at Austin campus: --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:26, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * John H. Reagan.
 * Robert E. Lee.
 * Albert Sidney Johnston.
 * James Stephen Hogg.
 * Jefferson Davis.
 * Woodrow Wilson.

6666 Ranch
I've created this new article. If some of you are able to expand it and also possibly add a map, it could get nominated for DYK I think.Zigzig20s (talk) 05:24, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The owners have an interesting legacy as well. Not sure if anyone wants to expand their pages. There is also Dixon Creek, which flows through their ranch and should be added to the List of rivers of Texas, but not sure where on the list. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 02:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Waggoner Ranch
Hello. Feel free to help me expand Waggoner Ranch. If you are able to add a map, that would be great. I am working on the red links as well. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 08:54, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Category:Companies based in Gainesville, Texas
Category:Companies based in Gainesville, Texas, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for Upmerging into Category:Gainesville, Texas. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. - RevelationDirect (talk) 07:06, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Streets in San Antonio, Texas
Category:Streets in San Antonio, Texas, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for merging into Category:Streets in Texas and Category:Transportation in San Antonio, Texas. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.RevelationDirect (talk) 02:32, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Companies by Texas City - 11 Small Categories
11 different small subcategories under Category:Companies based in Texas by city, all of which are within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for Dual Upmerging into Category:Companies based in Texas and the city category. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.RevelationDirect (talk) 18:39, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Texas Revolution
Per this discussion at the MilHist Wikiproject, we're trying to get interest in bringing Texas Revolution to FA status and main page prominence by May 25, 2015 (Memorial Day). This will coincide with the airing of History Channel documentary on the events of the Texas Revolution after the Battle of the Alamo. Even if we can't get the article to FA status and on the main page, any improvements we can make to it will assist those who come looking for more information on the topic.

This is a call for volunteers! I think we need 1-2 to do research, 1 to write up the research that has already been done (first half of the war), and 1 one to write up the new stuff. Plus a copyeditor and someone to track down images. I've begun the brainstorming on Talk:Texas Revolution. Karanacs (talk) 23:22, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Companies based in Montgomery County, Texas
Category:Companies based in Montgomery County, Texas, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.RevelationDirect (talk) 04:06, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Calling for proof readers re the Texas Revolution project.
In regards to the above-mentioned Texas Revolution project mentioned by, we are trying to get existing supporting articles in decent shape and could use some proof readers. You don't have to do a rework of an article, just look for the obvious. Many articles out there have been tagged, have been the object of hanky-panky, and sometimes erroneously edited by good editors. Please help if you have time, and Category:Texas Revolution is a good place to start.— Maile (talk) 15:34, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!


Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to discuss naming convention for TCU women's sports teams
I just started a discussion at Talk:TCU Horned Frogs and Lady Frogs to determine if the TCU women's programs – specifically basketball – still go by the "Lady Frogs" name or if they have transitioned to "Horned Frogs." Please chime in. Thanks! Rikster2 (talk) 14:01, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Good Article Reassessment of Texan schooner Invincible
Texan schooner Invincible, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:14, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:2009 Fort Hood shooting#Removal of verified content
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:2009 Fort Hood shooting. Thanks. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:44, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Texas topographic map
Hi! I made a topographic map of Texas here. As I am not very familiar with Texas I would like to ask you to check it for accuracy. I will be happy to get your comments.--Ikonact (talk) 12:23, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Overall, it looks pretty good to me. The topography looks correct to me.  Hopefully, some others here will have a look at it and comment.  This is a tremendous work, and I thank you for doing it. Since there are highways on this map, you might want to also post this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads. — Maile  (talk) 00:13, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Goodphil for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goodphil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Goodphil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 10:28, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Request for comments at Republic of Texas (unofficial)
I realize this project seems to be inactive, but maybe there are some editors following this page who would care to chime in on the the Republic of Texas [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Republic_of_Texas#Clarifying_what_exactly_the_Republic_of_Texas_should_be_defined_as Talk page] about how to classify it. Thanks! - CompliantDrone (talk) 01:42, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride
 You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!


 * What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
 * When? June 2015
 * How can you help?
 * 1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
 * 2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
 * 3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing!

User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa

Suggestion
Hello all! I was curious if anyone else thought it might be a good idea to make a (nonbinding) guideline on how all the individual US state WikiProjects should organize themselves, to help standardize them. I originally put this suggestion in the WikiProject United States talk page, so feel free to look there if you're interested. It's pretty empty though; basically all they said was to see what each of the individual projects thought about it. Please tell me if you have any concerns with this idea; hopefully we can find a way for everyone to love it! Also, I'm new at making proposals, so please forgive me if I do anything silly. :) Hope that you like this idea! JonathanHopeThisIsUnique (talk) 04:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mohamed Elhassan Mohamed for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohamed Elhassan Mohamed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mohamed Elhassan Mohamed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:28, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Texas pronunciation guide
Here is a nice ref from the folks over at the TSHA that could be put in the Resources section:  Enjoy, TuckerResearch (talk) 17:50, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

A-Class review for Runaway Scrape needs attention
A few more editors are needed to complete the A-Class review for Runaway Scrape; please stop by and help review the article! Thanks! AustralianRupert (talk) 11:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Texas Historical Commission atlas has changed information links
The home URL remains the same: http://atlas.thc.state.tx.us/

However, once you access information, those links have changed. Whatever you have linked to THC as sources in articles are now dead links. I just made a recent change to an article. You can see by the diff how it's been changed. — Maile (talk) 20:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Bot Request to resolve the issue. — Maile (talk) 22:48, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Texaplex merged into Texas Triangle
Just FYI, I have boldly merged the content of Texaplex into Texas Triangle,, and redirected Texaplex to Texas Triangle,. A merge had been proposed at Texaplex since Nov. 2011. It seemed logical to do so. Attribution has been added to talk pages and. Regards, 220  of  Borg 03:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Martin Lake Plant
I'm looking for a photo and any information about the construction of the Martin Lake Steam Electric Station in Tatum, Texas. --Kopiersperre (talk) 00:26, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Lazy S Ranch and Long S Ranch
Is anyone interested in helping me create referenced articles about the Lazy S Ranch, Long S Ranch, etc., historic ranches owned by Christopher Columbus Slaughter which have been redeveloped into towns (I think)?Zigzig20s (talk) 20:45, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

El Paso Texas edit-a-thon
I would like to invite you to attend a Wikipedia meetup described on. This meeting is scheduled for 5 March 2016 in El Paso. Thank you for your attention and I hope to see you there. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Featured list review?
Would anyone be interested in helping to clean up List of tallest buildings in Austin as it is undergoing a featured list review. There are some very big problems with many of the "tallest buildings lists" that are currently featured. I think this list specifically no longer meets featured list criteria. Specifically, two whole sections (under construction and approved) are completely unreferenced. There is an outdated tag from 3 years ago not addressed. There are many dead links, very messy citations, images have no alt-texts, and many of the buildings in the main list are unsourced. It has been neglected for years now and it shows. This would take a lot of work to bring it up to standards again sadly...

I have nominated List of tallest buildings in Austin for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Mattximus (talk) 14:12, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Trouble finding references? The Wikipedia Library is proud to announce ...
 The Wikipedia Library

There are up to 30 free one-year Alexander Street Press (ASP) accounts available to experienced Wikipedians through this partnership. To apply for free access, please go to WP:ASP.

Alexander Street Press is an electronic academic database publisher. Its "Academic Video Online: Premium collection" includes videos in a range of subject areas, including news programs (like 60 minutes) and newsreels, music and theatre, speeches and lectures and demonstrations, and documentaries. This collection would be useful for researching topics related to science, engineering, history, music and dance, anthropology, business, counseling and therapy, news, nursing, drama, and more. Cheers! 22:09, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Signpost
Hi! Would any members here be interested in interviewing about your work on this WikiProject for the SignPost? Ping me or let me know on my talk page. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Angelina & Neches River Authority
I would like to request an article for the Angelina & Neches River Authority.

I would try to create one myself, but I understand that it would be a conflict of interest as I am employed by the Authority.

I'm available to provide any help/information that conflict of interest guidelines allow.

The Angelina & Neches River Authority is missing from the list of Texas State Agencies, as well as the River Authorities of Texas category, and it doesn't have a page of its own.
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:River_authorities_of_Texas

It does appear on a list of river authorities in texas:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Texas_river_authorities

Here are some sources of info:
 * https://tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/mwa01
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angelina_River
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neches_River
 * http://www.anra.org
 * http://www.anra.org/about/history.html
 * http://www.anra.org/divisions/water_quality/crp

Jeremiahpoling (talk) 18:59, 6 July 2016 (UTC)


 * if you are watching this page for a reply, your request was copied over to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers.  responded by creating Angelina & Neches River Authority. — Maile  (talk) 12:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Awesome! Thanks! I'll respond there. -- Jeremiahpoling (talk) 13:41, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Missing Texas Supreme Court Justices
Drafts have been created for dozens of missing Texas Supreme Court Justices at WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/United States judges and justices. Please help complete these drafts and move them to mainspace. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Cheers! bd2412 T 02:48, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

US 50,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more states than they might otherwise work on. If there's the interest I will start 1000 State Challenges like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of states regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for the US and your specialist/home state like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every state, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any state sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thankyou.♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:36, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages
Greetings Members!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * Fix and improve Mr.Z-bot's popular pages report

If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.

Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Best regards, — Delivered: 18:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

drafting article for Huntsville High School (Texas)
I could use some help. The draft is at Draft:Huntsville High School (Texas). This will replace the redirect at Huntsville High School (Texas). davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  01:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Notice about adminship to participants at this project
Many participants here create a lot of content, may have to evaluate whether or not a subject is notable, decide if content complies with BLP policy, and much more. Well, these are just some of the skills considered at Requests for adminship.

So, please consider taking a look at and watchlisting this page:


 * Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

You could be very helpful in evaluating potential candidates, and even finding out if you would be a suitable RfA candidate.

Many thanks and best wishes,

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Texas Women in Red
Might I draw your attention to a new redlist of notable Texas women who lack a wikipedia biography, in the form of WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by dictionary/Handbook of Texas - drawn from the

Right now, there are more than five times as many biographies of men as there are of women on wikipedia - see the Wikidata Human Gender Indicators page. I hope this project will lend its support to addressing this imbalance by creating biographies for women within your project's scope, and perhaps by adopting the Handbook of Texas redlist. More generally, WikiProject Women in Red has more than 300 redlists covering perhaps 100,000 notable women for whom we have no biography. thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tagishsimon (talk • contribs) 23:51, 09 March 2017 (UTC)

March Against Hate
Project members are invited to participate in the AfD discussion re: Portland Women March Against Hate. I've expressed an interest in moving the article to March Against Hate, and expanding its scope to cover more than just Portland. I welcome editors to either contribute to the ongoing discussion or help expand this article's section for other cities, including San Antonio. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Popular pages report
We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, will post at /Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of. We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
 * The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
 * The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
 * The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to for his original, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Templates of municipalities by county: consolidate the "city", "town", and "village" fields into "municipalities"?
I found out that legally there is no longer any distinction between a city, town, or village in Texas law. https://texascityattorneys.org/2009speaker_papers/typescities.pdf

"The Local Government Code, codified in 1987, did away with the distinction of city, town, or village and loosely replaced those terms with Type A, B, or C cities."

Why not consolidate the "city", "town", and "village" fields into a single "cities"? Aslso related categories should be mass consolidated into "Cities in XXXX County, Texas" WhisperToMe (talk) 14:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Edit requests for Vianovo article
Hello! On behalf of Vianovo, a company with offices in Austin, I'm reaching out to see if any editors are willing to help me update the company's Wikipedia article. There are 2 edit requests posted here. I won't edit the article directly because of my conflict of interest, and I'm happy to respond to any questions or concerns on the article's talk page (or on my user talk page). Thanks for your consideration. Inkian Jason (talk) 18:13, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The edit requests have been answered, so I am marking this section as resolved. Thanks! Inkian Jason (talk) 16:20, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Original research noticeboard inquiry about Texas's age of consent
Please see No_original_research/Noticeboard

WhisperToMe (talk) 08:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

AFD: 2017 Plano shooting
Harizotoh9 (talk) 06:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Articles for deletion/2017 Plano shooting

New Member
Hello! My name is Colman2000, and I just joined WikiProject Texas a few days ago. I lived in Amarillo for two years, and I am so thrilled to be a new participant in this awesome WikiProject! I have just made edits to lots of articles on here, and I will continue doing so! Please don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions, concerns, advice on any edits that are made to any article regarding Texas, or if you want an honest opinion from me regarding any edit made to an article about Texas. Thank you for taking the time to read this message, and I am delighted to be a new participant in this WikiProject! Colman2000 (talk) 02:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Alice Walton Art
Hi! I am looking for editors interested in prominent people in Texas to review an edit request for the Art section of Alice Walton, a Texas resident, art collector and chairwoman of the Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art in Bentonville, Arkansas. I will not direct edit the page because I have a Conflict of interest, which I disclosed on my user page and declared on Talk:Alice Walton. I created a proposed update that tidies up the existing content and includes appropriate sourcing regarding Crystal Bridges and Ms. Walton's collection. I have reached out to several editors and WikiProjects, but there has not been a response on this particular request. I appreciate any help from the community to review and update the section. Thanks, Kt2011 (Talk · COI:Walton family) 15:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Factual Edits to UTSA page
Good afternoon. Can someone help me? I have a COI and cannot edit the page for my employer, The University of Texas at San Antonio. But there are facts on the university's Wikipedia page that are incorrect.

I shared a few factual edits on The University of Texas at San Antonio talk page, with sources, to try to update the page but haven't heard back. Can someone offer guidance as to how best to do this and still be respectful of Wikipedia's COI guidelines?

Factual Updates for Intro Section: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:University_of_Texas_at_San_Antonio

Thank you!

ChristiF12 (talk) 14:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ❌ thank you for your request but please could you make the request on the article talk page?   Dr Strauss   talk   22:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

New Texas userbox templates
New Texas userbox templates are now available at Template:User WP Texas and Template:User WP United States. Let me know if you have any suggestions. Yours aye, Buaidh  talk contribs 23:12, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Image requested
File:Texas dip 2017.png is up for deletion as it is not a free image. Do any of our Texan wikipedians have a free image of a Texas dip? If so, please upload and then post a note at that you've done so. Thanks, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 00:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template Transclude lead excerpt.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you. &mdash; The Transhumanist  07:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Casa Padre
Project members are invited to help Casa Padre article about the holding center in Brownsville. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:40, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

RfC at Richard B. Spencer
There is an RfC at the Richard B. Spencer talk page found here that members of this project might be interested in taking part in. -- ψλ  ● ✉ ✓ 02:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Memorial on the Southwest University campus
Does anyone know anything about the memorial on the Southwestern University campus in Georgetown, Texas, displayed to the right? Francis Asbury Mood's name is inscribed on one side, but I'm struggling to find much more info. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Perhaps because he helped found the university?
 * And it looks to me like that's his grave marker on the university grounds, "His body was brought to Georgetown and buried on the university grounds. A handsome granite monument marks his resting place."
 * On the other hand, this says his grave was moved to Odd Fellows Cemetery at an unnamed date.
 * — Maile (talk) 23:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for replying. I'll assume this is not a notable monument, then. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:12, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * — Maile (talk) 23:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for replying. I'll assume this is not a notable monument, then. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:12, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for replying. I'll assume this is not a notable monument, then. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:12, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Revisions
I am planning on working on adding a "Health" section to this article. The current "Healthcare" section covers topics that do not actually concern healthcare, including Maternal Mortality and Obesity. These two topics, amongst others, belong in a separate health section. In addition to these topics, I want to research and cover tobacco use, alcohol use, and infant health. There are a variety of health topics that can be added to this, but I think this is a good place to start. I would appreciate any and all feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aminawilliams (talk • contribs) 00:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Norse, Texas
I have created a stub for Norse, Texas, a ghost town near Clifton, Texas. Just notifying the WikiProject in case anybody wants to expand it. Safiel (talk) 19:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

RfC on election/referendum naming format
An RfC on moving the year from the end to the start of article titles (e.g. South African general election, 2019 to 2019 South African general election) has been reopened for further comment, including on whether a bot could be used move the articles if it closed in favour of the change: Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation). Cheers, Number   5  7  15:46, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Eagle Houston nominated for deletion
--- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:17, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Articles for deletion/Eagle Houston

Kilgore College Rangerettes
Was wondering if someone from this WikiProject might be familiar with this dance team and wouldn't mind taking a look at it. There's seems to have been a lot a fluff added over the past ten months or so, including trivial information and photos of some not really Wikipedia notable individuals that probably is not relevant per WP:NOTEVERYTHING. It's also possible that the excessive detailed content was added by an editor who has a COI. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:03, 18 January 2019 (UTC)


 * you might also want to post this at WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests. — Maile (talk) 21:15, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the suggestion . -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:34, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

WP 1.0 Bot Beta
Hello! Your WikiProject has been selected to participate in the WP 1.0 Bot rewrite beta. This means that, starting in the next few days or weeks, your assessment tables will be updated using code in the new bot, codenamed Lucky. You can read more about this change on the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team page. Thanks! audiodude (talk) 06:46, 27 February 2019 (UTC)