Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States History/Archive 1

America
"America" is an ambiguous term. I recommend the use of United States instead. BradMajors (talk) 01:12, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Dunmore's Proclamation
In the main article pertaining to Dunmore's Proclamation, no mention is made of the effect that the proclamation had on southern colonists and the resulting incorporation of such colonists (who were formerly loyalists) into support for revolution. The primary cause for this movement was the potential loss of slaves for slave-dependent sugar and tobacco growers. I feel that this is an integral element of this chapter of history and ought to be explored in this article. I lack the historical expertise to adequately or properly incorporate this information; otherwise I would write it myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.8.228.28 (talk) 16:36, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Userbox
Can a userbox be created which does not add the page the userbox is on to a category? BradMajors (talk) 01:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Ornithological?
Why does your banner USHistoryTalk claim your projects purpose is to create a "standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource"? It would make more sense to focus on US history than on the study of birds. Anomie⚔ 00:18, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme
As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
 * The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
 * The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
 * A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot  ( Disable )  21:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for United States History
Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:27, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

US Constitution FAR heads up
As a related Wikiproject, I'm informing you that United States Constitution has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Cheers! Zidel333 (talk) 15:29, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Middle Colonies
The Middle Colonies article is in an appalling state. In recent months, the article has been almost entirely a massive copyvio cut-and-pasted from http://school.discoveryeducation.com/teachersguides/pdf/ushistory/ul/mt13c_the_middle_colonies_tg.pdf

For some reason, the article also appears to be a vandalism magnet. Is it perhaps this years' school assignment somewhere?

I've now removed the whole thing by reverting all the way back to an older version of the article. (Note that although the current version of this article, as of the time of this comment, appears to bear a strong resemblance to the text in http://en.allexperts.com/q/General-History-674/Middle-Colonies-1.htm (dated 10/25/2007), the Wikipedia text has been taken from an earlier Wikipedia revision dated 7 June 2007, which pre-dates the publication date of the allexperts.com article.)

Even without this issue, the older version is still completely unsourced, and still reads like a school essay, paraphrase, or cut-and-paste job, although I can't currently find a source candidate. Would someone like to rewrite it from scratch? -- The Anome (talk) 01:01, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I've now trimmed this article down to a stub, for the reasons given above. Even the contents of the stub remain unverified. -- The Anome (talk) 17:19, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Northwest Territory
I've talked with a couple other users about forming a task force for the Northwest Territory, to improve articles about the U.S. Midwest regional history before state boundaries were drawn. Would anyone oppose a task force forming as a subgroup of WikiProject United States History? Mingusboodle (talk) 05:17, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I am an editor who would support this and join such a task force. I already have worked extensively on several midwestern history related articles that would fall within this scope. Charles Edward (Talk) 18:12, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I would also join this.-- King Bedford I Seek his grace  18:32, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

I see no objections. I propose we create a taskforce page here: WikiProject_United_States_History/Northwest Territory Task Force Charles Edward (Talk) 20:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Manifest Destiny
This article is a good essay on the background and history of the concept of Manifest Destiny. It is often vandalized (especially during the school year), and on occasion attracts folks who wish to assert a point of view, rather than just letting the facts speak for themselves. (An example of the latter might be the recent addition in the introduction of the assertion that Manifest Destiny was used "to justify the genocide of the Native American populations"; the word "genocide" does not otherwise appear in the article.)

I have started a discussion on the talk page concerning the religious influences on the concept. A critical eye on the article itself would also be appreciated. Kablammo (talk) 13:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

I'll watch that page for PoV pushers, and do my best to reverse edits that push PoV. Thanks for the heads up. Dunnsworth (talk) 01:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group
Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. &mdash; Delievered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the  parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:48, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Question about copyright status: historical marker text
There's a question about the copyright status of text on US State historical markers. Please weigh in if you have interest at that thread. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:06, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The historical markers in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania are copyrighted and trademarked by the state. --DThomsen8 (talk) 23:49, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps Reassessment of Union_Stock_Yards
Union_Stock_Yards has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. Ruslik_ Zero 09:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Civil war timeline
Is there a Timeline of all the events in the civil war?198.236.11.107 (talk) 19:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

GA Reassessment of Mormon Trail
I have done the GA Reassessment of the Mormon Trail article as part of the GA Sweeps project. I have found the article does not meet current GA Criteria and as such I have placed the article on hold pending work. I am notifying all interested editors that this article may be delisted if it is not improved. My review can be found here. If you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. H1nkles (talk) 23:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Framers of the US Constitution
is a new article that may be redundant with. Someone please sort it out, but try not to bite the newbie! Cheers, Melchoir (talk) 08:21, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

IS THERE ANYONE STILL ACTIVE ON THIS PROJECT?
I am only asking this question since there have been no posts since June and have recently decided to begin peer reviewing and expaning upon articles in the feild of United States History. If possible I would like to revive the effort of expaning upon the selection of U.S. History articles by not simply focusing on the most well known and debated aspects of American History but instead focusing on stubs and untouched aspects of history that will provide a more thorough and complete explanation of the United States.

I have begun this task by reviewing and expanding upon George Washington's Farewell Address. Although I am happy with the content I am positive that it is need of wordsmithing, proofreading, and peer review. My hope is that one of the members of this project will join me in this project since I have failed to find a taker in the United States project.

I look forward to your contributions and criticisms. --Epignosis (talk) 08:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Somersett's Case the catalyst for the US Declaration of Independence???
The article says,

"Somersett's Case ... It is one of the most significant milestones in the campaign to abolish slavery throughout the world and is largely acknowledged to have been the catalyst for the 1776 United States Declaration of Independence."

To an American, this is an astonishing statement, since Americans think of the Intolerable acts and other actions of King George III and Parliament, and not of this case. I have added a fact template for this statement.

I have added to call attention to the Somersett's Case article and its astonishing statement about the US Declaration of Independence. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:46, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Jacob Riis
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the artcile which you can see at Talk:Jacob Riis/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:46, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

When does the generated worklist get updated?
When does the automatically generated worklist get updated? I have added both class= and importance= parameters with values to several articles listed, and added the template to other articles. So, when does the list get updated? --DThomsen8 (talk) 02:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Merge Perpetual Union to Articles of Confederation?
There is currently an underattended (me and the article's creator) discussion at Talk:Articles of Confederation to consider merging Perpetual Union to Articles of Confederation. Might some interested editors be persuaded to attend? - 2/0 (cont.) 22:17, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Uniform Bill of Lading Act and Uniform Bill of Lading Act of 1916 articles
We received a query on the Help Desk about the above articles.

An editor asked if these were the same Act, and I suggested that perhaps they could be merged.

However, another editor mentioned that 64th United States Congress lists:
 * August 9, 1916 - Uniform Bill of Lading Act of 1916
 * August 29, 1916 - 2nd Uniform Bill of Lading Act of 1916

Could someone more knowledgeable possibly look at the two articles and see if they refer to the same Bill, or whether they cover the two different bills - in which case the articles will need to be amended/moved accordingly.

Thanks --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 14:03, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Merge proposal
has proposed a possible merge of articles North Carolina v. Alford (1970 Supreme Court of the United States case), with the form of guilty plea it spawned, Alford plea. Discussion is at Talk:North_Carolina_v._Alford. Thank you for your time, Cirt (talk) 14:54, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Please also see Content_noticeboard. Cirt (talk) 05:16, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 04:06, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Article needing review/cleanup: African American Women, 1960's
I noticed a new article that needs work and wanted to draw this project's attention to it: African American Women, 1960's. The article needs review; since it appears to be based largely on an ethnography published as All Our Kin, should it be refactored and moved to an article on that study? Or perhaps it could be the starting point for a broader article? Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 09:59, 30 January 2010 (UTC) (Cross-posted to African diapsora project Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_African_diaspora) Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 10:04, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Pulaski
There is a move discussion potentially relevant to participants at this project: Kazimierz Pułaski → Casimir Pulaski at Talk:Kazimierz Pułaski. -Rrius (talk) 00:33, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Expert Help - American gangsters during the 1920s
The article American gangsters during the 1920s is in serious need of an expert on the subject. The article has very few references, and does not have a lead section. Thanks, Justin W Smith talk/stalk 03:52, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

FAR
nominated Marshall Plan for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Dana boomer (talk) 15:59, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

new related WikiProject: United States Public Policy
Hi everyone! I want to invite anyone who's active here and has an interest in public policy and its history to join WikiProject United States Public Policy, which is just starting up. We've got some cool things planned, including working with students and their professors for several public policy courses.--Sross (Public Policy) (talk) 13:16, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Relevant AFD discussion page - The Most Hated Family in America
There is an AFD for The Most Hated Family in America, which is a television documentary film that was written and presented by the BBC's Louis Theroux about the family at the core of the Westboro Baptist Church (info from lede of article). Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 18:20, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * AFD is located at: Articles for deletion/The Most Hated Family in America.

United States History articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the United States History articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:47, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Grace Sherwood, Witch of Pungo FAC
This article is here as a FA candidate. Would appreciate commentary to help improve the article. Thank you. — Rlevse • Talk  • 13:26, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

United States related Tag and Assess proposal
There is a proposal on WikiProject United States to task Xenobot with tagging and assessment of articles that fall into the scope of WikiProject United States. Please take a few moments to provide your comments about this proposal.

If you are interested in joining WikiProject United States please add your name under the applicable section here. --Kumioko (talk) 17:08, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Plymouth
FYI, the usage of Plymouth is up for discussion, see Talk:Plymouth. 76.66.203.138 (talk) 12:45, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to help with WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 03:18, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed Move Discussion
I have proposed to rename three articles to more accurately affect their scope and content: As a historic fact, a diverse group (and not just African-Americans) were involved in this movement. In addition, the movement fought for the rights of all Americans, not just African-Americans. Its leaders esposed a "big tent" strategy to involve a broad based support. Most Civil Rights legislation addresses discrimination based on race, religion or national origin, and a title that focuses upon racial discrimination distorts the topic. Hence, I am proposing to restore the pre-2006 article names. Your comments are welcomed at: Talk:African-American_Civil_Rights_Movement_(1955–1968). Racepacket (talk) 23:13, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * African-American Civil Rights Movement (1955–1968) → American Civil Rights Movement (1955–1968)
 * African-American Civil Rights Movement (1896–1954) → American Civil Rights Movement (1896–1954)
 * African-American Civil Rights Movement (1865–1895) → American Civil Rights Movement (1865–1895)

A consideration for cross project consolidation of talk page templates
I have started a conversation here about the possibility of combining some of the United States related WikiProject Banners into WikiProject United States. If you have any comments, questions or suggestions please take a moment and let me know. --Kumioko (talk) 20:30, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Scale Examples on Assessment page
Several of the Quality Scale Examples are out of date (e.g. Eric Bana is now a FA quality not a GA quality article). I replaced the one for the Start Class (the old example was upgraded to B class), but others need to be gone through. Also the India link for the FA example goes to an old version of Australia. AJseagull1 (talk) 07:17, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

US Collaboration reactivated & Portal:United States starting next
Casliber recently posted a suggestion on the talk page for WikiProject United States about getting the US Wikipedians Collaboration page going again in an effort to build up articles for GA through FA class. See U.S. Wikipedians' notice board/USCOTM. After several days of work from him the page is up and ready for action. A few candidates have already been added for you to vote on or you can submit one using the directions provided. If you are looking for inspiration here is a link to the most commonly viewed articles currently under the scope of Wikiproject United States. There are tons of good articles in the various US related projects as well so feel free to submit any article relating to US topics (not just those under the scope of WPUS). This noticeboard is intended for ‘’’All’’’ editors working on US subjects, not just those under WPUS.

The next item I intend to start updating is Portal:United States if anyone is interested in helping. Again this is not specific to WPUS and any help would be greatly appreciated to maximize visibility of US topics. The foundation has already been established its just a matter of updating the content with some new images, biographies and articles. Please let leave a comment on the Portals talk page or let me know if you have any questions or ideas. --Kumioko (talk) 23:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Collaboration for the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Greetings, the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution has been chosen as the U.S. Wikipedians Collaboration of the Month for February 2011. As a project who has identified this article to be in your scope we encourage you to edit this article and help to build it up to better explain the subject and to get it promoted. --Kumioko (talk) 20:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Featured portal candidate: United States
Portal:United States is a current featured portal candidate. Please feel free to leave comments. -- RichardF (talk) 14:30, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Adding "Popular pages" to U.S.-related projects
A very interesting tool of the Wikimedia Toolserver is called WikiProject Popular pages lists. These lists are similar to project-related article lists like U. S. article lists used for generating assessment statistics. The Popular pages lists include the rank, total views, average daily views, quality and importance ratings for the listed articles. Here is the full list of projects using popular pages lists. An FAQ also is available at User:Mr.Z-man/Popular pages FAQ.

I recently added links to lists of popular pages as shown below to the U.S. Portal - WikiProjects box and the nominations sections for each of the selected articles boxes.

Portal:United States/Projects/Popular pages

Because this project was not included, I am bringing up the popular pages tool here. This tool makes it very easy to track three of four balancing dimensions when selecting articles for showcasing at a portal - quality, importance and popularity. When tracking the fourth dimension, topic, the related article lists tool (such as for U.S. article lists tool) also might be useful by filtering on categories of interest.

If you do decide to use this tool, feel free to update Portal:United States/Projects/Popular pages as well.

Regards, RichardF (talk) 02:22, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of History of Maryland Route 200 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of Maryland Route 200 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. Racepacket (talk) 09:23, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Files_for_deletion/2011_March_21
All opinions welcome. Thanks. walk victor falktalk 03:16, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Files_for_deletion/2011_March_21
All opinions welcome. Thanks. walk victor falktalk 03:32, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

New article
Hi folks, I just created the Honor Flight Network article. Any work is much appreciated. Thanks! NYyankees51 (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Colonial Governors
Hello people of WikiProject United States History!

I've worked a lot on wikipedia articles related with the history of the Americas, since that this is a topic that I´m interested. the case is I realized that, since a long time, all governors of states like Texas, New Mexico and Florida have articles on wikipedia since those states joined the United States, while only a few colonial governors of those states had them. In addition, articles by some of the colonial governors of Florida have little information and seek more of it. I thought it would be nice to all colonial governors of those states also have articles on wikipedia, because they are a bit forgotten in this encyclopedia. I've already looked for information and I've edited articles the some of these governors and I ask that, if interested, you also collaborate on editing articles from other governors of those states. The names of the governors of Texas, New Mexico and Florida are on the lists Royal Governor of La Florida, Spanish governors of New Mexico, List of Texas Governors and Presidents.

I hopefully are at least some editors interested. I would appreciate any cooperation. --Isinbill (talk) 00:51, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Declaration of independence
There is presently a debate over whether the list article Declaration of independence ought to include a hatnote pointing specifically to the United States Declaration of Independence. Those in favor argue that historical, demographic, and practical factors justify this treatment, while those in opposition argue that no country's document should receive special treatment under any circumstances. I am bringing the discussion to your attention because United States Declaration of Independence is included in this wikiproject. Please see here if you are interested in weighing in on the matter. Thank you. &mdash;Bill Price (nyb) 17:45, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Collaboration with WP:USRD
Hello. At WP:USRD, I have started a task force with the goal of improving U.S. Route 66 and any articles related to it. US 66 is by far the most viewed road article, so we at the project want to get the article in good shape and to do it we'd like as many hands as possible. I am still in the midst of organizing things, but I'd like to extend an invitation to help out. We're looking for a few editors who are interested in the history, landmarks, pop culture, and Americana along the Mother Road.

If you know of any other WikiProjects that might be able to help, please let me know. If you're interested or know someone who might be, please sign up or have them sign up at WP:USRD/US66. Thanks! –Fredddie™ 05:48, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

US National Archives DYK collaboration
This summer I am serving as the first Wikipedian in Residence at the National Archives (see Signpost article); in order to serve as a hub for activity related to the National Archives' collaboration with Wikipedia, I have recently created a project page at WP:NARA. Since it seems relevant to this Wikiproject, I wanted to point members to our first editing project, which was recently announced and can be found here. The National Archives is an incredible resource for images and other documents related to American history. I would be grateful for any input as we work out the details, and, of course, your participation once it launches. Dominic·t 14:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Status of this project
Greetings, I was looking at the list of WikiProjects at the WikiProject Council and it states that WikiProject United States History is inactive. I am not sure thats true and this propject is active I recommend changing the listing at the Council page. --Kumioko (talk) 16:46, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion to pull this project under WikiProject United States
It was recently suggested that this project might be inactive or semiactive and it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States. I also noticed by looking at the list of projects at the WikiProject Council that the project is listed as inactive. Additionally, it doesn't appear by the talk page or project page that the project is very active. This discussion is intended to start the process of determining if the project is active or if members are interested in it being added to the projects supported by WikiProject United States. I will contact each of the active members of the project for their input and ask them to comment here. --Kumioko (talk) 18:30, 16 June 2011 (UTC) All Active members have been notified. --Kumioko (talk) 20:43, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * There is definitely a strong editor community working on articles within the scope of this project, however this forum is not frequently used. I think making this a task-force under the umbrella of WP:US would go along way to helping both projects. WP:US could easily become a super-project like WP:MilHist, which could provide a better forum for collaboration. &mdash;Charles Edward (Talk 18:41, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Go for it! Honestly, I had forgotten that I was a part of this project and that it even existed. Technically, the projects have a lot of overlap so I see no issue in merging them. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:40, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the WikiProject United States History, as a project over this country, it could add the WikiProject United States. Moreover, as Charles Edward, I think the access to this project would be greater under this area and possibly more people would join the project.--Isinbill (talk) 23:41, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't disagree. I do believe that the collaborative efforts of both groups may improve the quality of the articles.  I'm not exactly sure what we would be 'giving up' so readily... I'm also not clear on where the charge of being 'interested in current events, not history' is really coming from, or if that is necessarily a bad thing given the nature of History as a discipline.  Drawing connections to and from current events is part of the Historical process, and may serve to strengthen the overall quality of all articles involved.  --FESmitty77 (talk) 19 June 2011  —Preceding undated comment added 18:16, 19 June 2011 (UTC).

"What are you guys talking about? We need to remain independent. If we join with the WikiProject United States, we won't get a handful of editors to help us. All those editors are interested in is current events, not history. If you all are willing to give in that easily, I'd be more than happy to take over as Project Leader to help us get more active.--Valkyrie Red (talk) 17:23, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify this isn't intended as a hostile takeover of the project. It would still remain mostly autonomous (except the banner) and would still be best served with a project leader to focus on items and articles related specifically to this project so if you are willing I would encourage you to do that either way.
 * The only significant thing that would change would be the WikiProject template (We would replace the banner with WPUS with WPUSHistory under it like you can see on Talk:Internal Revenue Service with United States government and the project would be added to the list of projects supported by WPUS. Thats pretty much it. Additionally, the bots which currently support WPUS would be adjusted to include US History, a topic for US Hisory would be added under Category:United States articles by topic, the members would be added to the US Newsletter (which they can get without being members of the project if they want it), the project would get an expanded user visibility (though the newsletter and WPUS project page), etc. This project would still be able to independantly do as much or as little as it wants as far as content drives, working on articles, discussions on the talk page, etc. --Kumioko (talk) 17:51, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Kumioko, listen to yourself. You seem to have lost your leadership touch. We're only a little inactive cause there hasn't been any motivating factors for the project recently. If we merge with US, how'll that change our situation? Answer, it won't. This project will just lie in the shadow of the other, more popular project, and we'll still have the same inactivity. Only difference will be that it won't be acknowledged due to the fact that it is now a part of US project and that project isn't inactive. Like I said, if no one is up to the challenge, I'll be glad to lead this. Just give me a couple of weeks and this project won't be inactive anymore.--Valkyrie Red (talk) 02:11, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't really agree that this project would be forgotten anymore than the Military history task forces are forgotten under the Military history project. Its no problem though, take all the time you need. Like I mentioned above if the project doesn't want to its fine with me I was just following up on a suggestion by someone else. Most of the articles in the project are already dually maintained by both anyway. I just thought it might be helpful to get this project going again. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help. --Kumioko (talk) 18:37, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Making the group a joint subproject of the History and US History projects seems to me to be a good idea. It could use the US banner, and I could set it up to assess for both.John Carter (talk) 14:47, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Endorse the proposal, but see the points User:Valkyrie Red is making. I pledge to step up my involvement in this content area. BusterD (talk) 21:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, I continue to insist (as I did from the discussion here at the discussion Kumioko mentions that the US Wikiproject be redefined with a start date (1783 or 1776). I have no stake nor opinion about if this project should be a part of Wikiproject US or not, just that there should be logically defined areas of expertise. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 14:20, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * FWIW, I can see some reason to the above statement. There are however some questions as to what project, if any, content related to pre-independence material would fall within the scope of. More or less, all existing geographical locations of the country fall within the scope of the related state projects, which are a form of subproject of the US project. If there were a specific subproject or related project for pre-US and/or Canadian independence related topics, and that might be the North America project or some other related project, that might work, or, alternately, it might make sense to perhaps create such a group if there is sufficient interest. John Carter (talk) 15:58, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Well, if we add under WikiProject United States, the project gets little activity, and the project won't be active any more. Sorry Kumioko, I strongly oppose it. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  00:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thats alright, this one doesn't look like it has the support anyway. I don't really agree that the activity will decrease unless all the members decide to stop editing but hopefully this project will pick back up again and won't need the help. --Kumioko (talk) 00:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I don't take no offense, since I am only member of WP:CAL, WikiProject California covers about the former country, before becoming a statehood in 1850, not the state by itself. Look, I do not want to add WikiProject California under WikiProject United States any time soon, since WP:CAL has many members and five task forces including Los Angeles and Southern California task force under WP:CAL. Since WP:TEXAS covers only about the former country, not the state by itself. Also, I do not add WikiProject Texas under WikiProject United States anytime soon too, because there is penalty of activty. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  01:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * As for those 2 examples both of those projects have a lot of members and activity so it really wouldn't be much of a benefit to add them to WPUS. I also don't know how to go about adding a project with multiple subprojects or task forces. Thats something that hasn't come up yet. There are a few states that would probably benefit but right now I am more focusing on National level. In the next couple months though there will probably be a couple states added. I have also been talking to some of the states to pull in the cities and other inactive projects that relate to that state. Seattle and Eastern Washington in to Washington for example. What I am going to add the WPUS banner to the remaining 450 articles that are in WPUS History and not in WPUS so that way the articles are dually maintained by both projects. That way WPUS History can still do what they need and want to do and WPUS can as well. --Kumioko (talk) 01:18, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It has been over a month since the last comments were left and it appears that a couple of the members of the project oppose being added to WikiProject United States. If I am incorrect in that assessment though please let me know but for now it appears that the members of the project have spoken and do not wish to be supported by WikiProject United States. I do hope that the projects can collaborate in the future since they both have many of the same articles in common. --Kumioko (talk) 19:43, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Formatting of Template:Pulitzer Prize for History
I am requesting your feedback at Template talk:PulitzerPrize History.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:08, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Color
I have a second issue in need of feedback at Template talk:PulitzerPrize History.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:22, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Historiography of the United States has been nominated as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for next August 2011
Historiography of the United States, an article within the scope of this project, has been nominated to be the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for next August 2011. You can vote for this or other articles to be next months Collaboration of the Month here. Project Messenger Bot 19:37, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

United States Declaration of Independence article needs to be adopted
I have performed a review at Talk:United States Declaration of Independence/GA1. However, the nominator has exercised his WP:RTV. The article needs someone to adopt it and address my concerns in order to regain its GA status. I will allow seven days for someone to step forward.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:35, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Would like uninvolved assistance with Redeemers
The Redemption (United States history) article has been begging to be merged with Redeemers for a very long time. Many discussions to merge the pages have gone stale, the latest set of tags was applied sometime last year. So today I boldly merged the two, and would like someone to check my work and see if they agree with my choice. If the page needs to be moved to the other namespace, that's fine with me. But I'm just not seeing why two separate articles on the same political phenomenon need exist. Better to get disagreement now so I could easily revert. Other feedback or direct editing would be welcome. BusterD (talk) 19:41, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Request for comment from supporting WikiProjects
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:1st Filipino Infantry Regiment (United States). RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:49, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

FAC for 1st Filipino Infantry Regiment (United States)
I have nominated the article 1st Filipino Infantry Regiment (United States) for FA. The review can be found here. Comments from reviewers are needed to help determine whether the article meets the criteria for featured articles; all editors are invited to participate. Any assistance with this nomination would be greatly appretiated. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 00:39, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Input requested in article move discussion
Hi. Readers at this page may be interested in contributing to the discussion at Talk:Jeffersonian democracy. Thanks in advance for any input. -GTBacchus(talk) 16:40, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Fall 2011 Photo Contest
WP:NRHP is having a Fall Photo Contest running from Oct. 21-Dec. 4, 2011. I'd like to encourage anybody who enjoys photography, as well as anybody who is interested in historic places to participate as a photographer, a sponsor, or both.

One way that an individual editor or a project can participate is to sponsor their own challenge. For example, somebody here might want to include a challenge such as "A barnstar will be awarded to the photographer who adds the most photos to the NRHP county lists of previously non-illustrated NRHP sites that are related to steamboats on the Mississippi." To sponsor a challenge all you need to do is come up with an idea, post it on the contest page, and do the small bit of work needed to judge the winner(s).

Any and all contributions appreciated.

Smallbones (talk) 03:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

99 Percent Declaration
The 99 Percent Declaration has a difficult history. The article is nominated for deletion and rescue. The original author, a criminal defense attorney for the Occupy Wall Street protesters arrested on the Brooklyn Bridge, has edited the article and has been continually reverted on the article talk page. The WP:SUMMARY and several sources have been removed by the nominator for deletion. It's the US Collaboration of the Month. I am working on a version at User:Dualus/99 Percent Declaration; please see. Dualus (talk) 06:58, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


 * That article does indeed have a "difficult history", much of which the above user has neglected to mention. Whatever the genuine merits of having an article on that topic, the article as created was built to house original research by the above user, already rejected at other articles, pushing the now-discredited claim that this document represented the official views of Occupy Wall Street, among other things.  This helps to explain why it has been tagged for deletion since its creation.


 * A person claiming to be the original author of the document later inserted, directly into the article space, a disgruntled personal message to Wikipedia readers about his purported mistreatment and marginalization by the Occupy Wall Street movement. This, naturally, was reverted in short order, whereupon User:Dualus took it upon himself to copy the message to the article's talk page, after which it was removed from the talk page as well (presumably because angry user-generated manifestos are not ordinarily seen as relevant to improving an article of any sort).


 * The "WP:SUMMARY" Dualus refers to was, in fact, an exhaustive point-by-point rephrasing of virtually the entire agenda contained in the document (again, containing OR)—in my opinion, not tremendously different from a copy/paste job of the original—and in any event, containing far more detail and enthusiasm than an encyclopedic tone would seem to allow.


 * The comment regarding "several sources removed by the nominator for deletion", meanwhile, undoubtedly refers to the removal of this material, which is full of OR and questionable sources, and whose connection to the article topic, is, itself, the product of WP:SYNTHESIS.


 * The article is, indeed, currently listed as the U.S. Collaboration of the month. It would appear that this is because Dualus made the listing himself, after deciding for himself that it should be the next collaboration of the month.


 * Finally, the user's personal version of the article hosted in his userspace, which he has here invited editors to inspect, seems to be a project which has been discouraged.


 * And this is all to say nothing of the fifteen or so other Wikiproject pages the user has canvassed, or his repeated listing of the document alongside major historical documents such as the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, apparently unconcerned by the notion that perhaps an anonymously authored list of demands by a group of U.S. political protesters perhaps doesn't share the same stature as declarations of policy promulgated by the United Nations.


 * The above background may prove useful to any editor wishing to have a fuller understanding of what has been going on at the article listed here.

Proposal to add WikiProject United States History under WikiProject United States
Greetings, I am a member of WikiProject United States, it was formerly recently suggested that WikiProject United States History might be inactive or semi active and it might be beneficial to include a project for it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States, which Kumioko have added some of the projects like WikiProject American television and WikiProject United States Government, after I've opposed to pulled the project myself. After reviewing the project it appears that there have not been any active discussion on the talk page in some time and the only content updates appear to be simple maintenance so being supported by a larger project might be beneficial. This discussion is intended to start the process of determining if the project members are interested in the project being added to the projects supported by WikiProject United States. If have any thoughts, comments or questions, please let me know. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  07:57, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Since there is objections, I am going to add the WikiProject United States banner myself. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  21:37, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination as a United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month candidate
One or more articles relating to this project have been nominated to be a future United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month. All editors interested in improving these articles or voting for next months collaboration are encouraged to participate here. --Kumioko (talk) 19:52, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

A Proposal
Below are some ideas on restructuring and revitalizing WikiProject History. It may be easier to keep discussion in one place, perhaps here.

General Points

 * Restructure the front page so that it more closely resembles that of WikiProject Military History. This design is easy to navigate, and getting to specific areas of the WikiProject is made quicker and less difficult.


 * Forge closer ties with some of its "daughter" projects. WikiProject History should serve as a focal point for history-related article improvement drives and discussions, and should be a community of editors supportive of smaller, fairly inactive region-specific history projects.


 * Expand the A-Class review process. This should be a major function of WikiProject History (conducting A-Class reviews for smaller, "daughter" projects).
 * Work on expanding the number of History Good and Featured articles.


 * Host task forces devoted to improving recently-created articles. Some editors should work with WikiProject Deletion Sorting to save as many quality history-related AfDs as reasonably possible.


 * WikiProject History should be less of a "front-lines" WikiProject, like the Military History one, but more of a coordinating effort. An enhanced A-Class review process and forging relations with "daughter" projects would help to achieve this goal.

Membership and Leadership

 * All current WikiProject History members would be members of the new, revitalized project. WikiProject Military History members, as well as members of all region-specific history projects, would be automatically inducted into the project, although these users could opt out at any time.


 * All members of the WikiProject should have an equal say in WikiProject affairs.
 * However, a group of five coordinators should be elected by all editors that are part of the abovementioned categories to make the WikiProject "flow" smoothly. These coordinators would serve for twelve months each, and would be elected in February of each year.
 * Each coordinator would have a specific task, or "department".
 * Chief Coordinator. This coordinator would serve as a guide to other coordinators and members of the project.
 * Assessment and Review Coordinator. This coordinator would sort reviews, with the help of two delegates that s/he could appoint.
 * Membership Coordinator. This coordinator would deal with membership issues, and would direct and judge "contests" on the project.
 * Resources Coordinator. This coordinator would assist members in need.
 * Content Coordinator. This coordinator would work on improving articles in need, and would direct efforts and drives related to this.

Role on the Encyclopedia
WikiProject History should be a visible, important part of the encyclopedia, as it should work to coordinate other projects and direct various task forces and drives on the website. Newcomers interested in history should be assisted and guided by the Resources Coordinator and other helpful editors.

WikiProject History should work together with other projects to achieve some of the goals of the encyclopedia as a whole.

Thank you for reading this, and for commenting, if you are interested.  DCI  talk 23:17, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 01:51, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

NARA on-wiki ExtravaSCANza participation
Hey everyone. Please take a look at User:The ed17/NARA to brainstorm ideas and a structure on how we can help the National Archives ExtravaSCANza. My hope is that the success of this event will ensure that others will be organized in the future, even without Dominic as a Wikipedian-in-Residence, so we all benefit from the high-quality, formerly non-digitized media uploaded to the Commons. Thanks, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 10:50, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Reviewer needed for W. E. B. Du Bois Featured article status
The project has an opportunity to have another Featured Article: W. E. B. Du Bois is up for FA review, at Featured article candidates/W. E. B. Du Bois/archive1. It has two reviewers, but needs a third to be ratified. If you want to review it, make sure you are familiar with the criteria at Featured article criteria, and dont be afraid to suggest improvements. Thanks. --Noleander (talk) 20:53, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Check this out
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2012. 68.39.100.32 (talk) 11:15, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

AFD for Luce–Celler Act of 1946
You are invited to join the discussion at Articles for deletion/Luce–Celler Act of 1946. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:51, 7 February 2012 (UTC) --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:51, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject United States History banner
WikiProject United States History and {{WikiProject United States|UShistory=yes}} exist, should the subproject banner be merged into the main USproj banner?

70.24.247.54 (talk) 04:37, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Haymarket affair Good Article reassessment
Haymarket affair, which is listed as part of this WikiProject, has been nominated for a community reassessment to determine if it meets the good article criteria and so can be listed as a good article. Please add comments to the article reassessment page. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:51, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Racial Diversity in the U.S. Classroom
I am planning to expand the stub article Diversity in the classroom as part of an assignment for my Poverty, Justice, and Human Capabilities course at Rice University. Specifically, I would like to focus on racial diversity in U.S. classrooms, which I feel makes the page relevant to the U.S. History WikiProject: it concerns historical and modern-day affairs in the U.S., including segregation, Brown vs. Board of Education, and Affirmative Action. Specifically, I would like to define racial diversity in the classroom, give its background in the U.S., cite research on its effects, summarize its social implications, and list and explain current policy on racial diversity in schools in America. My sources will include textbooks and readings from my class, newspaper articles, academic journals, etc. By becoming a member of this WikiProject, I hope to help identify, edit, and expand articles on United States history. Please let me know if you have any comments, questions, concerns, or suggestions. You can place them here or directly on my talk page. Thanks, Weatherby551 (talk) 05:17, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Pinchot-Ballinger controversy
Hi, I think there are some problems with the article on the Pinchot-Ballinger controversy. I'm going to do my best to expand the article and fix these problems, but I'd be interested to hear if others agree that I've pinpointed the right areas for improvement. Timber Trail (talk) 18:34, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * It's rather sketchy and inadequate as a resource. It covers the basic facts of the scandal, but little else.
 * It appears to rely entirely on only two sources, each of which is used as a footnoted citation exactly once.
 * My research indicates that the consequences of the scandal (the split in the Republican Party in the 1912 presidential election, leading to the election of Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat; and the rise of future U.S. Supreme Court justice Louis Brandeis to the national stage) lend it importance. If this is indeed so, they are not discussed in detail here.
 * It contains neither a historiography of the scandal nor much information on how the scandal was perceived at the time.

Edits to the "Diversity in the classroom" page
Amanda, apparently I made the same bad mistake here as I did in Chloe's article and actually implemented the changes I initially suggested. There's no use in undoing them, but consider it huge favor. Nevertheless, here were general suggestions that I followed and that you should, too:


 * You need a Reference and/or footnotes list. Just follow the generous example I provided you with and you should be fine. I noticed you had listed the citation within the text when I was in edit mode, but due to technical errors, they were not displaying properly. Fix this.


 * You're completely lacking a "See also" section. You need to include at least a handful of links to related pages so that your page has a much larger chance of generating traffic. Possible page links could be included towards Race, Gender, Native American, African America, Jim Crow....pages like these will do fine.


 * Your "Americanization School" section could use some expansion. I feel that the concept of the assimilation-induced environment is important and deserves more information. List some of its negative effects on the minority children who were enrolled into them. Maybe even a quote or something from a notable figure who advocated such schools

I hope these suggestions get the ideas flowing, and I hope the rest of the Wiki Commmunity here can may lend a helping hand as well. Good luck!!!

J hernan26 (talk) 06:55, 9 April 2012 (UTC)J hernan26

List of African-American firsts
You are invited to visit the article's talk page and comment on inclusion criteria. Zepppep (talk) 09:20, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

More opportunities for editors to access free research databases!
The quest for getting Wikipedia editors the sources they need for articles related to United States History and other subjects is gaining momentum. Here's what's happening and what you can sign up for right now: In addition to these great partnerships, you might be interested in the next-generation idea to create a central Wikipedia Library where approved editors would have access to all participating resource donors. It's still in the preliminary stages, but if you like the idea, add your feedback to the Community Fellowship proposal to start developing the project. Drop by the talk page of User:Ocaasi, who is overseeing these projects, if you have any questions.--JayJasper (talk) 17:58, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Credo Reference provides full-text online versions of nearly 1200 published reference works from more than 70 publishers in every major subject, including general and subject dictionaries and encyclopedias. There are 125 full Credo 350 accounts available, with access even to 100 more references works than in Credo's original donation.  All you need is a 1-year old account with 1000 edits.  Sign up here.
 * HighBeam Research has access to over 80 million articles from 6,500 publications including newspapers, magazines, academic journals, newswires, trade magazines and encyclopedias. Thousands of new articles are added daily, and archives date back over 25 years covering a wide range of subjects and industries.  There are 250 full access 1-year accounts available.  All you need is a 1-year old account with 1000 edits.  Sign up here.
 * Questia is an online research library for books and journal articles focusing on the humanities and social sciences. Questia has curated titles from over 300 trusted publishers including 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, and newspaper articles, as well as encyclopedia entries.  There will soon be 1000 full access 1-year accounts available.  All you need is a 1-year old account with 1000 edits.  Sign up here.

Proposal for United States A-Class review process
There is a proposal at WikiProject United States to start an A-Class review process for United States related articles. Please stop by and join the discussion. Kumioko (talk) 02:21, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Manila Village, Louisiana
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Jean Lafitte, Louisiana. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Westerns
Well, it's not particularly well worded for non-userpages, but yeah, this WikiProject is now setup and still in the early stages of building its project area before user-participation can really begin to function. Anyone interested, please feel free to join. Note, this project not only covers film and TV, but Western novels, comics, actors, directors and authors, etc who make the fictional-Wild West possible. Thanks, Ma<font color="#B40000">&reg;&copy; usBr<font color="#B40000">iti sh {chat} 01:55, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:US state and territory history
You may wish to comment on the proposed deletion of Template:US state and territory history at Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 3. Yours aye, Buaidh  02:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Antonio Miranda Rodriguez
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Los Angeles Pobladores. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:36, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage ready for community feedback
Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage, an RFC that will affect the title of the articles currently titled Support for the legalization of abortion and Opposition to legal abortion if consensus is found in favor of its conclusions, is now in its community feedback phase and ready for editors to register opinions and arguments. Please add your feedback; thanks! —chaos5023 (talk) 17:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Kentucky were Southern Unionist
Kentucky geographically is and was a Southern State. The Union soldiers from Kentucky called themselves Southern Unionist. They never considered themselves as Northerners, but Unionist. Their diaries and letters makes this very clear. They did not like or use the term "Yankee" for themselves. 67.140.144.83 (talk) 16:18, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Japanese American Veterans Association
You are invited to join the discussion at WP:RSN. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 07:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Call for organizers: WLM US 2013 needs you
Hi, I wanted to invite you to help organize the 2013 Wiki Loves Monuments photo contest in the United States. Last year, over 22,000 files were uploaded (90% by new Wikipedia users) to illustrate articles about historic places in the United States. We need all the help we can get, so if you're interested in organizing the contest, please add your username at this page. If you have any questions, please don't post them here - place a new message on User talk:Mono. Thanks, Mono 15:13, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Religion of Founding Fathers
There has been an editor recently who has been going around to multiple biography articles on prominent American founding fathers and changing their religious affiliation to Deism in the infoboxes, and adding Category:American deists. My understanding is that this is only partially correct: They could be considered deists in the sense that they submitted religion to rational analysis, but were not deists in the sense that they rejected the idea of divine intervention. Anyway, I have reverted or tried to correct these edits on several articles, but it keeps getting added back. I would appreciate any input from people more familiar with the subject. (I will also invite the editor in question to comment here.) ~Adjwilley (talk) 18:03, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Firstly i did not "change" their affiliation. I added to it. You seem to have the impression that people can only 1 religious belief. This is false. <font color="grey" face="Tahoma">Pass a Method  <font color="grey" face="papyrus">talk  18:22, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * For example this source states that Christians mix new age and Eastern beliefs with Christian ones. I can find many more such sources, including for other religions. <font color="grey" face="Tahoma">Pass a Method <font color="grey" face="papyrus">talk  18:25, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Of course people can believe in more than one thing, which is one of the points I was trying to make above. These men were members of religions, but also believed in some tenets of deism. Whether or not this makes them deists can be debated, and there will undoubtedly be sources arguing both sides. But when you edit articles like Hugh Williamson (a Presbyterian who some call a deist) and Cornelius Harnett (an Episcopalian who some call a deist) and categorize both as deists without further qualification or mentioning the Episcopalianism or Presbyterianism, this becomes a problem in my view. ~Adjwilley (talk) 18:39, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Your point would be valid if i worded the additions in an exclusive/restricted nature. But i did not. I purposefully worded the additions in a loose and unlimited manner. For example, i could have said "so and so was a deist" or "so and so adhered to deism". Instead i said "so and so said he was a deist" or "so and so described him as a deist", thus leaving open the possiblity of another belief system. Hence i thnk your concerns are invalid per WP:VERIFIABILITY. <font color="grey" face="Tahoma">Pass a Method <font color="grey" face="papyrus">talk  19:00, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * A number of scholars have done extensive research on the question of Hamilton's religion-- as a young man he did have many deist characteristics, but seems to have fewer of them as he aged. Citations on this difficult issue should be limited to solid reliable sources that demonstrate a full knowledge of the scholarly literature. Hamilton never called himself a deist. Rjensen (talk) 20:03, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

List of people on United States banknotes
This FLC highlights 53 people famous in American history. Any comments/reviews would be welcome. Thank you in advance.--Godot13 (talk) 18:44, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

RM:Tariff of 1828 → Tariff of Abominations

 * (Discuss) – Tariff of 1828 → Tariff of Abominations Kauffner (talk) 07:36, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Horrible Histories
Hi. We're having a discussion on the fate of Horrible Histories TV show at: Horrible Histories (2009 TV series). As a relevant Wikiproject, we would greatly appreciate it if you would voice your opinion on the talk page, or to have a crack at editing and improving it. Thankyou for your time. :)--Coin945 (talk) 13:22, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Discussion to remove the Automatically assessed logic from the WikiProject United States template
Greetings, there is a discussion regarding removal of the logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories from Template:WikiProject United States. Most of the categories (over 220 Wikipedia wide) were deleted in February 2013 because they were empty. These categories were previously populated by a bot that hasn't run since 2011 and the categories aren't used. Removal of this uneeded/unused logic will greatly reduce the size and complexity of the WikiProject United States template. Any comments or questions are encouraged here. Kumioko (talk) 18:51, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Lest there is any confusion for people who don't speak the same language, the words "logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories" refer to the feature that was supposed to allow this WikiProject's template to "inherit" class and importance ratings from other WikiProjects. Kumioko says that there are no longer any bots performing the function that formerly copied those ratings. --Orlady (talk) 23:35, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pre-Industrial Linen Industry of Londonderry, New Hampshire, USA
Dear historians: This article is about to be deleted as a stale draft. It was declined at Afc as not having reliable sources. Most of the sources are offline. Can anyone here tell if they support the information in the article? &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 06:34, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bayard Wilkeson
Dear historians: This old abandoned draft submission is about to be deleted unless someone takes an interest in it. Is this a notable topic, worth rescuing, or should it be let go? &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 06:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox government cabinet
Template:Infobox government cabinet has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox cabinet. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Frietjes (talk) 21:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Seeking comments to improve Voting Rights Act of 1965
Greetings. I am looking for suggestions on how to improve the article Voting Rights Act of 1965, and I would be highly appreciative if folks from WikiProject United States History could leave some comments about it on the peer review I requested at Peer review/Voting Rights Act of 1965/archive1. The article was recently promoted to GA status, and it'd be fantastic to get it up to FA status. Thanks! –Prototime (talk · contribs) 03:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/freedmans village
Dear historians: The above interesting article will soon be deleted as an old draft. Is anyone interested in improving it? &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 16:34, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I boldly userfied this under my user page as I intend to work on it. I nominated the remaining redirects for speedy deletion. Please advise if this is an issue. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 06:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Milo Reno
Dear history experts: Here's an old abandoned Afc submission that appears to be about a notable historical figure. Should this be improved and added to the encyclopedia instead of being deleted as a stale draft? &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 17:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'll work on this draft from here. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 06:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Chris. I was hoping someone would rescue this one. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 07:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2014
You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride 2014, a campaign to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and its sister projects. The campaign will take place throughout the month of June, culminating with a multinational edit-a-thon on June 21. Meetups are being held in some cities, or you can participate remotely. All constructive edits are welcome in order to contribute to Wikipedia's mission of providing quality, accurate information. Articles related to LGBT history may be of particular interest. You can also upload LGBT-related images by participating in Wikimedia Commons' LGBT-related photo challenge. You are encouraged to share the results of your work here. Happy editing! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:12, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Project activity
I am confused so someone please help me out. I have been very active (I believe anyway) in not only creating articles related to history but editing them also. I have a full time job, working 67 hours this week, yet I still took time to research and start articles. History, or the project, is not semi dead to me but then I haven't had the time, nor do I really know how, to check all the activity out. For instance; I do not know what terminology "semi" means in the world of Wikipedia. Just the fact that "I" feel I have been far more than "semi" active, would make me want to remove the tag, I would like to know some criteria to understand the meaning of the tag.
 * I actually came here because I started the article The Lacassane Company that needs a template (and looked over) and I have to get up early. I would be more "active" but the "light"(house) project set me back by renaming (some screwed up convention) articles against all that could be right with Wikipedia (like common name, historical name, both sometimes) so I stopped for a while. I have a lot of researched work but will not work on articles that are named wrong by "consensus". That is another story and I haven't had the time to look for a way to stop it.
 * I drive a semi, am semi- tired, and would like to do more than semi- sleep, especially since I am semi- active. Alright then: that is enough on being "semi" so have a semi-good night. Otr500 (talk) 03:56, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Leaflet for Wikiproject United States History at Wikimania 2014
Hi all,

My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.

One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.

This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:

• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film

• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.

• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.

• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____

• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost The deadline for submissions is 1st July 2014 For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to: Project leaflets Adikhajuria (talk) 12:35, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Civil War Sesquicentennial 2011-2015
Dear American History experts: This old AfC submission was declined because the topic already exists at Commemoration of the American Civil War. It will be deleted shortly as a stale draft. Is there room for an article about this specific commemoration, and, if not, is there material that should be incorporated into the general article before the draft disappears? &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 14:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/1934 Seattle Longshoremen Strike
Hello American history experts. Is the above AfC draft about the same topic as 1934 West Coast waterfront strike, or is this a topic for a separate article? If it's the same, is there anything that should be merged from the draft into the existing article? &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 18:22, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

AfD
Could you comment on Articles for deletion/Benjamin Harrison VI? Appreciated, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 18:12, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Expert attention
This is a notice about Category:United States History articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. Iceblock (talk) 21:35, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emmett J. Scott
Dear historians: Here's an interesting old draft about an American history topic. Unfortunately, it's unsourced, and will soon be deleted unless someone takes an interest in it. Any takers? &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 13:39, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!


Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Revisions to the Housing Segregation article
I am planning on editing and restructuring the current Housing Segregation article. It belongs in the scope of WikiProject United States History but has yet to receive a quality or importance rating. I hope that my edits will bring up both the quality and importance of this article. It is currently lacking in depth of content and use of scholarly sources. I plan to provide a holistic coverage of this topic by adding material from reputable sources such as peer-review journal articles, published books, and articles from academic journals.

I plan on adding a "Causes of housing segregation" section, an "Effects of housing segregation" section, and an "Initiatives against housing segregation" section. My hope is that by adding material in these new sections, there will be a more comprehensive coverage of the topic. In addition, I plan on revising the current "History of housing discrimination" section by adding more content and creating two sub-sections: "Legislation" and "Government agencies". The legislation sub-section will focus on laws passed regarding housing discrimination while the government agencies sub-section will focus on the various government bodies dealing with housing segregation issues. I also want to focus on adding more content to the history section in order to provide context for the rest of the article.

If anyone is interested in the history of housing segregation, I would appreciate any and all feedback comments on the best ways to improve this article. I would love references to even more scholarly sources pertaining to the topic. Thank you. Aaie21 (talk) 01:12, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Wow, it's very exciting that you're going to do some concerted work on this topic. Housing segregation is a major world issue to which Wikipedia does not currently do justice. Here are some issues which come to mind readily:
 * The article called Housing Segregation should probably expand to take a worldwide perspective—or be renamed to Housing segregation in the United States—as racial segregation in residential areas has a long history in Australia, South Africa, and probably many other places around the world. (All comments below pertain to the U.S.)
 * In the history of housing segregation in the U.S., court cases deserve a section. One important case is Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. (1968), which was unusual because the Supreme Court gave an unusual extrapolation of the 13th Amendment. Hansberry v. Lee (1940) and Shelley v. Kraemer (1948) outlawed restrictive covenants on housing.
 * Another topic which deserves more treatment is the role of slum clearance and other urban planning policies. Through the years, especially since the 1940s, there have been many federal laws which financed changes to cities which resulted in de facto segregation.
 * Right now, the article has three sections: history (through 1968), "Segregation and Neighborhood Disinvestment", and "relocation". All three sections contain good material but they don't add up to a cohesive whole. The middle section reads a little like an essay. Probably, a new section should assess the overall state of housing segregation today, using statistics and other facts culled from reliable sources.
 * The History section could probably give more than 1 sentence to housing discrimination before 1934. Relevant issues include the failure of Forty acres and a mule; Black Codes; "Jim Crow" laws, and the Great Migration.
 * The history of housing segregation from 1968 to the present is also glossed over. The article called white flight is fairly well developed with different topics related to this period. One factor it doesn't mention is the riots of the 1960s, especially the King assassination riots in 1968. Urban decay and deindustrialization might also be good places to look for more info on this period.
 * Good luck and please let me know (maybe on my talk page) if there's any way I can assist you with your project. shalom, groupuscule (talk) 02:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

John Carver (Mayflower passenger) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for John Carver (Mayflower passenger) to be moved to John Carver (Plymouth Colony governor). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 11:46, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

America: Imagine the World Without Her
There is an ongoing discussion about describing the premise of the documentary America: Imagine the World Without Her in the lead section. Editors are invited to comment here. Erik II (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 23:53, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

AfC submission
Could anyone have a look at Draft:Mary Simpson? Thank you, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:40, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Appomattox Court House listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Appomattox Court House to be moved to New Appomattox Court House. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 08:59, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Category:Local civil rights history in the United States
Category:Local civil rights history in the United States, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for upmerging to Category:History of African-American civil rights. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:26, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

John Smith (explorer) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for John Smith (explorer) to be moved to Captain John Smith. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 17:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

American Civil War peer review
I have requested a peer review of the American Civil War article for assistance in preparing it for renomination to GA status at Peer review/American Civil War/archive4. Thank you in advance for any comments. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 10:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Violent labor disputes in the United States listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Violent labor disputes in the United States to be moved to List of worker slayings in labor disputes in the United States. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here.Jeff in CA (talk) 05:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed merger of 1864 Republican National Convention and 1864 National Union National Convention
At one time, I had thought these were two different events, but the articles at present both seem to be about the same event. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. older ≠ wiser 18:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Project activity
"This WikiProject is believed to be semi-active". Could someone "less" semi-active explain what this means? Otr500 (talk) 18:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I suppose no answer is actually an answer as to why the semi-active notation. Good to know so I won't waste time using project templates and such. Otr500 (talk) 08:46, 26 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I withdrew as a participant. Otr500 (talk) 08:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Resignation from the United States Senate
I have created a new article titled Resignation from the United States Senate. Michael Hardy (talk) 04:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Johnstown Flood listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Johnstown Flood to be moved to ???. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:14, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Treaty of Manila (1946) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Treaty of Manila (1946) to be moved to Treaty of Manila. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 11:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Trouble finding references? The Wikipedia Library is proud to announce ...
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 200%; line-height: 1; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif; font-weight: bold;"> The Wikipedia Library

There are up to 30 free one-year Alexander Street Press (ASP) accounts available to experienced Wikipedians through this partnership. To apply for free access, please go to WP:ASP.

Alexander Street Press is an electronic academic database publisher. Its "Academic Video Online: Premium collection" includes videos in a range of subject areas, including news programs (like 60 minutes) and newsreels, music and theatre, speeches and lectures and demonstrations, and documentaries. This collection would be useful for researching topics related to science, engineering, history, music and dance, anthropology, business, counseling and therapy, news, nursing, drama, and more. Cheers! 22:15, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Montgomery Bus Boycott listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Montgomery Bus Boycott to be moved to Montgomery bus boycott. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Manifest destiny listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Manifest destiny to be moved to Manifest Destiny. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 12:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

List of Colonial Colleges listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for List of Colonial Colleges to be moved to Colonial colleges. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:29, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Mississippi civil rights workers' murders listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Mississippi civil rights workers' murders to be moved to Murders of Chaney, Goodman, and Schwerner. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:44, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

African-American Civil Rights Movement (1954–68) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for African-American Civil Rights Movement (1954–68) to be moved to African-American Civil Rights Movement. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 19:59, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

African-American Civil Rights Movement (1954–68) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for African-American Civil Rights Movement (1954–68) to be moved to African-American Civil Rights Movement. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:29, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Impeachment and acquittal of Andrew Johnson listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Impeachment and acquittal of Andrew Johnson to be moved to uncertain1. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:30, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Penn's Creek Massacre listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Penn's Creek Massacre to be moved to Penn's Creek massacre. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 02:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Penn's Creek massacre listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Penn's Creek massacre to be moved to Penns Creek massacre. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:30, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Old-time radio listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Old-time radio to be moved to Golden Age of Radio. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Looking for feedback on a tool on Visual Editor to add open license text from other sources
Hi all

I'm designing a tool for Visual Editor to make it easy for people to add open license text from other sources, there are a huge number of open license sources compatible with Wikipedia including around 9000 journals. I can see a very large opportunity to easily create a high volume of good quality articles quickly. I have done a small project with open license text from UNESCO as a proof of concept, any thoughts, feedback or endorsements (on the Meta page) would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

--John Cummings (talk) 14:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Please See - Submissions
https://wikiconference.org/wiki/Submissions --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 00:49, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

RFC at SIG MCX re: Orlando shooting
Talk:SIG MCX Please post on that page if you have a comment. Felsic2 (talk) 20:14, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

RFC: Inclusion of vehicle use in crimes as part of vehicle articles
This RFC covers two automotive articles with similar disputed material. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles. Felsic2 (talk) 00:43, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Should the Ford Ford F-650 medium duty truck article include a mention in the body of the text or via a see also link the Oklahoma City bombing?
 * Should the Chevrolet Caprice article mention in the body or via a see also link the Beltway Sniper's use of a Chevrolet Caprice?

United States Declaration of Independence listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for United States Declaration of Independence to be moved to Declaration of Independence. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Proposal
I believe that a latest article of the US History timeline is starting to get too long (It's now covering over 25 years). As on the talk page of the article, many people propose to split into two separate articles. US History from 1991-2007 and US History from 2008-present.&mdash; JJ <font color="#BCD0E4">Be rs  Pub  lic  ( ta <font color="#D6D235">lk ) 16:28, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject United States - 50,000 Challenge
--- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:06, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

New York draft riots listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for New York draft riots to be moved to New York City draft riots. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 03:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Monday Night Massacre listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Monday Night Massacre to be moved to Dismissals of Sally Yates and Daniel Ragsdale. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Upcoming "420 collaboration"
– Bri (talk) 21:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Linking Saturday Night Massacre to Dismissal of FBI Director James Comey
There have been repeated edits linking Saturday Night Massacre to Dismissal of FBI Director James Comey via the "See Also" section. Given the current media speculation commenting between the two, this is understandable. However, how related the two will be in a historical viewpoint remains to be seen. At this time, I oppose making such links (and have opened up a conversation on the talk page about it).

Does anyone here wish to weigh in?

--<i style="font-family:comic sans ms; color:SeaGreen;">KNHaw</i> <sup style="color:SeaGreen;">(talk) 21:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

How to describe the Emmett Till case in the lead sentence of the Emmett Till article
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Talk:Emmett Till. A WP:Permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Mississippi civil rights workers' murders listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Mississippi civil rights workers' murders to be moved to Murders of Chaney, Goodman, and Schwerner. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 09:29, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Dunning School listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Dunning School to be moved to Dunning school. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 14:01, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

The Federalist Papers listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for The Federalist Papers to be moved to The Federalist. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:30, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Merge proposal
A merge proposal was started from a consensus on the article talk page of Alt-left, which is an article within the scope of this WikiProject.--Mark Miller (talk) 20:57, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

American historians and diffusion
,, who posted to my talk. Please Ping me if you need me directly for this conversation. Note that I will happily edit the categories however the community decides but that at the moment, Category:American historians is diffused by topic as it was 24 hours ago and there are only the two categories by state which I am not populating until I get more feedback. I will continue diffusing Category:American historians by century, which is a pre-existing scheme. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:26, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Copying a post from Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_History - please comment there. Johnbod (talk) 01:33, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Category:American historians is marked for diffusion and until earlier today, several subcategories by topic (altho not all), such as Category:American art historians were marked as non-diffusing. Obviously, this is a contradiction. I started out by taking the non-diffusing categories and putting them in the parent category and received some feedback questioning it. I have since removed the parent category and the non-diffusing tags (adding them back would be trivial, of course). I suggested that an alternate scheme for diffusing the parent Category:American historians may be by state and made a couple of these categories as a start: Category:Historians from California and Category:Historians from Pennsylvania. I am offering two questions to this WikiProject:
 * 1) Should subtopic categories of Category:American historians be marked as non-diffusing?
 * 2) Should Category:American historians be diffused by state?

RFC needs input
This RFC on confederate monuments could really use more eyes/input. Please take a look! Fyddlestix (talk) 21:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedian in Residence at the University of Pittsburgh to facilitate the transfer of historical content into Wikimedia projects
Your support is solicited for the Project Grant that can be seen here. Part of the grant-making process requires notification of those who would like to support this project. I am the potential grantee and believe that this position will make a significant contribution to many projects. The University of Pittsburgh intends to release as many historical photos as possible into the public domain. Most of the archival materials are related to United States History. Other projects will also benefit. Some of these are WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, WikiProject Ethnic groups, WikiProject Women in Red, WikiProject Pennsylvania, WikiProject United States History, WikiProject Military history/American Revolutionary War task force, WikiProject Pittsburgh, and WikiProject African diaspora. Some of these WikiProjects are currently semi-active and would benefit from more contributions from those in the Western Pennsylvania region and the University of Pittsburgh. The University of Pittsburgh has significant archival and historical content related to gaps to these WikProjects. Thank you for your consideration.
 * Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) ✐   ✉  23:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for National Association for the Advancement of Colored People to be moved to NAACP. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:03, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Murders of Chaney, Goodman, and Schwerner listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Murders of Chaney, Goodman, and Schwerner to be moved to Freedom Summer Murders. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Alexander H. Stephens listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Alexander H. Stephens to be moved to Alexander Stephens. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

2016 Orlando nightclub shooting listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting to be moved to Orlando nightclub shooting. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 19:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Watergate scandal listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Watergate scandal to be moved to Watergate. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Children's Aid Society listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Children's Aid Society to be moved to Children's Aid. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 04:30, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

African-American Civil Rights Movement (1954–1968) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for African-American Civil Rights Movement (1954–1968) to be moved to African-American civil rights movement (1954–1968). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 14:16, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Homestead Strike listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Homestead Strike to be moved to Homestead strike. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Pullman Strike listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Pullman Strike to be moved to Pullman strike. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 02:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

African-American civil rights movement (1954–1968) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for African-American civil rights movement (1954–1968) to be moved to Civil Rights Movement. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 14:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Francis Cabot Lowell (businessman) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Francis Cabot Lowell (businessman) to be moved to Francis Cabot Lowell. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 04:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

NSC-68 listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for NSC-68 to be moved to NSC 68. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:45, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Mammy archetype listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Mammy archetype to be moved to Mammy. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 08:15, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Evil empire listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Evil empire to be moved to Evil Empire speech. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:44, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

American Indian Wars listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for American Indian Wars to be moved to Indian Wars. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:59, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Evil empire listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Evil empire to be moved to Evil Empire speech. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template Transclude lead excerpt.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you. &mdash; The Transhumanist  11:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Colorado Springs, Colorado listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Colorado Springs, Colorado to be moved to Colorado Springs. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 17:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.