Wikipedia talk:WikiProject University of Houston/Archive 1

Question
I am new to Wikipedia. I have some pics that I took of the law school. I notice y'all said you need some. What do I do to upload them? MC Lewis 08:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for volunteering your photos! The best practice for uploading images is to head to the Wikimedia Commons, sign up for an account there, and upload the images there. This will allow us to use the images here on Wikipedia as well.  If you don't want to sign up for a Wikimedia Commons account, you can also simply upload the images on Wikipedia as well.  Either way, here's how you can do it:


 * While signed into your Wikipedia account, click this link to open the upload file page for your own work on Wikipedia or this link if you choose to upload the file on Wikimedia Commons (remember you need to sign up for an account there first).
 * In the "Source filename" area, click the "Choose file" button, and navigate to the proper spot on your computer.
 * For the "Destination filename", make sure choose a descriptive name for the file like "UH Law Center.jpg"
 * In the "Summary", you can put whatever information you'd like. Describe the photo, you may give yourself credit for taking it.
 * In the "Licensing" area, choose a license that you like best. I recommend using the GFDL.
 * Click the "Upload file" button. It will upload your photo.
 * From here, click this link. You'll arrive at the proper page to post your photo.
 * Click the "edit this page" tab on the top of the page, and place your image's link in the "Fulfilled requests" section's gallery.


 * Again, Thanks for helping out! You should join us a participant! Just add your name to the Participants section.
 * &mdash;Brianreading 23:47, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Good Job + Great Work!
Kudos to the UH WikiProject. We need dedicated students like you all who want to put our University of Houston in the best possible light.

Ebitnet (talk) 15:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

endowment
the endowment figure for UH is really off. I personally know its in between the 500-600 million range. 70.244.37.106 (talk) 05:46, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * You'll need to cite a credible source for that. Original research can't be used in Wikipedia.  Seeing as how the entire UH System endowment is $522 million, I can't see where you're getting that info.  The current source for the endowment is from U.S. News & World Report. Brianreading (talk) 06:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * right, but how can its satellite campuses have more money than its flagship campus? makes no sense. Look at UT's page, it lists the system's endowment. 70.244.62.39 (talk) 07:46, 16 April 2008 (UTC)


 * No other single university in the UH System has nearly the same endowment as the flagship campus. Think about it.  UH has about half the endowment.  The other schools in the UH system share the rest.  It makes perfect sense to me.  If the UT-Austin article is using the endowment for the entire system in its flagship university article this should be corrected, as it is flat out incorrect. Just because the UT-Austin article is wrong, doesn't mean the UH one should be also, right? Brianreading (talk) 09:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikimedia Chapter proposal: Wikimedia Texas
I wonder if anyone is interested in creating a Wikimedia chapter serving the state of Texas. See: meta:Talk:Wikimedia_chapters WhisperToMe (talk) 23:14, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme
As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
 * The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
 * The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
 * A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot  ( Disable )  21:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for University of Houston
Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:25, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

bayou bucket
--Coogru12 (talk) 21:21, 24 November 2008 (UTC)coogru12 I spoke with the athletic dept who sent me some pictures of the bayou bucket. I think a picture of the trophy would be appropriate. Would you like these images?
 * It would be excellent to use these images. I've been expanding the Bayou Bucket article.  Did the athletic department agree to license them as free images, or are they still considered Non-free? They could still be possibly used even if they are non-free, but it would help to figure out how to approach this. Thanks for your help! Brianreading (talk) 22:34, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

RfC for WP:BOOSTER
There is a request for comment about whether or not WP:BOOSTER documents a standard consensus and good practice that all editors and school/college/university articles should follow as an official policy or guideline. Madcoverboy (talk) 19:33, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group
Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. &mdash; Delievered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:54, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the  parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:49, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

UH Early education lab school closing
Hi! I'm not sure where to put this, but the UH Early Education lab school is closing: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nb/clearlake/special/6423133.html WhisperToMe (talk) 13:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I was aware of that too. Since we didn't put anything about the school on Wikipedia, I guess we won't really need to update anything on account of the news. Brianreading (talk) 18:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 04:07, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Houston Press article
I found "Crisis on Cullen Boulevard." by Tim Fleck of the Houston Press. This could be used as a source for things about U of H. According to this the university system's offices were in the Entex Building, now the Total Plaza. WhisperToMe (talk) 03:33, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

University of Houston articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the University of Houston articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (&diams;) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:47, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

US Collaboration reactivated & Portal:United States starting next
Casliber recently posted a suggestion on the talk page for WikiProject United States about getting the US Wikipedians Collaboration page going again in an effort to build up articles for GA through FA class. See U.S. Wikipedians' notice board/USCOTM. After several days of work from him the page is up and ready for action. A few candidates have already been added for you to vote on or you can submit one using the directions provided. If you are looking for inspiration here is a link to the most commonly viewed articles currently under the scope of Wikiproject United States. There are tons of good articles in the various US related projects as well so feel free to submit any article relating to US topics (not just those under the scope of WPUS). This noticeboard is intended for ‘’’All’’’ editors working on US subjects, not just those under WPUS.

The next item I intend to start updating is Portal:United States if anyone is interested in helping. Again this is not specific to WPUS and any help would be greatly appreciated to maximize visibility of US topics. The foundation has already been established its just a matter of updating the content with some new images, biographies and articles. Please let leave a comment on the Portals talk page or let me know if you have any questions or ideas. --Kumioko (talk) 23:36, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Glass Mountain (journal)
Would someone from this project be so kind to check the priority rating given to this article? A newbie editor insists on rating it "High" importance which, frankly, I doubt is correct. However, I'm not too familiar with this project, so I'd appreciate a more informed opinion. Thanks. --Crusio (talk) 14:34, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I re-ranked it as a "mid" WhisperToMe (talk) 16:40, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Linking concerns in UH article
Interested parties, please see my comment at Talk:University of Houston. I'm concerned that there are too few links in the lead, as well as in the article body itself, resulting in an article that is very different (link-wise) from the vast majority of other U.S. university articles. See the links in the comment for much context... - dcljr (talk) 22:34, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Help Improve Texas Projects and Portals
This is an open invitation to anyone interested in helping to update the information on the various Texas projects and portals. The information is generally out-of-date, sometimes by years. Every little bit helps. Every small improvement adds to the larger whole. Together, we can get the Texas pages to look current and helpful to visitors.

These two Category links will take you to the various pages:
 * Category:Texas portals
 * Category:WikiProject Texas

Anyone interested in improving the basic look and structure, could open a WP:RfC. Dialogue is good for the project.

These are areas I see could be improved, in addition to miscellaneous information on the portal and project pages:


 * Participant lists could be divided in to two separate lists: Active, and Inactive participants
 * Task lists that require monitoring, can be somewhat automated by replacing the individual topic items with category page links
 * Eliminate duplication of efforts. Inter-connect the like sections in different pages to a singular template.
 * As an example, I already updated the Open Tasks on WikiProject Texas, and the Things You Can Do on the Texas portal. These are exactly the same information, but point to two different templates.  In a perfect world, these two pages would point to the same template, but they don't - possibly due to page formatting. I updated the templates they point to, so at least the individual items will point to Wiki links that would, in essence, make the list items self-updating. But it would be better if both pointed to only one template.

-Maile66 (talk) 19:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Discussion on WikiProject Texas regarding support by WikiProject United States
WikiProject University of Houston has been mentioned as being added to a list of projects being supported by WikiProject United States. You are invited to join the dialogue Here
 * -Maile66 (talk) 18:47, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I am in favor WhisperToMe (talk) 03:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

New sources
WhisperToMe (talk) 03:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Khan, Sam Jr. "UH students vote for fee increase to help athletics." Houston Chronicle. Thursday February 2, 2012.

GA review
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Elizabeth_Warren/GA2#GA_Reassessment - You  really  can  21:36, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Discussion on consolidating inactive and semi-active university WikiProjects
This project may be affected by a proposed consolidation of inactive and semi-active WikiProjects covering universities. The proposed consolidation is being discussed on the talk page of WikiProject Universities. We are seeking feedback from the projects that may be impacted before we decide on a course of action. Please drop by to participate in the discussion. Thanks! –Mabeenot (talk) 06:58, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

College basketball team navigation template
Please join the discussion at the College Basketball Wikiproject for forming a consensus on the creation of a basic navigation template for college basketball teams. CrazyPaco (talk) 09:37, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!


Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template Transclude lead excerpt.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you. &mdash; The Transhumanist  07:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)