Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Unreferenced articles/Deletion review

How to best use going forward
My initial thought is that going forward, when posting a prod or AfD notice, is that volunteers post it at the bottom of the list WikiProject Unreferenced articles/Deletion review. We archive monthly, and it will give a good sub heading to discuss particular article if needed. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:44, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I am thinking we could have a summary table at the top of the page; something like this:


 * This is just a quick mock up but something like this might be useful if the page gets to long. Mattg82 (talk) 23:14, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Do you want to take an look at them and see what the outcome was? I tired to post in order, and if there was an AfD after the prod, I tried to include it as a sub section under the prod.  Notice that a blue link may be a deleted and redirected article. Jeepday (talk) 02:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I have finished documenting outcome, results tend to fall into four groups


 * 1) Delete; expired prod or failed AfD = 58
 * 2) Keep; article improved after delete suggestion = 39
 * 3) Redirect or rename; Lots of different rational and outcomes = 9
 * 4) Incomplete; Concerns not addressed, final disposition pending. = 2


 * I am thinking a straight count of what falls into each category is the next step, Thought? JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 12:03, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Past review
I have added a section for December 2010, I will start populating it with my old messages in posted order. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe I got all the of mine posted from December 2010, will tackle January 2011 next . Jeepday (talk) 02:05, 22 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Working on listing outcomes for December, I am not going to recreate January 2011. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:03, 24 January 2011 (UTC)