Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Usability/Main Page/Draft/Vote6I

Draft I.0

 * 1) Very nice, We love it! Wikipedia community is very well done and we're very influenced by how that is served up. hydnjo talk 02:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) I like Draft E and I, mainly because of the icons for the portals rasmusdf 10:23, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Support -- Nice mix of the best features of all the rest. -- Rmrfstar 10:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Support -- I also like Draft I; I think you should add the picture of the day at the bottom as in Draft H. --FeanorStar7 10:51, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Support Really great template. Particularly refreshing on the eyes and user friendly. --Peter McGinley 11:16, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Support Wonderful template Kevin. To me this is the most aesthetically pleasing as well as the most informative and easy to use. Definite support. Jombo 11:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Support The best template, adding a picture of the day would make it complete. Drafts like this one make 'sense', ones that have some content colour boxed, and some just plaintext left justified at the bottom (Draft A for example) just looks scruffy and half finished.  Good Work. SFC9394 12:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Support this one, I like the icons for portals and overall looks. Sabine&#39;s Sunbird 13:12, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Support Good design.  Lots of useful info and links, well organized.  Elwood00 T 13:32, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 10)  Support , Great, user friendly design. It looks professional, and easy to use. Great design Keeperoftheseal 14:15, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Support. Combines the best of all the other drafts. Whitetigah 14:33, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Support All other drafts had something letting it down. This one seems to take all the good things from the other ones. The ultimate draft in my opinion - [[Image:Union flag 1606 (Kings Colors).svg|20px]] • Dussst •  T 17:33, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) Support I support this draft in that it is more modern and asthetically pleasing, while at the same time keeping the features that I know and love (news, featured article, Selected Anniversary). Although I have to admit I have some concerns on any of these drafts in that I don't know if they would compensate well enough for the loss of speed in page loading that dial up users would face. User:AllPeopleUnite 17:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) Support Nice and modern design, seems very usable. Hugus 18:24, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 15) Support - A good combination of the best elements. Solar 20:09, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 16) Support - I really like the icons for the main portals, plus the colors.- JustPhil 23:09, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 17) Support - I love this one, much better than any of the others. --Aaron Einstein 23:44, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 18) Support - Good design-- provides quick access to portals and featured articles, as well as to community pages and to other Wikipedias.  --CannotResolveSymbol talk 23:04, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 19) Support - I like the boxes' bold titles, and the general spacing. Terrific contrast and style. qartis 20:26, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 20) Support - Attractive design and good graphics. I found it the best among all other drafts. vedant (talk &bull; contribs) 15:18, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Draft I.2 (revision)

 * But Today's Featured Picture only appears on weekends rather than 7 days per week 22:33, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

support best of the lot i think, we should definitely change the main page its really dull at the moment
 * 1) Strong Support - Best one in my opinion, I like the category pictures at the top, the design looks nicer than the current one, it looks more rounded off, easy to distinguish from normal pages, the layout is better, there's more space for the individual columns, and there's a pic of the day. --NorkNork 19:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I'd rather the FA were on the left, since otherwise it seems that news is the main feature of the site --Joewithajay 22:26, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Best so far, good improvement on I. &mdash;Vanderdecken&there4;  &int;  &xi;  &phi;   10:01, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Neutral, I'm not to fond of the colors. Broken S 22:41, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Strong Support - Great; tasteful colours, layout and icons. Greg carter 15:28, 30 January 2006 (UTC)