Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Victorian Museums

Status
It is obvious that this project can be seen as stand alone - self generating - and not necessarily tied into the parent projects (Victoria or Australia). It would be very useful to get a handle as to whether any of the participants wish to tie into any further formality or leave it as a project in name - but not part of the assessment system where templates and formal structure and wikiproject architecture may tie it in like other oz projects as at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Australia-related_WikiProjects. That way as to what extent of project work can be clarified as, in the aims and targets on the main page - ways of working with the articles and subjects without any necessary identifier (or not). Even a template identifying the articles or topics within the scope of the project might be an idea like the articles tied into Freopedia for instance.

Any feedback on these issues would be useful, as the main page seems the only point of understanding what is going on. That is not a problem - it is just that further encouragement and publicity could be sought at WP:AWNB and other locations if the status is clarified - a project in name, or a potential project possibly going through the hoops at a later stage at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals. JarrahTree 08:33, 20 May 2018 (UTC)