Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Assessment/A-Class review

Thoughts to consider

 * 1) Automating the nom page's creation (either MILHIST-style via project talk page box, AFD-style, or something else). Obviously, it's easier to not need bots. Open to ideas here. (Edit: somewhat automated creation until WPVG tag is worked out—try it out on the main page)
 * 2) Renaming this page A-Class assessment or A-Class candidates or A-Class nominations instead of A-Class review. The precedence is that MILHIST does "ACR" and thus that was the name mentioned in Torchiest's feature, but with "review" comes possibly negative connotations. A-Class assessment (ACA) may be a preferable acronym. Thoughts?
 * 3) Most of the WP documentation refers to "A-Class" (like the Mercedes series) but I believe the correct spelling is "A-class" since it "class" modifies the first word ("A"). Consensus?
 * 4) Since subpages for reviews is a new step, I stopped at just making the new page, keeping current procedure. We should eventually discuss closing assessments, whether we want specific A-Class criteria. No rush.
 * czar  &middot;   &middot;  05:20, 13 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Glad to see this is moving forward! I'll post some comments over the weekend. —Torchiest talkedits 22:19, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

(1) Automating nom creation

 * I'd asked Kirill Lokshin about how to set up the process, since he was the one who did it for MILHIST, back in January. The original thread is here; perhaps you can pick up the thread and see if he'll help us out. —Torchiest talkedits 21:44, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

(2) ACR vs. ACA

 * Assessment is my preference, and it's inline with the way MILHIST does theirs. —Torchiest talkedits 21:46, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

(3) A-Class vs. A-class

 * No strong preference, but lowercase is fine with me. —Torchiest talkedits 21:46, 18 May 2013 (UTC)