Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Good content/Archive 1

Former good articles
Do we need to list those? I don't see much purpose for them. --Mika1h (talk) 22:22, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I think they are useful in case someone wants to bring them back to GA status. In theory these articles should be closer to the standards than other articles. Kariteh (talk) 22:27, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * With the inclusion of C-class, the criteria for B-class became stricter. So any article which is rated as B-class should be close to GA. And we have Category:B-Class video game articles where people can browse them. --Mika1h (talk) 22:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree, but first WikiProject Video games/Assessment should be updated because it's significantly more lenient than Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment. Kariteh (talk) 22:41, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, let's leave the issue until that happens. --Mika1h (talk) 22:45, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

GAC section
Should GACs link to the page where the discussion is actually on? The disadvantage is that the links are red until the page is created, but this might also help to see which still need to be started. Currently, the section would be: Comments? MrKIA11 (talk) 18:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:GA candidate.svg|14px]] Final Fantasy VII
 * 2) [[Image:GA candidate.svg|14px]] Silent Hill 3
 * 3) [[Image:GA candidate.svg|14px]] Europa Barbarorum
 * 4) [[Image:GA candidate.svg|14px]] Chris Metzen
 * 5) [[Image:GA candidate.svg|14px]] Aether (video game)
 * 6) [[Image:GA candidate.svg|14px]] Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver
 * 7) [[Image:GA candidate.svg|14px]] Doom 3
 * 8) [[Image:GA candidate.svg|14px]] Star Wars: The Force Unleashed
 * 9) [[Image:GA candidate.svg|14px]] Iori Yagami


 * When I first saw this, I thought "what the heck?". But after thinking about it, I certainly can't deny the benefits. My one complaint is that the article itself is not easily accessible from this setup. Is there a template which can link the article, talk, and nomination pages? If no, should we make one for our GA and FA pages?
 * Something like [[Image:GA candidate.svg|14px]] Article name (Talk • Nomination). Any thoughts? (Guyinblack25 talk 19:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC))
 * I changed it to use half your idea. It now has [[Image:GA candidate.svg|14px]] Article name (Nomination). I don't think a link to the talk page would be nessessary on this page, but that can be changed. MrKIA11 (talk) 20:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks good. (Guyinblack25 talk 20:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC))

Automatic content under review
So with the new announcements template, I can have the "content under review" on this page update automatically... Good idea? You'd lose the numbered order and I'd probably drop the whole GAR and GTC sections since we're currently grouping those in the announcements to cut down on header bloat. I may have a way around it if you insist. Anyway, should I make the review content on this page update automatically? We'd still need to update the big list manually unless we bot it czar  ♔  04:48, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Redirect talk page
This talk page gets very little traffic. Any discussion here would not see a wide audience, but should. Is there any opposition to archiving and then redirecting this talk page to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games where more people can participate in discussions relevant to this page? – czar   16:55, 23 June 2015 (UTC)