Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Websites/Archive 6

WP 1.0 bot announcement
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 04:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Relevant AFD - Everybody Draw Mohammad Day
Please see Articles for deletion/Everybody Draw Mohammad Day. Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 17:16, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Everybody Draw Mohammad Day

Newgrounds up for deletion
FYI, Newgrounds has been sent to AfD for deletion. 76.66.193.224 (talk) 05:52, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Expekt.com
Is this notable? I umm'd and ahh'd about AfD but want to check here first. S.G.(GH) ping! 20:41, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 04:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Relevant AFD - Everybody Draw Mohammad Day
Please see Articles for deletion/Everybody Draw Mohammad Day. Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 17:16, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Everybody Draw Mohammad Day

Newgrounds up for deletion
FYI, Newgrounds has been sent to AfD for deletion. 76.66.193.224 (talk) 05:52, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Expekt.com
Is this notable? I umm'd and ahh'd about AfD but want to check here first. S.G.(GH) ping! 20:41, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Websites articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Websites articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:49, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

RfC on the use of terminology like “GiB” (gibibyte) on Wikipedia
Notice: An RFC is being conducted here at Talk:Hard diskdrive#RFC on the use of the IEC prefixes. The debate under consideration is the use in this table of the “Hard disk drive” article of nomenclature such as “KiB”, “MiB”, and “GiB” to describe capacities. The governing guideline on MOSNUM is Quantities of bytes and bits. The quality of the discussion can be improved by broadening participation of the discussion. This will hopefully more fully achieve a consensus. Greg L (talk) 17:56, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination for Riscos.info
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Riscos.info. Trevj (talk) 20:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC) (Using )

Facebook statistics
Can someone update the article, following the recent IPO of Facebook, which has increased the traffic. Some suggestions I would point:

i) Add a secondary source, rather than Socialbakers.com ii) Increase the list to 100/150/200 countries iii) Add three more columns, namely Sl no, penetration, change% iv) Convert the external links in the stats into ref with cite templates v) Expand the text vi) Add more than one type of stats, if possible vii) Represent some data in form of graphs/charts or a better world map viii) Add better links in external links section ix) Have updates for all countries at one time, not like as it is ix) Rename to Statistics of Facebook

Anyone, please review this. By going around the topic, I also found an article unupdated for a long time, Facebook features. Thanks, (Copied from WT:WikiProject Internet} extra 999  ( talk ) 15:48, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Google-Wallet-logo.svg
image:Google-Wallet-logo.svg has been nominated for deletion -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 23:10, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Coinbase Home Page (9-24-2013).png
File:Coinbase Home Page (9-24-2013).png has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.129.3 (talk) 02:16, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Beck v. Eiland-Hall for Peer Review

 * Beck v. Eiland-Hall

I've placed the article up for Peer Review.

Participation would be appreciated, at Peer review/Beck v. Eiland-Hall/archive1.

Thank you for your time,

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 04:38, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Hibe
Need help regarding two aspects of article above. I am related to the company, hence a potential conflict of interest.

A) Notability: The article contains two secondary sources. (I put few more in the talk page). Is it enough?

B) Edition: I wrote the article as a draft. As much as I tried to be neutral, there is still a conflict of interest. Can an editor have a peek at it? Comments are welcome and I expect changes.

Thanks.

VirtualArtifacts (talk) 17:51, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Seems like a decent amount of legitimate coverage. What's with all the French sources, though, when the site is based in San Francisco? Gary King  ( talk  ·  scripts )  18:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks Gary. Hibe is US-based, however most of its development was done in Montreal, Canada. What would then be the next step to insure that the quality of the article is on par with the community standards? Very best. VirtualArtifacts (talk) 22:18, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * It needs more reliable, English sources. Looking at the sources currently in use, it looks like only Le Devoir is the only reliable one, but it's not even in English. Press releases and the like generally don't count as a source that proves notability, per WP:CORP. Gary King  ( talk  ·  scripts )  00:06, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok. I hear you. We will get a reasonable secondary English source to back the article. How long can the current draft page remain before deletion? Many thanks. VirtualArtifacts (talk) 02:00, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Indefinitely Gary King  ( talk  ·  scripts )  03:37, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Relevant AFD discussion page
Please see Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia. AFD discussion is at, Articles for deletion/Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia. Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 22:57, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Search engine marketing
I believe that search engine marketing should fall under this WikiProject. Does anyone else here agree? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anneaholaward (talk • contribs) 19:30, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Possibly relevant tool
Interesting project. Just in case it's of use, a list of red links to anything resembling a domain name in the English-language Wikipedia can be found here. - TB (talk) 22:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Computing importance no longer defaults to Websites importance
Articles tagged using WikiProject Websites will retain their Websites importance, but will no longer get assigned a general computing importance unless one is provided explicitly using.

When assessing articles for the Websites project, please consider the computing importance and tag accordingly. For articles which also have a WikiProject Computing banner, its  must match the Websites.

This will help WP Computing in three ways:
 * 1) Improve the accuracy of importance assessments for general computing
 * 2) Avoid unexpected changes to the Computing importance that result from changing the Websites importance
 * 3) Bring attention to the parameter for general computing importance, reducing the likelihood of articles accidently being listed in multiple Computing importance categories. (This causes false entries in the Computing reassessment log – see discussion at WP:COMP/A – and likely other problems as well.) --Pnm (talk) 04:06, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Request for an independent look at proposed article
I've researched and drafted a proposed article about the C-SPAN Video Library, a website containing more than two decades of archived public affairs programming by the U.S. television network C-SPAN. That article is presently in my user subspace, here. I hesitate to post it immediately because I work with C-SPAN's communications team, and am mindful that I have a WP:CONFLICT with C-SPAN as a general subject. I hasten to add that the article has been written to strictly follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines, WP:VERIFY, WP:RS and WP:NPOV among them. I don't believe there is anything remotely controversial about the proposed article and its suitability per WP:NOTE is more than adequately demonstrated, but to stay on the safe side, I figured this was an appropriate place to post a review request. If there are no objections after a day or so, I'll probably go ahead and post it up. But I'm open to any feedback you may have here or on my talk page. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 20:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Looks like a good article. I don't see any serious problems. Some minor observations:
 * Lead: The 160,000 statistic could be moved to Content. "The complete collection of" in the lead sounds promotional, and it isn't necessary – it would be implied. Is a "Golden Beacon" known outside the industry? If not it might not need to be in the lead.
 * History section contains a lot of detail. In particular background about the C-SPAN archives should be covered elsewhere and linked to.
 * Public response section contains weasel words. "Landmark educational tool" sounds unencyclopedic, and should probably be a direct quote.
 * Do the Multichannel News, Mediaite, and Gothamist citations meet WP:RS? (Those would be helpful wikilinks in the citations.)
 * --Pnm (talk) 06:31, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the close read, Pnm. These are helpful observations and I'll have to go back into my research to find answers to some of your questions. I'll have some revisions to share over the weekend. Thanks, WWB Too (talk) 06:48, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've incorporated most of your suggestions into the current draft of the article. As for the sources, Multichannel News is an industry publication that goes back to 1980, and should remain. Gothamist probably is not, and the same point was already made by the NYT, so I've removed it. The more interesting question is Mediaite: it's a professional site with an editorial structure and is known for providing commentary on the news media (hence its name) but it is also known more for opinion than reporting and so is probably right on the bubble. If it falls short, then I will have to find a replacement. Your insight would be appreciated here. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 02:45, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It sounds like Mediaite is fine. You might try the Reliable sources noticeboard where some very thoughtful folks participate. I do think the Public response section needs to attribute the sources of opinions including that one. --Pnm (talk) 18:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, sounds good. The opinion there was sourced to Mediaite, hence the quotation marks I had placed around "landmark". However, I did look up additional sources, and added an editorial from the New Hampshire Union Leader and Howard Kurtz, then of The Washington Post, making similar statements. I then rewrote the sentence, softening the language somewhat. With that done, I've gone ahead and moved it into the mainspace. Thanks for your input, and if you have any other suggestions, let me know. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 19:50, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I requested a move of the userspace draft in place of the copy-paste, which will preserve the little bit of edit history, preserve links from this discussion, and get rid of the draft page, all at once. --Pnm (talk) 20:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Aha, I saw the "speedy delete" and wondered what was up. That makes sense, even if the template is a bit confusing. I'll keep an eye on it, and I appreciate the help. WWB Too (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've completed the move. — GorillaWarfare talk 22:11, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I nominated C-SPAN Video Library for Did you know. --Pnm (talk) 00:07, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * All looks good to me. Thanks for taking an active interest in the article, especially uploading that screen shot. If there's anything I can do to help with the DYK process, just let me know. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 21:29, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

New article: Net.wars
New article, created, at Net.wars. Additional assistance in research would be appreciated, feel free to help out at the article's talk page. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 21:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Bloginity.com
Hi everyone, I am a new member of this group, and looking forward to contribute as much as I can. I wanted to get your awareness for Bloginity which is up for deletion. I was hoping that some of you here may be able to help the group out with the improvement of the article, and or help with the debate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bloginity. ( Knox387 (talk) 21:27, 21 January 2011 (UTC)).


 * Hi there. Welcome. I would be happy to help, but I cannot seem to figure out what is notable about Bloginity.com...A. Ward (talk) 23:52, 26 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Let's keep the discussion about this article on the AfD page. --Pnm (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Welcome! --Pnm (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Blog del Narco
Hi! What categories would be good for Blog del Narco? Based on the coverage in reliable sources, Blog del Narco is a significant website. We need to have it appropriately categorized so people can find it WhisperToMe (talk) 08:29, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Santorum (sexual neologism)
This article has recently been expanded with additional sources and referencing improvements. There is also some ongoing discussion about that, at the article's talk page. If you are interested, please have a look at Santorum (sexual neologism) and the associated talk page discussion at Talk:Santorum (sexual neologism). Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 20:50, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Santorum (sexual neologism)

Request for comment - Santorum (neologism)
Request for Comment discussion started, please see Talk:Santorum_(neologism).
 * Santorum (neologism)
 * Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 14:29, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Alexa Bot
I have written a bot to update Alexa rankings. It depends on a pre-defined list of articles and it's currently being tried and discussed in this request for approval. Please check the bot contributions, add your feedbacks and help me improve the list of articles by reading these few tips.--OsamaK 23:00, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

RS noticeboard on Amina Abdallah Arraf al Omari
See Reliable_sources/Noticeboard regarding an RS noticeboard entry on the Amina Arraf/Minal Hajratwala interaction WhisperToMe (talk) 17:45, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Additional opinions needed about an article for a website
Can someone please join the discussion on the talk page of Digital Blasphemy about some issues? The article is currently being edited by two disagreeing editors.  D r e a m Focus  15:31, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

New guidelines for italicizing website titles
After much debate, some guidelines for when to italicize website titles have finally been added to the Manual of Style. Kaldari (talk) 20:13, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


 * That's useful. Is there any guidance regarding the inclusion of the TLD? I see there's been previous discussion of this at Amazon.com. Thanks. --Trevj (talk) 12:49, 12 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Related discussion at Template talk:Infobox website. -- Trevj (talk) 12:05, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Question
Are instant messaging services allowed on the List of virtual communities with more than 100 million users?--Cattus talk 17:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Pageview stats
After a recent request, I added WikiProject Websites to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at WikiProject Websites/Popular pages.

The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 22:30, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Z-man, I love your pageview stats, especially the fact they automatically include all re-directs, so I don't need to drill too far to get cumulative stats. I wonder if you can collaborate with Henrik to have his tool provide the same kind of service.
 * By the way I noticed you have not updated your stats lately and wonder if you plan to do it soon?
 * Thanks again for providing this service. Ottawahitech (talk) 00:17, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

New external template
I made two new templates, Template:Blogger and Template:Facebook Page.--Wikien2009 (talk) 20:18, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Redirects auto-creation
I have an open BRFA for creating missing redirects from website URLs to Wikipedia article names (e.g. torrentz.eu → Torrentz). Please have a look.--OsamaK (talk) 10:14, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

RfC on Long War Journal
Request participation here. Cla68 (talk) 05:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Links to sites using Tor
I came across the article Silk Road (marketplace) recently, and found a lot of links to sites in the domain .onion that require Tor (network) to access. I'm wondering whether such links are appropriate. I could not find any other article that cited such links, not even Tor (network) or .onion. RockMagnetist (talk) 05:16, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Japanese Movie Database
Please come participate in the discussion at Talk:Japanese Movie Database. Thanks! ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 00:27, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Articles on websites
Hello, folks! Articles on news / entertainment media typically describe in detail the "original media" (television channel, radio station, newspaper, magazine), but usually include very little about their websites. In the case of United States media, there are individual articles like nbcnews.com, espn.com and foxsports.com, articles like Forbes, The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times include decent sections, but there is little or nothing about the websites of ABC News, CBS News, Fox News, Bloomberg, USA Today and The Washington Post. Can you expand those articles and those about news websites from other countries? Thank you! --NaBUru38 (talk) 17:06, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Requested article: Hao123
Hao123 seems to be an Asian web portal, Alexa's ranking make it out to be around the 50st most popular website in the world - and we don't even have a stub about it... can someone fix that? :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 16:33, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Apps Proposal
A proposal for a WikiProject Apps has been made at WikiProject Council/Proposals/Apps. As WikiProject Websites is a related WikiProject, members of this WikiProject are invited to join the discussion. Thank you. XapApp (talk) 03:05, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

New article to propose: Rally.org
request edit

Hi, on behalf of the fundraising platform Rally.org, I've written a draft for a new Wikipedia article about the online platform and its predecessor, Piryx. I would like to have other editors review the draft and move it into live article space if it is ready, and provide feedback if edits are needed.

The platform easily meets notability, having received coverage in the press under its previous name, Piryx (which Rally.org still continues to operate) and as Rally.org, since its rebranding in 2011. In particular, Rally.org received a fair amount of coverage for having closed the highest ever Series A round of venture capital raised online, including articles in The Wall Street Journal and TechCrunch. Other reliable sources that I have used to write the draft include VentureBeat, Forbes and the San Francisco Chronicle.

Based on these sources, I've aimed to write the draft neutrally and include notable information about the platform, but I'd like to have other editors review it to make sure it meets Wikipedia's guidelines. Also, because I follow the "bright line" and don't make any edits to live articles, including moving drafts of new articles into live space, if the article looks ok, I hope that another editor will take it live.

The link to the draft in my user space is here: User:16912_Rhiannon/Rally.org

Please don't hesitate to ask here or on my Talk page if you have any questions. If you have edits to the draft, please feel free to make them and let me know. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 14:30, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Already moved to mainspace. -Nathan Johnson (talk) 15:57, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

What to display in the web address field when we don't give a link
There is consensus that for at least some onion sites that we should not give a link to the site from the article. At Talk:The Hidden Wiki I have raised a question about what we should show in the infobox in place of a link in those cases, your views would be welcome there. Thryduulf (talk) 09:24, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Websites support
Does anyone know why WikiProject Websites is "supported by" WikiProject Computing? Websites don't seem to be a particularly technical topic. It seems like if WikiProject Websites is to be a sub-project of someone, WikiProject Internet would be a better candidate. Please post your thoughts on the WikiProject Computing talk page. ~KvnG 20:56, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Rating
Could somebody rate the article Sporcle for me? I don't know what the rating should be. Thanks! buffbills7701 14:29, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Adrianne Wadewitz deletion discussion notice
There is an ongoing deletion discussion taking place now about whether or not to have a biographical article about Adrianne Wadewitz on Wikipedia.
 * 1) Adrianne Wadewitz
 * 2) Articles for deletion/Adrianne Wadewitz

The discussion is at Articles for deletion/Adrianne Wadewitz.

For those newer to Wikipedia, you may wish to read Articles for deletion and Notability.

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 15:15, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

List
We have the likes of List of chat websites, List of social networking websites, Comparison of online dating websites, List of photo-sharing websites. I think we should expand such lists to many other topics. Pass a Method  talk  11:19, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

RfC concerning the Lavabit email service
There is a request for comments (RfC) that may be of interest. The RfC is at

Talk:Lavabit

At issue is whether we should delete or keep the following text in the Lavabit article:


 * Before the Snowden incident, Lavabit had complied with previous search warrants. For example, on June 10, 2013, a search warrant was executed against Lavabit user Joey006@lavabit.com for alleged possession of child pornography.

Your input on this question would be very much welcome. --Guy Macon (talk) 04:43, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Archived some threads
I've archived some inactive threads to subsections which were notifications about discussions that have since been closed. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 21:30, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Popular pages tool update
As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).

Web tools, to replace the ones at ~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs.

If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot (talk) (for Mr.Z-man ) 05:32, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Leaflet For Wikiproject Websites At Wikimania 2014
Hi all,

My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.

One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.

This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:

• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film

• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.

• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.

• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____

• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost

For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to: Project leaflets Adikhajuria (talk) 11:09, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Kleargear AFD deletion discussion notice

 * 1) Kleargear
 * 2) Articles for deletion/Kleargear (2nd nomination)

Discussion about whether or not to delete article for Kleargear, discussion at Articles for deletion/Kleargear (2nd nomination). &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:32, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

European Sleep Apnea Database deletion discussion
European Sleep Apnea Database is undergoing a deletion discussion, AFD page at Articles for deletion/European Sleep Apnea Database. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:49, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * European Sleep Apnea Database

Problems with "Lockerz" article
The article about the Lockerz website is very stale, having not been significantly updated in two full years. Also, the article's talk page is a complete mess. Please consider updating the article and cleaning up the talk page, if possible. Thanks. — Jaydiem (talk) 23:32, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to User Study
Would you be interested in participating in a user study? We are a team at University of Washington studying methods for finding collaborators within a Wikipedia community. We are looking for volunteers to evaluate a new visualization tool. All you need to do is to prepare for your laptop/desktop, web camera, and speaker for video communication with Google Hangout. We will provide you with a Amazon gift card in appreciation of your time and participation. For more information about this study, please visit our wiki page (http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Finding_a_Collaborator). If you would like to participate in our user study, please send me a message at Wkmaster (talk) 18:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC).


 * The description at the "Finding a Collaborator" page linked above says that the study was supposed to be completed in April 2014. That was three months ago, yet I see no indication there or on the related Talk page that the study has even begun. What is the current status, please? — Jaydiem (talk) 20:05, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Use of Infoboxes for web applications
I'd like to bring up the discussion of the use of infoboxes. Modern web applications resemble traditional software that happens to run in a web browser far more than they do websites that provide content. Some examples include Dropbox (service), SlideRocket, Feedly, Google Docs, and Outlook Web App. Further, many of these web apps also include client applications for Windows, Mac OS X, iOS, etc. However, there is inconsistent use of the infoboxes. Though all of the ones I mentioned use Template: Infobox software, many others use Template: Infobox website. Some examples of those include Sway, Google Drive, Office Online, OneDrive, and Zoho Office Suite. Webmail services like Gmail, Outlook.com, and Yahoo Mail seem to fit somewhere in between.

Any thoughts on how these Infoboxes should be used? heat_fan1 (talk) 16:29, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

WhoWhatWhy
Please consider contributing to WP:Articles for deletion/WhoWhatWhy, in which our article about news website WhoWhatWhy is being considered for deletion. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 04:12, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Facebook
Please support :) --Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 18:21, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Have your say! We need your votes. --Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 19:48, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!


Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Notice re discussion about SourceWatch use in Wikipedia
A discussion about SourceWatch as an external link in Wikipedia is underway here. – S. Rich (talk) 18:44, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Seeking editors with spare time/energy for Newgrounds
Hello everyone! I've already taken some time getting this article back into 2015, but it's a bit hard going on my own. Article needs more removed or second/tert sources, and most info is out of my reach due to work firewalls (I hardly edit at home, if at all). I went over to WikiProject Internet Culture to drum up some more interest there too, but in any case I'd love to hear from some new editors from here as well. Happy trails, BlusterBlasterkablooie! 21:48, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

"NationStates"
The usage of is under discussion, see Talk:Jennifer Government: NationStates -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 03:57, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Free Speech Flag for Featured Picture
I've nominated the Free Speech Flag for Featured Picture.

Discussion is at Featured picture candidates/Free Speech Flag.

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 18:33, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of NewsBank for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NewsBank is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/NewsBank until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 08:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

"Economic Graph" section of LinkedIn
Hi all, I've proposed a small addition to LinkedIn and would really appreciate it if someone could take a look and provide feedback. I'm not editing the article myself because I have a COI: I work for a communications firm that represents LinkedIn. You can take a look at my suggestion at the bottom of this section on the LinkedIn Talk page. Thanks so much. Mary Gaulke (talk) 21:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

RfC invitation
Would interested editors please participate in the RfC at Talk:The Pirate Bay Thank you. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 19:05, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

"Deep Web"
The usage and primary topic of is under discussion, see talk:Dark Web -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 05:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Deletion to Quality Award
I've created the WP:Deletion to Quality Award.

This recognizes editors who've taken a page previously considered for deletion &mdash; to Featured Article or Good Article quality.

The award is inspired by the Million Award, the Article Rescue Squadron, and the WikiProject Quality Article Improvement.

Please see Deletion to Quality Award.

Thank you,

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 00:35, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of The Signpost (Wikipedia) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Signpost (Wikipedia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Signpost (Wikipedia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:07, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Merger RfC
Request for merge of Stack Overflow into Stack Exchange has been received. Input needed. >>>Join Discuss Here<<<. Thanks, GenQuest  "Talk to Me" 00:07, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Merge request
I would propose a rapid merger of Unique visitor and Unique user, both in this Wikiproject's purview. The larger, more detailed of the two (Uu) states repeatedly that the two are synonymous, and the smaller of the two articles (Uv) is very short and based on a single source. Transfer of the content should be fast and simple, with addition of a sentence that Uu is (it appears) more often used my the coding communities, and Uv by business/marketing individuals. Cheers. Le Prof User:Leprof_7272 Leprof 7272 (talk) 16:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Giant Bomb's GAR
Giant Bomb, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. GamerPro64 04:14, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Moviepilot
Hey all, anyone wanna take a stab at Moviepilot to see if it's notable? Looks flimsy at present and kinda comes off as promotional fluff. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:00, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

New wikiproject
How to add a new wikiproject?BOTFIGHTER (talk) 09:37, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Revival of the Webcomics Task Force
The past few months, I've been putting effort into reviving the Webcomic Task Force, with little results. I contacted WikiProject Comics about it, but for some reason, it didn't even cross my mind to contact this WikiProject. It seems indisputable to me that this topic in general would be of interest to WikiProject Websites. One of the articles I have basically created last month was Lists of webcomics, one which I rated of high importance to this project. The inactivity of the webcomics project has resulted in increasingly few webcomic articles have been made in recent years. I don't believe we have any articles whatsoever on webcomics started in 2014 or later. Meanwhile, stubs created ten years ago do not meet Wikipedia's guidelines anymore.

I've started a few discussions on the WikiProject's talk page. Feel free to comment and follow the page if you are interested. ~ Mable ( chat ) 11:07, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Template talk:Infobox website
You are invited to join the discussion at Template talk:Infobox website&. There is a proposal to add a "Key People" field to the template, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Ahecht (TALK PAGE ) 15:28, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Another discussion at Template talk:Infobox website
You are invited to join the discussion at. I propose adding an “oclc” field to the template (as is already done with and ) to support a semantic web and for the proper identification of websites. Thank you. — LLarson   (said &amp; done) 16:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Notice of discussion regarding the undefined template
A discussion regarding the template is being held at WP:External_links/Noticeboard. – S. Rich (talk) 12:34, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Request for setlist.fm
Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 02:09, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * en.wikipedia.org search for setlist.fm yields 891 Results

AfD: Timeline of popular Internet services
There is a deletion discussion about Timeline of popular Internet services, please have a look. Your help might also be needed in establishing inclusion criteria for that article once the deletion discussion has been closed. --Fixuture (talk) 19:01, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

RFCs on citations templates and the flagging free-to-read sources
See
 * Village pump (proposals)
 * Village pump (proposals)

Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 16:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Pajiba
Re pajiba.com how would I go about affirming its notability via outside sources? I noticed this site is cited about 86 times when I do a search on Wikipedia, which could get confusing if people want to know more about the site that was cited. Ranze (talk) 17:41, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Everyday Feminism - Criticism and controversies section
Editors are invited to join that discussion at Talk:Everyday Feminism. - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 01:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages
Greetings Members!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * Fix and improve Mr.Z-bot's popular pages report

If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.

Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Best regards, — Delivered: 18:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Fake news website - move discussion
Article is Fake news website.


 * Requested move discussion at: Talk:Fake_news_website. Sagecandor (talk) 13:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

New Wikileaking organization
Check out the new article on MormonWikiLeaks.

Sagecandor (talk) 05:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Fake news website - move discussion
Article is Fake news website.


 * Requested move discussion at: Talk:Fake_news_website. Sagecandor (talk) 13:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

New Wikileaking organization
Check out the new article on MormonWikiLeaks.

Sagecandor (talk) 05:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of YouTubers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of YouTubers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of YouTubers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Oliverrushton (talk) 17:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Muse
A proposal to merge duplicate articles TheMuse and The Muse together is up for discussion. To participate, see the open discussion at talk:The Daily Muse -- 65.94.168.229 (talk) 22:43, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Popular pages report
We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, will post at /Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of. We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
 * The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
 * The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
 * The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to for his original, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Quatloos.com
It's not an important article, and it looks fairly similar to a stub, but the Quatloos.com article now reflects the entirety of RS mentions for Quatloos!. It'll never be a GA, just because it's lacking some basics (even if I forced a Lead into the article, I'd need to replicate almost the entire body to satisfy the Lead length requirements). However, I'd suggest that it's now "well organized and essentially complete", so should be bumped up to an A grade.

I've also asked WikiProject California to review their grade. If you're happy to follow their recommendation on the rating, please say: it might be a waste of time to have two reviews by WikiProjects. Cheers, Bromley86 (talk) 00:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Opening sentence discussion at Talk:Breitbart News
Hello. I opened the discussion about the opening sentence of "Breitbart News" at "Talk:Breitbart News". Join in. --George Ho (talk) 17:04, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Elijah Daniel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elijah Daniel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Elijah Daniel (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sagecandor (talk) 21:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft for Web.com article for consideration
On behalf of Web.com via Burson-Marsteller, and as part of my work at Beutler Ink, I've submitted an expanded and updated draft of the Web.com article for consideration at Talk:Web.com. I am looking for an uninvolved editor to review this draft for accuracy and neutrality, and to copy over content appropriately as a replacement of the current article, which is severely problematic, as evidenced by the 5 tags seen at the top.

Is a member of WikiProject Websites willing to take a look at the draft? It is not terribly long or contentious, and I am more than happy to split the edit request into multiple if you prefer to only review one section at a time. Thanks for your consideration! Inkian Jason (talk) 15:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The edit request has been answered, so I am marking this section as resolved. Inkian Jason (talk) 20:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Deadline Hollywood
There is currently a discussion regarding whether or not the name of the Deadline Hollywood website should be italicized, please participate at Talk:Deadline Hollywood. Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk 00:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Updated Squarespace Draft
Hi there! I work on the Squarespace communications team. I have submitted a less promotional and more complete draft of the Squarespace article for consideration at Talk:Squarespace.

reviewed the draft and said they felt it was neutral, but questioned why I took the Awards section out in the draft. I was hoping an editor from WikiProject Websites might be willing to chime in on the Awards section discussion and consider whether to implement the proposed draft. Thanks in advance for your help!

Hayley at squarespace (talk) 19:10, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Infobox for PragerU

 * Brief discussion at Talk:PragerU.
 * Brief discussion at Talk:PragerU.

The article was created by a SPA ip with "infobox television". We're currently using an "infobox organization" instead. Given it's notability is for their videos, I'm thinking an "infobox website" might be better. I'm hoping some of the project members here might have more familiarity with the selection of infoboxes in such situations, and the general consensus for similar GA/FA articles. Thank you for your help. --Ronz (talk) 23:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft of Nextdoor for consideration
Hi,

I've redrafted a problematic article, Nextdoor, the hyperlocal social network. Although I am an experienced editor, I am a paid consultant to Nextdoor. As such, it would be greatly appreciated if an independent editor could review my proposal at: User:BC1278/sandbox/Nextdoor I have also started a discussion at: Talk:Nextdoor

Thanks BC1278 (talk) 21:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)BC1278

RfC at WikiProject YouTube
Should we expand the project scope of WikiProject YouTube to include other online videos/video platforms? Zoom ( talk page ) 19:14, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template Transclude lead excerpt.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you. &mdash; The Transhumanist  11:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:PragerU
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:PragerU. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Naming of website articles
I was wondering what guidelines there are around the naming of website articles and when they should be named after their domain name. Specifically, I wanted to know whether the article Baseball-Reference.com is named correctly or if it should be moved to (simply) Baseball Reference. Thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 15:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Request for comment on Sci-Hub
There is a request for comment on the Sci-Hub article:

Which of the following should be the opening paragraph of the Sci-Hub article?

Option 1 (from revision 864273518):

Option 2 (from revision 864287916):

Option 3 (current version):

As "sci-hub.tw" is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, I've removed the URL from the citation in Option 1. You can see the original citation in revision 864273518.

If you are interested, please participate at Talk:Sci-Hub. Thanks. —  Newslinger  talk   00:19, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Help with updates for Reddit article
Hi all! Are any editors from this WikiProject interested to help with a request to update the History section of Reddit? I've shared drafted changes for the section and a detailed explanation as to why my draft is an improvement to the article at the Reddit Talk page. In full disclosure: I'm making these suggestions on behalf of Reddit, as part of my work at Beutler Ink, so I will not make any direct edits to the article myself. Thanks in advance! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 19:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ This is has been done. Thanks! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk &middot; COI) 21:42, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

A new newsletter directory is out!
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
 * – Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Discussion on reliability of SitePoint on the reliable sources noticeboard
There is a discussion on the reliability of SitePoint on the reliable sources noticeboard. If you're interested, please participate at. —  Newslinger  talk   22:48, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Discussion on reliability of TorrentFreak on the reliable sources noticeboard
There is a discussion on the reliability of TorrentFreak for a claim related to Web Sheriff and MusicBrainz on the reliable sources noticeboard. If you're interested, please participate at. —  Newslinger  talk   23:21, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

WikiProjects???
Whats WikiProjects???.... Then to talk to someone about hacks coding and computer stuff? !!! Killershark101 9/27/19 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killershark101 (talk • contribs) 20:15, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Discussion on hidden screenshots in Infobox website
A discussion on hiding non-free works in infoboxes such as Infobox website is taking place at Template talk:Infobox website. You're welcome to share your thoughts on the matter! – PhilipTerryGraham (talk &middot;&#32;articles &middot;&#32;reviews) 13:14, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

CAT:NN
Hell, CAT:NN now has a backlog of almost 12 years. If anyone can help, please do so. There are usually around 300 articles in there that are web-related: [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Web_articles_with_topics_of_unclear_notability] and we are desperate for knowledgeable and interested people to look them over. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 14:50, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look through a bunch today / later this week. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 12:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that would be great. Boleyn (talk) 15:01, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Please make full use of Template:Decrease for websites' Alexa rank
Greetings!

Alas I don't have time to personally join your worthy project, but I still wanted to give you a small heads-up since it seems within the scope of your project:

Template:Decrease, which produces these nice red & green arrow-thingys indicating a rank change ( & ), actually also has options for negative increase  and positive decrease.

These should be used whenever there is a ranking in which - like e.g. in sports - 1st place is best, and higher numbers worse.

This is used as intended in a number of Wikipedia articles, but notably not in the vast majority of websites which have an Alexa rank. But Alexa ranks are like that - the lower, the better!

So to avoid confusion for the reader, I strongly suggest to henceforth use the proper pointing arrow on all Alexa rankings (and also on all other applicable rankings).

I tried to update a few articles to use this by hand, but I could not find a way to correct all instances automatically. If there is one, I'd love to know how to use it. --LordPeterII (talk) 18:35, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Userbox
Hi,

I recently joined WikiProject Websites and i was wondering if the project had a userbox to place on a user's profile to show they are a member of the project. If so, could someone please link the userbox below? Thanks!

- TheRealGrantma (talk) 20:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

FAR
I have nominated The Million Dollar Homepage for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

How to declare a site dead
Eventful appears to be dead. Currently, the URL is a redirect to another site owned by Entercom, the parent company. I didn't find any general-purpose wiki-editor-howto pages that address how to handle the death of a (notable) webpage. Eventful seems to be in a middle zone of notability: notable enough to get some third-party coverage in the past, but not notable enough that people (especially reliable sources like the press) notice its demise immediately. Combine that with a corporate owner who I'm sure would like to downplay its failure. The only third party source I found is in a mailing list hosted on google groups (maybe accessible at https://groups.google.com/group/eventful-api-developers) -- recent mailing list poster David is an Eventful employee posting from an eventful.com email address. How is something like this to be handled? I have a reasonably long history of Wikipedia micro-edits (fix a link, remove small vandalisms, etc), but not much experience in significant content updates such as this.

Bsammon (talk) 21:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Yahoo! News has an RFC
Yahoo! News, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 03:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Active?
Is anyone else assessing website articles? If so, could you respond so I can change the status of this project to active? Thanks. Sean Brunnock (talk) 14:29, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

FAR for 4chan
I have nominated 4chan for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  22:34, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sources
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like and turns it into something like
 * John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
 * John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from cite web, cite journal and doi.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:OpenSearch (software)
Members of this WikiProject may be interested in the proposed move of OpenSearch (software) to OpenSearch and OpenSearch to OpenSearch (syndication); see discussion. --Macrakis (talk) 13:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:ProtonMail/Archive 1
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:ProtonMail/Archive 1 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 14:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Request for FA comments
Hello! I'm currently trying to promote Gurl.com into a featured article. If you can, please leave feedback at Featured article candidates/Gurl.com/archive1. lullabying (talk) 21:00, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Request for special .onion task
I would like to make a guideline and taskforce for: List of Tor onion services will there be enough (3-5) people willing to work on this? Greatder (talk) 16:12, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Bcdb
Template:Bcdb has been nominated for merging with Template:BCDB title. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. &#8212;&#160;CJDOS,&#160;Sheridan,&#160;OR&#160;(talk) 20:30, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Request for advice on opening new WikiProject for Twitch.tv
Hi,

I'm just looking advice on my current proposal for a twitch WikiProject and what you think I can add to the proposal to increase chances of creation?

WikiProject Council/Proposals/Twitch

Thanks Silverdashmax (talk) 02:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Twitter
Twitter has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:ASmallWorld
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:ASmallWorld that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 12:34, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Dropout (streaming platform) and CollegeHumor
An article which may be of interest to members of this project—Dropout (streaming platform)—has been proposed for merging with CollegeHumor along with a proposal on renaming the latter article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Sariel Xilo (talk) 19:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

"Danbooru" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Danbooru&redirect=no Danbooru] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. 65.92.244.127 (talk) 05:17, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

"Booru" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Booru&redirect=no Booru] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. 65.92.244.127 (talk) 05:17, 21 October 2023 (UTC)