Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Writing Captions/Archive 1

When articles have been reviewed
Should reviewed articles be actually removed from the list or merely marked with strikethrough? I've been removing the ones I do, but I see that Neutrality and ke4roh have both been using strikethrough. It seems more logical, to me, to completely remove reviewed articles. 81.168.80.170 16:38, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)

First a strikethrough, then after a week or so they ought to be moved to a subpage with a "done" list.--GeneralPatton 19:23, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)

From a theoretical standpoint, the review process seems broken because there's nothing that really indicates an article actually has been reviewed. If there was a 'to be reviewed page/list' to which a captioned article is moved when a new caption is written, and then the article link was struck through on that page/list once it was reviewed, then there'd be a guarentee that at least one person had actually looked at the new caption. As it is now a new caption sits around with it's link struckout on the list and then gets archived after a week whether or not anybody actaully reviews the caption. At least that's how I read the instructions. Now, whether or not review is actually needed is a different question. --Kop 23:30, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Standard image types
Moved to Captions

When a caption isn't appriopriate
On the Battle of Aljubarrota page there is a large battle plan. Would be best way to deal with this be to remove it from this page and leave it in the article only as a link to the image page and to write a full description on the image page? I feel it will be impossible to gain any meaning from a thumbnail sized image. I will also post this suggestion on the article discussion, but thought it worth asking here too.


 * That one may be best without a caption. What else is there to say besides "This is the battle plan - which you can read about in the article?"  See also Wikipedia_talk:Captions -- ke4roh 18:55, Jul 29, 2004 (UTC)

Similarly, the one image on the ISO 8859 page is a symbol table which is discussed in the text. Is a caption worthwhile in this case? I don't think it would add much. AdamH 15:35, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Already captioned article
The article MKULTRA has a good image caption, which i gather was added after the article was added to this list, by someone not in this project. In such a case, should I just strikethrough the article on the list and say "done" in the editing comment? Deepak 17:19, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * I think so. AdamH 15:39, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)

New to Writing Captions
I've read through Captions, but I'm new to Wikipedia. Is it okay if I just jump in and update the captions on a topic I'm familiar with (Tokyo&mdash;I lived there from 2001–2002) or should I get more official approval from someone in the Writing Captions project? --Che Fox 17:44, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * I didn't see any responses, so I think I'll just pitch in. --Che Fox  7:48, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)


 * Hello Che Fox, it's great to have you join. As long as you've read the guidelines for a good caption and gone through the showcase examples, you're fine. You dont have to restrict yourself to topics you're familiar with. Sometimes a quick read of the article and a dash of google, gives you enough material for the caption. Deepak 16:46, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Wow. Great work there on Tokyo. Im going to be submitting it for Featured article status. Deepak 13:18, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Thanks Deepak. I've revamped the captions for Tokyo.  Comments appreciated!  --Che Fox 06:55, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Project directory
Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the WikiProject Council/Directory. This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. B2T2 14:40, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Check Wikipedia
The project generates two reports with images w/o descriptions: -- User:Docu
 * WikiProject Check Wikipedia
 * WikiProject Check Wikipedia

Defunct?
The project was tagged with WikiProject status/Defunct on May 2 due to "no activity for more than 1 year". According to the WikiProject guide, the defunct tag should be used when "In some cases projects are simply superseded (e.g., merged elsewhere), have served their stated purpose, or have been inactive for so long that they are unlikely ever to be revived." The first two haven't happened and never will, and the third is debatable - how does one define inactivity? What is there that needs to be updated? The project has never been very "active" by page activity, but that doesn't mean people aren't systematically improving captions. I've removed the tag. ··gracefool&#9786; 22:48, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!


Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

A new newsletter directory is out!
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
 * – Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)