Wikipedia talk:WikiSpeak/Decoding RfA

Re Support Reason No.8
"...alleged photograph..."? Can't the supporter tell if it was taken by a camera? WTF! LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:39, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * This illustration illustrates a common phenomenon on WP. Unfortunately, the single best piece of commentary on this particular topic is on The Site That Must Not Be Named (and contains a personal attack on a fellow Wikipedian who's far more powerful than you or I) so I can't link to it, but Google has helpfully ranked it top if you search on "internet disease". – iride  scent  15:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Can you imagine what I might look like if the image on my talkpage is truly being rendered by the internet prism? LessHeard vanU (talk) 15:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Now now, you two. Fixed the grammatical gaffaw (you can't allegedly be a photograph, it is or it isn't a photograph), but you can allegedly be freekin hot as a person.  Used Irid's link above to prove it. :-)  Keeper  |  76  |  what's in a name?  15:23, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


 * "...you can allegedly be freekin hot as a person"... Someone call? EyeSerene talk 17:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Dry
" " What happened to the "truthiness" theme? The 12 thing seems like more of an inside-joke. Did the well go dry or what?-- Koji †  Dude  (C) 21:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) "Oppose, not enough mainspace edits"
 * means: "Oppose, you're 12"
 * 1) "Oppose, too many userboxes"
 * means: "Oppose, you're 12"
 * 1) "Oppose, I can't read your signature"
 * means: "Oppose, you're 12"
 * 1) "Oppose, too high a ratio of user talk to mainspace edits"
 * means: "Oppose, you're 12"


 * This is only tangentially related, but somehow I suspect that oppose reason 6b is directed at yours truly. Anyways, I don't think it's really an inside joke - it's common knowledge that one's level of social networking clearly can be combined with whether an editor is a certain age in an infallible biconditional. Nousernamesleft (talk) 02:56, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

This gets even better with time
I'm reading it again now, and it still merits a good laugh.  Enigma msg  15:34, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Just came across this very very good. BigDunc  19:44, 4 August 2009 (UTC)