Wikipedia talk:WikiWomen's History Month/Outcomes

Month over but not DYK
I suggest that we keep listing the women which were nominated for DYK for March but didn't make it to a March appearance, when they appear in April, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:21, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree. Let's do that. --Rosiestep (talk) 13:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh that sounds like a good idea, but lets not forget to thank all the contributors. It looks like a record making month. I wonder did anyone notice the change in male:female ratio who didn't know it was happening? Victuallers (talk) 15:10, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, really great, I'm so proud and inspired! I had to host my WikiWomen's event yesterday, April 5. I'm torn about adding our successes to this page or that might not be fair. What do you all think? If no, that's no big deal too, since they were all improved or written on April 5, not March 5 :) SarahStierch (talk) 17:36, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't mind ;) - I still wait for one of my DYK ladies to get the review finished (Carmen Reppel), --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:32, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Being bold, being impatient, and in anticipation of March/Women's History Month, I created several women's biographies in Feb and included them in the Outcomes list -- no one complained. So IMO, yesterday's edit-a-thon articles belong on the Outcomes page, too, as 2014's capstone. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:44, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Carmen Reppel appeared, the last one I nominated for DYK in March. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:27, 11 April 2014 (UTC)