Wikipedia talk:Wiki Ed/Caltech/Social Media for Scientists (FA 2016)

Suggestions for instructors using Wikipedia in their courses
Thinking about using Wikipedia as part of your chemistry course? Doing so gives students experience integrating chemical knowledge and in copy-editing, both relevant to their professional development. In terms of implementation, here are my observations based on several years of experience.

'''step 1: Is your instructor is experienced in Wikipedia? If not, the students have a problem because he/she does not practice what they preach and will be unskillful.'''

Regardless: --Smokefoot (talk) 13:08, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The most important step is the selection of topics that allow students to contribute new content. The instructor should make sure that good general sources exist on the assigned topics, preferably reviews and textbooks. A major part of the learning experience comes from students re-describing or summarizing what they read from these broad sources.
 * Learning Wikipedia techniques is almost irrelevant to the educating students. To this end, it can be useful for the instructor to set up new articles with examples of linking and reference format. Students can then readily add to this article, even without registering as a user.
 * Students should be graded on the quality of their content, not the quantity.
 * Peer review (by fellow students) is a joke, how can a fellow student critique an article on topics that they barely fathom, not to mention dealing with conflict of interest in grading their friends?
 * Steer away from toxicity, environmental, or safety aspects. Tons of content on such topics are readily Google-able. Students learn little from parroting this material and can be poor judges of quality sources.  Teach them chemistry - mechanisms, (bio)synthesis, structure, bonding, spectroscopy, reactivity, ...  Help them sort notable from non-notable aspects.
 * Bear in mind that editors at Wikipedia are not supposed to serve graders for your class. Instructors need to be involved, but they could expect good cooperation from established editors.