Wikipedia talk:Wikiethics/Poll

Please Note. This page is a sandbox fork of the real poll. &#2384; Metta Bubble puff  04:33, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

APPROVAL POLL
I think the build time for this has been going on more than long enough and now is the time to get a consensus as to whether this should be approved or not. This is not a majority poll since polls are evil and Wikjipedia runs by consensus. Pegasus1138 Talk 00:22, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Begin: 00:22, 17 March 2006

End: 00:22, 24 March 2006

Oppose

 * Pegasus1138 Talk 00:22, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Working on this policy has been a POV nightmare since the beginning. Almost nothing in this policy reflects anything other than the ethical stance of Resid Gulerdem who insists on ignoring discussion, ignoring consensus, ignoring precedent, and ignoring existing policies. Almost before anything else was inserted into the policy he had an "no pornography" clause. The rest of the policy was fleshed out around that theme. It's a fantasyland policy. &#2384; Metta Bubble puff  01:08, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose KimvdLinde 02:42, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Comments

 * Based on the numerous comments on the talk page I am actively assuming that this is a proposed guideline and not a proposed policy. Pegasus1138 Talk 00:28, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The content is not yet stable for a poll. --Vsion 01:43, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I disagree, it is as stable as it is ever going to be and it has built up more than enough to be mature enough for people to determine whether or not it should be approved or not. It's not like the version is locked in as soon as the poll starts either, during and/or after (assuming it gets a consensus to have it be a guideline) people can still add on and edit it. Pegasus1138 Talk  01:45, 17 March 2006 (UTC)