Wikipedia talk:Wikiethics/archived poll

What is this poll?
The poll below was started after the creation of APPROVAL POLL on the main page. Please cast your vote in the original poll. The consensus is that the poll below was somewhat of an attempt to undermine the original poll. &#2384; Metta Bubble puff  18:47, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Do we need a poll at this stage
Comment regarding voting on "Do we need a poll?" poll:

NO

 * 1) The policy needs more work before voted. It is not ready for vote simple because it is not stable yet. It reflects 3-4 editors opinion. I announced this proposal in many places. Feedbacks from the community will improve it. Can anybody see a reason for such a rush?!... As a person who initiated and continuously contributing to this proposal, I feel that we need much more input from the community.Resid Gulerdem 05:32, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) (see comment below) --Vsion 06:18, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Voting is evil. User:Zoe|(talk) 07:14, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Needs more discussion, not censorship-by-vote. &#0151; JEREMY 11:12, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Perhaps this policy could be split onto smaller smaller and clearer micro-policies instead of one large all-encompassing policy? Then either vote for each part or spawn as new guidelines? DanielDemaret 11:56, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) This proposed policy or guideline seems large, unnecessary and ill formed, with potentially a hidden agenda. A poll (unless you want oppose as the outcome) seems premature.  + +Lar: t/c 15:08, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

YES

 * 1) Yes. The poll below is valid. It was started first and is underway. &#2384; Metta Bubble  puff  05:47, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) YES, get it over with. KimvdLinde 06:01, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Yes, this proposal is as mature is it will ever be in terms of acceptability as a guideline so now is as good a time as ever to have a poll. Pegasus1138 Talk  20:57, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Yes, as per Pegasus1138. Netscott 13:24, 18 March 2006 (UTC) Vote struck as the lack of terms regarding this poll appear to invalidate all votes regarding it. Netscott 15:33, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Comments
Since when can you vote a poll off a page because you disagree with it? &#2384; Metta Bubble puff  05:47, 17 March 2006 (UTC)


 * People should be aware of that existence of the poll is already questioned. If you put it to the bottom it will be missed. Be honest please... I can understand your twisting every other minute although I cannot respect for it, but at least let the peole know that there is no agreement on the poll, it is also an option that they may chose to say: later... At the bottom of the page, this poll is useless. And if you change the title it will be distriting the meaning of the poll. Resid Gulerdem 05:58, 17 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Honestly, I'm honoured to not have your respect. Your comments are lies, your editing is obsessive, your agenda is unethical, and your policy is not improving. It's time for a vote. &#2384; Metta Bubble puff  06:12, 17 March 2006 (UTC)


 * It is obvious that Pegasus1138's calling of poll is to preempt the discussion requested by Rgulerdem in village pump. This is a quite unfair, to be honest. An approval poll at this stage would be illegitimate, and it is wasting voters' time. Also I can't understand why the anti-censorship members feel so threatened by this proposal. Just relax, it is only a proposal, nobody is removing any picture yet. Let more users participate in the discussion first, please. Since Rgulerdem is asking for more time as he seeks community's opinion, be cool and give him more time. --Vsion 06:18, 17 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Try reading WP:DR If consensus is difficult to gauge from discussion alone, or if some users seem to be ignoring the consensus, consider conducting a publicized opinion survey. &#2384; Metta Bubble puff  06:31, 17 March 2006 (UTC)


 * And if you are really serious about consensus, you may look for it when you decide to start an opinion survey. Resid Gulerdem 06:36, 17 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The part copied from above: I said we and it includes MB, Vsion and me. MB in fact suggested that we need two months below. Vsion is also voted that we need some more time. Pegasus decided himself that he need a vote for it. Let us then determine first if we need a poll at this stage. As far as I remember MB was complaining all along regarding the polls at early stages of the projects. But anyways, let us vote for it to make it precise.