Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-04-17/Focus comparison

Astronomer Duncan Steel [...] described his main beef with Wikipedia as being an unrelated issue, its coverage of asteroids. Specifically, he mentioned the lack of an article on Arrius, which he named for his younger son, whereas an article already existed for Elbsteel, named for his eldest son. As Steel observed, "This causes arguments at home!"

I appreciate Dr(?) Steel was joking, but I bump into people all the time who complain in all seriousness because "I am the world's foremost authority on X and I'm outraged at how little coverage of my subject there is in Wikipedia!" Well surely, I retort, you're the natural choice to write the articles, so why don't you get to it? In this case, if Duncan the father could not be bothered, then Arrius himself ought to have stepped into the breach. &mdash; Del C 21:14, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Heh, you must meet a lot of world authorities! Bump into them all the time, eh? ;-) zafiroblue05 | Talk 02:19, 23 April 2006 (UTC)