Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-01-24/Flagged Revisions

I hope this is the right place for comments. I think it'd be useful to include what supporters of FRs have as their arguments. You also might want to oldid to the discussion on Jimbo's page as it will be archived eventually, that way if someone reads this article in a few weeks they can still get to the discussion? Other than those 2 things I like it. §hep  •  Talk  00:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Will do :-)  &mdash;  Jake   Wartenberg  00:45, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

✅ &mdash;  Jake   Wartenberg  01:11, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


 * You should also oldid the RfAr page.  Majorly  talk  15:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

✅ &mdash;  Jake   Wartenberg  15:57, 25 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Why aren't the IDs diffs? Pinpointing exactly where and when Jimbo said what he said and the ArbCom case attempted would be more helpful IMO. -- Menti  sock  09:31, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * We want to show the subsequent discussion. But feel free to link to some diffs, too.  &mdash;  Jake   Wartenberg  13:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Okay, it could be that I'm just being dense, but I went to WP:RFAR and WP:RFAR/C to read what Sceptre and the committee had discussed there, but I couldn't find the FR case. Could somebody provide a link in the article, por favor? Thanks. Killiondude (talk) 23:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Last revision before it was archived.--ragesoss (talk) 01:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I appreciate that. Killiondude (talk) 06:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC)