Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-03-15/Dispatches

Magnificent work - confidence levels in GAs improved greatly! It's also good to know that large tasks can actually get completed! Lee&there4;V (talk  •  contribs)  12:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I'd also like to commend the hard-working GA reviewers for an excellent job, but highlight a frequent problem with medical articles at GA. Many of the GA medical articles rely on primary sources, rather than secondary reviews, and do not conform to WP:MEDRS.  I hope some attention can be shone on this issue by posting it here to wide readership.  An explanation of how to determine PMID reviews can be found at Wikipedia Signpost/2008-06-30/Dispatches; I had intended to help identify the deficient medical articles during the sweeps, but was never able to complete that work.  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 12:55, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Excellent work by everyone involved!  bahamut0013  words deeds 13:28, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


 * An inspiring story, showing that progress can be made, even when we have backlogs like this. Thanks! HereToHelp (talk to me) 18:27, 21 March 2010 (UTC)