Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-06-07/In the news

The readability of Wikipedia does not take into account the wiki links. Thus this is not that accurate of a comparison. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:59, 10 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Another point, I would rather read something written for adults (Wikipedia) than for 15-year-olds, although we often write less clearly than we could. Maybe if we get Simple up to speed that will help too. Rich Farmbrough, 10:22, 10 June 2010 (UTC).

On the other hand if being unreadable means people get their medical advice from a doctor rather than wikipedia I'm not going to worry too much.©Geni 17:07, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Here's the abstract for the study; full paper should be at J Clin Oncol 28:15s, 2010 (suppl; abstr 6058). Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 21:21, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but the abstract was already linked under "abstract" in the next sentence. I agree though that it was a maybe a bit unwise to label the link to the press release as "study".
 * Regards, HaeB (talk) 14:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)