Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-06-28/Objectionable material


 * The article says "Harris' report and recommendations are due to be tabled at the fall meeting of the Board of Trustees." I assume from reading the linked Q&A that that is using the UK definition for Table (parliamentary procedure); I suspect many readers familiar with the US definition will be confused. Anomie⚔ 20:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * That was introduced in the copyediting process, I restored the earlier version which should be unambigous.
 * By the way, Wikinews just published an article about the same topic:
 * Regards, HaeB (talk) 21:15, 29 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Harris has now introduced himself and described the project at meta:2010 Wikimedia Study of Controversial Content. Regards, HaeB (talk) 17:55, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I've gathered a list of past Signpost coverage there:Image controversies covered in the "Signpost" (2006-2010). Regards, HaeB (talk) 03:42, 3 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I made a small request back when this mess started - a small request that we would get a simple policy and not end up getting a giant lawyer-proof policy that may or may not address Jimbo's original complaint that the images are non-educational. Nobody listened and now the commitees are forming. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 08:28, 2 July 2010 (UTC)